Thirsty Cities: The Urban Water Footprint and the Peri-urban Interface, a Four City Case Study from West Africa

Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 71)

Abstract

Urbanisation is increasingly affecting inter-sectoral water allocations. This paper looks beyond physical water transfers at the larger urban water footprint and how much it is affecting the urban periphery in the case of four cities in West Africa (Accra, Kumasi, Tamale and Ouagadougou). The results showed a water footprint variation between 892 and 1,280 m3/capita/year for these four cities based on actual and virtual water flows. The virtual flow through the food chain is outscoring actual domestic water consumption by a factor of 40–60 and using water resources far beyond the peri-urban interphase. However, the picture is changing with consideration of the grey water footprint. Due to limited wastewater treatment, peri-urban areas are the hot spots of water pollution diminishing their fresh water resources. The fresh water affected by the urban return flow easily doubles the overall urban water footprint. Improved on-site sanitation, especially with water saving and urine and excreta separating toilets would have a significant positive impact on the quality and quantity of the urban water footprint given that actual water availability is limiting large scale sewer connections for final wastewater treatment.

Keywords

Virtual water Wastewater Water footprint West Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture supported our data collection in Burkina Faso, while the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in Canada supported parts of the fieldwork in Ghana. We are also indebted to Michael Fink and Sophie Graefe who contributed to an earlier version of this paper and the Water, Land & Ecosystems Research Program of the CGIAR.

References

  1. Chambers N, Simmons C, Wackernagel M (2000) Sharing nature’s interest: ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2004) Water footprints of nations. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Drechsel P, Graefe S, Fink M (2007) Rural–urban food, nutrient and virtual water flows in selected West African cities. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, p 35 (IWMI Research Report Series 115)Google Scholar
  4. Erni M (2007) Modelling urban water flows: an insight into current and future water availability and pollution of a fast growing city. Case Study of Kumasi, Ghana. MSc thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Erni M, Dreschel P, Bader H-P, Scheidegger R, Zurbrügg C, Kipfer R (2010) Bad for the environment, good for the farmer? Urban sanitation and nutrient flows. Irrig Drain Syst 24(1–2):113–125 (Special issue on wastewater reuse)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erni M, Bader H-P, Drechsel P, Scheidegger R, Zurbrügg C, Kipfer R (2011) Urban water and nutrient flows in Kumasi. Ghana Urban Water J 8(3):135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghana Statistical Services (2002) 2000 Population and housing census; summary report of final results, Accra, GhanaGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2007) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour Manag 21:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual. Earthscan, London. http://www.waterfootprint.org/downloads/TheWaterFootprintAssessmentManual.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
  10. Johnson MP (2001) Environmental impacts of urban sprawl—a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ Plann 33:717–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lydecker M, Drechsel P (2010) Urban agriculture and sanitation services in Accra, Ghana: the overlooked contribution. Int J Agric Sustain 8(1):94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Molle F, Berkoff J (2009) Cities versus agriculture: a review of intersectoral water re-allocation. Nat Resour Forum 33(1):6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Montangero A, Belevi H (2007) Assessing nutrient flows in septic tanks by eliciting expert judgment: a promising method in the context of developing countries. Water Res 41:1052–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perret S (2006) Climate change and African agriculture. Policy note 36, August 2006, CEEPA, University of Pretoria. www.ceepa.co.za/docs/POLICY%20NOTE%2036.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2013
  15. Seidl M, Gnaboa Z, Mouchel JM (2005) Socio-cultural aspects of individual sanitation in West African cities. AGUA 2005, Cali, Colombia, 31 Oct–4 Nov 2005. http://bvs.per.paho.org/texcom/cd050704/seidl.pdf. Accessed 31 Sept 2013
  16. Smith LC, Alderman H, Aduayom D (2006) Food insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa: new estimates from household expenditure surveys. IFPRI research report 146. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA, pp 122Google Scholar
  17. UNESCO-IHE (2006) UNESCO water portal weekly update no 145: water footprints. www.unesco.org/water/news/newsletter/145.shtml. Accessed 31 Sept 2013
  18. Van Rooijen DJ, Turral H, Biggs TW (2005) Sponge city: water balance of mega-city water use and wastewater use in Hyderabad, India. Irrig Drain 54:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. WHO (2006) Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and grey water: wastewater use in agriculture (vol 2). World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pay Drechsel
    • 1
  • Olufunke O. Cofie
    • 2
  • Philip Amoah
    • 3
  1. 1.International Water Management InstituteColomboSri Lanka
  2. 2.Challenge Program for Water and FoodOuagadougouBurkina Faso
  3. 3.International Water Management InstituteAccraGhana

Personalised recommendations