Symmetry Breaking in Open Quantum Nonlinear Systems

  • Almas F. Sadreev
  • Evgeny N. Bulgakov
  • Dmitrii N. Maksimov
  • Konstantin N. Pichugin
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

We consider symmetry breaking in the simplest open quantum nonlinear systems such as dimer and plaquette of four nonlinear sites coupled with linear tight-binding wires. If the solution is stationary, the total Hilbert space can be projected into the inner states of the dimer or plaquette by the Feshbach procedure. That derives a nonlinear analogue of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with injected wave as a source. By neglecting radiation shifts the Lippmann-Scwinger equation limits to the coupled mode theory equations widely used in optics. We show three scenarios for the transmission through the nonlinear quantum systems. The first one inherits the linear case and preserves the symmetry. In the second scenario the symmetry is broken because of different intensities at the dimer sites. In the third scenario the intensities at the sites are equaled but phases of complex wave function are different. That results in a vortical power flow between the nonlinear sites similar to the DC Josephson current. We show how the phenomenon of symmetry breaking can used for switching of outputs symmetrically coupled to the quantum dimer . Also we reveal a domain in the parameter space where none of stationary solutions exist. As a result injection of a monochromatic symmetric wave gives rise to emission of nonsymmetric satellite waves with energies different from the energy of the incident wave. Thus, the response exhibits non monochromatic behavior.

Keywords

Photonic Crystal Symmetry Breaking Couple Mode Theory Propagation Band Antisymmetric Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Akhmediev NN (1982) Novel class of nonlinear surface waves: asymmetric modes in a symmetric layered structure. Sov Phys JETP 56:299Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eilbeck JC, Lomdahl PS, Scott AC (1985) The discrete self-trapping equation. Physica 16D:318MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsironis GP, Kenkre VM (1988) Initial condition effects in the evolution of nonlinear dimer. Phys Lett A 127:209CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kenkre VM, Wu H-L (1989) Interplay of quantum phases and non-linearity in the non-adiabatic dimer. Phys Lett A 135:120CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kenkre VM, Kuś M (1994) Bifurcations in the quantum nonlinear dimer. Phys Rev B 49:5956CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernstein LJ (1991) Nonlinear self-trapping in a quantum dimer. Physica D 53:240CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsironis GP, Deering WD, Molina MI (1993) Applications of self-trapping in optically coupled devices. Physica D 68:135CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Molina MI (1999) Self-trapping on a generalized nonlinear tetrahedron. Mod Phys Lett 13:225CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brazhnyi VA, Malomed BA (2011) Spontaneous symmetry breaking in Schrodinger lattices with two nonlinear sites. Phys Rev A 83:053844CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang C, Theocharis G, Kevrekidis PG, Whitaker N, Law KJH, Frantzeskakis DJ, Malomed BA (2009) Two-dimensional paradigm for symmetry breaking: the nonlinear Schrodinger equation with a four-well potential. Phys Rev E 80:046611CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Law KJH, Qiao L, Kevrekidis PG, Kevrekidis IG (2008) Stability of quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate confined in an optical lattice. Phys Rev A 77:053612CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yabuzaki T, Okamoto T, Kitano M, Ogawa T (1984) Optical bistability with symmetry breaking. Phys Rev A 29:1964CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otsuka K, Ikeda K (1987) Hierarchical multistability and cooperative flip-flop operation in a bistable optical system with distributed nonlinear elements. Opt Lett 12:599CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haelterman M, Mandel P (1990) Pitchfork bifurcation using a two-beam nonlinear Fabry-Perot interferometer: an analytical study. Opt Lett 15:1412CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Babushkin IV, Logvin YuA, Loǐko NA (1998) Symmetry breaking in optical dynamics of two bistable thin films. Quantum Electron 28:104CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kevrekidis PG, Chen Zh, Malomed BA, Frantzeskakis DJ, Weinstein MI (2005) Spontaneous symmetry breaking in photonic lattices: theory and experiment. Phys Lett A 340:275CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shwartz S, Weil R, Segev M, Lakin E, Zolotoyabko E, Menon VM, Forrest SR, El-Hanany U (2006) Light-induced symmetry breaking and related giant enhancement of nonlinear properties in CdZnTe: V crystals. Opt Express 14:9385CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maes B, Soljaĉić M, Joannopoulos JD, Bienstman P, Baets R, Gorza S-P, Haelterman M (2006) Switching through symmetry breaking in coupled nonlinear micro-cavities. Opt Express 14:10678CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maes B, Bienstman P, Baets R (2008) Symmetry breaking with coupled Fano resonances. Opt Express 16:3069CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aydin K, Pryce IM, Atwater HA (2010) Symmetry breaking and strong coupling in planar optical metamaterials. Opt Express 18:13407CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li R, Lv F, Lu Li, Xu Z (2011) Symmetry breaking and manipulation of nonlinear optical modes in an asymmetric double-channel waveguide. Phys Rev A 84:033850CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bulgakov EN, Pichugin KN, Sadreev AF (2011) Symmetry breaking for transmission in a photonic waveguide coupled with two off-channel nonlinear defects. Phys Rev B 83:045109; Light induced Josephson like current between two coupled nonlinear cavities coupled with a symmetrically positioned photonic crystal waveguide. J Phys Cond Mat 23:065304Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bulgakov EN, Sadreev AF (2011) Symmetry breaking in a T-shaped photonic waveguide coupled with two identical nonlinear cavities. Phys Rev B 84:155304CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maier AA (1982) Optical transistors and bistable devices utilizing nonlinear transmission of light in systems with undirectional coupled waves. Sov J Quantum Electron 12:1490CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gibbs HM (1985) Optical bistability: controlling light with light. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feshbach H (1958) Unified theory of nuclear reactions. Ann Phys (NY) 5:357; Feshbach H (1962) Unified theory of nuclear reactions, II. Ann Phys (NY) 19:287Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahaux C, Weidenmuller HA (1969) Shell model approach in nuclear reactions. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rotter I (1991) A continuum shell model for the open quantum mechanical nuclear system. Rep Prog Phys 54:635CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Datta S (1995) Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dittes F-M (2000) The decay of quantum systems with a small number of open channels. Phys Rep 339:215CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sadreev AF, Rotter I (2003) S-matrix theory for transmission through billiards in tight-binding approach. J Phys A Math Gen 36:11413CrossRefMATHMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haus HA (1984) Waves and fields in optoelectronics. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manolatou C, Khan MJ, Fan S, Villeneuve PR, Haus HA, Joannopoulos JD (1999) Coupling of modes analysis of resonant channel add/Drop filters. IEEE J Quantum Electron 35:1322CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fan S, Suh W, Joannopoulos JD (2003) Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators. J Opt Soc Am A 20:569CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suh W, Wang Z, Fan S (2004) Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in lossless multimode cavities. IEEE J Quantum Electron 40:1511CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    von Neumann J, Wigner E (1929) Ubermerkwuridge diskrete Eigenwerte. Phys Z 30:465MATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bulgakov EN, Sadreev AF (2008) Bound states in the continuum in photonic waveguides inspired by defects. Phys Rev B 78:075105CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moiseyev N (2009) Suppression of Feshbach resonance widths in two-dimensional waveguides and quantum dots: a lower bound for the number of bound states in the continuum. Phys Rev Lett 102:167404CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bulgakov EN, Sadreev AF (2011) Formation of bound states in the continuum for a quantum dot with variable width. Phys Rev B 83:235321CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bulgakov EN, Sadreev AF (2009) Resonance induced by a bound state in the continuum in a two-level nonlinear Fano-Anderson model. Phys Rev B 80:115308CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bulgakov EN, Sadreev AF (2010) Bound states in photonic Fabry-Perot resonator with nonlinear off-channel defects. Phys Rev B 81:115128CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Molina MI, Miroshnichenko AE, Kivshar YuS (2012) Surface bound states in the continuum. Phys Rev Lett 108:070401CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Joannopoulos J, Johnson SG, Winn JN, Meade RD (2008) Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    New GHC, Ward JF (1967) Optical third-harmonic generation in gases. Phys Rev Lett 19:556CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Litchinitser NM, McKinstrie CJ, de Sterke CM, Agrawal GP (2001) Spatiotemporal instabilities in nonlinear bulk media with Bragg gratings. J Opt Soc Am B 18:45CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cowan AR, Young JF (2003) Optical bistability involving photonic crystal microcavities and Fano line shapes. Phys Rev E 68:046606CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dhar A, Maji M, Mishra T, Pai RV, Mukerjee S, Paramekanti A (2012) Bose-Hubbard model in a strong effective magnetic field: emergence of a chiral Mott insulator ground state. Phys Rev A 85:041602(R)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Almas F. Sadreev
    • 1
  • Evgeny N. Bulgakov
    • 1
  • Dmitrii N. Maksimov
    • 1
  • Konstantin N. Pichugin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations