Objects in Mind

  • Mattia GallottiEmail author
  • John Michael
Part of the Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality book series (SIPS, volume 4)


In this editorial introduction, we provide some background to the discussions in social ontology and social cognition which form the context for the papers collected together in this volume. In doing so, we also briefly sketch how the individual contributions fit together within this broader context.


Autism Spectrum Disorder Social Cognition Natural Kind Institutional Fact Social Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Becchio, C., C. Bertone, and U. Castiello. 2008. How the gaze of others influences object processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird, A., and E. Tobin. 2012. Natural kinds. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 Edn.), ed. E.N. Zalta.
  3. Butterfill, S., and N. Sebanz. 2011. Editorial: Joint action: What is shared? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crane, T. 1991. All the difference in the world. The Philosophical Quarterly 41: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Jaegher, Hanne, Ezequiel Di Paolo, and Shaun Gallagher. 2010. Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein, B. 2012. Review of Creations of the mind (OUP), ed. S. Margolis and S. Lawrence. Mind 121: 200–204.Google Scholar
  7. Fusaroli, R., B. Bahrami, K. Olsen, A. Roepstorff, G. Rees, C. Frith, and K. Tylén. 2012. Coming to terms: Quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological Science 23(8): 931–939.Google Scholar
  8. Gallagher, Shaun. 2001. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 83–108.Google Scholar
  9. Gallotti, M. 2012. A naturalistic argument for the irreducibility of collective intentionality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallotti, M., and C.D. Frith. 2013. Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guala, F. 2010. Infallibilism and human kinds. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40: 244–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hull, D. 1994. Historical entities and historical narratives. In Minds, machines and evolution, ed. C. Hookway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hutto, D.D. 2008. The narrative practice hypothesis: Clarifications and implications. Philosophical Explorations 11: 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knoblich, G., N. Sebanz, and S. Butterfill. 2011. Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In The psychology of learning and motivation, ed. B.H. Ross. San Diego: Elsevier publication.Google Scholar
  17. Kripke, S. 1972/1980. Naming and necessity. In Semantics of natural language, ed. D. Davidson and G. Harman. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  18. Mallon, R., E. Machery, S. Nichols, and S. Stich. 2009. Against arguments from reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79: 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Margolis, S., and S. Lawrence (eds.). 2007. Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Menary, R. (ed.). 2010. The extended mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Michael, J., W. Christensen, and S. Overgaard. 2013. Mindreading as social expertise. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0295-z.Google Scholar
  22. Millikan, R. 1984. Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Obhi, S.S., and N. Sebanz (ed.). 2011. Moving together: Towards understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Experimental Brain Research 211: 329–336.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of meaning. In Language, mind, and knowledge, ed. K. Gunderson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reddy, V. 2012. A gaze at grips with me. In Joint attention: new developments in psychology, philosophy of mind and social neuroscience, ed. A. Seemans. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Samson, D., I.A. Apperly, J.J. Braithwaite, B.J. Andrews, and S.E. Bodley Scott. 2010. Seeing it their way: What other people see is calculated by low-level and early acting processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36: 1255–1266.Google Scholar
  27. Schmitz, M., B. Kobow, and H.B. Schmid (eds.). 2013. The background of social reality. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Searle, J.R. 2007. Social ontology and the philosophy of society. In Creations of the mind, ed. S. Margolis and S. Lawrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Searle, J.R. 2010. Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sterelny, K., and P.E. Griffiths. 1999. Sex and death: An introduction to the philosophy of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thomasson, A.L. 2003. Realism and human kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3: 580–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomasson, A.L. 2007. Artifacts and human concepts. In Creations of the mind, ed. S. Margolis and S. Lawrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tomasello, M., M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, and H. Moll. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 28: 675–735.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Advanced StudyUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations