Emerging Concepts in Adaptive Management

  • Derek Armitage
  • Steven Alexander
  • Mark Andrachuk
  • Samantha Berdej
  • Thomas Dyck
  • Prateep Kumar Nayak
  • Jeremy Pittman
  • Kaitlyn Rathwell
Chapter

Abstract

Adaptive management is an elegant concept. Structure management interventions and policies as experiments, monitor feedback, and make necessary adjustments. Yet, the implementation of adaptive management has often been difficult, and the outcomes unclear. We examine in this chapter six issues or concepts that emerge as central to ongoing efforts to advance the theory and practice of adaptive management of natural resources: (1) adopting a transdisciplinary perspective on adaptive management; (2) shifting from a natural resource management to social-ecological systems perspective; (3) situating adaptive management within a governance context; (4) surfacing the role of power in adaptive management processes; (5) engaging with knowledge co-production; and (6) exploring the role of adaptive management as a deliberative tool in support of social-ecological transformations.

Keywords

Adaptive management Uncertainty Natural resource management Transdisciplinary Governance 

References

  1. Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co- management. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 9. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art9/.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases. Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 473–502.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, C. R., Fontaine, J., Pope, K., & Garmestani, A. S. (2011). Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1339–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali-Khan, F., & Mulvihill, P. R. (2008). Exploring collaborative environmental governance: Perspectives on bridging and actor agency. Geography and Compass, 2, 1974–1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., & Doubleday, N. (Eds.). (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multi-level governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  7. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21, 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armitage, D., de Loe, R., & Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnold, J. S., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Bartels, W. L. (2012). Power and conflict in adaptive management: Analyzing the discourse of riparian management on public lands. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04636-170119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Batterbury, S., Forsyth, T., & Thomson, K. (1997). Environmental transformations in developing countries: Hybrid research and democratic policy. The Geographical Journal, 163, 126–132.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, E., & Zurek, M. (2006). Integrating epistemologies through scenarios. In W. V. Reid, F. Berkes, & D. Capistrano (Eds.), Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment (pp. 275–294). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berkes, F. (2003). Alternatives to conventional management: Lessons from small-scale fisheries. Environments, 31, 5–19.Google Scholar
  13. Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berkes, F. (2010). Shifting perspectives on resource management: Resilience and the reconceptualization of ‛natural resources’ and ‛management’. MAST Maritime Studies, 9, 11–38.Google Scholar
  15. Berkes, F. (2011). Restoring unity: The concept of marine social-ecological systems. In R. Ommer, R. Perry, K. Cochrane, & P. Cury (Eds.), World fisheries: A social-ecological analysis (pp. 9–28). London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Berkes, F., & Davidson-Hunt, I. (2008). The cultural basis for an ecosystem approach: Sharing across systems of knowledge. In D. Walter-Toews and E. Lister Nina-marie (Eds.), The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability (pp. 109–124). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Berkes, F., Hughes, T., Steneck, R., Wilson, J., Bellwood, D., Crona, B., & Worm, B. (2006). Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science, 311, 1557–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70, 1856–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., & Zondervan, R. (2009). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project, ESG Report No. 1. Bonn: The Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar
  22. Bohensky, E. L., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: What have we learned from a decade of international literature on “Integration”? Ecology and Society, 16(4), 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04342-160406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M. T., Kothari, A., & Renard, Y. (Eds.). (2007). Sharing power: A global guide to collaborative management of natural resources. London: Earthscan Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (Eds.). (2003). Contested nature: Promoting international biodiversity with social justice in the twenty-first century. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Brunner, R. D., Steelman, T. D., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C. M., Edwards, C. M., & Tucker, D. W. (2005). Adaptive governance: Integrating science policy and decision making. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Bryant, R. L. (1998). Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: A review. Progress in Physical Geography, 22, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Campbell, S. J., Kartawijaya, T., Yulianto, I., Prasetia, R., & Clifton, J. (2013). Co-management approaches and incentives improve management effectiveness in the Karimunjawa National Park, Indonesia. Marine Policy, 41, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8086–8091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., & Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/.Google Scholar
  30. Chapin, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Chuenpagdee, R., Bundy, A., Charles, T., Christie, P., Fanning, L., Gonzales, P., & Zwanenburg, K. (2005). Creating a positive future for fisheries and coastal communities worldwide. In R. Chuenpagdee & A. Bundy (Eds.), Innovation and outlook in fisheries: An assessment of the research presented at the 4th world fisheries congress (pp. 77–88). Fisheries Centre Research Report, 13(2), 77–88.Google Scholar
  32. Colfer, C. (2005). The complex forest: Communities, uncertainty, and adaptive collaborative management. Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.Google Scholar
  33. Cumming, G., & Collier, J. (2005). Change and identity in complex systems. Ecology and Society, 10(1): 29. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art29/.Google Scholar
  34. Dale, V. H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R. A., Hobbs, N. T., & Huntly, N. (2000). Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications, 107, 639–670.Google Scholar
  35. Davies, C., & Sarpong, D. (2013). The epistemological relevance of the arts in foresight and futures studies. Futures, 47, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Elgin, C. Z. (2002). Creation as reconfiguration: Art in the advancement of science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Engle, N. L., Johns, O. R., Lemos, M. C., & Nelson, D. R. (2011). Integrated and adaptive management of water resources: Tensions, legacies, and the next best thing. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art19/.Google Scholar
  40. Erdman, M. V., Merrill, P. R., Mongdong, M., Arsyad, I., Harahap, Z., Pangalila, R., & Baworo, P. (2004). Building effective co-management systems for decentralized protected areas management in Indonesia: Bunaken National Park case study. http://www.nrm.or.id. Accessed 6 March 2013.
  41. Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., Reed, M. R., Stringer, L. C., Kruijsen, J. H. J., White, P. C. L., Newsham, A., Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., Phillipson, J., Blackstock, K. L., Entwistle, N., Sheate, W. R., Armstrong, F., Blackmore, C., Fazey, J. A., Ingram, J., Gregson, J., Lowe, P., Morton, S., & Trevitt, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation, 40, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ferse, S. C., Máñez Costa, M., Schwerdtner Máñez, K., Adhuri, D. S., & Glaser, M. (2010). Allies, not aliens: Increasing the role of local communities in marine protected area implementation. Environmental Conservation, 37, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/.Google Scholar
  45. Fox, J., Bushley, B. R., Miles, E. B., & Quazi, S. A. (Eds.). (2008). Connecting communities and conservation: Collaborative management of protected areas in Bangladesh. Honolulu: East-West Centre.Google Scholar
  46. Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., & Cabezas, H. (2009). Panarchy, adaptive management and governance: Policy options for building resilience. Nebraska Law Review, 87, 1036–1054.Google Scholar
  47. Glaser, M. (2006). The social dimensions in ecosystem management: Strengths and weaknesses of human-nature mind maps. Research in Human Ecology, 13, 122–142.Google Scholar
  48. Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  49. Gunderson, L., & Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Science, 39, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad Sweden. Human Ecology, 34, 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harkes, I. (1998). The sasi laut system in Maluku Province, Indonesia. Fisheries Co-management Project Working Paper 33. ICLARM, Manila.Google Scholar
  53. Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Caldwell: Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ison, R., Blackmore, C., & Iaquinto, B. (2013). Towards systemic and adaptive governance: Exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecological Economics, 87, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johnson, B. (1999). Introduction to the special feature: Adaptive management—scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conservation Ecology, 3(1): 10. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art10/.Google Scholar
  56. Kallis, G., Kiparsky, M., & Norgaad, R. (2009). Collaborative governance and adaptive management: Lessons from California’s CALFED Water Program. Environmental Science and Policy, 12, 631–643.Google Scholar
  57. Kates, R., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., & Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Keith, D., Martin, T., McDonald-Madden, E., & Walters, C. (2011). Uncertainty and adaptive management for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 144, 1175–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kotchen, M., & Young, O. (2007). Meeting the challenges of the anthropocene: Towards a science of coupled human-biophysical systems. Global Environmental Change, 17, 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Laidler, G. (2006). Inuit and scientific perspectives on the relationship between sea ice and climate change: The ideal complement? Climate Change, 78, 407–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laidler, G., Elee, P., Ikummaq, T., Joamie, E., & Aporta, C. (2010). Mapping Inuit sea ice knowledge, use, and change in Nunavut, Canada (Cape Dorset, Igloolik, Pangnirtung). In C. Aporta & S. Gearheard (Eds.), SIKU: Knowing our ice: Documenting Inuit sea ice knowledge and use (pp. 45–80). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lang, D., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., & Moll, P., (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, (7 Supplement), 25–43.Google Scholar
  63. Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art18/.Google Scholar
  65. Lee, K. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  66. Lee, K. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), 3. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3/.Google Scholar
  67. Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Levin, S. (1999). Fragile dominion: Complexity and the commons. Reading: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  69. Levin, S. A., & Clark, W. C. (Eds.). (2010). Toward a science of sustainability: Report from toward a science of sustainability conference. Airlie Center, Warrenton. Virginia: November 29, 2009—December 2, 2009. CID Working Paper No. 196. Center for International Development at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  70. Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., & Taylor, W. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317, 1513–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mahon, R., McConney, P., & Roy, R. (2008). Governing fisheries as complex adaptive systems. Marine Policy, 32, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mannigel, E. (2008). Integrating parks and people: How does participation work in protected area management? Society and Natural Resources, 21, 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mappatoba, M. (Ed.). (2004). Co-management of protected areas: The case of community agreements on conservation in the Lore Lindu National Park, central Sulawesi—Indonesia. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
  74. Mascarenhas, M. (2007). Where the waters divide: First nations, tainted water and environmental justice in Canada. Local Environment, 12, 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McGregor, D. (2012). Traditional knowledge: Considerations for protecting water in Ontario. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 3(3), Article 11. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol3/iss3/11.
  76. McLain, R., & Lee, R. (1996). Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management, 20, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: General synthesis. Chicago: Island Press.Google Scholar
  78. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., & Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15(3), 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/.Google Scholar
  80. Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W., & Dickson, N. M. (2006). Global environmental assessments: Information and influence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  81. Moore, M. L., & Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: Networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art5/.Google Scholar
  82. Nadasdy, P. (2007). Adaptive co-management and the gospel of resilience. In D. Armitage & F. Berkes (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 208–227). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  83. Natcher, D. C., Davis, S., & Hickey, C. G. (2005). Co-management: Managing relationships, not resources. Human Organization, 64, 240–250.Google Scholar
  84. Nayak, P. K. (2011). Change and marginalisation: Livelihoods, commons institutions and environmental justice in Chilika Lagoon, India. Dissertation, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  85. Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2010). Whose marginalisation? Politics around environmental injustices in India’s Chilika Lagoon. Local Environment, 15, 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2014). Linking global drivers with local and regional change: A social-ecological system approach in Chilika Lagoon, Bay of Bengal. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 2067–2078.Google Scholar
  87. Njaya, F., Donda, S., & Béné, C. (2011). Analysis of power in fisheries co-management: Experiences from Malawi. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 652–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Oakerson, R. J. (1992). Analyzing the commons: A framework. In D. Bromley (Ed.), Making the commons work: Theory, practice and policy. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
  89. O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformations for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/.Google Scholar
  91. Olsson, P., Gunderson, L., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., & Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/.Google Scholar
  92. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Peterson, G. (2007). Using scenario planning to enable an adaptive co-management process in the Northern Highlands Lake District of Wisconsin. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 286–307). Vancouver: UBC.Google Scholar
  96. Peterson, G., Carpenter, S., & Brock, W. (2003). Uncertainty and the management of multistate ecosystems: An apparently rational route to collapse. Ecology, 84, 1403–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pinkerton, E. (2007). Integrating holism and segmentalism: Overcoming barriers to adaptive co-management between management agencies and multi-sector bodies. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 151–171). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  98. Press, T., Lea, D., Webb, A., & Graham, A. (Eds.). (1995). Kakadu: Natural and cultural heritage management. Darwin: Australian Nature Conservation Agency and North Australia Research Unit, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  99. Raik, D. B., Wilson, A. L., & Decker, D. J. (2008). Power in natural resources management: An application of theory. Society and Natural Resources, 21, 729–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Reed, M. S., Fazey, I., Stringer, L. C., Raymond, C. M., Akhtar-Schuster, M., Begni, G., & Wagner, L. (2013). Knowledge management for land degradation monitoring and assessment: An analysis of contemporary thinking. Land Degradation and Development, 24, 307–322.Google Scholar
  101. Reid, W., Berkes, F., Wilbanks, T., & Capistrano, D. (Eds.). (2006). Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  102. Ribot, J. (2003). Democratic decentralisation of natural resource: Institutional choice and discretionary power transfers in sub-Saharan Africa. Public Administration Development, 23, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., & Redford, K. H. (2001). Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners. Washington, D.C.: Biodiversity Support Program.Google Scholar
  105. Satria, A., & Adhuri, D. (2010). Pre-existing fisheries management systems in Indonesia, focusing on Lombok and Maluku. In K. Ruddle & A. Satria (Eds.), Managing coastal and inland waters: Pre-existing aquatic management systems in southeast Asia (pp. 31–55). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  106. Sendzimir, J., Magnuszewski, P., Flachner, Z., Balogh, P., Molnar, G., Sarvari, A., & Nagy Z. (2007). Assessing the resilience of a river management regime: Informal learning in a shadow network in the Tisza River Basin. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art11/.Google Scholar
  107. Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.Google Scholar
  108. Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social– ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/.Google Scholar
  109. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  110. Turner, B. L., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., & Schiller, A. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment systems for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 8080–8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vancouver, A. G. (2006). Raven travelling: Two centuries of Haida art. Vancouver Art Gallery: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
  112. Walker, B. H., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.Google Scholar
  113. Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  114. Waltner-Toews, D., & Kay, J. (2005). The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 38. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art38/.Google Scholar
  115. Weeratunge, N., Bene, C., Siriwardane, R., Charles, A., Johnson, D., Allison, E. H., & Badjeck, M. (2014). Small-scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish and Fisheries, 15, 255–279.Google Scholar
  116. Westgate, M., Likens, G., & Lindenmayer, D. (2013). Adaptive management of biological systems: A review. Biological Conservation, 158, 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics. In L. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy (pp. 333–360). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  118. Zurba, M., & Berkes, F. (2014). Caring for country through participatory art: Creating a boundary object for communicating Indigenous knowledge and values. Local Environment, 19, 821–836.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek Armitage
    • 1
  • Steven Alexander
    • 1
  • Mark Andrachuk
    • 1
  • Samantha Berdej
    • 1
  • Thomas Dyck
    • 1
  • Prateep Kumar Nayak
    • 1
  • Jeremy Pittman
    • 1
  • Kaitlyn Rathwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Change and Governance Group, Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations