Abstract
Developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) is a set of early childhood curricular recommendations published by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). DAP was introduced in the United States in the late 1980s through Bredekamp’s (1987) seminal work, “Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.” Since the initial publication, DAP has been widely accepted as the standard for early childhood educational practice in the United States and in Westernized countries around the world. Whereas proponents of DAP assert its positive influence on children, those more critical of DAP question whether it supports experiences for all young children equally. The aim of this chapter is to (a) describe a developmentally appropriate practice and its theoretical underpinnings, (b) to describe the conceptualization of the child and the role of the adult in DAP, and (c) to synthesize critiques of and recommended changes to DAP.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adair, J. K., & Bhaskaran, L. (2010). Meditation, rangoli, and eating on the floor: Practices from an urban preschool in Bangalore, India. Young Children, 65, 48–52.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/policy/multicultural-guidelines.aspx
Blanchefield, L. (2013). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Congressional Research Service Report No. 7–0856). Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33608.pdf.
Bloch, M. N. (1992). Critical perspectives on the historical relationship between child development and early childhood education research. In S. Kessler & B. B. Swadener (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum (pp. 3–20). New York: Teachers College Press.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1986). Developmentally appropriate practice. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood Programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Bredekamp, S. (2005). Play and school readiness. Educational Perspectives, 38, 18–26.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (revised ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Brice-Heath, S. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11, 49–76.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, C. P., & Lan, Y. C. (2015). A qualitative metasynthesis of how early educators in international contexts address cultural matters that contrast with developmentally appropriate practices. Early Education and Development, 26, 22–45.
Cannella, G. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
Carlson, V., & Harwood, R. (2010). Attachment, culture, and the caregiving system: The cultural patterning of everyday experiences among Anglo and Puerto Rican mother-infant pairs. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 53–73.
Charlesworth, R. (1998). Developmentally appropriate practice is for everyone. Childhood Education, 74, 274–282.
Cheng, D. P. W. (2001). Difficulties of Hong Kong teachers’ understanding and implementation of ‘play’ in the curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 857–869.
Cheuk, J., & Hatch, A. J. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of integrated kindergarten programs in Hong Kong. Early Child Development and Care, 177, 417–432.
Clark, M. (1989). Anastasia is a normal developer because she is unique. Oxford Review of Education, 15, 243–255.
Cochran, M. (2007). Finding our way: The future of American early care and education. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Derman-Sparks, L., & Edwards, J. O. (2010). Anti-bias education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Derman-Sparks & the A.B.C. Task Force. (1989). Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empowering young children. Washington, D.C.: NAEYC.
Dickinson, D. K. (2002). Shifting images of developmentally appropriate practice as seen through different lenses. Educational Researcher, 31, 26–32.
Driessen, R., Leyendecker, B., Scholmerich, A., & Harwood, R. (2010). Everyday experiences of 18 to 20 month old children from immigrant families: The influence of host culture and migration experience. Early Child Development and Care, 180, 1143–1163.
Dunn, L., & Kontos, S. (1997). Research in review: What have we learned about developmentally appropriate practice? Young Children, 52, 4–13.
Elkind, D. (1989). Developmentally appropriate practice: Philosophical and practical implications. Early Care & Education, 113–117.
Farago, F., Sanders, K., & Gaias, L. (2015). Addressing race and racism in early childhood: Challenges and opportunities. In J. Sutterby (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care discussions on sensitive issues (Vol. 19, pages unknown). Bingley: Emerlad.
Fenton, S. (1999). Ethnicity: Racism, class and culture. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Fischer, K., & Paré-Blagoev, J. (2000). From individual differences to dynamic pathways of development. Child Development, 71, 850–853.
Fleer, M. (2005). Developmental fossils – Unearthing the artifacts of early childhood education: The reification of "child development". Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 30, 2–7.
Garcia Coll, C., Crinic, K., Lamberty, G., Wasik, B., Jenkins, R., Garcia Vazquez, H., et al. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914.
Garner, A., Shonkoff, J., Siegel, B., Dobbins, M., Earls, M., McGuinn, L., Pascoe, J., & Wood, D. (2011). Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: Translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics, 129, 224–231.
Gaylord-Harden, N., Burrow, A., & Cunningham, J. (2012). A cultural-asset framework for investigating successful adaptation to stress in African American youth. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 264–271.
Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1988). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Göncü, A. (Ed.). (1999). Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grieshaber, S., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2001). Embracing identities in early childhood education: Diversity and possibilities. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hegde, A. V., & Cassidy, D. J. (2009). Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives on developmentally appropriate practices (DAP): A study conducted in Mumbai (India). Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23, 367–381.
Heinrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.
Ho, C. W. D. (2008). Exploring the definitions of quality early childhood programmes in a market-driven context: Case studies of two Hong Kong preschools. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16, 223–236.
Hsieh, M. F. (2004). Teaching practices in Taiwan's education for young children: Complexity and ambiguity of developmentally appropriate practices and/or developmentally inappropriate practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 5, 309–329.
Jambunathan, S., & Caulfield, M. (2008). Developmentally appropriate practices in Asian Indian early childhood classrooms. Early Child Development and Care, 178, 251–258.
Jipson, J. (1991). Developmentally appropriate practice: Culture, curriculum, connections. Early Education and Development, 2, 120–136.
Johnson, D. J., Jaeger, E., Randolph, S. M., Cauce, A. M., Ward, J., & NICHD Child Care Research Network. (2003). Studying the effects of early child care experiences on the development of children of color in the United States: Toward a more inclusive research agenda. Child Development, 74, 1558–1576.
Kessler, S. A. (1991). Early childhood education as development: Critique of the metaphor. Early Education and Development, 2, 137–152.
Kessler, S. A., & Swadener, B. B. (Eds.). (1992). Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kostelnik, M. J. (1992)., Myths associated with developmentally appropriate programs. Young Children, 17–23.
Langford, R. (2010). Critiquing child-centered pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into the centre of a democratic pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11, 113–127.
Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences (pp. 67–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lubeck, S. (1991). Reconceptualizing early childhood education: A response. Early Education and Development, 2, 168–174.
Lubeck, S. (1994). The politics of developmentally appropriate practice: Exploring issues of culture, class, and curriculum. In B. Mallory & R. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practice(s) (pp. 17–43). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lubeck, S. (1998). Is developmentally appropriate practice for everyone? Childhood Education, 74, 283–292.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1987). Sex segregation in childhood. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 239–288). New York: Academic.
MacNaughton, G. (1997). Feminist praxis and the gaze in early childhood curriculum. Gender and Education, 9, 317–326.
Mallory, B. L., & New, R. S. (1994). Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.
NAEYC. (1986). Position statement on developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth to age 8. Young Children, 41, 3–19.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1986). A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children birth through age eight. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1988). A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children: Developmentally appropriate practice in the primary grades, serving 5- through 8-year-olds. Young Children, 43, 64–84.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1996). A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children birth through age eight. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children birth through age eight. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. In J. P. Shonkoff & D. A. Phillips (Eds.), Board on children, youth, and families, commission on behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neblett Jr., E., Rivas-Drake, D., & Umaña-Taylor, A. (2012). The promise of racial and ethnic protective factors in promoting ethnic minority youth development. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 295–303.
Piaget, J. (1960). Equilibration and the development of logical structures. In J. M. Tanner & B. Inhelder (Eds.), Discussions on child development (Vol. IV). London: Tavistock Publications, Ltd.
Quinn, P. C., Westerlund, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2006). Neural markers of categorization in 6-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 17, 59–66.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 933–1016). New York: Wiley.
Ryan, S., & Grieshaber, S. (2004). It’s more than child development: Critical theories, research, and teaching young children. Young Children: Young Children Journal of the National Association for the Education of Young Children, 59, 44–52.
Sanders, K., Deihl, A., & Kyler, A. (2007). DAP in the ‘hood: Perceptions of child care practices by African American child care directors caring for children of color. Early Child Research Quarterly, 22, 394–406.
Saxe, G. B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 52, 306–316.
Saxe, G., & Esmonde, I. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of Fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 171–255.
Schulze, P., Harwood, R., Schoelmerich, A., & Leyendecker, B. (2002). The cultural structuring of parenting and universal developmental tasks. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2, 151–178.
Singer, E. (1996). Prisoners of the Method: breaking open the child-centred pedagogy in day care centres. International Journal of Early Years Education, 4, 28–40.
Spodek, B. (1991). Reconceptualizing early childhood education: A commentary. Early Education and Development, 2, 161–167.
Swadener, E. B., & Kessler, S. A. (1991). Reconceptualizing early childhood education: An introduction. Early Education and Development, 2, 85–94.
Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 255–283.
Tzou, P. W. (2007). The tension between teacher control and children’s freedom in a child-centered classroom: Resolving the practical dilemma through a closer look at the related theories. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 33–39.
UN General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html
UN General Assembly. (2001), Convention on the Rights of the Child: The aims of education (General Comment No. 1). Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/GeneralComment7Rev1.pdf
UN General Assembly. (2006), Convention on the Rights of the Child: Implementing child rights in early childhood (General Comment No. 7). Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/GeneralComment7Rev1.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, D. J. (1991). Extending the discourse on developmental appropriateness: A developmental perspective. Early Education and Development, 2, 109–119.
Williams, L. R. (1994). Developmentally appropriate practice and cultural values: A case in point. In B. L. Mallory & R. S. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education (pp. 155–165). New York: Teachers College Press.
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanders, K., Farago, F. (2018). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in the Twenty-First Century. In: Fleer, M., van Oers, B. (eds) International Handbook of Early Childhood Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0927-7_71
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0927-7_71
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0925-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0927-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)