Norms for Theories of Reflexive Truth

Chapter
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 36)

Abstract

In the past two decades we have witnessed a shift to axiomatic theories of truth. But in this tradition there has been a proliferation of truth theories. In this article we carry out a meta-theoretical reflection on the conditions that we should want axiomatic truth theories to satisfy.

Keywords

Norms Axiomatic theory Reflexive truth Disquotation Compositionality 

References

  1. Boolos, G. (1971). The iterative conception of set. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgess, A. G., & Burgess, J. P. (2011). Truth. Princeton: Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burgess, J. P. (2009). Friedman and the axiomatization of Kripke’s theory of truth. Ohio State, 2009. paper delivered at the Ohio State University conference in honor of the 60th birthday of Harvey Friedman.Google Scholar
  4. Cieśliński, C. (2007). Deflationism, conservativeness and maximality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36, 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feferman, S. (1984). Towards useful type-free theories I. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49, 75–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feferman, S. (1991). Reflecting on incompleteness. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Field, H. (2008). Saving truth from paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, H. & Sheard, M. (1987). An axiomatic approach to self-referential truth. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 33, 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. Fujimoto, K. (2012). Classes and truths in set theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (to appear).Google Scholar
  10. Halbach, V. (1994). A system of complete and consistent truth. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halbach, V. (1995). Tarski-hierarchies. Erkenntnis, 43, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halbach, V. (1999). Disquotationalism and infinite conjunctions. Mind, 108, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halbach, V. (2006). How not to state the T-sentences. Analysis, 66, 276–280 (Correction of printing error in vol. 67, 268).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halbach, V. (2011). Axiomatic theories of truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halbach, V., & Horsten, L. (2006). Axiomatizing Kripke’s theory of truth. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 71, 677–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horsten, L. (2011). The Tarskian turn: Deflationism and axiomatic truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 690–712 (reprinted in 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leitgeb, H. (2007). What theories of truth should be like (but cannot be). In Blackwell Philosophy Compass 2/2, pages 276–290. Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, R. L. (ed.).(1984). Recent essays on truth and the liar paradox. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McGee, V. (1985). How truthlike can a predicate be? A negative result. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 14, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGee, V. (1992). Maximal consistent sets of instances of Tarski’s schema (T). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheard, M. (1994). A guide to truth predicates in the modern era. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59, 1032–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheard, M. (2002). Truth, probability, and naive criteria. In V. Halbach & L. Horsten (ed.), Principles of truth. Frankfurt a. M.: Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen.Google Scholar
  24. Terzian, G. (2012). Uncovering the norms of truth. A meta-theoretic inquiry. PhD thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New College, University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations