How to Manage with Related Concepts of Research on Wellbeing and Health – A Theoretical Review with Special Reference to Later Life

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 11)

Abstract

Research on wellbeing has dealt with a number of related concepts. Empirical studies can rely on two perspectives: theories about resources and theories about needs. More recently approaches combining both aspects have been introduced. Health is more easily integrated into resource theories since health itself can be considered to represent one major resource. Health can also be integrated into the theories of needs, but it has either to be regarded as an independent need of its own or as a kind of reversed need, i.e. a need to escape symptoms of illness. In contrast, social capital can be integrated without difficulties into both theoretical perspectives on wellbeing since it can either be understood as an individual or a community based resource but also as a mean by which social needs or needs related to self-realization can be fulfilled. Both the concept of wellbeing and the concept of health can further be divided according to increasing subjectivity. In the case of wellbeing the most subjective study orientation leaves it to the individual to both define the concept as well as one’s position within that dimension. In the case of health the most subjective concept is represented by measures of perceived or self-rated health (SRH). Subjective orientations, although irreplaceable, lead to challenges, since it is difficult to ascertain the uttermost validity of this type of data. The continuity and activity theories of ageing emphasise wellbeing, whereas the disengagement theory regards the decline of wellbeing in later life as a more or less inevitable development. This chapter attempts by means of a review of the literature to clarify the internal relationships of the related concepts of wellbeing and/or health research and to account for their similarities and differences.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Social Capital Subjective Wellbeing Social Health Health Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allardt, E. (1975). Att ha, att älska, att vara. Om valfärd i Norden. [Having, loving, being. On welfare in the Nordic countries]. Lund: Argos.Google Scholar
  2. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., & Wilkin, D. (1993). Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 2(6), 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atchley, R. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 4(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle, [Outline of a theory of practice.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, M.H., Torrance, G.W., Sinclair, J.C., & Horwood, S.P. (1983). Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 308, 1330–7.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology Supplement, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  10. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Ferraro, K. (1980). Self-ratings of health among the old and the old-old. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Happy Planet Index. www.happyplanetindex.org/. Accessed July 2006.
  13. Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansson, S. (1970). Om levnadsnivåundersökningen. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget.Google Scholar
  15. Jylhä, M. (2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science & Medicine, 69(3), 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karisto, A. (1984). Hyvinvointi ja sairauden ongelma. English welfare and the problem of illness. Helsinki: Kansaneläkelaitoksen julkaisuja. M:46.Google Scholar
  17. Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Kim D. (Eds.). (2008). Social capital and health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehtinen, V. (1991). Suomalaisten aikuisten mielenterveys ja mielenterveyden häiriöt. [Mental health and mental disorders of the finnish adult population]. Helsinki: Kansaneläkelaitoksen julkaisuja. AL:33.Google Scholar
  20. Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nyqvist, F., Forsman, A. K., Giuntoli, G., & Cattan, M. (2013). Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: A systematic review. Aging and Mental Health, 17(49), 394–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parsons, T. (1952). The social system. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  24. Purola, T. (1971). Sairaus sosiaalilääketieteellisenä käsitteenä. [Illness as a socio-medical concept.]. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauslehti. Finnish Journal of Social Medicine, 3, 3–11.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In Mc. Murrin, The tanner lecture on human values, (Vol. I, pp. 197–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sheline Y. I., Disabato B. M., Hranilovich, J., Morris, C., D’Angelo, G., Pieper, C., et al. (2012). Treatment course with antidepressant therapy in late-life depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(11), 1185–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Social Progress Index. www.socialprogressimperative.org/. Accessed 11 April 2013.
  30. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dondrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Von Wright, G. W. (1986). Vetenskapen och förnuftet. [Science and reason]. Helsingfors: Söderströms.Google Scholar
  32. WHO. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. WHO-QOL-BREF. (2013). www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/whoqolbref/en/. Accessed Oct 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public HealthUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Nordic School of Public Health NHVGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations