Skip to main content

The Artistic Personality: A Systems Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Systems Model of Creativity

Abstract

When considering the relationship between personality and a given occupation or vocation, we usually assume the relationship remains invariant over time. One might assume, for instance, that the temperament and traits that distinguished military leaders in the 5th century BCE would be the same traits as those belonging to warriors in the Middle Ages, or in our own times. Yet the changes throughout history in the social and economic status of soldiers, and in the technology of warfare, suggest that the personalities of men (or women) attracted to a military career will be quite different in each period.

Why do people think artists are special? It’s just another job.

—Andy Wathol (1975, p. 178)

Reproduced with permission of Copyright © 2004 by the American Psychological Association.

C. Hoare (Ed.) Handbook of Adult Development and Learning. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, 31–42.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For practical reasons, we limit out discussion of the domain of art to Western painting.

  2. 2.

    Clearly, the two dimensions of the classification system are not completely independent. The more “painterly” a style is, for example, the less “representational” it is likely to be.

  3. 3.

    In the study, Ludwig also classified the works of certain artists as “symbolic”. Because we do not use this classification category in the present chapter, Ludwig’s findings relating to symbolic styles are not discussed here.

  4. 4.

    Also referred to, less favorably, as the “post-Warholian nightmare”.

References

  • Barron, F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K., & Cattell, H. (1972). Personality characteristics of female psychology, science and art majors. Psychological Reports, 31, 807–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: an empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 91–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J. W., & Kahn, S. P. (1984). Talent and achievement (Report). Chicago: Spencer and MacArthur Foundations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupchik, G. C. (1974). An experimental investigation of perceptual and stylistic dimensions of paintings suggested by art history. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics (pp. 235–257). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. (1998). After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, S. Z., & Marchand, P. (1983). Artistic style and personality in creative painters. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(2), 139–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1993). Finding the muse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1978). Primary and secondary process in waking and in altered states of consciousness. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, U. J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, C. (1940). Towards a newer Laocoon. Partisan Review, 3, 296–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: a psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143–169). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmelman, M. (1998). Portraits: talking with artists at the met, the modern, the louvre, and elsewhere. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, G. (1962). The shape of time. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, M., & Saltz, E. (1984). Cognitive styles as predictors of artistic styles. Journal of Personality, 52(1), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucie-Smith, E. (1999). Lives of the great twentieth century artists. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, A. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, L., & Storr, R. (1987). Chuck close. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse. New York: Basic Boob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, H. (1972). The de-definition of art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuphor, M. (1961). Abstract painting: 50 years of accomplishment, from Kandinsky to the present (Chevalier H, Trans.). New York: Harry Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3(2), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C. R. (1981). SoHo: the artist in the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. (1987). Jackson Pollock: A biography. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. J Psychol, 36, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In C. W. Taylor &. F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity (pp. 217–227). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, A. (1988). Solitude: A return to the self. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasari, G. (1959). Lives of the artists, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, (Original work published 1550).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollard, A. (1986). Degas, an intimate portrait. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. M., Koestner, R., & Hum, A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive style in autobiographies of creative achievers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(2), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolrffin, H. (1929). Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art (7th rev ed.). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abuhamdeh, S., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Artistic Personality: A Systems Perspective. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics