Advertisement

2.2 Interpreting Websites in Educational Contexts: A Social-Semiotic, Multimodal Approach

  • Emilia DjonovEmail author
  • John S. Knox
  • Sumin Zhao
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This chapter reports on three research projects concerned with websites. All three have adopted a social-semiotic, multimodal approach (cf. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold; Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Oxon: Routledge; Kress G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold, Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edn). London: Routledge) and developed new tools for understanding the complexity of website design and its implications for educational contexts. They have focused, however, on different challenges and types of hypermedia: (i) user orientation within websites for children, (ii) knowledge construction in online educational interactives for children, and (iii) news design in online newspapers and the literacy demands online newspapers present for TESOL and applied linguistics students. This paper opens by outlining the common starting point of all three projects in relation to the data – treating websites as meaningful texts. It then proceeds to consider differences in the questions and types of websites explored in each study, and how these differences have influenced the way social-semiotic multimodal tools for analysing the data have been developed in each study and complemented with other tools for collecting and analysing data (e.g. interviews with website users, designers and media practitioners). The paper concludes with a brief discussion of challenges that websites continue to present for educational research.

Keywords

Online Newspaper Pedagogic Discourse Navigation Path Applied Linguistic Semiotic Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. (1998–2004). The playground. Retrieved 8 September 2004, from http://www.abc.net.au/children.
  2. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  3. Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman, J. A. (2011). The decomposability of semiotic modes. In K. O’Halloran & B. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 17–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, B. B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge and K. Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B. B. (1974). Class, codes and control (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, B. B. (1975). Class, codes, and control: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. New York: Schocken Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernstein, B. B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein, B. B. (2000 [1996]). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. Bernstein, B. B. (2001). Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Bigum, C. (2002). Design sensibilities, schools and the new computing and education technologies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 130–139). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. British Broadcasting Corporation. (2001–2004). CBBC newsround. Retrieved 30 October 2004, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/default.stm.
  16. Burbules, N. C. (2002). The web as a rhetorical place. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 75–84). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Caple, H. (2013). Photojournalism: A multisemiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Caple, H., & Knox, J. (2012). Online news galleries, photojournalism and the photo essay. Visual Communication, 11(2), 207–236.Google Scholar
  19. Christie, F. (2000). The language of classroom interaction. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 184–203). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  20. Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Coffin, C. (2000). History as discourse: Construals of time, cause and appraisal. PhD thesis. University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
  22. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. de Vries, J. (2008). Newspaper design as cultural change. Visual Communication, 7(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Djonov, E. (2005). Analysing the organisation of information in websites: From hypermedia design to systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Retrieved 20 April 2012, from http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/23915.
  25. Djonov, E. (2007). Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective. Information Design Journal, 15(2), 144–162.Google Scholar
  26. Djonov, E. (2008). Children’s website structure and navigation. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education (pp. 216–236). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. Downes, T., & Fatouros, C. (1995). Learning in an electronic world: Computers in the classroom. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  28. Edwards, D. M., & Hardman, L. (1989). ‘Lost in Hyperspace’: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into practice (pp. 105–125). Oxford: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  29. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Arnold: London/New York.Google Scholar
  30. Feez, S., Iedema, R., & White, P. R. R. (2008). Media literacy (2nd ed.). Sydney: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar
  31. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Freebody, P. (2005). Does the use of online curriculum content enhance motivation, engagement and learning? The Le@rning Federation Trial Review: The Le@rning Federation. Retrieved 20 April 2012, from http://www.ndlrn.edu.au/verve/_resources/freebody2005_report__final.pdf.
  33. Garrett, J. J. (2003). The elements of user experience: User-centred design for the web. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Gauntlett, D. (2000). Web studies: A user’s guide. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 2–18). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  35. Greer, J., & Mensing, D. (2004). U.S. news web sites better, but small papers still lag. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(2), 98–112.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ‘ideology’: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurivetch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture, society and the media (pp. 56–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  38. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 1–49). Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  41. Hallin, D. C. (1997). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.), Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 57–98). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Hasan, R. (2009). Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  43. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  44. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  45. Humphrey, S. (1996). Exploring literacy in school geography (Metropolitan East disadvantaged schools program). Sydney: NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar
  46. Iyengar, S., & Reeves, R. (Eds.). (1997). Do the media govern?: Politicians, voters, and reporters in America. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Knox, J. S. (2007). Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages. Visual Communication, 6(1), 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knox, J. S. (2008). Online newspapers and TESOL classrooms: A multimodal perspective. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education (pp. 139–158). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  49. Knox, J. S. (2009a). Multimodal discourse on online newspaper home pages: A social-semiotic perspective. PhD thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  50. Knox, J. S. (2009b). Punctuating the home page: Image as language in an online newspaper. Discourse & Communication, 3(2), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knox, J. S. (2009c). Visual minimalism in hard news: Thumbnail faces on the smh online home page. Social Semiotics, 19(2), 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knox, J. S. (2010). Online newspapers: Evolving genres, evolving theory. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis, & K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applied linguistics methods: A reader (pp. 33–51). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Kok, A. K. C. (2004). Multisemiotic mediation in hypertext. In K. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 131–159). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  54. Kress, G. (2009). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 54–68). Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Oxon/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  58. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Krug, S. (2006 [2000]). Don’t make me think!: A common sense approach to web usability (2nd edn.). Berkeley: New Riders.Google Scholar
  60. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  61. Large, A., & Beheshti, J. (2000). The web as a classroom resource: Reactions from the users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(12), 1069–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Lemke, J. L. (2002a). Multimedia semiotics: Genres for science education and scientific literacy. In M. J. Schleppegrel & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 21–44). London/Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  64. Lemke, J. L. (2002b). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li, X. (2002). Web page design affects news retrieval efficiency. Newspaper Research Journal, 23(1), 38–49.Google Scholar
  66. Lin, C. A., & Jeffres, L. W. (2001). Comparing distinctions across websites of newspapers, radio stations, and television stations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69–91). South Yarra: Macmillan Publishers Australia Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  68. Machin, D., & Niblock, S. (2006). News production: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin, J. R. (2002a). Fair trade: Negotiating meaning in multimodal texts. In P. Coppock (Ed.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing (pp. 311–338). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  71. Martin, J. R. (2002b). From little things big things grow: Ecogenesis in school geography. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenco (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 243–271). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  72. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  73. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  74. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Moore, P. (1996). Reading and writing the internet. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 19(4), 317–329.Google Scholar
  76. National Geographic Society. (1996–2005). National Geographic Kids. Retrieved 8 September 2005, from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/kids.
  77. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.Google Scholar
  78. New York Hall of Science. (1999–2005). TryScience. Retrieved 20 April 2005, from http://www.tryscience.org.
  79. Nielsen, J., & Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage usability: 50 websites deconstructed. Indianapolis: New Riders.Google Scholar
  80. Painter, C. (2001). Learning through language in early childhood. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  81. Paterson, C., & Domingo, D. (Eds.). (2008). Making online news: The ethnography of new media production. New York/Bern/Berlin/Bruxelles/Frankfurt am Main/Oxford/Vienna: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  82. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II. On the horizon, 9(6), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rader, H. (2003). Information literacy: A global perspective. In A. Martin & H. Rader (Eds.), Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the 21st century (pp. 24–42). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  85. Ramapo Catskill Library. (1995–2005). Kidsclick!: Websearch for kids by librarians. Retrieved 20 April 2005, from http://www.kidsclick.org.
  86. Riffe, D., Aust, C. F., & Lacy, S. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 7(1), 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sanford Ink Corporation. (1998–2005). Sanford – a lifetime of color. Retrieved 20 April 2005, from http://www.sanford-artedventures.com.
  88. State Rail Authority of New South Wales. (2000–2002). Tracking trains. Retrieved 30 November 2002, from http://www.trackingtrains.com.au.
  89. Stenglin, M., & Djonov, E. (2010). Unpacking narrative in a hypermedia ‘artedventure’ for children. In C. R. Hoffmann (Ed.), Narrative revisited. Telling a story in the age of new media (pp. 185–212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stern, C. (2003). Measuring students’ information literacy competency. In A. Martin & H. Rader (Eds.), Information and IT literacy: Enabling learning in the 21st century (pp. 112–119). London: Facet.Google Scholar
  91. Thibault, P. (2001). Multimodality and the school science textbook. In C. T. Torsello, G. Brunetti, & N. Penello (Eds.), Corpora Testuali per Ricerca, Traduzione e Apprendimento Linguistico (pp. 293–335). Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
  92. Tosca, S. P. (2000). A pragmatics of links. Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext’00 Conference, 77–84.Google Scholar
  93. Unsworth, L. (2004). Comparing school science explanations in books and computer-based formats. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(3), 283–301.Google Scholar
  94. Utt, S. H., & Pasternack, S. (2003). Front page design: Some trends continue. Newspaper Research Journal, 24(3), 48–61.Google Scholar
  95. Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  96. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005a). Introducing social semiotics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Multimodality, genre and design. In S. Norris & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 73–94). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Whalley, P. (1990). Models of hypertext structure and learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 61–67). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yahoo! Inc. (1996–2005). Yahooligans: The web guide for kids. Retrieved 20 April 2005, from http://www.yahooligans.com.
  100. Zhao, S. (2008). From her world to our world: Making history on a children’s website. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 16(2), 44–52.Google Scholar
  101. Zhao, S. (2010). Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation (pp. 195–218). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  102. Zhao, S. (2011). Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge on web-based E-texts. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Early Childhood, Faculty of Human SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Human SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Arts and Social ScienceUniversity of Technology, SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations