Abstract
The potential use by a terrorist group of a Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD) or dirty bomb is a contemplated contingency in the twenty-first century. Since the 1990s, smuggling of radioactive materials has occurred in several countries involving sufficient amounts to make a dirty bomb. The health effects of an RDD explosion may vary significantly according to particle energy, and whether alpha, beta and gamma particles are inhaled, ingested or skin-absorbed. The activity of the radioactive source is another variable as well as the shape of the terrain, population density, local wind conditions, etc. The explosion of an RDD could contaminate water supply, food and other consumer articles. The physiological and psychological damage caused by the explosion of an RDD would most likely be greater than the effects produced by the radioactive contamination. Taking into account that the perception of fear is produced through a complex process of cognitive, behavioral, emotional and psychological factors, an RDD explosion could result in dozens of individuals traumatized for each physically injured person. Experimental tests and mathematical code systems to calculate radioactive doses produced in the explosion of an RDD are being developed, together with new technologies and techniques in the preparedness for radiological response and recovery. Although a worst case scenario could be postulated, proactive and integrating response strategies would significantly reduce the damage caused by a dirty bomb explosion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexander Y (ed) (2002) Combating terrorism. Strategies of ten countries. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Bailey MR, Birchall A, Etherington G, Graser G, Wilkins BT, Bessa Y, Bishop L, Brown J, Dorrian MD, Ewers LW, Fell TP, Ham GJ, Hammond DJ, Forrester S, Hodgson A, Howarth C, Ibrahimi ZF, Maguire H, Marsch J, Phipps AW, Puncher M, Ruggles R, Shutt A, Smith JRH, Turbitt D, Youngman MJ, Wilding D (2008). Individual monitoring conducted by the Health Protection Agency in the London Polonium-210 Incident. Health Protection Agency. HPA-RPD-067. Retrieved October 16th, 2014 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/337140/HPA-RPD-067_for_website.pdf
Bakalyarov A, Karetnikov M, Lebedev V, Muradyan G, Skorik Y, Tupikin N, Yakovlev G (2008) Experimental model on the device for the detection of nuclear materials by pulsed photoneutron technology. In: Apikyan S, Diamond D, Way R (eds) Prevention, detection and response to nuclear and radiological threats. The NATO science for peace and security series – B. Physics and biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 173–181
Carpintero-Santamaría N (2012) The incidence of illegal nuclear trafficking in proliferation and international security. Behav Sci Terrorism Polit Aggress 4(2):99–109, May 2012
Carpintero-Santamaría N (2012) Is WMD terrorism a likely prospect in the future? YES: WMD terrorism: a potential threat to international security. In: Jackson R, Sinclair SJ (eds) Contemporary debates on terrorism. Routledge, London, pp 76–83
Carpintero-Santamaría N (2014) Factors affecting nuclear security. In: Martín Ramirez J, Morrison C, Kendall A (eds) Conflict, violence, terrorism and their prevention, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp 150–163
Grigoriev AS (2011) Urgency of RTG decommissioning work management and main results of international cooperation in this sphere. Retrieved 27 March 2012 from http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/ST/NE/NEFW/Technical_Areas/WTS/CEG/documents/25th-IAEA-CEG-Plenary-Meeting/2.5-Grigoriev-Eng.pdf
Frontex Fran Quarterly. Quarterly, October-December 2013. http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/Annual_Risk_Analysis_2013.pdf
HPAC general and specific characteristics for model. Retrieved 1 September 2011 from www.ofcm.gov/atd_dir/pdf/hpac/pdf
Hill A (2003) Using the Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) hazard assessment program for radiological scenarios relevant to the Australian Defence Force, DSTO-CR-0294
Hoffman SG (2010) HotSpoT health physics codes. Version 2.07.1 user’s guide. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. LLNL-TM-411345 Rev. 1. 8 March 2010. https://narac.llnl.gov/operational.html
IAEA Safety Standards (2005) Categorization of radioactive sources. N° RS-G-1.9. Retrieved on 12 October 2014 from http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1227_web.pdf
IAEA Illicit Trafficking Database (ITDB). Retrieved 10 September, 2014 http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/security/itdb-fact-sheet.pdf
Lindley RA, Adduci JJ, Johnson L, Lepoire DJ (2008) Perspectives on international radiological trafficking. In: Apikyan S, Diamond D, Way R (eds) Prevention, detection and response to nuclear and radiological threats. The NATO science for peace and security series – B. Physics and biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–55
Ministerio de Fomento (2014) Retrieved on 17 October 2014 from http://www.puertos.es/estadisticas/estadistica_mensual/index.html
Morgan OW, Page L, Forrester S, Maguire H (2008) Polonium-210 poisoning in London: hypochondriasis and public health. Prehospital Dis Med 23(1):96–97, Retrieved on March 25, 2012 from http://pdm.medicine.wisc.edu/Volume_23/issue_1/morgan.pdf
NRPA Bulletin. Stralevern Info (2004). Norwegian radiation protection authority. www.stralevernet.no. Retrieved 25 July 2011
Pangi R (2008) Consequence management in the 1995 sarin attacks on the Japanese subway system. In: Howard RD, Forest J (eds) Weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. McGraw Hill, Chicago
Raskov W (2008) The Real-time On-line Decision Support System RODOS. Preparedness and response for nuclear and radiological emergencies. Retrieved on 3 September 2011 from www.iscram.org/dmdocuments/P269_278.pdf
RODOS Homepage (2008). Retrieved on 3 September 2014 from http://www.rodos.fzk.de http://www.rodos.fzk.de/
2012 Seoul nuclear security summit. Beyond security towards peace. Retrieved on 27 March 2012 from http://www.thenuclearsecuritysummit.org/eng_media/press/press_view.jsp?oCmd=6&b_code=1&idx=302&rnum=1&f_gubun=0
Timeline: Litvinenko death case. Retrieved 25 March 2012 from http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6179074.stm
Velarde G (2008) Nuclear terrorism: an overview. In: Apikyan S, Diamond D, Way R Prevention, detection and response to nuclear and radiological threats. The NATO science for peace and security series – B. Physics and biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 11–17
Velarde G (2014) Personal communication
Velarde G, Carpintero-Santamaría N (2010) Global terrorism: an assessment of biological, chemical and nuclear threat. In: Antonius D, Brown AD, Walters TK, Martín Ramirez J, Sinclair SJ Interdisciplinary analyses of terrorism and political aggression, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp 239–271
Walter H (2001). Dose assessment after an explosive dispersion of radioactive material in urban surroundings. A decision support system for use by radiation protection authorities. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Belgirate, 28–31 May 2001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carpintero-Santamaria, N. (2015). A Holistic Approach to Radiological Terrorism. In: Apikyan, S., Diamond, D. (eds) Nuclear Threats and Security Challenges. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9894-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9894-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9893-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9894-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)