Advertisement

The Cognitive–Affective Structure of Political Ideologies

  • Paul Thagard
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation book series (AGDN, volume 7)

Abstract

This chapter displays the structure of ideologies using a new technique called cognitiveaffective mapping, portraying the cognitive and emotional relations in both left-wing and right-wing ideologies. The technique is expanded to allow multimodal representations such as pictures and sounds in addition to verbal concepts, with Nazi ideology as an illustration. The cognitive–affective maps are based on a theory of emotional coherence that can explain why people are attracted to various ideologies. The psychological theory of emotional coherence meshes well with social mechanisms of cognitive and emotional transfer that can explain how ideologies spread through groups of individuals.

Keywords

Emotion Group decision taking Ideology Cognitive–affective maps Empathy Negotiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. I am grateful to an anonymous referee for comments and to Tobias Schröder and Thomas Homer-Dixon for helpful discussions.

References

  1. Axelrod, R. (Ed.). (1976). Structure of decision: the cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bastardi, A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Ross, L. (2011). Wishful thinking: Belief, desire, and the motivated evaluation of scientific evidence. Psychological Science, 22, 731–732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, R. J. (2005). The coming of the Third Reich. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Findlay, S. D., & Thagard, P. (2014). Emotional change in international negotiation: Analyzing the Camp David accords using cognitive-affective maps. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 1281–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giner-Sorolla, R., & Espinosa, P. (2011). Social cuing of guilt by anger and of shame by disgust. Psychological Science, 22, 49–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action: an ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haidt, J. (2012). The righeous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  12. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Homer-Dixon, T., Leader Maynard, J., Mildenberger, M., Milkoreit, M., Mock, S. J., Quilley, S., et al. (2013). A complex systems approach to the study of ideology: Cognitive-affective structures and the dynamics of belief systems. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 337–364. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Homer-Dixon, T., Milkoreit, M., Mock, S. J., Schröder, T., & Thagard, P. (2014). The conceptual structure of social disputes: Cognitive-affective maps as a tool for conflict analysis and resolution. SAGE Open, 4. doi:  10.1177/2158244014526210.
  16. Iacoboni, M. (2008). Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  17. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (2009). Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Leader Maynard, J. (2013). A map of the field of political ideologies. Journal of Political Ideologies, 18, 299–327. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2013.831589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall, P. (2010). Demanding the impossible: A history of anarchism. Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mele, A. R. (2001). Self-deception unmasked. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Melvern, L. (2004). Conspiracy to murder: The Rwandan genocide. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106, 835–845.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever “get it”? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schröder, T., & Thagard, P. (2013). The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: Three mechanisms that explain priming. Psychological Review, 120, 255–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sowa, J. F. (1999). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
  33. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thagard, P. (2003). Why wasn’t O. J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thagard, P. (2010a). The brain and the meaning of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thagard, P. (2010b). EMPATHICA: A computer support system with visual representations for cognitive-affective mapping. In K. McGregor (Ed.), Proceedings of the workshop on visual reasoning and representation (pp. 79–81). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. Thagard, P. (2011). The brain is wider than the sky: Analogy, emotion, and allegory. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thagard, P. (2012a). The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thagard, P. (2012b). Mapping minds across cultures. In R. Sun (Ed.), Grounding social sciences in cognitive sciences (pp. 35–62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thagard, P. (2015). Value maps in applied ethics. Teaching Ethics15, 115–127.Google Scholar
  42. Thagard, P. (in press). Emotional cognition in urban planning. In J. Portugali & E. Stolk (Eds.), Complexity, cognition, urban planning and design. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Thagard, P., & Aubie, B. (2008). Emotional consciousness:   A neural  model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Consciousness and  Cognition, 17, 811–834.Google Scholar
  44. Thagard, P., & Nussbaum, A. D. (2014). Fear-driven inference: Mechanisms of gut overreaction. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology (pp. 43–53). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thagard, P., & Schröder, T. (2014). Emotions as semantic pointers: Constructive neural mechanisms. In L. F. Barrett & J. A. Russell (Eds.), The psychological construction of emotions (pp. 144–167). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Writers for the 99 %. (2011). Occupying wall street: The inside story of an action that changed America. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations