The Role of Informal Digital Surveillance Systems Before, During and After Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Critical Analysis

  • Avi Magid
  • Anat Gesser-Edelsburg
  • Manfred S. Green
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)


Background One of the main limitations of traditional surveillance systems for disease detection is their inability to detect epidemics in real-time. In addition to syndromic surveillance, a number of informal digital resources have been developed. These systems are based on data collected through media sources such as news reports on the Internet, mailing lists, and RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds. The role of such systems at all stages of the epidemic remains unclear.

Methods A literature review was carried out on informal digital resources for infectious disease surveillance. We examined the source of information, the manner in which they process and disseminate the information, their role in each phase of disease outbreaks, and whether and to what extent these systems are capable of early detection and management of infectious disease epidemics.

Results Informal digital resources use similar sources of data for surveillance. However, they use different algorithms to create their output, and cover different geographic areas. In this regard, they complement each other with respect to information completeness. There is evidence in the literature on the systems’ usefulness in communicating information to public health professionals, as well as to the general public during and after previous epidemics. Retrospective studies of some systems have shown a theoretical decrease in the time of epidemic detection compared to conventional surveillance. However, there is no evidence of the ability for real-time detection.

Conclusions Currently, there is little prospective evidence that existing informal systems are capable of real-time early detection of disease outbreaks. Most systems accumulate large amounts of information on a wide variety of diseases, making it difficult to extract critical information. Presenting critical information clearly and precisely remains a challenge.


Infectious disease Outbreak Digital systems Formal Informal 


  1. 1.
    Anema A, Kluberg S, Wilson K, Hogg RS, Khan K, Hay SI et al (2014) Digital surveillance for enhanced detection and response to outbreaks. Lancet Infect Dis 14(11):1035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Barboza P, Vaillant L, Le Strat Y, Hartley DM, Nelson NP, Mawudeku A, Madoff LC, Linge JP, Collier N, Brownstein JS, Astagneau P (2014) Factors influencing performance of internet-based biosurveillance systems used in epidemic intelligence for early detection of infectious diseases outbreaks. PLoS One 9(3):e90536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brownstein JS, Freifeld CC, Madoff LC (2009) Digital disease detection – harnessing the web for public health surveillance. N Engl J Med 360:2153–2157CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brownstein JS, Freifeld CC, Reis BY, Mandl RK (2008) Surveillance Sans Frontieres: internet-based emerging infectious disease intelligence and the HealthMap project. PLoS Med 5:e151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E (2009) Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis 49(10):1557–1564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E (2013) Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Surfing Web 2009(49):1557Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan EH, Brewer TF, Madoff LC, Pollack MP, Sonricker AL, Keller M, Freifeld CC, Blench M, Mawudeku A, Brownstein JS (2010) Global capacity for emerging infectious disease detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21701–21706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chunara R, Andrews JR, Brownstein JS (2012) Social and news media anables estimation of epidemiological patterns early in the 2010 Haitian Cholera outbreak. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86(1):39–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, Levin SR, Pines JM, Mareiniss DP, Mohareb A, Gaydos CA, Perl TM, Rothman RE (2012) Google Flu trends: correlation with emergency department influenza rates and crowding metrics. Clin Infect Dis 54(4):463–464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freifeld CC, Mandl KD, Reis BY, Brownstein JS (2008) HealthMap: global infectious disease monitoring through automated classification and visualization of internet media reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:150–157CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartley DM, Nelson NP, Walters R, Arthur R, Yangarber R, Madoff L, Linge JP, Mawudeku A, Collier N, Brownstein JS, Thinus G, Lightfoot N (2010) Landscape of international event-based biosurveillance. Emerg Health Threats J 3:e3PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herman Tolentino M, Raoul Kamadjeu MD, Michael Matters PhD MPH, Marjorie Pollack MD, Larry Madoff MD (2007) Scanning the emerging infectious diseases horizon-visualizing ProMED emails using EpiSPIDER. Adv Dis Surveil 2:169Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang M, Zhong H, He J, Rutheford S, Yang F (2013) Using google trends for influenza surveillance in south China. PLoS One 8(1):e55205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madoff LC, Woodall JP (2005) The internet and the global monitoring of emerging diseases: lessons from the first 10 years of ProMED-mail. Arch Med Res 36:724–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milinovich GJ, Williams GM, Clements AC, Hu W (2014) Internet-based surveillance systems for monitoring emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 14(2):160–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morse SS (2012) Public health surveillance and infectious disease detection. Biosec Bioterror Biodef Strateg Pract Sci 10(1):6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mykhalovskiy E, Weir L (2006) The global public health intelligence network and early warning outbreak detection: a Canadian contribution to global public health. Can J Public Health:42–44Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Nelson NP, Brownstein JS, Hartley DM (2010) Event-based biosurveillance of respiratory disease in Mexico, 2007–2009: connection to the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic? EuroSurveillance 15(30)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ProMED-mail website:
  22. 22.
    Scarpino SV, Dimitrov NB, Meyers LA (2012) Optimizing provider recruitment for influenza surveillance networks. PLoS 8(4)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wagner MM, Moore AW, Aryel RM (2006) Book: handbook of biosurveillance 301Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson K, Brownstein JS (2009) Early detection of disease outbreaks using the Internet. Can Med Assoc J 180(8):829–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization (2008) International health regulations (2005), 2nd edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avi Magid
    • 1
  • Anat Gesser-Edelsburg
    • 1
  • Manfred S. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations