Advertisement

Health Care and Human Vulnerability: A Confucian Perspective

  • Jonathan Keung Lap ChanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Global Bioethics book series (AGBIO, volume 2)

Abstract

It is widely accepted that we bear special responsibilities toward those who are vulnerable, especially those who are vulnerable to our actions and choices. However, exactly who falls under the category of the vulnerable? What special responsibilities do we have toward them, and on what grounds?

Keywords

Moral Responsibility Distributive Justice Moral Obligation Moral Intuition Universal Declaration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1985. Nicomachean Ethics, 116–127. Trans: T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hacket.Google Scholar
  2. Confucius. 1885. The sacred books of China. The texts of Confucianism, 364. Trans: J. Legge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Confucius. 1979. The analects. Trans: D. C. Lau. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fan, R. 2010. Reconstructionist confucianism: Rethinking morality after the west, 47–48. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gooden, R. E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities, 110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, D., and R. Ames. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  7. MacIntyre, A. 1988. Whose justice? Which rationality?, 1–2. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  8. Mencius. 2003. Mencius: A bilingual edition. Trans: D. C. Lau. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach, 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism, 181, 188. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom, 175. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Sen, A. 2000. The standard of living. In The standard of living: The Tanner lectures on human values, eds. A. Sen, J. Muellbauer, K. Kanbur, K. Hart, and B. Williams, 36, 140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sen, A. 2002. Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sen, A. 2004. Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4): 332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration of bioethics and human rights. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied EthicsHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations