The Wilderness Continuum Concept and Its Application in Australia: Lessons for Modern Conservation

Chapter

Abstract

Wilderness is relative; it occupies parts of a spectrum of environmental modification ranging from synthetic high-input urban and agricultural systems through to environments with minimal human interference (Lesslie RG, Taylor BG, Biol Conserv 32:309–333, 1985). This chapter considers the wilderness continuum concept which accounts for the degree to which a place is remote from and undisturbed by the influences of modern technological society, accepting that there are no absolutely inaccessible and undisturbed areas remaining on earth. The focus of the wilderness continuum concept on degrees of remoteness and naturalness in the landscape contributes to our understanding of how modern conservation landscapes can be created, including the role of larger and more intact natural areas. Discussion points to the need for comprehensive disturbance mapping and monitoring focused on patterns of land use, settlement and access across the landscape – as these represent key drivers of terrestrial environmental change. A review and discussion of Australian National Wilderness Inventory (ANWI), a wild land evaluation program conducted in Australia during the 1980s and 1990s (Lesslie RG, Maslen M, National wilderness inventory: handbook of procedures, content and usage, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1995), is provided. More recent environmental assessments that draw on the work of the ANWI are introduced. An updated global assessment of wilderness quality based on ANWI methods is presented.

Keywords

Wilderness continuum Remoteness Naturalness Mapping Monitoring change Disturbance Modification Fragmentation Unmodified reference 

References

  1. ABARES. (2011). Multi-criteria Analysis Shell for Spatial Decision Support (MCAS-S) user guide, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra. http://www.abares.gov.au/mcass
  2. Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. (2012). National Wildlife Corridors Plan: A framework for landscape-scale conservation. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: National Wildlife Corridors plan Advisory Group. ISBN 978-1-921733-61-1.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. (2008). Remote and natural lands delineation. [online]. http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/publications/anlr/maps-delin.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2012.
  4. Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Van Bogaert, E., Arino, O., Kalogirou, V., & Perez, J. R. (2011). GLOBCOVER 2009 products description and validation report. European Space Agency, Frascati, Italy and Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, D., Nielsen, D., & Tangley, L. (1997). The last frontier forests: Ecosystems and economies on the edge. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI). [online]. http://www.globalforestwatch.org/english/pdfs/Last_Frontier_Forests.pdf
  6. Carver, S., Evans, A., & Fritz, S. (2002). Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Wilderness, 8(1), 24–29.Google Scholar
  7. Commonwealth of Australia. (1992). National forest policy statement. Perth: Advance Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davey, S. M., Hoare, J. R. L., & Rumba, K. (2002). Science and its role in Australian regional forest agreements. International Forestry Review, 4(1), 39–55.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, E. C. (2011). Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 369, 1010–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, M., Carver, S., Kun, Z., McMorran, R., Arrell, K., & Mitchell, G. (2010). Review of status and conservation of wild land in Europe. Project commissioned by the Scottish Government. [online]. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/Countryside/Heritage/wildland. Accessed 30 Dec 2015.
  11. Forman, D., & Wolke, H. (1992). The big outside. A descriptive inventory of the big wilderness areas of the United States (Rev. ed.). Harmony Books: New York. 499 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Gammage, B. (2011). The biggest estate on earth: How Aborigines made Australia. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Hannah, L., Carr, J. L., & Lankerani, A. (1995). Human disturbance and natural habitat: A biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 128–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Husby, E. (1995). Wilderness quality mapping in the Euro-Arctic Barents Region, DN-report, 1995–1994, Trondheim: Adresseavisen Offset.Google Scholar
  15. Kuiters, A. T., van Eupen, M., Carver, S., Fisher, M., Kun, Z., & Vancura, V. (2013). Wilderness register and indicator for Europe final report (EEA Contract No: 07.0307/2011/610387/SER/B.3). [online]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/wilderness/pdf/Draft%20wilderness%20register.pdf
  16. Lesslie, R. (2012). Mapping our priorities – Innovation in spatial decision support. In P. Figgis, J. Fitzsimons, & J. Irving (Eds.), Innovation for 21st century conservation (pp. 146–153). Sydney: Australian Committee for IUCN.Google Scholar
  17. Lesslie, R. G. (1997). A spatial analysis of human interference in terrestrial environments at landscape scale. PhD thesis, Department of Geography, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
  18. Lesslie, R. G. (1998). Global wilderness. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. Dataset derived using the Digital Chart of the World 1993 version and methods based on the Australian National Wilderness Inventory. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/global-wilderness. Accessed 30 Dec 2015.
  19. Lesslie, R. G., & Maslen, M. (1995). National wilderness inventory: Handbook of procedures, content and usage (2nd ed.). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  20. Lesslie, R. G., & Taylor, S. G. (1985). The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy. Biological Conservation, 32, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesslie, R., Thackway, R., & Smith, J. (2010). A national-level vegetation assets, states and transitions (VAST) dataset for Australia (version 2.0). Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.Google Scholar
  22. McCloskey, J. M., & Spalding, H. (1989). A reconnaissance level inventory of the amount of wilderness remaining in the world. Ambio, 18(4), 221–227.Google Scholar
  23. Mackey, B. G., Lesslie, R. G., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Nix, H. A. (1998). Wilderness and its place in nature conservation in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 4(3), 182–185.Google Scholar
  24. Nash, R. F. (1973). Wilderness and the American mind (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D’Amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., & Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience, 51(11), 933–938.Google Scholar
  26. Potapov, P., Yaroshenko, A., Turubanova, S., Dubinin, M., Laestadius, L., Thies, C., Aksenov, D., Egorov, A., Yesipova, Y., Glushkov, I., Karpachevskiy, M., Kostikova, A., Manisha, A., Tsybikova, E., & Zhuravleva, I. (2008). Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 51. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art51/
  27. Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C. & Foley J. A. (2010). Global Agricultural Lands: Pastures, 2000. Data distributed by the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/aglands.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.
  28. Sanderson, E. W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M. A., Redford, K.H., Wannebo, A. V. & Woolmer, G. (2002, October). The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience, 52(10), 891–904.Google Scholar
  29. Safford, H. D., Wiens, J. A., & Uayward, G. D. (2012). The growing importance of the past in managing ecosystems of the future, pages 319–327. Chapter 24 in J. A. Wiens, G. D. Hayward, H. D. Safford, C. & Giffen (Eds.), Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management (352 pp). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. State of the Environment 2011 Committee. (2011). Australia state of the environment 2011 (Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities). Canberra: DSEWPaC.Google Scholar
  31. Thackway, R. (2013). Applying a system for tracking the changes in vegetation condition to Australia’s forests. Proceedings of the Institute of Foresters Australia conference, managing our forests into the 21st century, held in Canberra, 7–11 April 2013, Canberra.Google Scholar
  32. Thackway, R., & Lesslie, R. (2008). Describing and mapping human-induced vegetation change in the Australian landscape. Environmental Management, 42(4), 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES)CanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations