Is the Human Rights Framework Still Fit for the Big Data Era? A Discussion of the ECtHR’s Case Law on Privacy Violations Arising from Surveillance Activities

Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 24)

Abstract

Human rights protect humans. This seemingly uncontroversial axiom might become quintessential over time, especially with regard to the right to privacy. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights grants natural persons a right to complain, in order to protect their individual interests, such as those related to personal freedom, human dignity and individual autonomy. With Big Data processes, however, individuals are mostly unaware that their personal data are gathered and processed and even if they are, they are often unable to substantiate their specific individual interest in these large data gathering systems. When the European Court of Human Rights assesses these types of cases, mostly revolving around (mass) surveillance activities, it finds itself stuck between the human rights framework on the one hand and the desire to evaluate surveillance practices by states on the other. Interestingly, the Court chooses to deal with these cases under Article 8 ECHR, but in order to do so, it is forced to go beyond the fundamental pillars of the human rights framework.

Keywords

Human rights Big data Mass surveillance Individual harm Societal interest Conventionality 

Bibliography

  1. Andrejevic, Mark. 2014. The big data divide. International Journal of Communication 8.Google Scholar
  2. Bentham, Jeremy. 1791. Panopticon; or the inspection-house (Dublin).Google Scholar
  3. Bollier, David. 2010. The promise and peril of big data. http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/10334-ar-promise-peril-of-big-data.pdf.
  4. Boyd, Danah and Kate Crawford. (2011) Six provocations for big data. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1926431.
  5. Busch, Lawrence. 2014. A Dozen Ways to Get Lost in Translation: Inherent Challenges in Large Scale Data Sets. International Journal of Communication 8 (2014).Google Scholar
  6. Calders, Toon & Sicco Verwer. 2010. Three naive bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 21(2).Google Scholar
  7. Craig, Terence, and Mary E. Ludloff. 2011. Privacy and big data: The players, regulators, and stakeholders. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, Kate and Jason Schultz. 2014. Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review 55: 93.Google Scholar
  9. Custers, Bart H. M. 2004. The power of knowledge; ethical, legal, and technological aspects of data mining and group profiling in epidemiology (Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publishers).Google Scholar
  10. Davis, Kord with David Patterson. 2012. Ethics of big data: Balancing risk and innovation. http://www.commit-nl.nl/sites/default/files/Ethics%20of%20Big%20Data_0.pdf.
  11. der Bart Sloot, Van. 2015. Do privacy and data protection rules apply to legal persons and should they? A proposal for a two-tiered system. Computer Law & Security Review 31: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Driscoll, Kevin and Shawn Walker. 2014. Working within a black box: Transparency in the collection and production of big twitter data. International Journal of Communication 8.Google Scholar
  13. Dusseault, Pierre-Luc. 2013. Privacy and social media in the age of big data: Report of the standing committee on access to information, privacy and ethics. http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Committee/411/ETHI/Reports/RP6094136/ethirp05/ethirp05-e.pdf.
  14. Feinberg, Joel. 1984. Harm to others. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. Galetta, Antonella and Paul De Hert. 2014. Complementing the surveillance law principles of the ECtHR with its environmental law principles: An integrated technology approach to a human rights framework for surveillance. Utrecht Law Review 10-1.Google Scholar
  17. Gerards, Janneke. 2012. The prism of fundamental rights. European Constitutional Law Review 8: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Habermas, Jurgen. 1995. On the internal relation between the rule of law and democracy. European Journal of Philosophy 3.Google Scholar
  19. Hildebrandt, Mireille, and Serge Gutwirth (eds.). 2008. Profiling the European citizen cross-disciplinary perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hoofnagle, Chris J. 2013. How the fair credit reporting act regulates big data. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2432955>.
  22. International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications. 2014. Working paper on big data and privacy. Privacy principles under pressure in the age of big data analytics 55th Meeting, 5–6, Skopje.Google Scholar
  23. Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The data revolution: Big data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Larose, Daniel T. 2006. Data mining methods and models (New Yersey: Wiley).Google Scholar
  25. Locke, John. 1988. Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  27. McAfee, Andrew and Eerik Brynjolfsson. 2012. Big data: The management Revolution: Exploiting vast new flows of information can radically improve your company’s performance. But first you’ll have to change your decision making culture. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, Thérèse and Gearóid Ó Cuinn. 2010. Work in progress. New technologies and the European court of human rights. Human Rights Law Review.Google Scholar
  29. Paine, Thomas. 1797. The rights of man: For the benefit of all mankind. Philadelphia: Webster.Google Scholar
  30. Payton, Theresa M., and Theodore Claypoole. 2014. Privacy in the age of big data: Recognizing threats, defending your rights, and protecting your family. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. Puschmann, Cornelius and Jean Burgess. 2014. Metaphors of big data. International Journal of Communication 8.Google Scholar
  32. Richards, Neil M. & Jonathan H. King. 2013. Three paradoxes of big data. Stanford Law Review online 66: 44.Google Scholar
  33. Richards, Neil M. and Jonathan H. King. 2014. Big data ethics. Wake Forest Law Review 49.Google Scholar
  34. Rubinstein, Ira. 2012. Big data: The end of privacy or a new beginning?. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12–56.Google Scholar
  35. Stevenson, Drury D. and Nicholas J. Wagoner. 2014. Bargaining in the shadow of big data. Florida Law Review 66: 5.Google Scholar
  36. Tene, Omer and Jules Polonetsky. 2013. Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 11: 239.Google Scholar
  37. Van der Sloot, Bart. 2014a. Privacy in the Post-NSA Era: Time for a Fundamental Revision?. Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 5: 1.Google Scholar
  38. Van der Sloot, Bart. 2014b. Do data protection rules protect the individual and should they? An assessment of the proposed general data protection regulation. International Data Privacy Law 3.Google Scholar
  39. Zarsky, Tal Z. 2003. Mine your own business!: making the case for the implications of the data mining of personal information in the forum of public opinion. Yale Journal of Law & Technology 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituut Voor Informatierecht (IViR)AmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations