Cognitive Semiotics

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Cognitive semiotics is a new field dedicated to the transdisciplinary study of meaning, involving above all researchers from semiotics, linguistics, developmental and comparative psychology, and philosophy. A nonexhaustive survey of the field shows the following research areas as being particularly representative: cognitive semantics, gesture studies, (language) evolution, semiotic development, and the embodied mind. The work of groups and academic institutions is also briefly described. On this basis, the following features are listed as characteristics of cognitive semiotics, distinguishing it from other approaches studying mind and meaning: emphasis on the conceptual–empirical loop, ontological pluralism and methodological triangulation, influence of phenomenology, meaning dynamism, and transdisciplinarity. The ultimate goal of cognitive semiotics is to provide insights into the nature and culture of human beings, and their similarities and differences compared to other creatures, thus helping to “mend the gap” between the humanities and the sciences, without succumbing to reductionism.

Keywords

Body Consciousness Culture Gesture Language Phenomenology Sign use 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter is a thoroughly revised and updated version of Zlatev (2012), to which a number of people provided considerable feedback: Mats Andrén, Johan Blomberg, Paul Bouissac, Riccardo Fusaroli, Joel Parthemore, Chris Sinha, Göran Sonesson, and Michael Ranta.

References

  1. Andrén, M. 2010. Children’s gestures between 18 and 30 months. PhD Thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
  2. Blomberg, J. 2014. Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. PhD Thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
  3. Blomberg, J., and Zlatev, J. 2013. Actual and non-actual motion: Why experimental semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9299–x.Google Scholar
  4. Bouissac, P. 1973. La Mesure des Cestes Prolégomènes à la Sémiotique Gestuelle. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, L. 2013. The communicative mind: A linguistic exploration of conceptual integration and meaning construction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  6. Brandt, P. Å. 2004. Spaces, domains and meanings. Essays in cognitive semiotics. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Bråten, S., and C. Trevarthen. 2007. Prologue: From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense. In On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy, ed. S. Bråten, 21–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brier, S. 2008. Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of meaning. Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bundgaard, P. 2010. Husserl and language. In Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences, eds. D. Schmicking and S. Gallagher, 369–399. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Cienki, A., and C. Müller. 2008. Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daddesio, T. 1995. On minds and symbols: The relevance of cognitive science for semiotics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deacon, T. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Deacon, T. 2012. Beyond the symbolic species. In The symbolic species evolved, eds. T. H. Schilhab, F. Stjernfelt, and T. Deacon, 9–38. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness explained. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Donald, M. 2001. A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Durst-Andersen, P. 2011. linguistic supertypes: A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eco, U. 1999/1997. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  21. Efron, D. 1941. Gesture and environment. New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
  22. Enfield, N.J. 2011. Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In The morality of knowledge in conversation, eds. T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 2002. The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Fusaroli, R., and K. Tylén. 2012. Carving language as social coordination. Interaction Studies 13 (1): 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallagher, S., and D. Zahavi. 2008. The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gallagher, S. 2005. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geeraerts, D., and H. Cuyckens. 2007. Introducing cognitive linguistics. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, eds. D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens, 3–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gould, S. J. 2003. The hedgehog, the fox and the magister’s pox: Mending the gap between science and the humanities. New York: Harmony Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grady, J. E. 2005. Image schemas and perception: Refining the definition. In From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, ed. B. Hampe, 35–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hampe, B. ed. 2005. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harder, P. 2010. Meaning in mind and society. A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobson, P. 2006. The cradle of thought: Exploring the origins of thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hoffmeyer, J. 1996. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hrdy, S.B. 2009. Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, E. 1989/1952. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, Second Book. Dordrecht: Klewer.Google Scholar
  36. Hutto, D. D. 2008. Folk psychological narratives: The socio-cultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kendon, A. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication, ed. M. R. Key. 207–227. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
  39. Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol 1. Standord: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lenninger, S. 2012. When similarity qualifies as a sign: A study in picture understanding and semiotic development in young children. Published Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Semiotics, Lund University.Google Scholar
  45. Levinson, S. C., and A. Majid. 2013. The island of time: Yélî Dnye, the language of Rossel Island. Frontiers of Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00061Google Scholar
  46. Lüdtke, U. 2012. Relational emotions in semiotic and linguistic development: Towards an intersubjective theory of language learning and language therapy. In Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in consciousness, intersubjectivity and language, eds. A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, T. Racine, and J. Zlatev, 305–346. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lutz, A., and E. Thompson. 2003. Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (9–10): 31–52.Google Scholar
  48. Maturana, H. R., and F. J. Varela. 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  49. Maturana, H. R. 1988. Reality: The search for objectivity, or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology 9 (1): 25–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McNeill, D. 2012. How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962/1945. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Nelson, K. 1996. Language in cognitive development. The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oakley, T. 2008. From attention to meaning: Explorations in semiotics, linguistics, and rhetoric. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  56. Persson, T. 2008. Pictorial primates: A search for iconic abilities in great apes, 139. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.Google Scholar
  57. Piaget, J. 1962/1945. Play, dreams and imagination in childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Richerson, P. J., and R. Boyd. 2005. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sinha, C. 2010. Language as a biocultural niche and social institution. In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, eds. V. Evans and S. Pourcel, 289–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, V., J. Clement, P. Møgelvang-Hansen, and H. Selsø Sørensen. 2011. Assessing in-store food-to-consumer communication from a fairness perspective: An integrated approach. Fachsprache—International Journal of Specialized Communication 33 (1–2): 84–105.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, V., P. Møgelvang-Hansen, and G. Hyldig. 2010. Spin versus fair speak in food labelling: A matter of taste? Food Quality and Preference 21:1016–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, V., M. Søndergaard, J. Clement, P. Møgelvang-Hansen, H. S. Sørensen, and G. Gabrielsen. 2009. Fair speak: Scenarier for vildledning på det danske fødevaremarked [Fair Speak: Scenarios of misleading conduct on the Danish food market]. Copenhagen: Ex Tuto Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Sonesson, G. 1989. Pictorial concepts. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sonesson, G. 2006. The meaning of meaning in biology and cognitive science. Sign Systems Studies 34 (1), 135–214.Google Scholar
  65. Sonesson, G. 2009. The view from Husserl's lectern: Considerations on the role of phenomenology in cognitive semiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 16 (3–4): 107–148.Google Scholar
  66. Sonesson, G. 2011. The mind in the picture and the picture in the mind: A phenomenological approach to cognitive semiotics. Lexia. Rivista di semiotica 07/08:167–182Google Scholar
  67. Stern, D. N. 2000/1985. The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  68. Stjernfelt, F. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Thompson, E. 2007. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. London: Belkarp Press.Google Scholar
  71. Tomasello, M. 1999. Cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Trevarthen, C. 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy. A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Before speech: The beginning of human communication, ed. M. Bullowa, 321–347. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tylén, K., E. Weed, M. Wallentin, A. Roepstorff, and C. Frith. 2010. Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind & Language 25 (1): 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Varela, F. 1996. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4): 330–350.Google Scholar
  77. Varela, F., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Violi, P. 2012. How our bodies become us: Embodiment, semiosis and intersubjectivity. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 4 (1): 57–75.Google Scholar
  79. Vygotsky, L. S. 1962/1934. Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Wallentin, M., A. H. Nielsen, P. Vuust, A. Dohn, A. Roepstorff, and T. E. Lund. 2011. Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage 58 (3): 963–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zahavi, D. 2001. Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5–7): 151–167.Google Scholar
  83. Zahavi, D. 2003. Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Ziemke, T., J. Zlatev, and R. Frank. eds. 2007. Body, language and mind. Vol 1: Embodiment. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  85. Zlatev, J. 2003. Meaning = life + (culture): An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning. Evolution of Communication 4 (2): 253–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zlatev, J. 2008. The co-evolution of intersubjectivty and bodily mimesis. In The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, eds. J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen, 215–244. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zlatev, J. 2009. The semiotic hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs and language. Cognitive Semiotics 4:169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zlatev, J. 2010. Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In Handbook on phenomenology and cognitive science, eds. S. Gallagher and D. Schmicking, 415–446. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zlatev, J. 2012. Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning. Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (1): 2–24.Google Scholar
  90. Zlatev, J. 2013. The mimesis hierarchy of semiotic development: Five stages of intersubjectivity in children. Public Journal of Semiotics 4 (2): 47–70.Google Scholar
  91. Zlatev, J., and M. Andrén, M. 2009. Stages and transitions in children’s semiotic development. In Studies in language and cognition, eds. J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson-Falck, and C. Lundmark, 380–401. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  92. Zlatev, J., T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen. 2008. The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Cognitive Semiotics, Centre for Languages and LiteratureLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations