Mountaineering or Ratcheting? Stone Age Hunting Weapons as Proxy for the Evolution of Human Technological, Behavioral and Cognitive Flexibility

Chapter

Abstract

Cultural, behavioral and cognitive evolution is often seen as cumulative and sometimes referred to in terms of a ratchet or the ratchet effect. In this contribution, I assess the value of the ratchet analogy as blanket explanation for the above aspects of human evolution. I use Stone Age weapon technologies as proxy for the evolution of human technological, behavioral and cognitive flexibility, and by doing so show that the ratchet analogy falls short of explaining human variability and complexity as reflected in the Stone Age archaeological record. Considering human cultural, behavioral and cognitive evolution from a theoretically constructed rugged landscape point of view, I suggest that mountaineering may be a more suitable analogy for the accumulation of human culture. In this scenario, culture and technology anchor societies within their respective evolutionary trajectories and fitness landscapes, and it more accurately reflects humans as ‘masters of flexibility’.

Keywords

Projectile technology Bow-and-arrow Spear Spearthrower-and-dart Cumulative culture Cognition Fitness landscapes 

References

  1. Attenbrow, V., Robertson, G., & Hiscock, P. (2009). The changing abundance of backed artefacts in south-eastern Australia: A response to Holocene climate change? Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2765–2770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backwell, L., d’Errico, F., & Wadley, L. (2008). Middle Stone Age bone tools from the Howiesons Poort layers, Sibudu Cave, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 566–1580.Google Scholar
  3. Barret, H. C. (2009). Where there is an adaptation, there is a domain: the form-function fit in information processing. In S. M. Platek & T. K. Schackelford (Eds.), Foundations in evolutionary cognitive neuroscience (pp. 97–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradfield, J., & Lombard, M. (2011). A macrofracture study of bone points used in experimental hunting with reference to the South African Middle Stone Age. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66, 67–76.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, A., Nevell, L., Yellen, J., & Hartman, G. (2006). Projectile technologies of the African MSA: Implications for modern human origins. In E. Hovers & S. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Palaeolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 233–255). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, R. W. (1995). The thinking ape: Evolutionary origins of intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carniero, R. L. (2003). Evolutionism in cultural anthropology: A critical history. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cattelain, P. (1997). Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: Bow, spearthrower, or both? In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile Technology (pp. 213–240). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Flexibility and variability: Essential to human cognition and the study of human cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 170–192.Google Scholar
  10. d’Errico, F., & Stringer, C. B. (2011). Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1060–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, J. (2005). Guns, germs and steel: A short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haidle, M. N. (2009). How to think a simple spear. In S. A. de Beaune, F. L. Coolidge, & T. Wynn (Eds.), Cognitive archaeology and human evolution (pp. 57–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Haidle, M. N. (2010). Working-memory capacity and the evolution of modern cognitive potential: Implications from animal and early human tool use. Current Anthropology, 51, S149–S166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidle, M. N. (2012). How to Think Tools? A Comparison of Cognitive Aspects in Tool Behavior of Animals and During Human Evolution. Cognitive perspectives in tool behavior, Vol. 1. urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-60146.Google Scholar
  16. Henrich, J. (2004). Archaeology, demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses – the Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henshilwood, C. S. (2005). Stratigraphic integrity of the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave. In F. d’Errico & L. Backwell (Eds.), From tools to symbols: From early hominids to modern humans (pp. 441–458). Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Henshilwood, C. S., & Dubreuil, B. (2011). The still bay and Howiesons Poort, 77–59 ka: Symbolic material culture and the evolution of the mind during the African Middle Stone Age. Current Anthropology, 52, 361–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hovers, E., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t—modern human behaviour in the Middle Paleolithic. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 295–304). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhn, S. (2006). Trajectories of change in the Middle Paleolithic in Italy. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 109–120). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lombard, M. (2005). Evidence of hunting and hafting during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A multianalytical approach. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lombard, M. (2006). First impressions of the functions and hafting technology of Still Bay pointed artefacts from Sibudu Cave. Southern African Humanities, 18(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  23. Lombard, M. (2007). Evidence for change in Middle Stone Age hunting behaviour at Blombos Cave: Results of a macrofracture analysis. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 62, 62–67.Google Scholar
  24. Lombard, M. (2011). Quartz-tipped arrows older than 60 ka: Further use-trace evidence from Sibudu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1918–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lombard, M., & Haidle, M. N. (2012). Thinking a bow-and-arrow: Cognitive implications of Middle Stone Age bow and stone-tipped arrow technology. Cambridge Journal of Archaeology, 22, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lombard, M., & Pargeter, J. (2008). Hunting with Howiesons Poort segments: Pilot experimental study and the functional interpretation of archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2523–2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lombard, M., & Parsons, I. (2010). Fact or fiction? Behavioural and technological reversal after 60 ka in Southern Africa. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 65, 224–228.Google Scholar
  28. Lombard, M., & Parsons, I. (2011). What happened to the human mind after the Howiesons Poort? Antiquity, 85, 1433–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64,000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Antiquity, 84, 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McBrearty, S., & Tryon, C. (2005). From Acheulean to Middle Stone Age in the Kapthurin Formation, Kenya. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 257–277). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. McCall, G. S. (2007). Behavioral ecological models of lithic technological change during the later Middle Stone Age of South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1738–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mellars, P. (2007). Rethinking the revolution: Eurasian and African perspectives. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef, & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
  33. Mercier, N., & Valladas, H. (2003). Reassessment of TL age estimates of burnt flint from the Paleolithic site of Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution, 45, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mesoudi, A. (2008). Foresight in cultural evolution. Biological Philosophy, 28, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohapi, M. (2007). Rose Cottage Cave lithic points: Does technological change imply change in hunting techniques? South African Archaeological Bulletin, 62, 9–18.Google Scholar
  36. Parsons, I., & Lombard, M. (2011). The multi-disciplinary landscape of mid-late Upper Pleistocene archaeology. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66, 178–185.Google Scholar
  37. Powell, A., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324, 1298–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preutz, J. D., & Bertolani, P. (2007). Savanna chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, hunt with tools. Current Biology, 17, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riede, F. (2008). The Laacher See-eruption (12,920 BP) and material culture change at the end of the Allerød in Northern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riegler, A. (2001). The cognitive ratchet: The ratchet effect as a fundamental principle in evolution and cognition. Cybernetics and Systems, 32, 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rots, V., & Van Peer, P. (2006). Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: Core-axe production, hafting and use at Late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 360–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shea, J. J. (2006). The origins of lithic projectile point technology: Evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shea, J. J. (2009). The impact of projectile weaponry on Late Pleistocene hominin evolution. In J.-J. Hublin & M. P. Richards (Eds.), The evolution of Hominin Diets: Integrating approaches to the study of Palaeolithic subsistence (pp. 189–199). Leipzig: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shea, J. J. (2011). Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: Behavioural variability versus “behavioural modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shea, J. J., & Sisk, M. L. (2010). Complex projectile technology and Homo sapiens dispersal into western Eurasia. PaleoAnthropology, 2010, 100–122.Google Scholar
  46. Shennan, S. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of sociology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  48. Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Paleolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature, 385, 807–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thieme, H. (1999). Altpaläolithische Holzgeräte aus Schöningen. Lkr. Helmstedt. Germania, 77, 451–487.Google Scholar
  50. Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2405–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2011). Social learning and evolution: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1008–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Villa, P., & Soriano, S. (2010). Hunting weapons of Neanderthals and early modern humans in South Africa. Journal of Anthropological Research, 66, 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Villa, P., Soriano, S., Teyssandier, N., & Wurz, S. (2010). The Howiesons Poort and MSA III at Klasies River Mouth, Cave 1A. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 630–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wadley, L. (2005). Putting ochre to the test: Replication studies of adhesives that may have been used for hafting tools in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution, 49, 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wadley, L. (2010). Were snares used in the Middle Stone age and does it matter? A review and case study from Sibudu, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 58, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wadley, L., & Mohapi, M. (2008). A segment is not a monolith: Evidence from the Howiesons Poort of Sibudu, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2594–2605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wadley, L., Hodgskiss, T., & Grant, M. (2009). Implications for complex cognition from the hafting of tools with compound adhesives in the Middle Stone Age, South Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 9590–9594.Google Scholar
  58. Wadley, L., Sievers, C., Bamford, M., Goldberg, P., Berna, F., & Miller, C. (2011). Middle Stone Age bedding construction and settlement patterns at Sibudu, South Africa. Science, 334, 1388–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkins, J., Schoville, B. J., Brown, K. S., & Chazan, M. (2012). Evidence for early hafted hunting technology. Science, 338, 942–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, V. M. E., Burke, A., & Lombard, M. (2014). Throwing spears and shooting arrows: Preliminary results of a pilot neuroarchaeological study. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 69, 199–207.Google Scholar
  61. Wright, S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, 1, 356–366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and Development StudiesUniversity of JohannesburgAuckland Park 2006South Africa
  2. 2.Wallenberg Research Centre, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS)Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations