Abstract
In this chapter, I turn from undocumented populations to the global poor, as subjects of representative claim making by more affluent disobedient actors from both liberal and hierarchical societies. Indeed, I develop the idea of civil disobedience as representative claim making by such actors to compensate for the inability of the poorest and most desperate inhabitants of the planet to exercise any influence over the multiple structures and agencies of global governance. These structures and agencies range from different types of nation states to International Governmental Organizations (IGOs), International Financial Organizations (IFOs), International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs), and so on. Here, a global perspective represents concern for the poorest, the sickest, and the hungriest at different sites and locations of global rule making. Such a perspective combines multinational coalitions of cosmopolitan citizens challenging the rulings and decisions of this or that IGO or IFO with states challenging the structure of international law as differentially impacting rich and poor. The approach I take in this chapter offers a third way between duties of assistance to the poor and global distributive justice. It does so by highlighting instead the normative equality assigned to peoples in Law of Peoples (2001). It does so by justifying disobedience by cosmopolitan citizens and states as contesting the unfair value of liberty between peoples in international rule making. In this respect, my approach offers a significant reinterpretation of the duty of assistance. It reinterprets the duty as prescribing assistance or help in the creation of a well-ordered international community of peoples, based on the fair value of their liberty in international agreements on trade and economic justice. However, it does not rule out progress towards egalitarian global distributive justice. My primary concern is with justifying disobedience by cosmopolitan citizens and states in the circumstance of piecewise global justice in which the value of liberty for peoples is unfair. It does not take a stand on particular schemes or policies of distributive justice, regarding these important policy matters as separate from the justification for resorting to civil disobedience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, Michael. 2011. Civil Disobedience, International. In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, ed. Deen Chatterjee, vol. 1, 133–135. Dordrecht: Springer.
———. 2015. Civil Disobedience in Cosmopolitan Perspective: National Responsibility, Citizenship, Representation. In Cosmopolitanism and the Legacies of Dissent, ed. Tamara Caraus and Camil Parvu. New York: Routledge.
Beitz, Charles. 2008. Justice and International Relations. In Global Justice Seminal Essays, ed. Thomas Pogge and Darrel Moellendorf. St. Paul: Paragon House.
———. 2011. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bentouhami, Hourya. 2007. Civil Disobedience from Thoreau to Transnational Mobilizations: The Global Challenge. Essays in Philosophy 8(2): Article 3.
Blake, Michael. 2001. Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30(3): 257–296.
Brock, Gillian. 2005. Egalitarianism, Ideals and Cosmopolitan Justice. Social Philosophy and Policy 5: 143–168.
Buchanan, Allen. 2007. Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caney, Simon. 2006. Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corlett, Angelo. 2003. Terrorism: A Philosophical Analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cudd, Ann. 2013. Human Rights and Global Equal Opportunity: Inclusion not Provision. In Human Rights: The Hard Cases, ed. Cindy Holder and David Reidy, 193–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1985. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.
Haksar, Vinit. 1976. Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 19: 151–192.
Held, David. 2004. The Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lefkowitz, David. 2007. On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience. Ethics 117(2): 202–233.
Loriaux, Sylvie. 2012. Fairness in International Economic Cooperation: Moving beyond Rawls’ Duty of Assistance. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15(1): 19–39.
Markovits, Daniel. 2005. Democratic Disobedience. Yale Law Journal 114: 1898–1948.
Miller, David. 2005. Against Global Egalitarianism. Journal of Ethics 9(1/2): 55–79.
———. 2012. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2008. Constructing the Law of Peoples. In Global Justice: Seminar Essays, ed. Thomas Pogge and Darrel Moellendorf, 461–580. St. Paul: Paragon House.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113–147.
Ogunye, Temi. 2015. Global Justice and Transnational Civil Disobedience. Ethics and Global Politics 8(1): 27217. Published Online 24 June 2015.
Pitkin, Hannah. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. New York: Cornell University Press.
———. 2008. Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. In Global Justice: Seminal Essays, ed. Thomas Pogge and Darrel Moellendorf, 355–390. St. Paul: Paragon House.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2001. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reidy, David. 2007. A Just Global Economy: A Defense of Rawls. The Journal of Ethics 11: 193–236.
Risse, Mathias. 2015. On Global Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Saward, Michael. 2006a. In Place of Global Democracy. Ethical Perspectives 15(4): 506–526.
———. 2006b. The Representative Claim. Contemporary Political Theory 5(3): 297–318.
———. 2009. Authorization and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected. Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): 1–22.
———. 2011. Slow Theory: Taking Time over Transnational Representation. Ethics and Global Politics 4(1): 1–18.
Scheffler, Samuel. 1999. Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism. Utilitas 11: 255–276.
Walzer, Michael. 1999. International Society: What Is the Best That We Can Do? Ethical Perspectives 6: 201–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, M. (2017). Unfair Terms of Global Cooperation and the Fair Equality of Liberty Between Peoples. In: Civil Disobedience in Global Perspective. Studies in Global Justice, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1164-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1164-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1162-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1164-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)