Advertisement

Moral Aspects of Professions and Professional Practice

  • Gerhard MinnameierEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Professions are usually defined as occupations that require expert training at an academic level and are built on a set of standards that have to be met by members of a given profession. These standards not only apply to certain kinds of expert knowledge that are expected of professionals but also ethical standards in relation to the usage of this expert knowledge. However, apart from possible failures to meet these requirements, professionals, like anybody else, normally do not always act according to one guideline alone. Their actions are rather tuned to different situational cues. The article explores what kind of situations can be distinguished on a theoretical basis, how far such differentiations are acceptable or even appropriate and where they are not, and how situational adaptation works. The paper ends with deriving implications for professional practice and vocational education and training.

Keywords

Professional ethics Business ethics Moral development Developmental stages Situation specificity Moral functioning Moral motivation 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (1991). The order of professionalization. Work and Occupations, 18, 355–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone – especially ourselves. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, K. (1997). Die Zukunft der Beruflichkeit. In M. Liedtke (Ed.), Berufliche Bildung: Geschichte, Gegenwart, Zukunft (pp. 351–369). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, K. (1999). Wirtschaftserziehung und Moralerziehung – ein Widerspruch in sich? Zur Kritik der Kohlbergschen Moralentwicklungstheorie. Pädagogische Rundschau, 53, 9–28.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, K. (2008). Moral judgment in economic situations. In F. K. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved – Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 359–370). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, K., & Parche-Kawik, K. (2004). Das Mäntelchen im Wind? Zur Domänespezifität moralischen Urteilens. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 50, 244–265.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, K., Dransfeld, A., Minnameier, G., & Wuttke, E. (2002). Autonomy in heterogeneity? Development of moral judgement behaviour during business education. In K. Beck (Ed.), Teaching-learning processes in vocational education: Foundations of modern training programmes (pp. 87–119). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, K., Heinrichs, K., Minnameier, G., & Parche-Kawik, K. (1999). Homogeneity of moral judgement? Apprentices solving business conflicts. Journal of Moral Education, 28, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blasi, A. (1995). Moral understanding and the moral personality: The process of moral integration. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 229–253). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  15. Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity (pp. 335–347). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Bragues, G. (2005). Business is one thing, ethics is another: Revisiting Bernard Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180, 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Church, B., Gaa, J. C., Nainar, S. M. K., & Shehata, M. M. (2005). Experimental evidence relating to the person-situation interactionist model of ethical decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2011). Markets and morality. Cato Journal, 31, 1–25.Google Scholar
  20. Clarke, J., & Holt, R. (2010). Reflective judgement: Understanding entrepreneurship as ethical practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Vol. I. Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 477–496.Google Scholar
  24. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2008). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Forsythe, R. L., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15, 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2008). Towards a new paradigm of moral personhood. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2009). Reconciling the self and morality: An empirical model of moral centrality development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1669–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). A practical logic of cognitive systems: Vol. 2. The reach of abduction – Insight and trial. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannafey, F. T. (2003). Entrepreneurship and ethics: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48, 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis: A response to Joakim Sandberg. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris, J. D., Sapienza, H. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2009). Ethics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayek, F. A. V. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: Vol. 2. The mirage of social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Heinrichs, K., Minnameier, G., & Beck, K. (2014). Ethical and moral considerations on entrepreneurship education. In S. Weber, F. K. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, M. Fretschner & S. Trost (Eds.), Becoming an entrepreneur (pp. 197–215). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Homann, K. (2002). Vorteile und Anreize. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  43. Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  47. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 52–73). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model. Psychological Review, 112, 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kutscha, G. (2008). Beruflichkeit als regulatives Prinzip flexibler Kompetenzentwicklung – Thesen aus berufsbildungstheoretischer Sicht. bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik – online, 14, 1–11.Google Scholar
  51. Lapsley, D. K. (2006). Moral stage theory. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 37–66). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  52. Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maitland, I. (2002). The human face of self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mankiw, N. G. (2011). Principles of microeconomics (6th ed.). Mason: South-Western.Google Scholar
  55. Minnameier, G. (2000). Strukturgenese moralischen Denkens: Eine Rekonstruktion der Piagetschen Entwicklungslogik und ihre moraltheoretischen Folgen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  56. Minnameier, G. (2001). A new “stairway to moral heaven”? A systematic reconstruction of stages of moral thinking based on a Piagetian “logic” of cognitive development. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Minnameier, G. (2004a). Peirce-suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Minnameier, G. (2004b). Ethics and economics, friends or foes? An educational debate. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minnameier, G. (2005). Developmental progress in ancient Greek ethics. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Minnameier, G. (2008). Education for business ethics – Options and restrictions from a systematic point of view. In F. K. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved – Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 371–381). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Minnameier, G. (2009). Measuring moral progress: A neo-Kohlbergian approach and two case studies. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Minnameier, G. (2010a). Entwicklung moralischen Denkens aus einer neo-kohlbergschen Perspektive. In B. Latzko & T. Malti (Eds.), Moralentwicklung und – erziehung in Kindheit und Adoleszenz (pp. S. 47–67). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  63. Minnameier, G. (2010b). The problem of moral motivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon – Killing two birds with one stone. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Minnameier, G. (2010c). The logicality of abduction, deduction, and induction. In M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen, & H. Rydenfelt (Eds.), Ideas in action: Procedures of the applying Peirce conference (pp. 239–251). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.Google Scholar
  65. Minnameier, G. (2011). Situationsspezifität moralischen Denkens und Handelns – Befunde, Erklärungen und didaktische Orientierungen. In O. Zlatikin-Troitschanskaia (Ed.), Stationen empirischer Bildungsforschung – Traditionslinien und Perspektiven (pp. 107–122). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Minnameier, G. (2013). Deontic and responsibility judgments: An inferential analysis. In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser & T. Lovat (Eds.), Handbook of moral motivation: What makes people act morally right? Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Minnameier, G., & Schmidt, S. (2013). Situational moral adjustment and the happy victimizer. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nunner-Winkler, G. (2007). Development of moral motivation from childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nunner-Winkler, G., & Sodian, B. (1988). Children’s understanding of moral emotions. Child Development, 59, 1323–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nyström, S. (2009). The dynamics of professional identity formation: Graduates transition from higher education to working life. Vocations and Learning, 2, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 536–547). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Peirce, C. S. (1903/1934). Lectures on pragmatism. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 11–131). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rest, J. R. (1983). Morality. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 556–629). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Rest, J. R. (1984). The major components of morality. In W. M. Kurtinez & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 24–38). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  78. Ross, W. T., Jr., & Robertson, D. C. (2000). Lying: The impact of decision context. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 409–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schminke, M., & Priesemuth, M. (2012). Behavioral business ethics: Taking context seriously. In D. De Cremer & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field (pp. 47–79). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision-making. Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tomlinson, P. (1986). Kohlberg’s moral psychology: Any advance on the present stage? In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg – Consensus and controversy: Essay in honour of Lawrence Kohlberg (pp. 107–121). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  85. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  86. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Valentine, S., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issues importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vanberg, V. J. (2001). The constitution of markets: Essays in political economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & Society, 35, 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Ethics and Business EducationGoethe UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations