Advertisement

Observations from the Use of Dogs to Undertake Carcass Searches at Wind Facilities in Australia

Conference paper

Abstract

Mortality searches for bird and bat carcasses at wind farms in Australia are becoming increasingly common. Dogs are used to detect biological scents in a number of fields and their use for bird and bat carcass monitoring at wind farms is growing globally; however this methodology has not been adopted so readily in Australia. This paper details general findings and survey techniques relating to the use of dogs learned from 8 years of field work and over 5,500 surveys. I have identified a number of factors which can influence detection ability and efficiency, including the relationship between the handler and the dog; weather conditions; topography; vegetation and target species. In addition, methodology which recognises the need to be flexible in the field is essential for maintaining consistent accuracy. Based on my observations trained dogs are more accurate (higher detection) and efficient (faster) then human searchers and as training costs do not need to be high, are an affordable alternative to humans. The use of dogs has clear advantages for detecting small birds and bats, on steep and heavily vegetated sites, where high accuracy is important, where threatened or endangered species are a concern, and at large sites with large areas to survey. Formal monitoring programs to quantify the influence of environmental factors on the dogs’ accuracy and efficiency would be welcome in Australia.

Keywords

Mortality monitoring Dogs Carcass searches Wind farms Australia 

References

  1. Arnett, E.B. 2006. A preliminary evaluation on the use of dogs to recover bat fatalities at wind energy facilities. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 1440–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, E.M. 2011. Waubra Wind Farm Monitored BAM plan final summary. Elmoby Ecology report 16. Acciona energy internal report.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, C., K. Stafford, and R. Fordham. 2006. The use of scent-detection dogs. Irish Veterinary Journal 59(2): 97–104.Google Scholar
  4. Erickson, W.P., G.D. Johnson, M.D. Strickland, and K. Kronner. 2000. Avian and bat mortality associated with the vansycle wind project, Umatilla County, Oregon: 1999 study year. Technical report prepared by WEST, Inc. for Umatilla County Department of Resource Services and Development, Pendleton, Oregon, 21pp. http://www.westinc.com/reports/vansyclereportnet.pdf
  5. Gutzwiller, K.J. 1990. Minimizing dog-induced biases in game bird research. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18: 351–356.Google Scholar
  6. Homan, H.J., G. Linz, and B.D. Peer. 2001. Dogs increase recovery of passerine carcasses in dense vegetation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 292–296.Google Scholar
  7. Huso, M.M.P. 2011. An estimator of wildlife from observed carcasses. Envirometrics 22: 318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mathews, F., M.F. Swindells, R. Goodhead, T.A. August, P. Hardman, D.M. Linton, and D.J. Hosken. 2013. Effectiveness of search dogs compared with human observers in locating bat carcasses at wind-turbine sites: A blinded randomized trial. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37(1): 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nussear, K.E., T.C. Esque, J.S. Heaton, M.E. Cablk, K.K. Drake, C. Valentin, C. Valentin, J.L. Yee, and P.A. Medica. 2008. Are wildlife detector dogs or people better at finding desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii)? Herpetological Conservation and Biology 3: 103–115.Google Scholar
  10. Paula, J., M.C. Leal, M.J. Silva, R. Mascarenhas, H. Costa, and M. Mascarenhas. 2011. Dogs as a tool to improve bird-strike mortality estimates at wind farms. Journal for Nature Conservation 19(4): 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reed, S.E., A.L. Bidlack, A. Hurt, and W.M. Getz. 2011. Detection distance and environmental factors in conservation detection dog surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 75(1): 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reitan, O., K. Bevanger, R. May, and E. Lie Dahl. 2011. Turbine induced bird mortality at the Smøla wind-power plant – Species specific estimates. Conference on wind energy and wildlife impacts, 2–5 May 2011, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  13. Schnell G.D., E.A. Mosteller, and J.A. Grzybowski. 2007. Post-construction avian/bat risk assessment and fatality study for the Blue Canyon II Wind Power Project, Oklahoma: Summary of first-year findings. Technical Report, Horizon Wind Energy, Houston; 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Elmoby EcologyCreswickAustralia

Personalised recommendations