Skip to main content

Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Qualitative Content Analysis designates a bundle of text analysis procedures integrating qualitative and quantitative steps of analysis, which makes it an approach of mixed methods. This contribution defines it with a background of quantitative content analysis and compares it with other social science text analysis approaches (e.g. Grounded Theory). The basic theoretical and methodological assumptions are elaborated: reference to a communication model, rule orientation of analysis, theoretical background of those content analytical rules, categories in the center of the procedure, necessity of pilot testing of categories and rules, necessity of intra- and inter-coder reliability checks. Then the two main procedures, inductive category formation and deductive category assignment, are described by step models. Finally the procedures are compared with similar techniques (e.g. codebook analysis) and strengths and weaknesses are discussed.

This text is partly based on Mayring (2010a, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis (Qualitative research methods series, Vol. 38). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, P. V. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuehlau, J. (1978). Untersucht die Inhaltsanalyse eigentlich Inhalte? Inhaltsanalyse und Bedeutung. Publizistik, 23, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuehlau, J. (1982). Die Sprachlosigkeit der Inhaltsanalyse. Linguistische Bemerkungen zu einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse. Tuebingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L. (1959). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to content analysis. In I. S. Pool (Ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp. 7–32). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser-Zikuda, M., & Mayring, P. (2003). A qualitative oriented approach to learning emotions at school. In P. Mayring & C. V. Rhoeneck (Eds.), Learning emotions: The influence of affective factors on classroom learning (pp. 103–126). Frankfurt: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, L. A., & Gleser, G. C. (1969). The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haußer, K., Mayring, P., & Strehmel, P. (1982). Praktische Probleme bei der Inhaltsanalyse offen erhobener Kognitionen, diskutiert am Beispiel der Variablen “Berufsinteresse arbeitsloser Lehrer”. In H.-D. Dann, W. Humpert, F. Krause & K.-Chr. Tennstaedt (Hrsg.), Analyse und Modifikation subjektiver Theorien von Lehrern (Forschungsberichte 43 des Zentrum 1 Bildungsforschung, Sonderforschungsbereich 23 (S. 159–S. 173) Konstanz: Universitaet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussy, W., Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2010). Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, V., Witte, H., & Witte, E. H. (1974). Die Inhaltsanalyse als Messinstrument. Methodenkritische Aspekte einiger Inhaltsanalysen von Publikumszeitschriften. Publizistik, 19, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1969). Introduction to part 1. In G. Gerbner, O. R. Holsti, K. Krippendorff, W. J. Paisley, & P. J. Stone (Eds.), The analysis of communication content (pp. 3–16). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. (Orig. 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis – Research instrument or mode of interpretation? In M. Kiegelmann (Ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology (pp. 139–148). Tuebingen: Verlag Ingeborg Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2010a). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (11th ed., first edition 1983). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2010b). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.), Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (S. 601–613). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2013). Qualitative content analysis – Theoretical foundation and basic procedures. www.qualitative-content-analysis.aau.at. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.

  • Mayring, P., Huber, G. L., Guertler, L., & Kiegelmann, M. (Eds.). (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A., Boivin, M., & Meier, M. (2008). Theme-analysis: Procedures and application for psychotherapy research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1959). The representational model and relevant research methods. In I. D. S. Pool (Ed.), Trends in content analysis (pp. 33–88). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool, I. D. S. (1959). Trends in content analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996). Science wars. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruehl, M. (1976). Vom Gegenstand der Inhaltsanalyse. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 24, 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoefer, G. (Ed.). (1980). Gottschalk-Gleser-Sprachinhaltsanalyse. Theorie und Technik. Studien zur Messung aengstlicher und aggressiver Affekte. Beltz: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigleder, S. (2008). Die strukturierende qualitative Inhaltsanalyse im Praxistest. Eine konstruktive kritische Studie zur Auswertungsmethodik von Philipp Mayring. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. J. (1997). Thematic text analysis: New agendas for analyzing text content. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts (pp. 35–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, D., Haußer, K., Mayring, P., Strehmel, P., Kandler, M., & Degenhardt, B. (1985). Psychologie der Krisenbewaeltigung. Eine Laengsschnittuntersuchung mit arbeitslosen Lehrern. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymann, A. (1973). Bedeutungsfeldanalyse. Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 25, 761–776.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Mayring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures. In: Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., Presmeg, N. (eds) Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics