7.4 Juxtaposing Interpretations of Research on School Principalship

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Research evidence suggests that the idea of leadership as a panacea for all the functional ills of schooling is unfounded, however convenient the notion has been for policy-makers. Good leadership is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for good schooling, and we now know that principals successful in one school context cannot always operate with equal efficacy in a different setting. Research on school leadership has likewise suffered from the tension between evidencing and delivering improvement, and challenging and informing policy, most obviously in the dearth of research on quantifying the impact of leadership on pupil outcomes. This chapter sifts through a range of research from developed and developing countries to get an overview of interpretations away from the hegemony of ‘Western’ contexts, interrogating findings in terms of how they relate to method and interpretation. The link between interpretation and methodology is theory, in the absence of which the researcher cannot be sure what has been found. The appropriateness of the latter affects the legitimacy of the former, and ultimately the usefulness of the research. Our review suggests that good research, from whatever cultural tradition, goes beyond the folk-knowledge of anecdote to the theoretically constructive.

Keywords

Student Outcome School Principal School Leadership Educational Leadership Leadership Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Addi-Raccah, A. (2006). Accessing internal leadership positions at school: Testing the similarity-attraction approach regarding gender in three educational systems in Israel. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agezo, C. K., & Hope, W. C. (2011). Gender leadership in Cape Coast Municipality primary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsbury, T. L. (2004). Does school board turnover matter? Revisiting critical variables in the Dissatisfaction Theory of American democracy. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(4), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barty, K., Thomson, P., Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2005). Unpacking the issues: Researching the shortage of school principals in two states in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catano, N., & Stronge, J. H. (2007). What do we expect of school principals? Congruence between principal evaluation and performance standards. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(4), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeJaeghere, J., Williams, R., & Kyeyune, R. (2009). Ugandan secondary school headteachers’ efficacy: What kind of training for whom? International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gu, Q., Sammons, P., & Mehta, P. (2008). Leadership characteristics and practices in schools with different effectiveness and improvement profiles. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996a). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Weaver-Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 723–783). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996b). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 141–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Kwan, P. (2009). Vice-principals’ dilemma – Career advancement or harmonious working relationship. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(3), 203–216.Google Scholar
  12. Kwan, P. (2011). Assessing school principal candidates: Perspectives of the hiring superintendents. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14, 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levačić, R. (2005). Educational leadership as a causal factor. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mascall, B., & Leithwood, K. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorosi, P. (2010). South African female principals’ career paths: Understanding the gender gap in secondary school management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(5), 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mulford, B. (2005). Quality evidence about leadership for organizational and student learning in schools. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, P. (2011). Challenges and research agenda of school leadership in Taiwan. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saitis, C., & Menon, M. E. (2004). Views of future and current teachers on the effectiveness of primary school leadership: Evidence from Greece. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(2), 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sperandio, J. (2000). Leadership for adolescent girls: The role of secondary schools in Uganda. Gender and Development, 8(3), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sperandio, J., & Kagoda, A. (2010). Women teachers’ aspirations to school leadership in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(1), 22–33.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, A. (2007). Self‐report data in cross‐cultural research: Issues of construct validity in questionnaires for quantitative research in educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(2), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Torres, M., Zellner, L., & Erlandson, D. (2008). Administrator perceptions of school improvement policies in a high-impact policy setting. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(7), 1–15.Google Scholar
  24. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2010). The influence of school leadership on teachers’ perception of teacher evaluation policy. Educational Studies, 36(5), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wong, P. (2004). The professional development of school principals: Insights from evaluating a programme in Hong Kong. School Leadership & Management, 24(2), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations