Delivery Systems for Self Healing Protective Coatings

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 233)

Abstract

The commercial uptake of self healing coating technology depends on the successful incorporation of healing mechanisms into the coating. Healing mechanisms for the polymer, which makes up the matrix of the coating, is fundamentally different to that for the delivery of inhibitors. In the former case it will depend largely on reversible bond formation which allows either triggered or autonomic flow of the polymer into a defect. On the other hand, the inhibitor is more likely to be encapsulated in order to isolate it from the polymer matrix thus saving it for triggered release in response to damage. This chapter provides an overview of self healing coatings, looking at polymer healing mechanism followed by a more detailed examination of encapsulation delivery systems.

Keywords

Self healing coatings Self healing materials Encapsulation Corrosion inhibitors 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    S.R. White et al., Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 409(6822), 794–797 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.L. Zheludkevich, in Self-Healing Materials, ed. by S.K. Ghosh. Self-Healing Anticorrosion Coatings (Wiley-VCH, 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.E. Hughes, I.S. Cole, T.M. Muster, R.J. Varley, Combining green and self healing for a new generation of coatings for metal protection. Nat. Asia Mater. 2(4), 143–151 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.L. Zheludevich, D. Raps, A.C. Bastos, T. Hack, M.G.S. Ferreira, Self Healing Coatings with Multiple Level Protection Based on Active Nanoparticles, in NANOSPAIN-2008 (Braga, Portugal, 2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Zheludkevich, M. Ferreira, S. Poznyak, in Self-Healing Corrosion Protection Coatings with Nanocontainers of Corrosion Inhibitors. ed by V.E. Borisenko, S.V. Gaponenko, V.S. Gurin. Physics, Chemistry and Application of Nanostructures: Reviews and Short Notes (2007), pp. 380–383Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Tedim et al., Enhancement of active corrosion protection via combination of inhibitor-loaded nanocontainers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2(5), 1528–1535 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.K. Tedim, A.N. Salak, F. Montemor, D. Snihirova, M. Pilz, M.L. Zheludkevich, M.G.S. Ferreira, Zn–Al layered double hydroxides as chloride nanotraps in active protective coatings. Corros. Sci. 55, 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Stimpfling, F. Leroux, H. Hintze-Bruening, Organo-modified layered double hydroxide in coating formulation to protect AA2024 from corrosion. Colloids Surf. A 458, 147–154 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Krzak, Z. Tabor, P. Nowak, P. Warszyński, A. Karatzas, I.A. Kartsonakis, G.C. Kordas, Water diffusion in polymer coatings containing water-trapping particles. Part 2 experimental verification of the mathematical model. Prog. Org. Coat. 75, 207–214 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.J. Garcia et al., Self-healing anticorrosive organic coating based on an encapsulated water reactive silyl ester: synthesis and proof of concept. Prog. Org. Coat. 70(2–3), 142–149 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Gonzalez-Garcia et al., A combined redox-competition and negative-feedback SECM study of self-healing anticorrosive coatings. Electrochem. Commun. 13(10), 1094–1097 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Latnikova et al., Polyfunctional active coatings with damage-triggered water-repelling effect. Soft Matter 7(2), 369–372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Nesterova, K. Dam-Johansen, S. Kiil, Synthesis of durable microcapsules for self-healing anticorrosive coatings: a comparison of selected methods. Prog. Org. Coat. 70(4), 342–352 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Suryanarayana, K.C. Rao, D. Kumar, Preparation and characterization of microcapsules containing linseed oil and its use in self-healing coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 63(1), 72–78 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Samadzadeh et al., Tung oil: an autonomous repairing agent for self-healing epoxy coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 70(4), 383–387 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Kumar, L.D. Stephenson, J.N. Murray, Self-healing coatings for steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 55(3), 244–253 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Wiesener et al., In-situ contact angle studies of the release of water displacing agents from capsule filled organic coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206(21), 4481–4487 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T.G. Nijland, J.A. Larbi, R.P.J. van Hees, B. Lubelli, M. de Rooij, Self Healing Phenomena in Concretes and Masonry Mortars: a Microscopic Study, in Self Healing Materials (Springer, Eindhoven, 2007), p. 31Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Perugini, Plasma-sprayed self-sealing ceramic coatings: materials chemistry and high temperature protective properties. Thin Solid Films 108(4), 415–425 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Sugama, K. Gawlik, Self-repairing poly(phenylenesulfide) coatings in hydrothermal environments at 200 °C. Mater. Lett. 57(26–27), 4282–4290 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Miccichè et al., Moisture induced crack filling in barrier coatings containing montmorillonite as an expandable phase. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202(14), 3346–3353 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Hikasa et al., Preparation and corrosion studies of self-healing multi-layered nano coatings of silica and swelling clay. Mater. Res. Innovations 8(2), 84–88 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Yabuki, K. Okumura, Self-healing coatings using superabsorbent polymers for corrosion inhibition in carbon steel. Corros. Sci. 59, 258–262 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.J. Garcia, Effect of polymer architecture on the intrinsic self-healing character of polymers. Eur. Polymer J. 53(1), 118–125 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Cordier et al., Self-healing and thermoreversible rubber from supramolecular assembly. Nature 451(7181), 977–980 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S.J. Kalista Jr, T.C. Ward, Thermal characteristics of the self-healing response in poly(ethylene-co-methacrylic acid) copolymers. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(13), 405–411 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    X. Chen et al., A thermally re-mendable cross-linked polymeric material. Science 295(5560), 1698–1702 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Bode et al., Self-healing metallopolymers based on cadmium bis (terpyridine) complex containing polymer networks. Polym. Chem. 4(18), 4966–4973 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Kötteritzsch et al., One-component intrinsic self-healing coatings based on reversible crosslinking by diels-alder cycloadditions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214(14), 1636–1649 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Postiglione, S. Turri, M. Levi, Effect of the plasticizer on the self-healing properties of a polymer coating based on the thermoreversible Diels-Alder reaction. Prog. Org. Coat. 78, 526–531 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Gonzalez-Garcia et al., A combined mechanical, microscopic and local electrochemical evaluation of self-healing properties of shape-memory polyurethane coatings. Electrochim. Acta 56(26), 9619–9626 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nissan Develops World’s First Clear Paint that Repairs Scratches on Car Surfaces. JCNN News, 2005Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    H.N. McMurray, G. Williams, Inhibition of filiform corrosion on organic-coated aluminum alloy by hydrotalcite-like anion-exchange pigments. Corrosion 60(3), 219–228 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    H.R. Fischer, Self-repairing material systems―a dream or a reality? Nat. Sci. 2, 873–901 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    S.J. Garcia, H.R. Fischer, S. van der Zwaag, A critical appraisal of the potential of self healing polymeric coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 72(3), 211–221 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    B.F. Gibbs et al., Encapsulation in the food industry: a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 50(3), 213–224 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    I. Roy et al., Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as novel non-viral vectors for targeted gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 250(1), 25–33 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Nishikawa et al., Hepatocyte-targeted in vivo gene expression by intravenous injection of plasmid DNA complexed with synthetic multi-functional gene delivery system. Gene Ther. 7(7), 548–555 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S.K. Sahoo, V. Labhasetwar, Nanotech approaches to delivery and imaging drug. Drug Discovery Today 8(24), 1112–1120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M.L. Hans, A.M. Lowman, Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6(4), 319–327 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    O.G. Schramm et al., Polymeric nanocontainers with high loading capacity of hydrophobic drugs. Soft Matter 5(8), 1662–1667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J.R. Galvele, Transport processes and mechanism of pitting of metals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 123(4), 464–474 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    W.H. Slabaugh et al., Filiform corrosion of aluminum. J. Paint Technol. 44(566), 76–& (1972)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    S.D. Mookhoek, H.R. Fischer, S. van der Zwaag, Alginate fibres containing discrete liquid filled vacuoles for controlled delivery of healing agents in fibre reinforced composites. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 43(12), 2176–2182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.D. Mookhoek, H.R. Fischer, S. van der Zwaag, A numerical study into the effects of elongated capsules on the healing efficiency of liquid-based systems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 47(2), 506–511 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Rouquerol et al., Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids. Pure Appl. Chem. 66(8), 1739–1758 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    T. Nesterova, Self-Healing Anticorrosive Coatings, in Materials Science (Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagan, 2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    S.I. Rae, et al. in Novel Self-Healing Systems: Expanding and Inhibited Healing Agents. ASME 2014 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, SMASIS 2014. 2014Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science, 1st edn. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    C. Lai et al., Formation of calcium phosphate nanoparticles in reverse microemulsions. Mater. Lett. 59(2–3), 210–214 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Y.M. Lvov et al., Halloysite clay nanotubes for controlled release of protective agents. ACS Nano 2(5), 814–820 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    E. Jamstorp et al., Mechanically strong geopolymers offer new possibilities in treatment of chronic pain. J. Controlled Release 146(3), 370–377 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. Forsgren et al., A ceramic drug delivery vehicle for oral administration of highly potent opioids. J. Pharm. Sci. 99(1), 219–226 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. Ku et al., Fracture toughness of phenol formaldehyde composites reinforced with E-spheres. J. Compos. Mater. 43(7), 741–754 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    S.A.S. Dias et al., Sol–gel coatings modified with zeolite fillers for active corrosion protection of AA2024. Corros. Sci. 62, 153–162 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    S.A.S. Dias et al., The role of Ce(III)-enriched zeolites on the corrosion protection of AA2024-T3. Electrochim. Acta 112, 549–556 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    S. Thomas et al., Self-repairing oxides to protect zinc: review, discussion and prospects. Corros. Sci. 69, 11–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    S. Bohm et al., Novel environment friendly corrosion inhibitor pigments based on naturally occurring clay minerals. Materials and Corrosion-Werkstoffe Und Korrosion 52(12), 896–903 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    N. Granizo et al., Ion-exchange pigments in primer paints for anticorrosive protection of steel in atmospheric service: Cation-exchange pigments. Prog. Org. Coat. 75(3), 147–161 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    E. Abdullayev, Y. Lvov, Clay nanotubes for corrosion inhibitor encapsulation: release control with end stoppers. J. Mater. Chem. 20(32), 6681–6687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    D.G. Shchukin et al., Halloysite nanotubes as biomimetic nanoreactors. Small 1(5), 510–513 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    H.P. Wang et al., Data-constrained modelling of an anthracite coal physical structure with multi-spectrum synchrotron X-ray CT. Fuel 106, 219–225 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    S. Yang, T.E. Gureyev, M.B. Tulloh, M.B. Clennell, M. Pervukhina, Feasibility of a data constrained prediction of hydrocarbon reservoir sandstone microstructures. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, (2010)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    M.F. Montemor et al., The synergistic combination of bis-silane and CeO2.ZrO2 nanoparticles on the electrochemical behaviour of galvanised steel in NaCl solutions. Electrochim. Acta 53, 5913–5922 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Anticorrosion coatings with self-healing effect based on nanocontainers impregnated with corrosion inhibitor. Chem. Mater. 19(3), 402–411 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    M.F. Montemor, R. Pinto, M.G.S. Ferreira, Chemical composition and corrosion protection of silane films modified with CeO(2) nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 54(22), 5179–5189 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Nanostructured sol-gel coatings doped with cerium nitrate as pre-treatments for AA2024-T3-corrosion protection performance. Electrochim. Acta 51(2), 208–217 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Oxide nanoparticle reservoirs for storage and prolonged release of the corrosion inhibitors. Electrochem. Commun. 7(8), 836–840 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Corrosion protective properties of nanostructured sol-gel hybrid coatings to AA2024-T3. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200(9), 3084–3094 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    D.G. Shchukin, M. Zheludkevich, H. Moehwald, Feedback active coatings based on incorporated nanocontainers. J. Mater. Chem. 16(47), 4561–4566 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    N.P. Tavandashti, S. Sanjabi, Corrosion study of hybrid sol-gel coatings containing boehmite nanoparticles loaded with cerium nitrate corrosion inhibitor. Prog. Org. Coat. 69, 384–389 (2010)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    A.C. Balaskas et al., Improvement of anti-corrosive properties of epoxy-coated AA 2024-T3 with TiO2 nanocontainers loaded with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Prog. Org. Coat. 74(3), 418–426 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    E.D. Mekeridis, I.A. Kartsonakis, G.C. Kordas, Multilayer organic-inorganic coating incorporating TiO2 nanocontainers loaded with inhibitors for corrosion protection of AA2024-T3. Prog. Org. Coat. 73(2–3), 142–148 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    M.F. Montemor, M.G.S. Ferreira, Analytical characterization of silane films modified with cerium activated nanoparticles and its relation with the corrosion protection of galvanised steel substrates. Prog. Org. Coat. 63(3), 330–337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    E.D. Mekeridis et al., Release studies of corrosion inhibitors from cerium titanium oxide nanocontainers. J. Nanopart. Res. 13(2), 541–554 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    M. Schem et al., CeO2-filled sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of AA2024-T3 aluminium alloy. Corros. Sci. 51(10), 2304–2315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    H. Lermer et al., Synthesis and structure refinement of ZSM-5 single-crystals. Zeolites 5(3), 131–134 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    F. Kleitz et al., Transformation of highly ordered large pore silica mesophases (Fm3 m, Im3 m and p6 mm) in a ternary triblock copolymer-butanol-water system. Chem. Commun. 13, 1536–1537 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    C.T. Kresge et al., Ordered mesoporous molecular-sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 359(6397), 710–712 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    K.M. Ryan et al., Control of pore morphology in mesoporous silicas synthesized from triblock copolymer templates. Langmuir 18(12), 4996–5001 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    J.Y.T. Chong et al., Steric stabilisation of self-assembled cubic lyotropic liquid crystalline nanoparticles: high throughput evaluation of triblock polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxide-polyethylene oxide copolymers. Soft Matter 7(10), 4768–4777 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    X. Mulet et al., High throughput preparation and characterisation of amphiphilic nanostructured nanoparticulate drug delivery vehicles. Int. J. Pharm. 395(1–2), 290–297 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    D. Ebrahimi et al., High throughput screening arrays of rhodium and iridium complexes as catalysts for intramolecular hydroamination using parallel factor analysis. Analyst 133, 817–822 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    D.Y. Zhao et al., Morphological control of highly ordered mesoporous silica SBA-15. Chem. Mater. 12(2), 275–279 (2000)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    P.J. Colver, S.A.F. Bon, Cellular polymer monoliths made via pickering high internal phase emulsions. Chem. Mater. 19(7), 1537–1539 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    M.L. Zheludkevich, I.M. Salvado, M.G.S. Ferreira, Sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of metals. J. Mater. Chem. 15(48), 5099–5111 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    A. Bhaumik, Mesoporous titanium phosphates and related molecular sieves: synthesis, characterization and applications. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci. 114(4), 451–460 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    M. Mokhtar, S.N. Basahel, T.T. Ali, Effect of synthesis methods for mesoporous zirconia on its structural and textural properties. J. Mater. Sci. 48(6), 2705–2713 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    D.M. Lyons, K.M. Ryan, M.A. Morris, Preparation of ordered mesoporous ceria with enhanced thermal stability. J. Mater. Chem. 12(4), 1207–1212 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    T.L. Metroke, R.L. Parkhill, E.T. Knobbe, Passivation of metal alloys using sol-gel-derived materials—a review. Prog. Org. Coat. 41(4), 233–238 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    D. Wang, G.R. Bierwagen, Sol-gel coatings on metals for corrosion protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 64(4), 327–338 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    F.J. Rossier-Miranda, C. Schroen, R.M. Boom, Colloidosomes: versatile microcapsules in perspective. Colloids Surf., A 343(1–3), 43–49 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    S.E. Hornstrom et al., Paint adhesion and corrosion performance of chromium-free pretreatments of 55 % Al-Zn-coated steel. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 10(9), 883–904 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    A.N. Khramov et al., Nanostructured sol-gel derived conversion coatings based on epoxy- and amino-silanes. Prog. Org. Coat. 47(3–4), 207–213 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    L.S. Kasten et al., An XPS study of cerium dopants in sol–gel coatings for aluminum 2024-T3. Surf. Coat. Technol. 140(1), 11–15 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    L. Mascia et al., Molybdate doping of networks in epoxy-silica hybrids: domain structuring and corrosion inhibition. Prog. Org. Coat. 56(1), 13–22 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    N.C. Rosero-Navarro et al., Improved corrosion resistance of AA2024 alloys through hybrid organic–inorganic sol–gel coatings produced from sols with controlled polymerisation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 203(13), 1897–1903 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    A.N. Khramov et al., Hybrid organo-ceramic corrosion protection coatings with encapsulated organic corrosion inhibitors. Thin Solid Films 447, 549–557 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    A. Wittmar et al., Hybrid sol-gel coatings doped with transition metal ions for the protection of AA 2024-T3. J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 61(3), 600–612 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    S.M.A. Hosseini, A.H. Jafari, E. Jamalizadeh, Self-healing corrosion protection by nanostructure sol-gel impregnated with propargyl alcohol. Electrochim. Acta 54(28), 7207–7213 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    N.C. Rosero-Navarro et al., Effects of Ce-containing sol-gel coatings reinforced with SiO2 nanoparticles on the protection of AA2024. Corros. Sci. 50(5), 1283–1291 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    D.G. Shchukin et al., Layer-by-layer assembled nanocontainers for self-healing corrosion protection. Adv. Mater. 18(13), 1672–1678 (2006)Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    I.A. Kartsonakis et al., Hybrid organic–inorganic multilayer coatings including nanocontainers for corrosion protection of metal alloys. Corros. Sci. 57, 56–66 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    F. Andreatta et al., Water-based ZrO2 pretreatment for AA2024 aluminum alloy. Surf. Interface Anal. 42(4), 293–298 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    F. Andreatta et al., Corrosion behaviour of sol–gel treated and painted AA2024 aluminium alloy. Prog. Org. Coat. 69(2), 133–142 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    D. Raps et al., Electrochemical study of inhibitor-containing organic-inorganic hybrid coatings on AA2024. Corros. Sci. 51(5), 1012–1021 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    N.N. Voevodin et al., An organically modified zirconate film as a corrosion-resistant treatment for aluminum 2024-T3. Prog. Org. Coat. 41(4), 287–293 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    R.B. Greegor et al., X-ray spectroscopic investigation of the Zr-site in thin film sol-gel surface preparations. J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 20(1), 35–50 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    A.S. Hamdy, Advanced nano-particles anti-corrosion ceria based sol gel coatings for aluminum alloys. Mater. Lett. 60(21–22), 2633–2637 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    A.S. Hamdy, A clean low cost anti-corrosion molybdate based nano-particles coating for aluminum alloys. Prog. Org. Coat. 56(2–3), 146–150 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    S.R. Taylor et al., Increasing the functionality of military coatings using nano-dimensioned materials. Corros. Rev. 25(5–6), 491–522 (2007)Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    V. Palanivel, D.Q. Zhu, W.J. van Ooji, Nanoparticle-filled silane films as chromate replacements for aluminum alloys. Prog. Org. Coat. 47(3–4), 384–392 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    A.S. Hamdy, D.P. Butt, Novel anti-corrosion nano-sized vanadia-based thin films prepared by sol-gel method for aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 181(1–3), 76–80 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    C. Sanchez et al., Designed hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites from functional nanobuilding blocks. Chem. Mater. 13(10), 3061–3083 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    J.H. Osborne, Observations on chromate conversion coatings from a sol-gel perspective. Prog. Org. Coat. 41(4), 280–286 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    A. Kumar et al., A pseudoboehmite-silane hybrid coating for enhanced corrosion protection of AA2024-T3. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157(10), C346–C356 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    A. Cabral et al., Analytical characterisation and corrosion behaviour of bis- triethoxysilylpropyl tetrasulphide pre-treated AA2024-T3. Corros. Sci. 47(3), 869–881 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    D.Q. Zhu, W.J. van Ooij, Corrosion protection of AA 2024-T3 by bis-3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl tetrasulfide in neutral sodium chloride solution. Part 1: corrosion of AA 2024-T3. Corros. Sci. 45(10), 2163–2175 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    D.Q. Zhu, W.J. van Ooij, Corrosion protection of AA 2024-T3 by bis-3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl tetrasulfide in sodium chloride solution. Part 2: mechanism for corrosion protection. Corros. Sci. 45(10), 2177–2197 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    S.V. Lamaka et al., Novel hybrid sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of AZ31B magnesium alloy. Electrochim. Acta 53(14), 4773–4783 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    A. Bögershausen et al., Drug release from self-assembled inorganic—Organic hybrid gels and gated porosity detected by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 18(3), 664–672 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    N. Iyi et al., Deintercalation of carbonate ions from a hydrotalcite-like compound: enhanced decarbonation using acid-salt mixed solution. Chem. Mater. 16(15), 2926–2932 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    G. Williams, H.N. McMurray, Inhibition of filiform corrosion on polymer coated AA2024-T3 by hydrotalcite-like pigments incorporating organic anions. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 7(5), B13–B15 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    A.N. Salak et al., Anion exchange in Zn-Al layered double hydroxides: in situ X-ray diffraction study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 495(1–3), 73–76 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    S.P.V. Mahajanam, R.G. Buchheit, in Corrosion and Protection of Light Metal Alloys, ed. by R.G. Buchheit et al. Characterization of Zn-Al-V10O286-Corrosion-Inhibiting Hydrotalcite Pigments in Epoxy Resins (2004), pp. 270–282Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    M. Mullet, V. Khare, C. Ruby, XPS study of Fe(II)-Fe(III) (oxy) hydroxycarbonate green rust compounds. Surf. Interface Anal. 40(3–4), 323–328 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    F.H. Zhang et al., Fabrication of oriented layered double hydroxide films by spin coating and their use in corrosion protection. Chem. Eng. J. 141(1–3), 362–367 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    R.B. Leggat et al., Performance of hydrotalcite conversion treatments on AA2024-T3 when used in a coating system. Corrosion 58(4), 322–328 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    R.G. Buchheit et al., Active corrosion protection in Ce-modified hydrotalcite conversion coatings. Corrosion 58(1), 3–14 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    S.P.V. Mahajanarn, R.G. Buchheit, Characterization of inhibitor release from Zn-Al-[V10O28]6-hydrotalcite pigments and corrosion protection from hydrotalcite-pigmented epoxy coatings. Corrosion 64(3), 230–240 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    R.G. Buchheit et al., Active corrosion protection and corrosion sensing in chromate-free organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 47(3–4), 174–182 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Active protection coatings with layered double hydroxide nanocontainers of corrosion inhibitor. Corros. Sci. 52(2), 602–611 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    N. Granizo et al., Ion-exchange pigments in primer paints for anticorrosive protection of steel in atmospheric service: anion-exchange pigments. Prog. Org. Coat. 76(2–3), 411–424 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    X. Yu et al., One-step synthesis of lamellar molybdate pillared hydrotalcite and its application for AZ31 Mg alloy protection. Solid State Sci. 11(2), 376–381 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    R.G. Buchheit, H. Guan, Formation and characteristics of Al-Zn hydrotalcite coatings on galvanized steel. JCT Res. 1(4), 277–290 (2004)Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    W. Zhang, R.G. Buchheit, Hydrotalcite coating formation on Al-Cu-Mg alloys from oxidizing bath chemistries. Corrosion 58(7), 591–600 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    G. Williams, H.N. McMurray, Anion-exchange inhibition of filiform corrosion on organic coated AA2024-T3 aluminum alloy by hydrotalcite-like pigments. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 6(3), B9–B11 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    S.K. Poznyak et al., Novel inorganic host layered double hydroxides intercalated with guest organic inhibitors for anticorrosion applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1(10), 2353–2362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    M. Kendig, M. Hon, A hydrotalcite-like pigment containing an organic anion corrosion inhibitor. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 8(3), B10–B11 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    M. Kendig, M. Hon, Environmentally triggered release of oxygen-reduction inhibitors from inherently conducting polymers. Corrosion 60(11), 1024–1030 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    R. Trujillano et al., Preparation, physicochemical characterisation and magnetic properties of Cu-Al layered double hydroxides with CO3 2- and anionic surfactants with different alkyl chains in the interlayer. Physica B 373(2), 267–273 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    T.G. Harvey et al., The effect of inhibitor structure on the corrosion of AA2024 and AA7075. Corros. Sci. 53(6), 2184–2190 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    D. Hasha et al., Studies of silicoaluminophosphates with the sodalite structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110(7), 2127–2135 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    M.E. Davis et al., A molecular-sieve with 18-membered rings. Nature 331(6158), 698–699 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    H.K. Varma et al., Porous calcium phosphate coating over phosphorylated chitosan film by a biomimetic method. Biomaterials 20(9), 879–884 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    J.B. Moffat, J.F. Neeleman, Preparation and some properties of high surface-area boron phosphate. J. Catal. 31(2), 274–277 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    K. Sarkar et al., A porous open-framework titanium oxophenylphosphate. J. Solid State Chem. 181(8), 2065–2072 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    H.N. Kim et al., Characterization of zirconium phosphate polycation thin films grown by sequential adsorption reactions. Chem. Mater. 9(6), 1414–1421 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    J. Sinko, Challenges of chromate inhibitor pigments replacement in organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 42(3–4), 267–282 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    H.F. Clay, J.H. Cox, Chromate and phosphate pigments in anti-corrosive primers. J. Oil Colour Chem. Assoc. 56(1), 13–16 (1973)Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    A.C. Bastos, M.G.S. Ferreira, A.M. Simoes, Comparative electrochemical studies of zinc chromate and zinc phosphate as corrosion inhibitors for zinc. Prog. Org. Coat. 52(4), 339–350 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    N.S. McIntyre et al., XPS studies of octadecylphosphonic acid (OPA) monolayer interactions with some metal and mineral surfaces. Surf. Interface Anal. 37(9), 749–754 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    X.F. Liu, S.J. Huang, H.C. Gu, Crack growth behaviour of high strength aluminium alloy in 3.5 %NaCl solution with corrosion inhibiting pigments. Int. J. Fatigue 24(7), 803–809 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    B. del Amo et al., High performance water-based paints with non-toxic anticorrosive pigments. Prog. Org. Coat. 45(4), 389–397 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    R.L. Howard et al., Inhibition of cut edge corrosion of coil-coated architectural cladding. Prog. Org. Coat. 37(1–2), 83–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    R.L. Twite, G.P. Bierwagen, Review of alternatives to chromate for corrosion protection of aluminum aerospace alloys. Prog. Org. Coat. 33(2), 91–100 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    A. Kalendova, D. Vesely, Study of the anticorrosive efficiency of zincite and periclase-based core-shell pigments in organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 64(1), 5–19 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    A. Kalendova et al., Anticorrosion properties of inorganic pigments surface-modified with a polyaniline phosphate layer. Prog. Org. Coat. 63(2), 209–221 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    V.I. Pokhmurs’kyi et al., Corrosion protection of aluminum alloys by inhibiting pigments. Mater. Sci. 42(5), 573–578 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    M. Adachi-Pagano, C. Forano, J.P. Besse, Delamination of layered double hydroxides by use of surfactants. Chem. Commun. 1, 91–92 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    T. Hibino, W. Jones, New approach to the delamination of layered double hydroxides. J. Mater. Chem. 11(5), 1321–1323 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    L. Li et al., Hollow nanoshell of layered double hydroxide. Chem. Commun. 29, 3125–3127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    P.C. Lebaron, Z. Wang, T.J. Pinnavaia, Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: an overview. Appl. Clay Sci. 15(1–2), 11–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    K. Haraguchi, Synthesis and properties of soft nanocomposite materials with novel organic/inorganic network structures. Polym. J. 43(3), 223–241 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    J.J. Luo, I.M. Daniel, Characterization and modeling of mechanical behavior of polymer/clay nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 63(11), 1607–1616 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    A. Okada, A. Usuki, Twenty years of polymer-clay nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 291(12), 1449–1476 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    S.A.F. Bon, T. Chen, Pickering stabilization as a tool in the fabrication of complex nanopatterned silica microcapsules. Langmuir 23(19), 9527–9530 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    S.A.F. Bon, P.J. Colver, Pickering miniemulsion polymerization using Laponite clay as a stabilizer. Langmuir 23(16), 8316–8322 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    T. Chen, P.J. Colver, S.A.F. Bon, Organic-inorganic hybrid hollow spberes prepared from TiO2-stabilized pickering emulsion polymerization. Adv. Mater. 19(17), 2286–2289 (2007)Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    S.A.F. Bon et al., Route to stable non-spherical emulsion droplets. Eur. Polymer J. 43(11), 4839–4842 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    F.J. Rossier-Miranda, K. Schroen, R. Boom, Mechanical characterization and pH response of fibril-reinforced microcapsules prepared by layer-by-layer adsorption. Langmuir 26(24), 19106–19113 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    S.D. Mookhoek et al., Applying SEM-based X-ray microtomography to observe self-healing in solvent encapsulated thermoplastic materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12(3), 228–234 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    S.H. Cho, S.R. White, P.V. Braun, Self-healing polymer coatings. Adv. Mater. 21(6), 645–649 (2009)Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    D.S. Xiao et al., Self-healing epoxy based on cationic chain polymerization. Polymer 50(13), 2967–2975 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    D.S. Xiao, M.Z. Rong, M.Q. Zhang, A novel method for preparing epoxy-containing microcapsules via UV irradiation-induced interfacial copolymerization in emulsions. Polymer 48(16), 4765–4776 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    D.Y. Wu, S. Meure, D. Solomon, Self-healing polymeric materials: a review of recent developments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33(5), 479–522 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Y.C. Yuan et al., Self-healing polymeric materials using epoxy/mercaptan as the healant. Macromolecules 41(14), 5197–5202 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    T. Yin et al., Self-healing epoxy composites—preparation and effect of the healant consisting of microencapsulated epoxy and latent curing agent. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67(2), 201–212 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    G. Bierwagen et al., Active metal-based corrosion protective coating systems for aircraft requiring no-chromate pretreatment. Prog. Org. Coat. 68(1–2), 48–61 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    E.N. Brown, S.R. White, N.R. Sottos, Microcapsule induced toughening in a self-healing polymer composite. J. Mater. Sci. 39(5), 1703–1710 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    M.L. Zheludkevich et al., Triazole and thiazole derivatives as corrosion inhibitors for AA2024 aluminium alloy. Corros. Sci. 47(12), 3368–3383 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    M. Benmessaoud et al., Inhibiting effect of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole on the corrosion of Cu-30Ni alloy in aerated 3 % NaCl in presence of ammonia. Corros. Sci. 49(10), 3880–3888 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    H.F. Yang et al., pH-dependent 2-amino-5-mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole monolayers at the silver surface: surface enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopic and electrochemical observations. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255(5), 2994–2999 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    L.J. Zhang et al., 2-Amino-5-(4-pyridinyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole film at the silver surface: observation by Raman spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257(15), 6347–6352 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    X.D. He, X.M. Shi, Self-repairing coating for corrosion protection of aluminum alloys. Prog. Org. Coat. 65(1), 37–43 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    H. Yang, W.J. van Ooij, Plasma deposition of polymeric thin films on organic corrosion-inhibiting paint pigments: a novel method to achieve slow release. Plasmas Polym. 8(4), 297–323 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    S.A. Agnihotri, N.N. Mallikarjuna, T.M. Aminabhavi, Recent advances on chitosan-based micro- and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J. Controlled Release 100(1), 5–28 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    C.M. Dry, M.J.T. Corsaw, A time-release technique for corrosion prevention. Cem. Concr. Res. 28(8), 1133–1140 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    K.S. Toohey et al., Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. Nat. Mater. 6(8), 581–585 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    S. Wernick, R. Pinner, P.G. Sheasby, The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminium and its Alloys, 5th edn. (Finishing Publications and ASM International, Teddington, 1987)Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    D. Kowalski, A. Tighineanu, P. Schmuki, Polymer nanowires or nanopores? site selective filling of titania nanotubes with polypyrrole. J. Mater. Chem. 21(44), 17909–17915 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    C.Y. Han et al., Anodized aluminum oxide membranes as templates for nanoscale structures. Plat. Surf. Finish. 91(7), 40–45 (2004)Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    M. Rohwerder, M. Stratmann, Surface modification by ordered monolayers: new ways of protecting materials against corrosion. MRS Bull. 24(7), 43–47 (1999)Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    T. Schmidt-Hansberg, P. Schubach, A comparative study of innovative aluminium pretreatments. ATB Metallurgie 43(1–2), 9–14 (2003)Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    M. Knag, Fundamental behavior of model corrosion inhibitors. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 27(5), 587–597 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    M. Knag et al., Langmuir-Blodgett films of dococyltriethylammonium bromide and octadecanol on iron. Deposition and corrosion inhibitor performance in CO2 containing brine. Corros. Sci. 48(9), 2592–2613 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    S. Ramachandran et al., Self-assembled monolayer mechanism for corrosion inhibition of iron by imidazolines. Langmuir 12(26), 6419–6428 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    I. Felhősi et al., Kinetics of self-assembled layer formation on iron. Electrochim. Acta 47(13–14), 2335–2340 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    V. Subramanian, W.A. Ducker, Counterion effects on adsorbed micellar shape: experimental study of the role of polarizability and charge. Langmuir 16(10), 4447–4454 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    A. Shida et al., Zirconium-phosphate films self-assembled on aluminum substrate toward corrosion protection. Surf. Coat. Technol. 169, 686–690 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    M.S. Donley, V.N. Balbyshev, N.N. Voevodin, Self-assembled NAnophase Particle (SNAP) surface treatments for corrosion protection of AA2024-T3. Prog. Org. Coat. 52(1), 34–38 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    N.N. Voevodin et al., Nanostructured coatings approach for corrosion protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 47(3–4), 416–423 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    A. Khramov et al., Sol-gel-derived corrosion-protective coatings with controllable release of incorporated organic corrosion inhibitors. Thin Solid Films 483(1–2), 191–196 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    A. Trinchi, T.H. Muster, A review of surface functionalized amine terminated dendrimers for application in biological and molecular sensing. Supramol. Chem. 19(7), 431–445 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    T. Wang, G. Zhang, F. Fei, Synthesis and application of imidazoline dendrimer corrosion inhibitor. Speciality Petrochemicals 27(5), 1–5 (2010)Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    G. Fan, J. Ge, L. Chai, Synthesis and evaluation of new kind of imidazoline corrosion inhibitor. Speciality Petrochemicals 28(1), 73–76 (2011)Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    D.W. DeBerry, Modification of the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of stainless steels with an electroactive coating. J. Electrochem. Soc. 132(5), 1022–1026 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    P. Zarras, J. He, D.E. Tallman, N. Anderson, A. Guenthner, C. Webber, J.D. Stenger-Smith, J.M. Pentony, S. Hawkins, L. Baldwin (ed.), in Chapter 10 Electroactive Polymer Coatings as replacements for Chromate Conversion Coatings. Smart Coatings, ACS Symposium Series, ed. by T.E.A. Prover (American Chemical Society, Washington, 2007)Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    J.O. Iroh, Conducting polymer coating: a viable alternative to chromate conversion coating. Surf. Eng. 17(4), 265–267 (2001)Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    M. Rohwerder, A. Michalik, Conducting polymers for corrosion protection: What makes the difference between failure and success? Electrochim. Acta 53(3), 1300–1313 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    M. Rizzi, M. Trueba, S.P. Trasatti, Polypyrrole films on Al alloys: the role of structural changes on protection performance. Synth. Met. 161(1–2), 23–31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    B. Wessling, Scientific engineering of anti-corrosion coating systems based on organic metals (polyaniline). J. Corros. Sci. Eng. 1, (1999)Google Scholar
  213. 213.
    J. Reut, A. Opik, K. Idla, Corrosion behavior of polypyrrole coated mild steel. Synth. Met. 102(1–3), 1392–1393 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    M.M. Attar, J.D. Scantlebury, Polyaniline as a possible inhibitor for the corrosion of mild steel. J. Corros. Sci. Eng. 1, (1997)Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    A. Michalik, M. Rohwerder, Conducting polymers for corrosion protection: a critical view. Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie 219(11), 1547–1559 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    B. Wessling, Polymers to organic metals. Chem. Innov. 31(1), 35–40 (2001)Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    B. Wessling, New insight into organic metal polyaniline morphology and structure. Polymers 2(4), 786–798 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    M. Rohwerder, Conducting polymers for corrosion protection: a review. Int. J. Mater. Res. 100(10), 1331–1342 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    J. He et al., Conducting polymers and corrosion III. A scanning vibrating electrode study of poly (3-octyl pyrrole) on steel and aluminum. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147(10), 3667–3672 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    M. Rohwerder, in ACS Symposium Series. Intelligent corrosion protection by conducting polymers (2009), pp. 274–287Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    J.N. Barisci et al., Conducting polymers as a basis for responsive materials systems. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 9(9), 723–731 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    N. Jadhav, M.B. Jensen, V. Gelling, Tungstate and vanadate-doped polypyrrole/aluminum flake composite coatings for the corrosion protection of aluminum 2024-T3. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 12(2), 259–276 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    D.V. Andreeva, E.V. Skorb, D.G. Shchukin, Layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte/inhibitor nanostructures for metal corrosion protection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2(7), 1954–1962 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    A.J. Vreugdenhil, M.E. Woods, Triggered release of molecular additives from epoxy-amine sol-gel coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 53(2), 119–125 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    C. Rottman, G. Grader, D. Avnir, Polarities of Sol-Gel-derived ormosils and of their interfaces with solvents. Chem. Mater. 13(10), 3631–3634 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    E.V. Skorb et al., Light responsive protective coatings. Chem. Commun. 40, 6041–6043 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    J. Zhang, G.S. Frankel, Corrosion-sensing behavior of an acrylic-based coating system. Corrosion 55(10), 957–967 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    M. Buchler, T. Watari, W.H. Smyrl, Investigation of the initiation of localized corrosion on aluminum alloys by using fluorescence microscopy. Corros. Sci. 42(9), 1661–1668 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    G. Liu, H.G. Wheat, in Coatings for Early Corrosion Detection, in Corrosion, ed. by D.C. Hansen, A. Alfantazi, V.J. Gelling (2010), pp. 239–247Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    H.G. Wheat, G. Liu, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth. ed. by H.W. Jin, Y.Y. Wang, D.B. Lillig. Fluorescent Coatings for Corrosion Detection (2008), pp. 217–223Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    D. Fornasiero, F. Grieser, Analysis of the visible absorption and SERS excitation spectra of silver sols. J. Chem. Phys. 87(5), 3213–3217 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    F.H. Scholes et al., Silica-overcoated substrates for detection of proteins by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 39(5), 673–678 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    A. Trinchi et al., in 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Distributed Quantum Dot Sensors for Monitoring the Integrity of Protective Aerospace Coatings (2012)Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    D. Zhao et al., The fabrication and corrosion resistance of benzotriazole-loaded raspberry-like hollow polymeric microspheres. Surf. Coat. Technol. 238, 15–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    A.E. Hughes et al., Revelation of intertwining organic and inorganic fractal structures in polymer coatings. Adv. Mater. 26, 4504–4508(2014) Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    M.F. Montemor et al., Evaluation of self-healing ability in protective coatings modified with combinations of layered double hydroxides and cerium molibdate nanocontainers filled with corrosion inhibitors. Electrochim. Acta 60, 31–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    M.W. Kendig, R.G. Buchheit, Corrosion inhibition of aluminum and aluminum alloys by soluble chromates, chromate coatings, and chromate-free coatings. Corrosion 59(5), 379–400 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Materials ResearchHelmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Zentrum für Material- und Küstenforschung GmbHGeesthachtGermany
  2. 2.Department of Materials and Ceramic EngineeringCICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.Institute for Frontier MaterialsDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  4. 4.CSIRO Mineral ResourcesClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations