Helping the Helpers: Understanding Family Storytelling by Domestic Helpers in Singapore

  • Kakit Cheong
  • Alex Mitchell
Part of the Mobile Communication in Asia: Local Insights, Global Implications book series (MCALIGI)


The recording and sharing of family stories remains an important aspect of what it means to be a “family”. Existing research has shown that such stories help family members maintain close bonds. Additionally, the sharing of personal experiences can help family members create and present individual and family identities. Traditionally, these stories are shared face-to-face. However, for a variety of reasons, more families are geographically distributed. While there has been extensive research into how migrant workers make use of ICTs for social support or interpersonal communication, there remains a gap in understanding how these workers use ICTs specifically for family storytelling. To address this, we conducted two rounds of ethnographic interviews with 25 Filipino domestic helpers in Singapore. At the same time, we sought to examine the types of stories these women currently share. As such, we deployed cultural probe packs which consisted of a disposable camera and writing materials. The interview findings show that factors such as cost or limited access to technology resulted in fewer opportunities for family storytelling. In addition, interviewees also described themselves to have “nothing interesting to share” and that they were “unable to do more” in terms of sharing their experiences with their families back home. Interestingly, the cultural probe findings suggest that this perception may not always be accurate, as evidenced by how the participants were able to reflect upon their daily lives and record numerous personal experiences using the probes.


Mobile phones Family storytelling Domestic helpers Migrant workers Cultural probes 



This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its International Research Centre @ Singapore Funding Initiative and administered by the Interactive & Digital Media Programme Office.


  1. Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., & Moskowitz, D. (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults: Links to agency, communion, and subjective well-being. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alampay, E., Alampay, L., & Raza, K. (2013). The impact of cybercafés on the connectedness of children left behind by overseas Filipino workers. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.Google Scholar
  3. Babbie, E. R. (2013). The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  4. Bohanek, J. G., Fivush, R., Zaman, W., Lepore, C. E., Merchant, S., & Duke, M. P. (2009). Narrative interaction in family dinnertime conversations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(4), 488–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabanes, J. V. A., & Acedera, K. A. F. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media & Society, 14(6), 916–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheong, K., & Mitchell, A. (2015). Kwento: Using a participatory approach to design a family storytelling application for domestic helpers. In J. Abascal, S. Barbosa, M. Fetter, T. Gross, P. Palanque, M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-computer interaction – INTERACT 2015 (vol. 9298, pp. 493–500). Seattle: Springer International Publishing, Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.Google Scholar
  7. Chib, A., Wilkin, H. A., & Hua, S. R. M. (2013). International migrant workers’ use of mobile phones to seek social support in Singapore. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(4), 19–33.Google Scholar
  8. Cooley, C. H. (1902). The looking-glass self. O’Brien, 126–128.Google Scholar
  9. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., … Rouncefield, M. (2003). Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI2004). Brisbane: Ergonomics Society of Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Dalsgaard, T., Skov, M. B., Stougaard, & M., Thomassen, B. (2006). Mediated intimacy in families: Understanding the relation between children and parents. In Proceedings of interaction design and children 2006 (pp. 145–152). Tampere: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fivush, R. (2007). Maternal reminiscing style and children’s developing understanding of self and emotion. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fivush, R. (2008). Remembering and reminiscing: How individual lives are constructed in family narratives. Memory Studies, 1(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fivush, R., Bohanek, J. G., & Duke, M. (2008). The intergenerational self: Subjective perspective and family history. In Self continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 131–143). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., & Reese, E. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77(6), 1568–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fivush, R., Bohanek, J. G., & Marin, K. (2010). Patterns of family narrative co-construction in relation to adolescent identity and well-being. In Narrative development in adolescence (pp. 45–63). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forghani, A., & Neustaedter, C. (2014). The routines and needs of grandparents and parents for grandparent-grandchild conversations over distance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. Toronto.Google Scholar
  17. Frensch, K. M., Pratt, M. W., & Norris, J. E. (2007). Foundations of generativity: Personal and family correlates of emerging adults’ generative life-story themes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaver, W. W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham, C., & Rouncefield, M. (2008). Probes and participation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  21. Horst, W., Bunt, T., Wensveen, S., & Cherian, L. (2004). Designing probes for empathy with families. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Dutch directions in HCI, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., … Hansen, H. (2003). Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Kellas, J. K. (2010). Narrating family: Introduction to the special issue on narratives and storytelling in the family. Journal of Family Communication, 10(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiser, L. J., Baumgardner, B., & Dorado, J. (2010). Who are we, but for the stories we tell: Family stories and healing. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2(3), 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koenig Kellas, J., & Trees, A. R. (2006). Finding meaning in difficult family experiences: Sense-making and interaction processes during joint family storytelling. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(1), 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lim, S. S., & Soon, C. (2010). The influence of social and cultural factors on mothers’ domestication of household ICTs–Experiences of Chinese and Korean women. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J., Jurmu, M., Pihlajaniemi, H., Markkanen, P., & Ojala, T. (2015). Evaluation probes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul.Google Scholar
  28. Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277–295. doi:  10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00352.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media & Society, 13(3), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McAdams, D. P. (2004). Generativity and the narrative ecology of family life. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. McCarthy, J. R. (2012). The powerful relational language of ‘family’: Togetherness, belonging and personhood. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDougall, Z., & Fels, S. (2010). Cultural probes in the design of communication. Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, ACM, New York, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  33. MOM. (2014). Singapore workforce. Accessed 1 July 2015.
  34. MOM. (2015). Foreign workforce number. Accessed 1 July, 2015.
  35. Pennebaker, J. W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson, B. E., & Klohnen, E. C. (1995). Realization of generativity in two samples of women at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pratt, M. W., & Fiese, B. H. (2004). Family stories and the life course: Across time and generations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Quek, K. M.-T. (2014). The Evolving challenges of modern-day parenthood in Singapore. In Parenting across cultures (pp. 145–161). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Rahman, N. A., Yeoh, B. S., Huang, S., & Yeoh, B. (2005). Dignity overdue: Transnational domestic workers in Singapore. In: Asian women as transnational domestic workers (pp. 233–261). Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, J. (1994). Tales and transformations: Stories in families and family therapy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stone, E. (2004). Black sheep and kissing cousins: How our family stories shape us. New Brunswick: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, A. C., Fisackerly, B. L., Mauren, E. R., & Taylor, K. D. (2013). “Grandma, tell me another story”: Family narratives and their impact on young adult development. Marriage & Family Review, 49(5), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomas, M., & Lim, S. S. (2011). On maids and mobile phones: ICT use by female migrant workers in Singapore and its policy implications. In J. Katz (Ed.), Mobile communication: Dimensions of social policy (pp. 175–190). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, E. C. (2009). Mobile phones, communities and social networks among foreign workers in Singapore. Global Networks, 9(3), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trees, A. R., & Kellas, J. K. (2009). Telling tales: Enacting family relationships in joint storytelling about difficult family experiences. Western Journal of Communication, 73(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vutborg, R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., & Vetere, F. (2010). Family storytelling for grandparents and grandchildren living apart. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Wong-Villacres, M., & Bardzell, S. (2011). Technology-mediated parent–child intimacy: Designing for Ecuadorian families separated by migration. Paper presented at the CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  49. Wyche, S. P., & Grinter, R. E. (2012). “This is how we do it in my country”: A study of computer-mediated family communication among Kenyan migrants in the United States. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle.Google Scholar
  50. Yeoh, B. S., & Huang, S. (1998). Negotiating public space: Strategies and styles of migrant female domestic workers in Singapore. Urban Studies, 35(3), 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations