Advertisement

Sustainable Processing Systems: What New Strategies for Tropical Agri-Chains?

  • Dominique PalletEmail author
  • Jérôme Sainte-Beuve
Chapter

Abstract

To be sustainable, food and non-food processing systems must impart value to local production by generating jobs and incomes while managing water- and energy-related environmental constraints. The design of sustainable processes must take into account different forms of organization between actors – from small producers to more industrialized tropical agri-chains –, the scale – artisanal, semi-industrial, etc. – for which they are meant, and the evolution of consumer demands, with these latter often wanting to sustain their traditional diets but with the best possible nutritional and health qualities. The processes must take into account the numerous constraints and criteria pertaining to raw materials, finished products, and the local environment in the countries of the South. Environmental sustainability of processing systems also requires improvements in the energy efficiency of processes, reduction in the use of water (recycling), the deriving of value from co-products, and more effective pollution control.

The approach proposed by CIRAD aims to analyze the diversity of existing processing systems, design more innovative and sustainable ones, and then provide them with the necessary support in real-world contexts in association with the other actors of the tropical agri-chains. Food processing systems are complex because they involve various unitary operations that have to conform to demanding specifications. A modelling approach allows the selection of technological solutions to be formalized and rationalized. To incorporate sustainability criteria in the design of food and non-food processing systems, new design processes make use of multi-criteria analysis methods.

Keywords

Energy Efficiency Life Cycle Assessment Processing System Unitary Operation Fermented Fish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. After (2014) Technical Guidelines. http://www.after-fp7.eu/en/results/results-dissemination/technical-guidelines. Retrieved 2 June 2016
  2. Briffaz A, Bohuon P, Méot JM, Dornier M, Mestres C (2014a) Modelling of water transport and swelling associated with starch gelatinization during rice cooking. J Food Eng 121:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briffaz A, Bohuon P, Méot JM, Pons B, Matencio F, Dornier M, Mestres C (2014b) Modelling of brown rice and limited-water cooking modes and its potential use for texture prediction. J Food Eng 141:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruz JF, Béavogui F, Dramé D, (2011) Le fonio, une céréale africaine. Versailles/Wageningen (The Netherlands)/Gembloux (Belgium), Éditions Quæ/CTA/Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, coll. Agricultures tropicales en poche, 160 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Esnouf C, Russel M, Bricas N (dir.) (2011) Pour une alimentation durable. Réflexion stratégique duALIne. Versailles, Éditions Quæ, 288 pGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (1997) The state of food and agriculture: the agroprocessing industry and economic development. Rome, FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/w5800e/w5800e.pdf. Retrieved 2 June 2016
  7. FAO (2004) The state of food insecurity in the world. FAO, Rome ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5650e/y5650e00.pdf. Retrieved 2 June 2016Google Scholar
  8. FAO (2014) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2014. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3720e.pdf. Retrieved 2 June 2016
  9. Hien NN, Tao LT (2012) Situation of wastewater treatment of natural rubber latex processing in the Southeastern region Vietnam. J Vietnam Environ 2(2):58–64Google Scholar
  10. Jai Shanker HP, Girish K (2014) Rubber processing industry effluent treatment using a bacterial consortium. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(10):775–782Google Scholar
  11. Latex Industry and Block Rubber (2001) Industrial sector code of practice for pollution prevention (Cleaner Technology). Latex Industry and Block Rubber, Thailand 47 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Leong ST, Muttamara S, Laortanakul P (2003) Reutilization of wastewater in a rubber-based processing factory: a case study in Southern Thailand. Resour Conserv Recycl 37(2):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maire B, Delpeuch F (2004) La transition nutritionnelle, l’alimentation et les villes dans les pays en développement. Cahiers Agricultures 13(1):23–30Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Energy (2007) Energy efficiency index in rubber industry, department of alternative energy development and efficiency. Ministry of Energy, Thailand, 73 pGoogle Scholar
  15. Obodai M, Oduro-Yeboah C, Amoa-Awua W, Anyebuno G, Ofori H, Annan T, Mestres C, Pallet D (2015) Kenkey production, vending, and consumption practices in Ghana. Food Chain 4(3):275–288Google Scholar
  16. Reach (2006) European regulation (regulation no. 1907/2006)Google Scholar
  17. Rivier M, Méot JM, Ferré T, Briard M (2009) Le séchage des mangues. Versailles, Éditions Quæ, coll. Guide pratique, 112 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Tran T, Da G, Moreno Santander MA, Vélez-Hernández GA, Giraldo-Toro A, Piyachomkwan K, Sriroth K, Dufour D (2015) A comparison of energy use, water use and carbon footprint of cassava starch production in Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia. Resour Conserv Recycl 100:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Utomo TP, Hasanudin U, Suroso E (2010) Comparative study of low and high-grade crumb rubber processing energy. In: Proceedings World Congress on Engineering 2010, vol III, 30 June-2 July, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Éditions Quæ 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIRAD – UMR QualisudMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.CIRAD – UMR IATEMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations