Flow

  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
  • Sami Abuhamdeh
  • Jeanne Nakamura
Chapter

Abstract

What makes people want to go on with the effort required from life? Every epistemology of behavior must sooner or later cope with this basic question. The question is not so mysterious for nonhuman organisms, which presumably have built-in genetic programs instructing them to live as long as their physical machinery is able to function. But our species has a choice: With the development of consciousness, we have the ability to second-guess and occasionally override the instructions coded in our chromosomes. This evolutionary development has added a great deal of flexibility to the human repertoire of behaviors. But the freedom gained has its downside—too many possibilities can have a paralyzing effect on action (Schwartz 2000). Among the options we are able to entertain is that of ending our lives; thus, as the existential philosophers remarked, the question of why one should not commit suicide is fundamental to the understanding of human life.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. (1944). Creative evolution. New York: The Modern Library (Original published in 1931).Google Scholar
  3. Berlyne, D. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Bühler, C. (1930). Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes [The mental development of children]. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  5. Conti, R. (2001). Time flies: Investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. Journal of Personality, 69, 1, 1–26.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity! Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, L. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. In R. Ames, C. Ames. (Eds.). Research on motivation in education; goals and cognitions (pp. 45–71). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J., (1999). Emerging goals and the self-regulation of behavior. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.). Advances in social cognition. Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation (Vol. 12, pp. 107–118) Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.Google Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deci. E., & Ryan. R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elliot, A. J., Faler, J., McGregor, Η. Α., Campbell, W. Κ., Sedikides, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Competence valuation as a strategic intrinsic motivation process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 780–794.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, C. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 273–288.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, W. J. (1990). About time: inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Glisky, M. L., Tataiyn, D. J., Tobias, Β. Α., Kihlstrom, J. F., & McConkey, Κ. M. (1991). Absorption, openness to experience, and hypnotizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 263–272.Google Scholar
  22. Greenwald, A. (1982). Ego task analysis: An integration of research on ego-involvement and self-awareness. In A. H. Hastorf, A. M. Isen (Eds.). Cognitive social psychology (pp. 109–147). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Groos, K. (1901). The play of man. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  24. Harackicwiz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1352–1363.Google Scholar
  25. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The joint effects of target and purpose goals on intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(7), 673–689.Google Scholar
  26. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Manderlink, G. (1984). Λ process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 531–551.Google Scholar
  27. Harackiewicz, J. M., Sansone, C., & Manderlink, G. (1985). Competence, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A process analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 493–508.Google Scholar
  28. Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: toward a developmental model. Human Development, 2(1), 34–64.Google Scholar
  29. Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drive and the CNS. Psychology Review, 62, 243–252.Google Scholar
  30. Hunt, J. (1965). Intrinsic motivation and its role in development. In Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol 12. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 189–282.Google Scholar
  31. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  32. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.Google Scholar
  33. Levin, R., & St Fireman, G. (2001). The relation of fantasy proneness, psychological absorption, and imaginative involvement to nightmare prevalence and nightmare distress. Imagination Cognitive Personality, 21(2), 111–129.Google Scholar
  34. Mead, G. H. (1970). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original published in 1934).Google Scholar
  35. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52.Google Scholar
  36. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2001). Catalytic creativity: The case of Linus Pauling. American Psychologist, 56(4), 337–341.Google Scholar
  37. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In: C. R. Snyder, S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Piager, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  39. Raihuiide, K. (1989). The context of optimal experience: an exploratory model of the family. New Ideas in Psychology, 7(1), 91–97.Google Scholar
  40. Reser, J. P., & Scherl, L. M. (1988). Clear and unambiguous feedback: A transactional and motivational analysis of environmental challenge and self-encounter. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8(4), 269–286.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.Google Scholar
  42. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don’t feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In L. L. Maitin, A. Tesser. (Eds.). Striving and feeling: interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 203–228). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Sansone, C., Sachau, D. Α., & Weir, C. (1989). Effects of instruction on intrinsic interest: The importance of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 819–829.Google Scholar
  44. Schmuck, P., & Sheldon, K. M. (Eds.). (2001). Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
  45. Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist 55(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
  46. Tellegen, Α., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277.Google Scholar
  47. Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6(1), 94–102.Google Scholar
  48. Weber, M. J. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  49. White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.Google Scholar
  50. Wild, T. C., Kuiken, D., & Schopflocher, D. (1995). The role of absorption in experiential involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 569–579.Google Scholar
  51. Wong, M. (2000). The relations among causality orientations, academic experience, academic performance, and academic commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 315–326.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
    • 1
  • Sami Abuhamdeh
    • 3
  • Jeanne Nakamura
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Behavioral & Organizational ScienceClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA
  2. 2.The University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyIstanbul Şehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations