Advanced Characterisation Methods for Interface Shear Resistance for Airport Overlays

Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 13)

Abstract

It is recognised that the adequacy of bond between an asphalt surface layer and the underlying pavement material is fundamental to good pavement performance. This is even more important in airport pavements where shear forces imparted by braking and turning aircraft are high. Various measures of interface shear resistance are available to characterise the bond of asphalt surface layers. Advanced test methods were developed to measure the shear resistance of the interface between asphalt layers. These methods include monotonic testing in direct shear, as well as repeated load testing in inclined shear mode. Both methods have been utilised to compare the interface shear resistance of runways of different field performance, as well as assessing the impact of rain on interface shear resistance achieved during runway asphalt overlay work. Further, the repeated load test has been used to identify a shear susceptible asphalt mixture, with poor field performance, using the monotonic test results to compare cores from two runways.

Keywords

Shear stress Shear resistance Interface fatigue Airport asphalt 

References

  1. Goodman, S, Bekheet, W, Hassan, Y, & Abd El Halim, AO 2002, ‘Rapid in-situ shear testing of asphalt pavements for runway construction quality control and assurance, Proceedings 2002 FAA Airport Technology Transfer Conference, Atlantic City, USA, May.Google Scholar
  2. Kruntcheva, MR, Collop, AC & Thom, NH 2006, ‘Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance’, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 467-471.Google Scholar
  3. Mejia, D, Celaya, M, Iyer, S, Rao, C, Shokouhi, P & Nazarian, S 2008, A Work Plan toward Evaluation of Technologies to Assess Presence and Extent of Delamination of HMA Airfield Pavements, Research Project 06-04, Centre of Transportation Infrastructure Systems, El Paso, USA, June.Google Scholar
  4. Mohammad, LN, Bae, A, Elseifi, MA, Button, J & Scherocman, JA 2009, ‘Interface shear strength characterisation of emulsified tack coats’, Proceedings Asphalt Pavement Technology, Minneapolis, USA, 15-18 March, Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, vol. 78, pp. 250-277.Google Scholar
  5. Santagata, FA, Ferrotti, G, Partl, MN & Canestrari, F 2009, ‘Statistical investigation of two different interlayer shear test methods’, Materials and Structures, vol. 42, pp. 705-714.Google Scholar
  6. Tashman, L, Nam, K, Papagiannakis, T, Willoughby, K, Pierce, L & Baker, T 2008, ‘Evaluation of construction practices that influence the bond strength at the interface between pavement layers’, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 154-161.Google Scholar
  7. Uzan, J, Livneh, M, & Eshed Y 1978, ‘Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers’, Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, vol. 47, pp. 495-521.Google Scholar
  8. White, G 2015a, ‘Asphalt overlay bond strength’, Proceedings Airport Pavement and Lighting Forum, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 30 April – 1 May 2015, Australian Airports Association.Google Scholar
  9. White, G 2015b, ‘Asphalt tenderness in an Australian airport runway’, Transportation Geotechnics, article in press doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.08.001.
  10. White, G & Gabrawy, T 2016, ‘Airport asphalt surface interface shear resistance’, International Journal of Pavement Engineering and Asphalt Technology, vol. 17, no. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fulton HoganParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations