The Social Construction and Resistance of Menstruation as a Public Spectacle

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to develop a feminist theoretical understanding of menstruation. I use the perspectives of three leading male theorists—Erving Goffman, Karl Marx, and Michel Foucault—to understand this phenomenon, while keeping a feminist focus on how their works illuminate this profoundly female predicament. I first use Goffman’s concept of stigma in order to establish the micro-level, social psychological aspects of negative portrayals of menstruation and their internalization by women. I next use Foucault’s theory on discourses to understand how stigmas are social constructions that change over historical time, and I compare premodern and modern discourses on menstruation. Here I contend that menstrual discourses shift from premodern superstitious and religious understandings, to the medicalization of menstruation and a focus on hygiene, with the rise of modern sciences in the late nineteenth century. Third, I use Marx’s understanding of capitalism to discuss how the emergence of the personal care industry utilized new medical discourses for their own commercial interests by tracing the industrialization and commoditization of feminine hygiene products. Finally, I explore how feminists today are mobilizing to resist all three of these sociohistorical developments—the stigmatization of menstruation, the medicalization of menstrual discourses surrounding this stigma, and the commercialization of menstruation.

Keywords

Menstruation Menarche Patriarchy Feminist movements Sociological theory Social psychology Erving goffman Menstrual stigma Shame Secrecy Michel foucault Power and discourse Panopticon Male gaze Self-policing Self-objectification Karl Marx Capitalism Menstrual commodification Commercialization Femcare industry Victorian era Menstrual taboo Industrialization Cult of domesticity Menstrual medicalization Menstrual advertising Radical menarchists Third wave menstrual activism Alternative feminine hygiene products 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baca Zinn, M., & Eitzen, S. (1993). Diversity in families. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Bartky, S. L. (1997). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 92–111). New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brumberg, J. J. (1998). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. De Beauvior, S. (1952). The second sex (trans: H. M. Parshley). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. Docherty, S. (2010). Smear it on your face, rub it on your body, it’s time to start a menstrual party. Critical Theory and Social Justice Journal of Undergraduate Research Occidental College, Spring (1), 2–25.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life (trans: K. E. Fields). New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Erchull, M. (2011, May 21). Distancing through objectification? Depictions of women’s bodies in menstrual product advertisements. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0004-7.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes, G. B., Adam-Curtis, L., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003).The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women’s and men’s perceptions of the menstruating woman. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 27, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison (trans: A. Sheridan). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Green, L. (2013). Period hatin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1×5xvHmhqo&feature=youtube. Accessed 25 Jan 2013.
  13. Houppert, K. (1999). The curse confronting the last unmentionable taboo: Menstruation. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  14. Johnston-Robledo, I., & Chrisler, J. C. (2011, July 31). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as social stigma. Sex Roles, 68, 9–18. doi:10.10007/s11199-011-0052-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kissling, E. (2006). Capitalizing on the curse: The business of menstruation. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Kowalski, R. M., & Chapple, T. 2000. The social stigma of menstruation: Fact or fiction? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lander, L. (1988). Images of bleeding: Menstruation as Ideology. New York: Orlando Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, J. (1994). Menarche and the (Hetero) sexualization of the female body. Gender and Society, 8(3), 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacDonald, S. M. (2007). Leaky performances: The transformative potential of menstrual leaks. Women Studies in Communications, Fall(30.3), 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mann, S. (2012). Doing feminist theory: From modernity to postmodernity. New York: Oxford University Press.Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Merskin, D. (1999). Adolescence, advertising, and the ideology of menstruation. Sex Roles, 40(11/12), 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul, P. (2003). http://mum.org/armenpau.htm. Accessed 17 Oct 2011.
  23. Ramazanoglu, C. (Ed.). (1993). Up against foucault: Explorations of some tensions between foucault and feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Rich, A. (1995). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 28, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts, T.-A., & Waters, P. L. (2004). Self-objectification and that ‘not so fresh feeling’: Feminist therapeutic interventions for healthy female embodiment. Women & Therapy, 27(3/4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts, T.-A., Goldenberg, J., Power, C., & Pyszcynski, T. (2002). ‘Feminine protection’: The effects of menstruation on attitudes toward women. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 26, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simes, M. R., & Berg, D. H. (2001). Surreptitious learning: Menarche and menstrual product advertisements. Health Care for Women International, 22, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stein, E., & Kim, S. (2009). Flow: The cultural story of menstruation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stubbs, M., & Costos, D. (2004). Negative attitudes toward menstruation: Implications for disconnection within girls and between women. Woman & Therapy, 27(3/4), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tiegs, V. (2008). http://menstrala.blogspot.com. Accessed 17 Oct 2011. http://www.lunette.com/index.php?id=40. Accessed 16 Nov 2012.
  32. Welter, B. (1973). The cult of true womanhood: 1820–1860. In M. Gordon (Ed.), The American family in socio-historical perspective (pp. 224–250). New York: St Martins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southeastern Louisiana UniversityHammondUSA

Personalised recommendations