Bibliography

  • A. D. Buchanan Smith
  • O. J. Robison
  • D. M. Bryant
Chapter

Keywords

Agricultural Experiment Station Ohio Agric Colour Inheritance Iowa Agric KANSAS Agricultural Experiment Station 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abderhalden, E. 1899. Die Beziehungen der Wachstumsgeschwindigkeit des Säuglings zur Zusammensetzung der Milch. Z. phys. Chemie, 27.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1923. The value of a first cross in the production of pork and bacon. J. Min. Agric, 29: 939–941.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1929. Pig breeding in Sweden. Farmer & Stockbreeder, 43: 1431–1432.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1929. Los tipos de cerdos. Riv. Asoc. Argent. Criad. Cerdos, 8, No. 78: 19–27.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. 1931. Litter testing and pig recording. Interim report by the Pig Industry Council. Min. Agric. & Fish., Marketing Leaflet No. 30, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. 1931. Leistungskontrolle der Schlesischen Schweinezucht. Ergebnisse der Zuchtleistungsprüfungen Kalenderjahr 1931. Mit einer Durchschnittsberechnung der Kontrolljahre 1926–31. Durchgef. v. d. Landwirtschaftskammer Niederschlesien und dem Verband schlesischer Schweinezüchter E. V.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. 1931–32. Ergebnisse der amtlichen Schweine-Leistungskontrolle der Landwirtschaftskammer Brandenburg 1931-32.Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous. 1932. Schweinezucht und Schweinehaltung und ihre Aussichten. Dtsch. landw. Tierz., 36, No. 22.Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous. 1932. Pig breeding and disease problems. Vet. Rec. N. S., 12: 1351–1352.Google Scholar
  10. Anthony, D. J. 1929. Some variations in the number of ribs in pigs. Vet. J., 85: 229.Google Scholar
  11. Aristotle. Historia Animalium II. 1-7.Google Scholar
  12. Armstrong, J. T. 1932a. Breeding pigs for export. Tasmanian J. Agric., 3: 25–29.Google Scholar
  13. Armstrong, J. T. 193b. The pig industry. Tasmanian J. Agric, 3: 63-67.Google Scholar
  14. Asdell, S. A. and Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1927. Some practical observations on the inheritance of colour, beard, and tassels. Brit. Goat Soc. Year Book, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Ashley, R. C. and Malcomson, A. W. 1920. Variation of individual pigs in economy of gains. J. Agric. Res., 19: 225–234.Google Scholar
  16. Auld, R. C. 1889. Some cases of solid-hoofed hogs and two-toed horses. Amer. Nat., 23: 447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Axelsson, J. 1928. Några betydelsfulla faktorer inom vår svinavel. Nordisk Jordbrugsforsk.: 217-252.Google Scholar
  18. Axelsson, J. 1929a. Resultaten vid renavel och korsning inom svinaveln i Malmöhus län. Svenska Svinavelsför. tidsk., No. 6: 168-181.Google Scholar
  19. Axelsson, J. 1929b. Sambandet mellan antalet grisar i kullarna vid födseln och medelvikten pr gris i desamma vid olika ålder. Nordisk Jordbrugsforsk.: 123-141.Google Scholar
  20. Axelsson, J. 1929c. Resulteten från den av Malmöhus Läns svinavels-förening anordnade smågriskontrollen vid Svalöf åren 1927–1928. Förlagsaktiebolagets i Malmö Boktryckeri, Malmö.Google Scholar
  21. Axelsson, J. 1930. Resultat från smågriskontrollen vid Ruhlsdorf i jämförelse med svenska. Svenska Svinavelsför. tidsk. No. 6: 175-184.Google Scholar
  22. Axelsson, J. 1933. Einige Resultate der Schweinemastkontrolle in Malmöhus Län. Z. Züchtg., B. 28: 157–191.Google Scholar
  23. Baird, W. W. 1923. Swine feeding experiments at the Nappan experimental farm. Canada: Dominion Exp. Farms, Nappan Farm Rpt. Supt.: 12-14.Google Scholar
  24. Baker, J. R. 1924. Sexual abnormalities in pigs. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 4: 112–114.Google Scholar
  25. Baker, J. R. 1925a. On the descended testes of sex-intergrade hogs. Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 69: 689–701.Google Scholar
  26. Baker, J. R. 1925b. On sex-intergrade pigs: their anatomy, genetics, and developmental physiology. Brit. J. Exp. Biol., 2: 247–263.Google Scholar
  27. Baker, J. R. 1926a. Asymmetry in hermaphrodite pigs. J. Anat., 60: 374–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Baker, J. R. 1926b. Sex in Man and Animals. Routledge, London, 175 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Baker, J. R. 1928. A new type of mammalian intersexuality. Brit. J. Exp. Biol., 6: 56–64.Google Scholar
  30. Bartram, H. A. 1926. Über die Wurfgrösse beim veredelten Landschwein. Züchtungskunde, 1: 256–269.Google Scholar
  31. Bässmann, W. 1933. Die Schweinezucht in der Mark Brandenburg. Dtsch. landw. Tierz. 37: 341–343.Google Scholar
  32. Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the study of variation treated with especial regard to discontinuity in the origin of species. Macmillan & Co., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Beck, N. 1931. 19de Beretning om sammenlignende Forsøg med Svin fra statsanerkendte Avlscentre. 139te Beretning fra Forsøgslaborato-riet. København. 184 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Beck, N. 1933. 21de Beretning om sammenlignende Forsøg med Svin fra statsanerkendte Avlscentre 150de Beretning fra Forsøgslaboratoriet. København. 195 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Becker, E. 1896–97. Uber Zwitterbildung beim Schwein. Verh. Phys.-Med. Ges. Würzburg, 30.Google Scholar
  36. Bengtsson. S. 1923–1924. Grissuggans mjölkavkastning och dennas sam-mansättning. Nordisk Jordbrugsforsk., 5: 355–364.Google Scholar
  37. Berry, R. A. and O’Brien, D. G. 1921. Errors in feeding experiments with cross-bred pigs. J. Agric. Sci., 11: 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Beste, K. 1927. Das deutsche veredelte Landschwein Lüneburger Zucht mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Blutaufbaues. Dissertation, Halle-Wittenberg.Google Scholar
  39. Birch, R. R. 1923. Natural and artificial immunity of young pigs to hog cholera. Cornell Vet., 13: 159–169.Google Scholar
  40. Bitting, A. W. 1897. The fecundity of swine. Indiana Agric. Exp. Sta., Veter. Dept., 10th Ann. Rpt.: 42-46.Google Scholar
  41. Blanc, L. 1893. Étude sur la polydactylie chez les mammifères. Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 40: 53–88.Google Scholar
  42. Bomhard, (Dr.) 1927. Die Erbanlagen der unterfränkischen Schweinezucht. Z. Schweinez., 34: 773–778.Google Scholar
  43. Bonnier, G. and Hallqvist, C. 1930. Letalanlag hos Svin. Medd. Inst. f. Husdjursföräd., No. 3: 46–53.Google Scholar
  44. Brambell, F. W. R. 1927. The histology of an hermaphrodite pig and its developmental significance. J. Anat., 63: 397–407.Google Scholar
  45. Bryden, Wm. 1933. The Chromosomes of the Pig. Cytologia, 5: 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Buckingham, J. L. 1930. An hermaphrodite pig. Vet. Rec, 10: 967.Google Scholar
  47. Bulatovici, G. T. 1930. Contributiuni la studiul cauzelor lipsei de proli-ficitate la rasa Mangalita. Dissertation, Bukarest.Google Scholar
  48. Bull, S. and Carroll, W. E. 1929. Type in swine as related to rate and economy of gain and quality of pork. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta., Circ. 345, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Bull, S. and Longwell, J. H. 1929. Swine Type Studies: II. Type in swine as related to quality of pork. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 322: 395–490.Google Scholar
  50. Bull, S. and Olson, F. C. 1931. [Barrows and gilts about equal in pork produced]. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rpt.Google Scholar
  51. Calder, A. 1928. Report on the bacon pig competition at Highland and Agricultural Society’s Show, July, 1928. Scottish Agric. Publish. Co., Glasgow, 19 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Calder, A. and Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1928. Pig testing: the results of preliminary work on bacon type. Scot. J. Agric, 11: 318–325.Google Scholar
  53. Calder, A. 1930–1931. Experiences of pig testing in Scotland. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 10: 74–85.Google Scholar
  54. Calder, A. 1931. Individuality and performance in the selecting of breeding pigs. Lanes. County Milk Record. Soc. Year Book, 1931.Google Scholar
  55. Calder, A. 1933–1934. Pig breeding in Scotland. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 13: 123–129.Google Scholar
  56. California Agricultural Experiment Station. 1929–30. Breeding experiments with Berkshire hogs. California Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 57.Google Scholar
  57. Calinescu, J. 1929. Rendementul animalelor de macelarie. Rev. stiintel. vet., No. 9: 247.Google Scholar
  58. Campbell, D. M. 1914. Springtime Surgery. 3rd Ed. Chicago. 163 pp.Google Scholar
  59. Canada: Dominion Department of Agriculture, 1923. Federal assistance to hog breeding. The Boar Premium Policy for Swine Clubs. Domin. Depart. Agric, Live Stock Branch. 8 pp.Google Scholar
  60. Carlyle, see Richter, Hempel, Ohligmacher and Rodewald, 1928.Google Scholar
  61. Carmichael, W. J. and Rice, J. B. 1920. Variations in farrow: with special reference to the birth weight of pigs. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 226: 65–95.Google Scholar
  62. Carr-Saunders, A. M. 1922. Note on inheritance in swine. Science, 55: 19.Google Scholar
  63. Carroll, W. E. and Roberts, E. 1928. Crossbred pigs prove no better than pure-breds. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 124.Google Scholar
  64. Carroll, W. E., Bull, S., Rice, J. B., Laible, R. J. and Smith, R. A. 1929. Swine Type Studies: I. Type in swine as related to rate and economy of gain. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 321: 339–392.Google Scholar
  65. Chlebaroff, G. S. 1925–26. [Growth, fattening capacity and economic value of Bulgarian breeds of pig.] Yearb. Agric. Faculty, Sofia Univ.Google Scholar
  66. Christensen, F. W., Thompson, O. A. and Jorgenson, L. 1926a. Bacon and lard type hogs compared. Production of bacon hog. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 194: 23–27.Google Scholar
  67. Christensen, F. W., Thompson, O. A. and Jorgenson, L. 1926b. Prolificacy of sows and mortality of pigs. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 194: 83.Google Scholar
  68. Claus, G. 1928. Züchterische Betrachtungen zur veredelten Landschweinezucht. Dtsch. landw. Tierz. 32, No. 47.Google Scholar
  69. Clemente, L. S. 1931. A genetic study of inbreeding and outbreeding in Berkshire swine. Natur, appl. Sci. Bull., 1: 173–186.Google Scholar
  70. Cole, L. J., Park, J. S. and Deakin, A. 1933. „Seedy Cut” as affecting bacon production. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 118, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  71. Congrès de l’élévage et l’alimentation du porc. 1928. Travaux Soc. nat. d’encourag. à l’agric, Paris, 559 pp.Google Scholar
  72. Constantinescu, G. K. 1928. Ein rezessives Weiss beim Schwein. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 47: 147–150.Google Scholar
  73. Constantinescu, G. K. 1933. Vererbungsversuche an Schweinen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Mangalitzaschweines. Z. Züchtg., B. 26: 395–427.Google Scholar
  74. Cooper, T. P. 1914. Pork production contest. Breeders’ Gaz., 65: 523–524.Google Scholar
  75. Corner, G. W. 1920. A case of true lateral hermaphroditism in a pig with functional ovary. Carneg. Instit. Publ. 274: 137–142.Google Scholar
  76. Corner, G. W. 1921. Internal migration of the ovum. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 32: 78–83.Google Scholar
  77. Coues, E. 1878. On a breed of solid-hoofed pigs apparently established in Texas. Bull. U. S. Geol. & Geog. Surv., 4: 295–298.Google Scholar
  78. Craft, W.A. 1924–26. Genetic investigations with swine at the Oklahoma Station: A study of two different systems of breeding, limited inbreeding and outcrossing, when practised with swine. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta., Bien. Rpt.: 34-37.Google Scholar
  79. Craft, W. A. 1927–30. Outbred hogs outgain inbred hogs. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 78-81, 83-85.Google Scholar
  80. Craft, W. A. 1927–30. Pigs inherit swirl hair. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 86.Google Scholar
  81. Craft, W. A. 1929. The influence of birth weight upon subsequent development of inbred and outbred pigs. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim.Prod.: 128-130. (1930).Google Scholar
  82. Craft, W. A. 1931. Further observations on inbred and outbred pigs in the feed yard. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 265-266. (1932).Google Scholar
  83. Crew, F. A. E. 1923a. Three cases of developmental intersexuality in the pig. Veter. J., 79, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  84. Crew, F. A. E. 1923b. Studies in intersexuality. I. A peculiar type of developmental intersexuality in the male of the domesticated mammals. Proc. Roy. Soc, B. 95: 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Crew, F. A. E. 1924a. Blue and white colour in swine. J. Hered., 15: 395–396.Google Scholar
  86. Crew, F. A. E. 1924b. Hermaphroditism in the pig. J. Obst. Gynaecol., 31: 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Crew, F. A. E. 1924c. Genetics and the pig breeder. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 4: 40–45.Google Scholar
  88. Crew, F. A. E. 1925. Prenatal death in the pig and its effect upon the sex-ratio. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 46: 9–14.Google Scholar
  89. Crew, F. A. E. 1927. Abnormal sexuality in animals. II. Physiological. Quart. Rev. Biol., 2: 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Crew, F. A. E. 1927. The genetics of sexuality in animals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Culbertson, C. C. and Evvard, J. M. 1925. The costly influence of an inferior sire. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 1, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  92. Culbertson, C. C. and Evvard, J. M. 1925–26. A superior litter of crossbred pigs. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 53-59. (1927).Google Scholar
  93. Culbertson, C. C., Evvard, J. M., Kildee, H. H. and Helser, M. D. 1928. Swine Performance Record — Litter Comparisons. Series I. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 26, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  94. Culbertson, C. C., Evvard, J. M., Kildee, H. H. and Helser, M. D. 1931. Swine Performance Record — Litter Comparisons. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 277: 86–115.Google Scholar
  95. Culbertson, C. C., Kildee, H. H., Helser, M. D. and Hammond, W. E. 1932. Swine Performance Record — Litter Comparisons. — Series II. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 28, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  96. Culbertson, C. C., Kildee, H. H., Helser, M. D. and Hammond, W. E. 1933. Swine Performance Record — Litter Comparisons — Series III. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 30, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  97. Dabrowa-Szremowicz, S. V. 1905a. Eine neue Abart von Schweinen. Illust. Landw. Ztg., 25: 564–565.Google Scholar
  98. Dabrowa-Szremowicz, S. V. 1905b. Einhuferschweine. Illust. Landw. Ztg., 25: 810–811.Google Scholar
  99. Dahlander, — 1927. Erste Leistungsprüfung der ostpreussischen Schweinezüchter-Vereinigung Königsberg i. Pr. Dtsch. landw. Tierz., 31, No. 45.Google Scholar
  100. Dahlander, G. 1932. Die Zucht des Schweines. Anleit. dtsch. Ges. Zch-tngsk., Heft 19.Google Scholar
  101. Damle, D. M. 1931. How many times wild pigs breed in one year? Agric. & Livestock in India, 1: 274–275.Google Scholar
  102. Danish foreign office journal, 1930. Pig breeding and the bacon industry. The Danish Foreign Office, Copenhagen, November, 1930.Google Scholar
  103. Darwin, C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  104. Dassogno, L. 1915. Sulla durata della gravidanza nelle scrofe Yorkshires. Industr. Latt. Zootec, No. 12: 180–182.Google Scholar
  105. David, L. T. 1932. Histology of the skin of the Mexican hairless swine (Sus scrofa). Amer. J. Anat., 50: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Davidson, H. R. 1924. Records of production and their use in breeding. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 4: 26–30.Google Scholar
  107. Davidson, H. R. 1927. Variations in carcase type for pork and bacon. Scot. J. Agric, 10: 394–403.Google Scholar
  108. Davidson, H. R. 1930. Reproductive disturbances caused by feeding protein-deficient and calcium-deficient rations to breeding pigs. J. Agric Sci., 20: 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Davidson, H. R. 1933. The results of twenty-five years of pig testing in Denmark and their relation to pig recording methods in Great Britain. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 13: 34–45.Google Scholar
  110. Davidson, H. R. 1933. Pig recording as a factor in cheapening and increasing pig production. J. Min. Agric, 40: 42–50.Google Scholar
  111. Davidson, H. R. 1934. First cross pigs for bacon. Farmer & Stockbreeder, N. S., 48: 2552.Google Scholar
  112. Davidson, H. R. and Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1927–1928. Pig testing and recording for the purposes of advanced registry. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 7: 3–19.Google Scholar
  113. Davidson, H. R. and Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1927–1928. Recording and pig testing for the purpose of advanced registry. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 7: 46–62.Google Scholar
  114. Davidson, H. R. and Duckham, M. A. 1929. First report on the East Anglian pig recording scheme. Dept. Agric, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  115. Day, G. E. 1915. Productive swine husbandry. Lippincott’s Farm Manuals, 2nd Edition; J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia & London. 363 pp.Google Scholar
  116. Deakin, A. 1932a. Melanic pigmentation of the mammary glands of the black breeds and the red breed of pigs. Proc. VI. Intern. Cong. Genetics, 2: 41–42.Google Scholar
  117. Deakin, A. 1932b. Cases of extreme sexual infantilism in the sow. Anat. Rec, 51: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Dechambre, P. 1925. L’Hybridation du sanglier et du porc Rev. d’hist. nat. appl., 6: 207–212.Google Scholar
  119. Dechambre, P. 1926. La reproduction entre les porcs et les sangliers, hybridation ou croisement? Rev. Zootech., 5, No. 4.Google Scholar
  120. Dechambre, P. 1929. Études génétiques sur les porcs et les sangliers. Réc. méd. vétér., 105: 129–184.Google Scholar
  121. Dechambre, P. 1934. La croissance du jeune porc pendant son élevage. Rev. Zootech., No. 2: 75–79.Google Scholar
  122. Deighton, T. 1929. A study of the metabolism of two breeds of pigs. J. Agric. Sci., 19: 140–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Detlefson, J. A. & Carmichael, W. J. 1921. Inheritance of syndactylism, black and dilution in swine. J. Agric. Res., 20: 595–604.Google Scholar
  124. Dieckert, F. 1929. Über die Fruchtbarkeit des weissen deutschen Edel-schweines nach Untersuchungen an Herdbuchtieren der ostpreussi-schen Schweinezüchtervereinigung Allenstein in den Jahren 1918–27. Züchtungskunde, 4: 474–483.Google Scholar
  125. Döhrmann, H. 1930. Alkalmas-e az isohaemogglutinatio és a precipitalio a sertés fajtatisztáságak megallapitására? Dissertation, Budapest.Google Scholar
  126. Drahn, F. 1923. Zur Entstehung der Hyperdaktylie beim Schwein. Eine embryologisch-entwicklungs-mechanische Studie. Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierhlk., 49: 245–260.Google Scholar
  127. Duchanek, J.O. 1894. Hermaphroditismus bei Schweinen. Tierärztl. Zbl., 17.Google Scholar
  128. Duckham, A. N. 1928–1929. The commercial value of pig recording. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 8: 67–72.Google Scholar
  129. Duckham, A. N. 1929a. Second report on the East Anglian pig recording scheme. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  130. Duckham, A. N. 1929b. Pig recording in East Anglia. J. Min. Agric, 36: 731–738.Google Scholar
  131. Duckham, A. N. 1929c. Aspects of pig recording. Essex County Farmers’ Yearbook.Google Scholar
  132. Duckham, A. N. 1929–1930. The interpretation of pig recording results. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 9: 70–76.Google Scholar
  133. Duckham, A. N. 1930–31. Rationalising the pig industry. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 10.Google Scholar
  134. Duncker, G. 1915. Die Frequenzverteilung der Geschlechtskombinationen bei Mehrlingsgeburten des Menschen und des Schweins. Biol. Zbl., 35: 506–539.Google Scholar
  135. Dunlop, G. 1933. Methods of experimentation in animal nutrition. J. Agric. Sci., 23: 580–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Durham, G. B. 1921. Inheritance of belting spotting in cattle and swine. Amer. Nat., 55: 476–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Ellinger, T. 1921. The influence of age on fertility in swine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 7: 134–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Ellinger, T. & Evvard, J. M. 1923. The register of performance for swine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 57-61. (1924).Google Scholar
  139. Eudes-Deslongchamps. 1842. Mém. Soc. Linn, de Normandie, 7: 41. (Cited by Darwin).Google Scholar
  140. Evans, B. R. 1930. Duroc Sentinel, 5, No. 11: 3.Google Scholar
  141. Evvard, J. M. & Culbertson, C. C. 1926. Studies of swine types. Amer. Herdsman, No. 1: 6.Google Scholar
  142. Evvard, J. M. 1926. Crossbred hogs win new laurels. Amer. Swineherd, No. 12: 4.Google Scholar
  143. Evvard, J. M., Culbertson, C. C., Shearer, P. S., Bassett, C. F. & Hammond, W. E. 1926. Part II. Development of the crossbred and purebred pigs from weaning time to market. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet No. 20.Google Scholar
  144. Eyton, T. C. 1837. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 5: 23.Google Scholar
  145. Fargo, J. M. and Coyner, J. M. 1930. Experiments with swine in Alabama. Pigs that make best gains also yield best carcases. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 24, 25.Google Scholar
  146. Feige, E. 1932. Die Nutzung unserer Schweinerassen. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr., 48: 716–717.Google Scholar
  147. Ferrin, E. F. and McCarty, M. A. 1923. The comparative feed requirements and rate and cost of gains of fall and spring farrowed pigs. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim, Prod.: 71-74 (1924).Google Scholar
  148. Ferrin, E. F. 1930. Testing breeding hogs for big production. Swine World, 17 (4).Google Scholar
  149. Ferrin, E. F. 1931. Selecting the most profitable brood sow type. Swine World, 18.Google Scholar
  150. Ferrin, E. F., Anderson, P. A. and Johnson, Do. 1931. The selection of breeding stock on the basis of economy of gains and carcass values. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Sta., Private Publication.Google Scholar
  151. Ferrin, E. F., Anderson, P. A. and Johnson, Do. 1932. National swine record of performance. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Sta., Private Publication.Google Scholar
  152. Ferrin, E. F. 1932. Production tests for the selection of breeding hogs. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 134-137 (1933).Google Scholar
  153. Feunteun, L. 1932. Étude zootechnique de la production porcine en Co-chinchine. Bull. Écon. Indo-Chine. (Rev. Zootech. No. 12: 404-409).Google Scholar
  154. Finlay, G. F. 1924. Sterility in swine. Nat. Council Pig Breed. & Feed., Bull. No. 1, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  155. Fishbein, M. 1913. Isoagglutination in man and lower animals. J. Infect. Diseases, 12: 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Fleming, G. 1902. A textbook of operative veterinary surgery. Vol. 2. London & New York.Google Scholar
  157. Förster, G. 1927. Die Eberstationen als Mittel zur Hebung der Schweinezucht. Dtsch. landw. Presse, 54: 661.Google Scholar
  158. Frings, P. 1932. Die Zucht des veredelten Lahdschweines in der Provinz Schleswig-Holstein. Arb. Dtsch. Ges. Zchtngskde., Heft 54, 77 pp.Google Scholar
  159. Frölich, G. 1911. Fruchtbarkeit und Geschlechtsverhältnis beim weissen Edelschwein. Jahrb. wiss. prakt. Tierzucht, 6: 451–454.Google Scholar
  160. Frölich, G. 1913. Uber die Ergebnisse experimenteller Vererbungsstudien beim Schwein. J. Landw., 61: 217–235.Google Scholar
  161. Frölich, G. 1919. Über Abstammung und Inzucht, an der Hand der wichtigsten Blutlinien des weissen deutschen Edelschweins, Ammerländer. Dtsch. landw. Tierz., 23: 69–71, 76-78, 83-85.Google Scholar
  162. Frölich, G. 1927. Zucht-und Nutztypen in der Schweinezucht. Z. f. Schweinez., 34: 73–77.Google Scholar
  163. Frost, J. A. 1933. (In litteris) 11.2.33.Google Scholar
  164. Funkquist, H. 1927. Der Stand der Rinder-, Schaf-und Schweinezucht in Schweden und ihre Hebung. Züchtungskunde, 2: 289–312.Google Scholar
  165. Funkquist, H. 1929. Erbliche Begattungsunfähigkeit bei Zuchtebern. Hereditas, 13: 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Gadeau de Kerville, H. 1902. Notes de Tératologie mammalogique et ornithologique. Bull. Soc. Amis Sci. Nat. Rouen: 131-143.Google Scholar
  167. Galbusera, S. 1920. Di alcuni ibridi osservati in Sardegna. La clinica veter., 43: 385–386.Google Scholar
  168. Garth, W. 1894. Zwei Fälle von Hermaphroditismus verus beim Schwein. Dissertation, Giessen, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  169. Gärtner, R. 1931. Vererbung beim Schwein. Züchtungskunde, 6: 241–249.Google Scholar
  170. Gentry, N. W. 1905. Inbreeding Berkshires. Amer. Breed. Ass. Rpt.: 168-171.Google Scholar
  171. George, C. R. 1912. The inheritance of fecundity in Poland-China sows. Thesis, University of Ohio.Google Scholar
  172. Ginieis, C. R. 1912. Hermaphrodisme chez le porc. Rec. Méd. vétér. Alfort, 85: 478–481.Google Scholar
  173. Girard, A. 1921. Les races porcines méridionales. Rev. vétér. (Toulouse), 73: 82–95, 466-485.Google Scholar
  174. Godbey, E. G. 1930. A study of the results of intensively inbreeding Berkshire swine. South Carolina Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 35.Google Scholar
  175. Goeldi, E. A. 1914. Ueber atavistische Längsstreifung bei den neugeborenen Jungen gewisser Rassen des Hausschweines. C.R. 9. Congr. Internat. Zool.: 369-370.Google Scholar
  176. Gohren. See Richter, Hempel, Ohligmacher and Rodewald, 1928.Google Scholar
  177. Golf, A. 1927. Neuere Forschungsergebnisse in der Schweinezucht und Schweineaufzucht. Mitt. dtsch. Landw.-Ges., 42, No. 49: 1108–1112.Google Scholar
  178. Gonzalez, B. M. & Lago, F. P. 1923. Improving Philippine swine. J. Philippine Agric., 12.Google Scholar
  179. Gould, H. N. 1923. Observations on the genital organs of a sex-inter-grade hog. Anat. Rec., 26: 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Graham, R., Tunnicliff, E. A. & Frank, E. R. 1925. [Livestock disease investigations]. Illinois Sta. Rpt.Google Scholar
  181. Graham, R. & Tunnicliff, E. A. 1926. [Investigations on swine diseases at the Illinois Station]. Illinois Sta. Rpt.Google Scholar
  182. Graham, R., Tunnicliff, E. A. & McCulloch, E. C. 1927. [Work with hog cholera at the Illinois Station]. Illinois Sta. Rpt.: 88-90.Google Scholar
  183. Grahl, W. 1904. Acht Fälle von Zwitterbildung beim Schwein, darunter ein Fall von Hermaphroditismus verus lateral is. Inaug. Dissert., München. pp. 1-49.Google Scholar
  184. Grandi, W. C. 1931. Pig-keeping costs. Min. Agric. & Fish., Bull. 33: 1–26.Google Scholar
  185. Grimes, J. C. & Sewell, W. E. 1928. Improving serub hogs by the use of purebred sires. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 12-13.Google Scholar
  186. Grimes, J. C., Sewell, W. E. & Taylor, W. C. 1929. Improving scrub hogs by the use of purebred sires. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 13-15.Google Scholar
  187. Grimes, J. C. & Sewell, W. E. 1930. Experiments with swine in Alabama. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta., Rpt.Google Scholar
  188. Grimes, J. C., Sewell, W. E. & Taylor, W. C. 1930. Grading up hogs by the use of purebred sires. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 234, 12pp.Google Scholar
  189. Griswold, D. J., Trowbridge, P. F., Hogan, A. G., & Haigh, L. D. 1928. The effect of gestation and lactation upon the growth and composition of swine. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 114, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  190. Gutbrod, K. 1932. Die Rasse-und Typfrage in der süddeutschen Schweinezucht. Südd. Landw. Tierzucht, 26, No. 34.Google Scholar
  191. Habu, Y. 1930. Inheritance of face shape in swine. Japan. J. Genet., 6: 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Habu, Y. 1932. Comparison of the growth of swine with special reference to the utilisation of F1. Imp. Zootech. Exp. Sta. Chiba-Shi., Bull. No. 30, 36 pp.Google Scholar
  193. Haecker, V. 1918. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Eigenschaftsanalyse (Phaenogenetik). Gemeinsame Aufgaben der Entwicklungsgeschichte, Ver-erbungs-und Rassenlehre. Fischer, Jena, 344 pp., 181 figs.Google Scholar
  194. Haldane, J. B. S. 1927. The comparative genetics of colour in rodents and carnivora. Biol. Rev., 2: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Hale, F. 1933. Pigs born without eye balls. J. Hered., 24: 105–106.Google Scholar
  196. Hallam, 1833. [Letter on a singular race of pigs.] Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 16.Google Scholar
  197. Hallqvist, C. 1933. Ein Fall von Letalfaktoren beim Schwein. Hereditas, 18: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Hammond, J. A. 1912. Case of hermaphroditism in the pig. J. Anat. Physiol., 7: 307–312.Google Scholar
  199. Hammond, J. 1914. On some factors controlling fertility in domestic animals. J. Agric. Sci., 6: 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Hammond, J. 1921. Further observations on the factors controlling fertility and foetal atrophy. J. Agric. Sci., 11: 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Hammond, J. 1922. On the relative growth and development of various breeds and crosses of pigs. J. Agric. Sci., 12: 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Hammond, J. 1926. The importance of a prolific strain. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 6: 73–75.Google Scholar
  203. Hammond, J. 1927. Growth and conformation in the pig. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 7: 76–81.Google Scholar
  204. Hammond, J. 1929. Fertility in pigs. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 9: 23–27.Google Scholar
  205. Hammond, J. 1932. Pigs for pork and pigs for bacon. J. Roy. Agric. Soc. England, 93: 131–145.Google Scholar
  206. Hammond, J. 1933. The anatomy of pigs in relation to market requirements. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 13: 28–33.Google Scholar
  207. Hammond, J. 1934a. Conformation and development of the bacon pig. Agric. Progress, 11: 127–129.Google Scholar
  208. Hance, R. T. 1917–1918. The diploid chromosome complexes of the pig (Sus scrofa) and their variations. J. Morph., 30: 155–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Hance, R. T. 1918. Variations in somatic chromosomes. Biol. Bull., 35: 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1923. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för genomförande av avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1923. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 266, Husdjuravd. No. 40, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  211. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1924. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1924. Medd. Centralanst försöksväs. jordbr., No. 289, Husdjuravd. No. 46, 78 pp.Google Scholar
  212. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1926. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1925. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 306, Husdjuravd. No. 49.Google Scholar
  213. Hansson, N. 1927a. Leistungskontrolle in der schwedischen Schweinezucht. Z. Tierz. Zücht Biol., 10: 341–376.Google Scholar
  214. Hansson, N. 1927b. De svenska svinerasernas fruktsamhet. Landtmannen: 589-590.Google Scholar
  215. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1927. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1926. Jämte över-sikt över de under ären 1923–1926 uppnådda medelresultaten. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 322, Husdjuravd. No. 53, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  216. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1928. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1927. Medd’. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 339, Husdjuravd. No. 59, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  217. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1929a. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen før avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1928. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 363, Husdjuravd. No. 64, 31 pp.Google Scholar
  218. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1929b. Översikt över resultaten av Åstorps-försöken åren 1923–28. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 364, Husdjuravd. No. 65, 50 pp.Google Scholar
  219. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1930. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1929. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 381, Husdjuravd. No. 73, 43 pp.Google Scholar
  220. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1931. Verksamheten vid försöksstationen för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1930. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 402, Husdjuravd. No. 77, 64 pp.Google Scholar
  221. Hansson, N. & Bengtsson, S. 1932. Verksamheten vid försöksstationerna för avkastningskontroll inom svinaveln under år 1931. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs jordbr., No. 414, Husdjuravd. No. 80, 55 pp.Google Scholar
  222. Harris, J. A. 1916. Variation, correlation, and inheritance of fertility in the mammals. Amer. Nat., 50: 626–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Hart, E. B. & Steenbock, H. 1918a. Hairless pigs. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 297, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  224. Hart, E. B. & Steenbock, H. 1918b. Thyroid hyperplasia and the relations of iodine to the hairless pig malady. J. Biol. Chem., 33: 313–322.Google Scholar
  225. Hays, F. A. 1919. Inbreeding animals. Delaware Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 123: 5–49.Google Scholar
  226. Hayward, H. 1917. Inbreeding experiments with pigs. Delaware Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 17.Google Scholar
  227. Hempel, K. 1925. Über die Entwicklung der Ferkel während der Säugezeit und die Einrichtung von Leistungsprüfungen in der Schweinezucht. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  228. Henning, G. F. & Stout, W. B. 1932. Factors influencing the dressing percentage of hogs. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 505, 32 pp.Google Scholar
  229. Herlyn, K. E. 1928. Über Blutgruppen bei Tieren. Züchtungskunde, 3: 377–398.Google Scholar
  230. Hermann, G. 1932. Über die Schilddrüsen von Wild-und Hausschwein und ihren verschiedenen Rhythmus in der Tätigkeit. Arch. Tierheilk., 64: 547–550.Google Scholar
  231. Hicks, W. H. 1922. Experiments with swine at the Agassiz experimental farm. Canada Exp. Farms, Agassiz Farm Rpt. Supt.: 15-18.Google Scholar
  232. Hicks, W. H. et alii. 1924. Experiments with swine at the Canadian Experimental Farms. Canada Exp. Farms, Rpts. Supts.Google Scholar
  233. Hicks, J. S. 1933. Genetics and the practical breeder of pure-bred stock. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 13: 45–50.Google Scholar
  234. Hinman, R. B. 1926. Bacon breeds. Amer. Swineherd, 3:16.Google Scholar
  235. Hobday, F. T. G. 1914. Castration and ovariotomy. 2nd Ed., 162 pp. W. & A. K. Johnston Ltd., Edinburgh & London.Google Scholar
  236. Hobson, A. 1931. Wessex Saddleback markings. Nat. Pig Breed. Ass. Gaz., No. 16: 37–46.Google Scholar
  237. Höfliger. 1931. Haarkleid und Haut des Wildschweines, VII. Beitrag zur Anatomie von Sus scrofa L. und zum Domestikationsproblem. Z. Anat., 96: 551–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Hofman-Bang, N. O. 1922. 10de Beretning om sammenlignende Forsøg med Svin fra statsunderstøttede Avlscentre. 109de Beretning fra Forsøgs-laboratoriet. København. 109 pp.Google Scholar
  239. Hogan, A. G. 1923. The relation of age and weight of swine to gains in nutrients. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 28-31. (1924).Google Scholar
  240. Hogan, A. G. & McKenzie, F. F. 1926. Fecundity of swine: The normal sexual cycle and the cycle as influenced by age and by unfavourable dietary conditions. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 244: 24.Google Scholar
  241. L’hostis, J. & Gilbert, M. 1923. Un cas d—hermaphrodisme chez le porc. Rec. Méd. Vétér. Alfort, 100: 427–435.Google Scholar
  242. Hughes, E. H. 1933. Inbreeding Berkshire swine. J. Hered., 24: 199–203.Google Scholar
  243. Hughes, E. H. 1935. Polydactyly in swine. J. Hered., 26: 415–418.Google Scholar
  244. Hughes, E. H. & Hart, H. 1934. Defective skulls inherited in swine. J. Hered., 25: 111–115.Google Scholar
  245. Hughes, W. 1927. Sex-intergrades in foetal pigs. Biol. Bull., 52: 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Hughes, W. 1929. The free-martin condition in swine. Anat. Rec., 41: 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Hughes, W. 1930. The twinning condition in swine. Trans. R. Canad. Inst., 17: 209–216.Google Scholar
  248. Hutt, F. B. 1934. Inherited lethal characters in domestic animals. Cornell Veterinarian, 24: 1–25.Google Scholar
  249. Idaho agricultural experiment station. 1931. Genetic studies with swine at the Idaho Station. Idaho Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 179: 20.Google Scholar
  250. Illinois agricultural experiment station. 1923. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 16.Google Scholar
  251. Illinois agricultural experiment station. 1923’24. [Seek strain of hogs resistant to cholera.] Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 72.Google Scholar
  252. Illinois agricultural experiment station. 1924–25. [Intermediate pigs still superior in type tests.] Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 55-57.Google Scholar
  253. Illinois agricultural experiment station. 1926. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 49-59.Google Scholar
  254. Indiana agricultural experiment station. 1930. Swine efficiency test completed. Indiana Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.Google Scholar
  255. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1918. [Different types of swine respond differently to feed.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 20-21.Google Scholar
  256. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1922. [The question of swine type.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 23.Google Scholar
  257. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1925. [Type test with swine.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 62-63.Google Scholar
  258. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1926. [Swine inbreeding versus outbreeding.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 23.Google Scholar
  259. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1926. [Breeding swine for natural resistance to cholera.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 43.Google Scholar
  260. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1927. [Swine feeding and breeding experiments at the Iowa Station.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 17, 18, and 21.Google Scholar
  261. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1928a. [Investigations with swine at the Iowa Station. Type tests with swine.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 48, 49.Google Scholar
  262. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1928&. [Breeding for resistance to cholera in swine.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 33-34.Google Scholar
  263. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1929. [Breeding for resistanc to hog cholera at the Iowa Station.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 33-34.Google Scholar
  264. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1930. [Swine performance record.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 52-53.Google Scholar
  265. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1931. [Experiments with livestock.] Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 22-31, 33-35, 37.Google Scholar
  266. Iowa agricultural experiment station. 1933. Pig testing results. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 30.Google Scholar
  267. Ivanov, M. F. 1933. Novaja poroda svineĭ — Ukrainskaja belaja. Probl. Životn., No. 1: 32-42.Google Scholar
  268. Jakobiec, J. and Marchlewski, T. 1932. O wpływie bliskiego chowu krewniaczego na biologiczne i uzytkowe właścuvości świni domowej. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Lett., B. II: 347–361.Google Scholar
  269. Jespersen, J. and Madsen, M. P. O. 1929. Beretning om Afkomsunder-Søgelser over Orner af Dansk Landrace. Bull. Roy. Vet. Agric. Coll., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  270. Jespersen, J. & Madsen, M. P. O. 1931. Beretningom Afkomsundersøgelser over Orner af Dansk Landrace. Samvirk. Danske Andelsslag., 138 pp.Google Scholar
  271. Joest, E. 1921. Spezielle pathologische Anatomie der Haustiere. 2, 650 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
  272. Johansson, I. 1929a. Statistiska undersokningar över svinens fruktsam-het. Nordisk Jordbrugsforsk.: 85-99.Google Scholar
  273. Johansson, I. 1929b. Statistische Untersuchungen über die Fruchtbarkeit der Schweine. Z. Tierzücht. Zücht Biol., 15: 49–86.Google Scholar
  274. Johansson, I. 1929c. Dräktighetsidens längd hos nötkreatur och svin. Ultuna Lantbruksinst. årsberät.: 41-59.Google Scholar
  275. Johansson, I. 1931. Problems in breeding for high prolificacy. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 11: 80–87.Google Scholar
  276. Jorgenson, C. E. 1922. Field and laboratory studies of infectious enteritis in young pigs and the efficiency of bacterins in the control of this disease. N. Amer. Vet., 3: 642–646.Google Scholar
  277. Joseph, W. E. 1924. Feeding brood sows and growing the litters. Montana Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 165, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  278. Kaempffer, A. 1932. Über ein zweites Isoagglutinogen-Agglutininpaar, B-B, im Schweineblut. Z. Rassenphysiol., 5: 53–58.Google Scholar
  279. Kaempffer, A. 1932. Über die Vererbung der Blutgruppen des Schweins. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 61: 261–293.Google Scholar
  280. Kalugin, I. I. 1925. Contributions to the study of tri-and polydactylous pigs of White Russia, II, III, IV, and V. (t.t.) Bull. White Russ. State Inst. Agric. & Forest., No. 5, 30 pp., No. 7, 65 pp., No. 8, 53 pp. + 47 plates.Google Scholar
  281. Kansas agricultural experiment station. 1915–16. Inheritance investigation in swine. Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 19.Google Scholar
  282. Kansas agricultural experiment station. 1917–18. Inheritance investigations in swine. Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 42-43.Google Scholar
  283. Kayser, W. 1929. Individualitätsreaktionen des Blutes von Schafen, Ziegen, Schweinen und* Rindern. Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
  284. Keith, T. B. 1930. Relation of size of swine litters to age of dam and to size of succeeding litters. J. Agric. Res., 41: 593–600.Google Scholar
  285. Kennessey, B. 1930. Adatok a Magyarországí Berkshiretényesztéshez. Me-zögazdasági Közlöny, Budapest, 5 sez.: 237-246.Google Scholar
  286. Kentucky agricultural experiment station. 1922. Size, sex and weight of pigs per litter. Kentucky Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt., pt. 1: 46-47.Google Scholar
  287. King, F. G. 1926. Is motherliness in brood sows an inheritable character? Poland China J., 12, No. 17: 4.Google Scholar
  288. Kingsbury, B. F. 1909. Report of a case of hermaphroditism (H. verus lateralis) in Sus scrofa. Anat. Rec, 3: 278–282.Google Scholar
  289. Kinzelbach, W. 1931. Untersuchungen über Atresia ani beim Schweine, Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 60: 84–124.Google Scholar
  290. Kitchin, A. W. M. 1930. Third report on the East Anglian pig recording scheme. Animal Nutrition Institute, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  291. Kitchin, A. W. M. 1931. Economic aspects of pig recording. J. Min. Agric, 37: 957–965.Google Scholar
  292. Kloss, C. B. 1921. Malaysian bearded pigs. J. Straits Branch, Roy. Asiatic Soc, No. 83: 147–150.Google Scholar
  293. Koch, P. & Neumüller, O. 1932. Gesichtsspalten als Erbfehler beim Schwein. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr., 40: 353–357.Google Scholar
  294. Konopinski, T. 1932. Poszukiwania wspöłzależności pomiedzy liczbą sutek u macior a ilością urodzonych prosiśt. Rocz. Nauk Roln. Lesn., 28: 277–300.Google Scholar
  295. Kopsch, Fr. & Szymonowicz, L. 1896. Ein Fall von Hermaphroditismus verus bilateralis beim Schweine, nebst Bemerkungen über die Entstehung der Geschlechtsdrüsen aus dem Keimepithel. Anat. Anz., 12: 129–139.Google Scholar
  296. Kosswig, C. & Ossent, H. P. 1931. Die Vererbung der Haarfarben beim Schwein. Z. Züchtg., B. 22: 297–383.Google Scholar
  297. Kosswig, C. & Ossent, H. P. 1932. Ein Beitrag zur Vererbung der Haarfarben beim Schwein. Züchter, 4: 225–230.Google Scholar
  298. Kosswig, C. & Ossent, H. P. 1933. Bemerkungen von Kosswig-Ossent zur Arbeit Kronacher-Ogrizek. Z. Züchtg., B. 26: 429–430.Google Scholar
  299. Kozelka, A. W. 1929. The inheritance of natural immunity among animals. J. Hered., 20: 519–530.Google Scholar
  300. Krallinger, H. 1930. Über einige das Geschlechtsverhältnis beeinflussende Faktoren. Züchtungskunde, 5: 490–502.Google Scholar
  301. Krallinger, H. 1931. Cytologische Studien an einigen Haussäugetieren. Arch. Tierern. u. Tierz., 5: 127–187.Google Scholar
  302. Krallinger, H. & Schott, A. 1933. Untersuchungen über Geschlechtsleben und Fortpflanzung der Haustiere. II. Der Einfluss des Decktermins innerhalb der Rausche der Schweine auf ihre Fruchtbarkeit und das Geschletsverhältnis der Nachkommen. Arch. Tierern u. Tierz., 9: 41–49.Google Scholar
  303. Krallinger, H. & Schott, A. 1934. Untersuchungen über Geschlechtsleben und Fortpflanzung der Haustiere. III. Hat der Eber einen Einfluss auf die durchschnittliche Ferkelzahl der von ihm erzeugten Würfe? Züchtungskunde, 9: 175–179.Google Scholar
  304. Krediet, G. 1929. Gonade und Uterus beim intersexuellen Schwein. Baum-Festschr. Schaper, Hannover.Google Scholar
  305. Krediet, G. 1930. Hermaphroditismus. Geneesk., 28: 199–282.Google Scholar
  306. Krediet, G. 1932. Ein Genitalapparat eines intersexuellen Schweines mit 2 Ovariotestes. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk., 59: 194–202.Google Scholar
  307. Kreiner, H. 1926. Das halbrote bayrische Landschwein im Entwicklungsgang der Schweinezucht in Altbayern, besonders in Niederbayern und in der Oberpfalz. Land. i. Bayern, Rietsch, Gm. b. H.Google Scholar
  308. Kronacher, C. 1924. Vererbungsversuche und Beobachtungen an Schweinen. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 34: 1–120.Google Scholar
  309. Kronacher, C. 1926. Nochmals: Schweineleistungsprüfungen. Mitt. dtsch. Landw.-Ges., 41: 943–948.Google Scholar
  310. Kronacher, C. 1927. Allgemeine Tierzucht. Part IV. Die Züchtung. Paul Parey, Berlin: 549-550.Google Scholar
  311. Kronacher, C. 1930. Weitere Vererbungsbeobachtungen und-Versuche an Schweinen. Z. Züchtg., B. 18: 315–365.Google Scholar
  312. Kronacher, C. & Ogrizek, A. 1932. Vererbungsversuche und-Beobachtungen an Schweinen. III. Z. Züchtg., B, 25: 3–43.Google Scholar
  313. Kronacher, C. & Ogrizek, A. 1933. Bemerkungen Kronacher-Ogrizek. Stellungnahme zu den Bemerkungen C. Kosswigs zu unserer Arbeit „Vererbungsversuche und-Beobachtungen an Schweinen. III”. Z. Züchtg., B, 26: 431–434.Google Scholar
  314. Krüger, H. 1926. Schlachtbeobachtungen und Ausschlachtungsversuche an Schweinen. Wiss. Arch. Landw., 3.Google Scholar
  315. Kuchenbecker, L. 1931. Ein Schwein mit Eselhufen. Dtsch. landw. Presse, 58: 310.Google Scholar
  316. Kudrjavcev, P. N. 1932. Opyt ocenki summarnogo genotipa proizvodite-leĭ v svinovodstve. Probl. Životn., No. 7: 82–87.Google Scholar
  317. Kudrjavcev, P. N. 1933. Polialleljnoe skreščivanie kak metod ispytanija hrjakov. Probl. Životn., No. 4.: 42–46.Google Scholar
  318. Kuhlman, A. H. & Cole, L. J. 1929. Birth weight important factor in swine production. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 405: 64.Google Scholar
  319. Kulow, H. 1928. Ein Vergleich zweier Blutlinien von Wurfgeschwistern des deutschen veredelten Landschweines in bezug auf Körperformen und Leistungen. Z. Tierzüchtg. ZüchtBiol., 13: 1–92.Google Scholar
  320. Lacy, M. D. 1932. Differences between barrows and gilts in the proportion of pork cuts. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 354-357. (1933).Google Scholar
  321. Laible, R. J., Bull, S. & Mitchell, H. H. 1924. Swine type tests favour intermediate pig. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 59-69.Google Scholar
  322. Laible, R. J., Smith, R. A. Bull, S. & Longwell, J. H. 1925. Intermediate pigs still superior in type tests. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 55-57.Google Scholar
  323. Lambert, W. V., Murray, C. & Shearer, P. S. 1928. Selection for natural resistance to cholera in swine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 33-37. (1929).Google Scholar
  324. Larsson, S. 1928. Gödningsgradens inverkan på svinens Foderförbruk-ning pr kg. tillväxt. Medd. Centralanst. försöksväs. jordbr., No. 338, Husdjuravd. No. 58, 26 pp.Google Scholar
  325. Larsson, S. 1929. Recording and litter testing in Sweden. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 9: 28–33.Google Scholar
  326. Layley, G. W. & Malden, W. J. 1935. The evolution of the British pig. London: John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd. 119 pp.Google Scholar
  327. Leeny, H. 1920. Livestock of the Farm. London.Google Scholar
  328. Lehmann, F. 1911. Über den Futterbedarf und die Leistung des säugenden Mutterschweines. J. Landw., 59: 317–363.Google Scholar
  329. Lehmann, F. 1911. Grundlagen der modernen Schweinemast. Jahrb. dtsch. Landw.-Ges., 16: 942–955.Google Scholar
  330. Lehmann, W. 1924. Studien über den Zusammenhang von Wüchsigkeit mit Trockensubstanz und Alkaligehalt des Blutes bei Schweinen. Dissertation, Bern.Google Scholar
  331. Letard, E. & Legendre, G. 1933. Situation de l’élevage porcin en France. Rev. Zootech., No. 4: 300–310.Google Scholar
  332. Lloyd-Jones, O. & Evvard, J. M. 1919. Studies on color in swine. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 53: 203–208.Google Scholar
  333. Lowrey, L. G. 1911. Prenatal growth of the pig. Amer. J. Anat., 12: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  334. Lucey, J. 1931–1932. Pig breeding in the Irish Free State. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 11: 121–125.Google Scholar
  335. Lund, A., Beck, H. & Rosting, P. 1925. 13de Beretning om sammenlig-nende Forsøg med Svin fra statsunderstøttede Avlscentre.l 17de Beretning fra Forsøgslaboratoriet. København, 146 pp.Google Scholar
  336. Lush, J. L. 1921. Inheritance in swine. J. Hered., 12: 57–71.Google Scholar
  337. Lush, J. L. 1923. Cross breeding of swine and the chief results. Breed. Gaz., 83: 74.Google Scholar
  338. Lush, J. L. 1925. The possibility of sex control by artificial insemination with centrifuged spermatozoa. J. Agric. Res., 30: 893–913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  339. Lush, J. L. 1926. Inheritance of horns, wattles, and color. J. Hered., 17: 72–91.Google Scholar
  340. Lush, J. L. 1931. Genetic aspects of the record of performance work with swine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 51-62. (1932).Google Scholar
  341. Lush, J. L. & Culbertson, C. C. 1931. The consequences of inbreeding Poland-China hogs. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 23.Google Scholar
  342. Lush, J. L., Culbertson, C. C. & Hammond, J. A. 1931. Weight at birth important in pigs. Poland China J., 18, No. 4.Google Scholar
  343. Lüthge, H. 1930. Das deutsche veredelte Landschwein. Z. Schweinez., No. 36: 599–601.Google Scholar
  344. Lüthge, H. 1933. Beobachtungen über die Bedeutung der Ausgeglichenheit von Ferkelwürfen und die Vererbung dieser Eigenschaft. Züchtungskunde 8: 333–344.Google Scholar
  345. Machens, A. 1915. Fruchtbarkeit und Geschlechtsverhältnis beim veredelten Landschwein. Berl. tierärztl. Wchschr., 31: 559–562.Google Scholar
  346. MacCarthy, C. J. 1929. The department’s policy in regard to the improvement of cattle and swine. Dept. Agric. J., No. 2: 135–148. (Dublin).Google Scholar
  347. Mackenzie, K. J. J. & Marshall, F. H. A. 1915. On ovariotomy in sows; with observations on the mammary glands and the internal genital organs. J. Agric. Sci., 7: 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  348. Malsburg, K. 1924. Recherches génétiques sur le porc monongulé. Rozp. Biolog.: 247-254.Google Scholar
  349. Manzano, 1934. Performing pigs. Farmer & Stockbreeder, Jan. 8th.: 94.Google Scholar
  350. Marshall, L. M. 1928. Standardising quality in pigs. Live Stock J.: 107.Google Scholar
  351. Masko, R. 1930. Über das Blutbild beim Hausschwein. Dissertation, Zagreb.Google Scholar
  352. Matthews, B. 1927. Leistungskontrolle in der Schweinezucht. Dtsch. landw. Tierzucht, 31, No. 46.Google Scholar
  353. McArthur, C. L. 1918. The immunity of suckling pigs to hog cholera. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 151: 3–22.Google Scholar
  354. McKenzie, F. F. 1928. Growth and reproduction in swine. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 118, 67 pp.Google Scholar
  355. McKenzie, F. F. 193.1. [Studies on physiology of reproduction]; Cryptor-chidism in swine. Missouri Agric Exp. Sta., Bull. 300.Google Scholar
  356. McKenzie, F. F. 1932. [Breeding experiments at the Missouri Experiment Station]. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 310.Google Scholar
  357. McLean, J. A. 1914. The sapphire hog. J. Hered., 5: 301–304.Google Scholar
  358. McPhee, H. C. & Zeller, J. H. 1925. Unusual coat colours in swine. J. Hered., 16: 347–350.Google Scholar
  359. McPhee, H. C. 1925–26. The value of herd book data for the genetic investigations of sex-ratio and frequency of sex combinations in swine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 203-206. (1927).Google Scholar
  360. McPhee, H. C. 1927. The swine herd-book as a source of data for the investigation of the sex-ratio and frequency of sex-combinations in pig litters. J. Agric. Res., 34: 715–726.Google Scholar
  361. McPhee, H. C. 1930a. Swine inbreeding at the United States Department of Agriculture Laboratories and at the State Experiment Stations. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 128-131. (1931).Google Scholar
  362. McPhee, H. C 1930b. Swine inbreeding at the United States Department of Agriculture — a Progress Report. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 131-134. (1931).Google Scholar
  363. McPhee, H. C. 1931. Size of litter as a selection index in swine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 262-264. (1932).Google Scholar
  364. McPhee, H. C., Russell, E. Z. & Zeller, J. 1931. An inbreeding experiment with Poland-China swine. J. Hered., 22: 393–403.Google Scholar
  365. McPhee, H. C. 1932. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on swine. Proc. VI. Intern. Cong. Genetics, 2: 132–133.Google Scholar
  366. McPhee, H. C. & Buckley, S. S. 1934. Inheritance of cryptorchidism in swine. J. Hered., 25: 295–303.Google Scholar
  367. Meiners, F. 1922. Sieben Fälle von Polydactylie beim Schwein. Med. vet. Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
  368. Melvin, A. D. & Schroeder, E. C. 1906. Animal breeding and disease. U. S. Dept. Agric, Bur. Anim. Indust., Rpt.: 213-222.Google Scholar
  369. Miller, P. E. 1919. Hairless pigs. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Sta., Morris Sub-sta. Rpt.: 45-46.Google Scholar
  370. Milne, B. C. 1920. Experiments with swine in Canada. Canada Exp. Farms Rpt.: 172.Google Scholar
  371. Milovanov, V. K. 1932. Sovremennoe sostojanie voprosa iskusstvennogo osemenenija svinei. Probl. Životn., No. 4: 31-34.Google Scholar
  372. Minkler, F. C. 1916. Hog cholera. New Jersey Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 132-136.Google Scholar
  373. Mohler, J. R. 1933. Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry, 1933. U. S. Dept. Agric, Bureau Anim. Ind., 47 pp.Google Scholar
  374. Mohr, O. 1930. Dodbringende arvefaktorer hos husdyr og mennesker. Natu-rens Verden., 14: 1–31.Google Scholar
  375. Möller, H. & Dollar, J. A. W. 1903. The practice of veterinary surgery. Vol. 3, Regional surgery. 583 pp. London.Google Scholar
  376. Morkeberg, P. A. 1916. [The present position and future prospects of swine breeding in Denmark.] Tiddskr. Landökonomi, 5: 233–269Google Scholar
  377. Morkeberg, P. A. 1916. [The present position and future prospects of swine breeding in Denmark.] Tiddskr. Landökonomi, 6: 324–336; Dept. Agric. Tech. Inst. Ireland J., 17: 40-56.Google Scholar
  378. Morkeberg, P. A. 1926. Selection methods in Denmark. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 6: 48–56.Google Scholar
  379. Morris, H. P. & Johnson, D. W. 1932. Effects of nutrition and heredity upon litter size in swine and rats. J. Agric. Res., 44: 511–521.Google Scholar
  380. Morrison, R. 1926. The individuality of the pig; its breeding, feeding and management. London, John Murray: xii + 377 pp.Google Scholar
  381. Moskovits, F. 1931. Present tendencies in European pig production. Month. Bull. Agric. Sci. & Prac, 22: 225–231.Google Scholar
  382. Mumford, F. B. 1921. The effect on growth of breeding immature animals. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 45: 3–37.Google Scholar
  383. Mumford, F. B. & Bernard, P.M.I 1924. Age as a factor in animal breeding. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 210: 34–36.Google Scholar
  384. Mumford, F. B. & McKenzie, F. F. 1925. Age as a factor in animal breeding. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 228: 31.Google Scholar
  385. Mumford, F. B., Hogan, A. G. & McKenzie, F. F. 1925–26. Swine breeding; the effect of age, unfavourable dietary conditions and the normal oestrous cycle. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 85-88.(1927).Google Scholar
  386. Mund, F. 1926. Die Entwicklung der Zucht des veredelten Landschweins in der Provinz Sachsen. Arb, Dtsch. Ges. Zchtngsk., No. 31.Google Scholar
  387. Murray, G. N. 1934. A statistical analysis of growth and carcase measurements of baconers. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci., 2: 301–360.Google Scholar
  388. Nachtsheim, H. 1922. Vererbung bei Schweinen. I. Schweine als Versuchstiere für Vererbungsexperimente. Z. Schweinez., 29: 65–71.Google Scholar
  389. Nachtsheim, H. 1924. Über die Vererbung der Zitzenzahl beim Schwein und ihre Bedeuting für die Praxis. Mitt. dtsch. Landw.-Ges., 39: 455–459.Google Scholar
  390. Nachtsheim, H. 1924. Vererbungversuche an Schweinen: Die Vererbung von Farbe und Zeichnung. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 33: 317.Google Scholar
  391. Nachtsheim, H. 1924. Vererbungsversuche an Schweinen: Die Vererbung der Zitzenzahl. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 33: 307–311.Google Scholar
  392. Nachtsheim, H. 1925a. Zitzenzahl und Ferkelzahl. Dtsch. landw. Tierzucht, 29: 345–349.Google Scholar
  393. Nachtsheim, H. 1925b. Untersuchungen über Variation und Vererbung des Gesäuges beim Schwein. Z. Tierzücht. ZüchtBiol., 2: 113–161.Google Scholar
  394. Nachtsheim, H. 1933. Zur Frage der Züchtung seuche-immuner Hausschweine. Züchtungskunde, 8: 450–452.Google Scholar
  395. Nathusius, — 1864. „Schweinschädel”. Berlin. (as cited by Darwin, 1868).Google Scholar
  396. Nathusius, [Simon von.] 1912. Hochinteressante Vererbung bei Schweinen. III. landw. Ztg., 33: 618.Google Scholar
  397. Neuhaus, M. 1930. Inheritance of Number of Nipples in the Domestic Pig. (t.t.) Ž. eksper. Biol. (Russian), 6: 73–77.Google Scholar
  398. Neuhaus, M. 1930. Inheritance of Some Characters in the Pig. (t.t.) Ž. eksper. Biol. (Russian), 6: 233–236.Google Scholar
  399. New zealand department of scientific and industrial research, 1930. Pig recording, bacon manufacture, and some aspects of the pig industry in New Zealand. New Zeal. Dep. Sci. Indust. Res., Bull. 17, 62 pp. Wellington.Google Scholar
  400. Nordby, J. E. 1929a. An inherited skull defect in swine. J. Hered., 20: 229–232.Google Scholar
  401. Nordby, J. E. 1929b. Congenital skin, ear and skull defects in a pig. Anat. Rec, 42: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  402. Nordby, J. E. 1929c. Sterility in boar responsible for reduced size of litters. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass., 74: 911–914.Google Scholar
  403. Nordby, J. E. 1930. Congenital ear and skull defect in swine. J. Hered., 21:499–501.Google Scholar
  404. Nordby, J. E. 1932a. Inheritance of whorls in the hair of swine. J. Hered. 23: 397–404.Google Scholar
  405. Nordby, J. E. 19326. Type in market swine and its influence on quality of pork. Idaho Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 190, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  406. Nordby, J. E. 1933a. Congenital melanotic skin tumors in swine. J. Hered., 24:361–364.Google Scholar
  407. Nordby, J. E. 1933b. Cryptorchidism and its economic importance to the producer of swine and the processor of pork products. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass., 82: 901–912.Google Scholar
  408. Nordby, J. E. 1934a. White-spotting in Duroc-Jersey swine. J. Agric. Res., 49: 625–634.Google Scholar
  409. Nordby, J. E. 1934b. Kinky tail in swine. J. Hered., 25: 171–174.Google Scholar
  410. Ohio agricultural experiment station. 1930–31. Fiftieth annual report. Hog experiments. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 497: 128–132.Google Scholar
  411. Ohio agricultural experiment station. 1931–32. Fifty-first annual report; swine experiments. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 516: 81–84.Google Scholar
  412. Ohligmacher, K. 1925. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Ferkel während der Säugezeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der ersten Kreuzungswürfe aus veredelten Landschweinen mit Berkshires. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  413. Oklahoma agricultural experiment station. 1924–26. A report on investigations of farm problems. Oklah. Agric. Exp. Sta:, Bien Rpt.: 34-37 [See Craft, W. A.].Google Scholar
  414. Ossent, H. P. 1929. Rezessives Weiss und Frischlingsstreifung der Man-galitza-Schweine. Züchter, 1: 11–13.Google Scholar
  415. Ossent, H. P. 1932. Ein seuche-immunes wildfarbiges Hausschwein. Züchter, 4: 152–158.Google Scholar
  416. Ossent, H. P. 1933. Die Züchtung widerstandsfähiger Schweinerassen. Züchtungskunde, 8: 399–402.Google Scholar
  417. Ostertag, H. P. and Zuntz, —. 1908. Untersuchungen über die Milchsekretion des Schweines und die Ernährung der Ferkel. Landw. Jahrb., 37: 201–260.Google Scholar
  418. Palmer, C. C. 1917. Partial thyroidectomy in pigs. Amer. J. Physiol., 42: 572–581.Google Scholar
  419. Park, J. S. 1930. Tests show new factors affecting pork yields. National Provisioner, March 1st, June 7th and August 30th, 1930.Google Scholar
  420. Parker, G. H. & Bullard, C. 1900. The arrangement of the mammary glands in litters of unborn pigs. Science, 11: 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  421. Parker, G. H. & Bullard, C. 1913. On the size of litters and the number of nipples in swine. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci., 49: 399–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  422. Parker, G. H. 1914. A note on sex determination. Science, 39: 215–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  423. Parkes, A. S. 1923a. Studies on the sex-ratio and related phenomena. III. The influence of size of litter. Ann. Appl. Biol., 10: 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  424. Parkes, A. S. 1923b. Studies on the sex-ratio and related phenomena. IV. The frequencies of sex-combinations in pig litters. Biometrika, 15: 373–381.Google Scholar
  425. Parkes, A. S. 1925. Studies on the sex-ratio and related phenomena. VII, The foetal sex-ratio in the pig. J. Agric. Sci., 15: 284–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  426. Parkes, A. S. 1926. Studies on the sex-ratio and related phenomena. VIII. The seasonal sex-ratio in the pig. Z. indukt. Abst. Vererbg., 40: 121–138.Google Scholar
  427. Patel, D. S. 1932. How many times wild pigs breed in a year. Agric. & Livestock in India, 2: 232.Google Scholar
  428. Pearl, R. 1913. On the correlation between the number of mammae of the dam and size of litter in mammals. I. Interracial correlation. II. Intraracial correlation in swine. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 11: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  429. Pearl, R. 1918. The seasonal distribution of swine breeding. Science Month., 7: 244–251.Google Scholar
  430. Pease, M. S. 1929. Mendelism. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 9: 44–48.Google Scholar
  431. Pergoli, — 1924. Le odierne conoscenze sull’ eredità e la loro pratica ap-plicazione zootecnica. Giorn. Agricolt. del Domenica, 34: 60.Google Scholar
  432. Petersen, P. & Oetken, Fr. 1896. Untersuchungen über die Zusammensetzung der Schweinemilch, speciell über den Fettgehalt derselben. Milchztg.: 665, 736.Google Scholar
  433. Pick, L. 1914. Über den wahren Hermaphroditismus des Menschen und der Säugetiere. Arch. mikr. Anat., 84: 119–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  434. Plaim, R. 1930. Über Messungen am Becken weiblicher Schweine verschiedener Rassen. Vet.-med. Dissertation, Wien.Google Scholar
  435. Plumb, C. S. 1927. Marketing farm animals. The Athenaeum Press, Ginn and Company, Boston, U. S. A., 366 pp.Google Scholar
  436. Popov, N. A. 1926. The influence of age on the intensity and cost of fattening pigs (t. t.). Trans. Yaroslav. Zootech. Exp. Sta.: 122-124.Google Scholar
  437. Prentiss, C. W. 1902–03. Polydactylism in man and the domestic animals with especial reference to digital variation in swine. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 40: 245–314.Google Scholar
  438. Price, W. T. 1932. Pig keeping in Scandinavia. Agric. Prog., 9: 78–84.Google Scholar
  439. Price, W. T. 1932. Pig recording in Wiltshire. Pig Breeders’ Anuval, 12: 102–107.Google Scholar
  440. Pütz, H. 1889. Ein Fall von Hermaphroditismus verus unilateralis bei einem Schweine. Dtsch. Z. Tiermed., 15: 91–100.Google Scholar
  441. Racz, M. 1931. Problems and methods of breeding lard pigs. Month. Bull. Agric. Sci. & Pract., 22: 467–474.Google Scholar
  442. Rang, F. 1931. Untersuchungen über die Isohämagglutination im Blute des Schweines und Rindes mit eingeengten Seren. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  443. Reed, F. H. 1922. Swine experiments at the Lacombe experimental station. Canada Expt. Farms, Lacombe Sta., Rpt. Supt.: 38-48.Google Scholar
  444. Reed, F. H. & Chapman, L. T. 1927. Swine husbandry in Central Alberta. Canada Dept. Agric, Bull. 73, N. S., 32 pp.Google Scholar
  445. Reynolds, M. H. 1910. Immunity in young pigs from cholera immune sows. Amer. Vet. Rev., 38: 236–237.Google Scholar
  446. Rhoad, A.O. 1934. Woolly hair in swine. J. Hered., 25: 371–375.Google Scholar
  447. Richter, K. 1925. Die gewichtsmässige Entwicklung der Ferkel der veredelten Landschwein-und der deutschen weissen Edelschweinrasse. während einer zehnwöchigen Säugeperiode. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  448. Richter, K. 1926. Zwillings-und Mehrlingsgeburten bei unseren landwirtschaftlichen Haussäugetieren. Arb. dtsch. Ges. Zchtngsk., No. 29: 88-100.Google Scholar
  449. Richter, K., Hempel, K., Ohligmacher, K. & Rodewald, A. 1928. Untersuchungen an Sauen und Ferkeln während der Säugezeit bei den wichtigsten deutschen Schweinerassen. Arb. dtsch. Ges. Zchtngsk., No. 37, 81 pp.Google Scholar
  450. Ritzoffy, N. 1931. Prinos k poznavanju turopoljskog svinjćeta. (English Summary). Vet. Arh.: 83-134.Google Scholar
  451. Ritzoffy, N. 1933. Die Rolle der Inzucht in der Turopoljer Schweinerasse. Z. Züchtg. B., 27: 419–429.Google Scholar
  452. Roberts, E. & Rice, J. B. 1924. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 70-73.Google Scholar
  453. Roberts, E. 1925–26. Inheritance of resistance to disease. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 50-53. (1927).Google Scholar
  454. Roberts, E. & Laible, R. J. 1925. Heterosis in pigs. J. Hered., 16: 383–385.Google Scholar
  455. Roberts, E. 1925. Heredity involved in hairlessness of animals. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 59.Google Scholar
  456. Roberts, E. & Card, L. E. 1925–26. Further data on inheritance of resistance to disease. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 201-203. (1927).Google Scholar
  457. Roberts, E. 1927. Study of hairlessness now directed at causes. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 74.Google Scholar
  458. Roberts, E. Carroll, W. E. 1927. [Work with hog cholera at the Illinois Station.] Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 88-90.Google Scholar
  459. Roberts, E. 1928. Heredity looms larger in animal abnormalities. Illinois Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 124-125.Google Scholar
  460. Roberts, E. & Carroll, W. E. 1931. The inheritance of „hairlessness” in swine-Hypotrichosis. II. J. Hered., 22: 125–132.Google Scholar
  461. Roberts, J. A. Fraser. 1929. The inheritance of a lethal muscle contracture in the sheep. J. Genet., 21: 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  462. Robertson, G. S. 1933. Pig breeding and marketing in Northern Ireland. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 13 108–115.Google Scholar
  463. Robinson, H. G 1922. Evolution of the Tamworth, Large White and Middle White pigs. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 2: 15–24.Google Scholar
  464. Robinson, H. G. 1923. Some digressions upon breeding. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 3: 7–11.Google Scholar
  465. Robinson, H. G. 1934. May on the Farm. J. Min. Agric, 41: 192–194.Google Scholar
  466. Robison, W. L. 1919. Effect of age of pigs on rate and economy of gains. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 335: 545–575.Google Scholar
  467. Robison, W. L. 1932. Comparative gains of purebred and crossbred hogs. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 497: 130.Google Scholar
  468. Robison, W. L. 1932. Dressed yields of barrows and sows. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 497: 129–130.Google Scholar
  469. Rodewald, J. 1926. Über die Milchleistung der Sauen und das Wachstum der Ferkel des hann.-braunschw. Landschweines, während der acht-wöchigen Säugezeit. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  470. Rommel, G. M. 1906. The fecundity of Poland-China and Duroc-Jersey sows. U. S. Dept. Agric, Circ. 95, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  471. Rommel, G. M. 1907. Inheritance of litter size in Poland-China sows. Amer. Breed. Ass. Rpt., 3: 201–208.Google Scholar
  472. Rommel, G. M. & Phillip, E. F. 1907. Inheritance in female line of size of litter in Poland-China sows. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc, 45: 245–254.Google Scholar
  473. Rothwell, G. B. 1920. Experiments with swine in Canada. Canada Expt. Farms Rpt.: 190.Google Scholar
  474. Rothwell, G. B. 1921. Experiments with swine. Canada Expt. Farms, Anim. Husb. Div., Interim Rpt.: 26-39.Google Scholar
  475. Rothwell, G. B. 1924. Feeding experiments with swine at the Central Experimental Farm. Canada Expt. Farms, Anim. Husb. Div., Rpt.: 36-52.Google Scholar
  476. Rothwell, G. B., Macmillan, A. A., and Peterson, A. W. 1931. The advanced registry policy for pure-bred swine. Live Stock Branch, Dominion Dept. Agric, Ottawa, Canada, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  477. Rothwell, G. B. and Peterson, A. W. 1934. The advanced registry policy for pure-bred swine. Live Stock Branch, Dominion Dept. Agric, Ottawa, Canada, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  478. Rózycki, K. 1933. Dotychczasowe wyniki badań kontrolnych nad trzodą bekonową. Przegląd hodowl., 7: 175–180.Google Scholar
  479. Russell, E. Z. 1922. Breeds of swine. U. S. Dept. Agric, Farm Bull. 1263, 22 pp.Google Scholar
  480. Sabatini. 1908. Untersuchungen über die Dauer der Trächtigkeit bei unseren wichtigsten Haustieren beinflusst durch Frühreife, Erstgeburt, sowie Zahl und Geschlecht der Föten. Jahrb. wiss. prakt. Tierzucht, 3.Google Scholar
  481. Sanders, H. G. 1931. Sows’ milk yields. J. Min. Agric, 37: 1041–1042.Google Scholar
  482. Sauerbeck, E. 1909. Über den Hermaphroditismus verus und den Hermaphroditismus im allgemeinen von morphologischen Standpunkt aus. Frankf. Z. Pathol., 3: 339–357, 661-705, 829-878.Google Scholar
  483. Schermer, S. 1929. Über das Vorkommen von Blutgruppen bei den Haustieren, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der Grollschen Agglutinationsbilder. Züchtungskunde, 4: 169–179.Google Scholar
  484. Schermer, S. 1930. Die Blutgruppen bei den Haustieren. Forsch. Fortschr., 6: 366–367.Google Scholar
  485. Schermer, S. Kayser, W., & Kaempffer, A. 1930. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Isoagglutinine im Blute des Menschen und des Schweines. Z. Immunitätsfrschg., 68: 437–449.Google Scholar
  486. Schermer, S. & Kaempffer, A. 1932. Über die genetische Bedingtheit der Isoagglutinine auf Grund von Blutgruppenuntersuchungen beim Schwein. Klin. Wchschr., 11: 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  487. Schmidt, See Richter, Hempel, Ohligmacher and Rodewald, 1928.Google Scholar
  488. Schmidt, Ad. 1915. Über den Einfluss der Domestikation auf die mechanischen Qualitäten der Pars compacta von Sus scrofa dom. nebst einigen Beiträgen zur Theorie der funktionellen Anpassung des Extremitätenskeletts. Arch. Entw. Mech., 41: 472–534, 605-671.Google Scholar
  489. Schmidt, J. & Lauprecht, E. 1926. Über die Milch der veredelten Landschweinsauen und ihre Zusammensetzung. Züchtungskunde, 1: 50–62.Google Scholar
  490. Schmidt, J., Lauprecht, E. & Vogel, H. 1926. Beiträge zur Entwicklung und Ernährung der Ferkel während der Säugezeit. Züchtungskunde, 1: 242–256.Google Scholar
  491. Schmidt, J. 1927. Über Leistungsprüfungen in der Schweinezucht, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Provinz Hannover. Dtsch. landw. Presse, 54: 658–659.Google Scholar
  492. Schmidt, J. & Vogel, H. 1927. Bericht über die Schweineleistungsprüfungen der Landwirtschaftskammer für die Provinz Hannover. Z. Schweinez., 34: 521–528.Google Scholar
  493. Schmidt, J. & Vogel, H. 1928. Leistungsprüfungen an veredelten Landschweinen auf dem Versuchsgut Friedland der Universität Göttingen. Züchtungskunde, 3: 153–182.Google Scholar
  494. Schmidt, J., Vogel, H. & Zimmermann, C. 1929. Leistungsprüfungen an deutschen veredelten Landschweinen und deutschen weissen Edelschweinen. Arb. dtsch. Ges. Zchtngsk., No. 47, 146 pp.Google Scholar
  495. Schmidt, J. & Vogel, H. 1930a. Bericht über die Schweineleistungsprüfungen in der Provinz Hannover. Züchtungskunde, 5: 193–216.Google Scholar
  496. Schmidt, J. & Vogel, H. 1930b. Ein Beitrag zur Rassenbeurteilung des veredelten Landschweines und des deutschen Edelschweines auf Grund ihrer Nutzleistungen. Dtsch. landw. Presse, No. 2: 16.Google Scholar
  497. Schoenfeld, —. 1928. Leistungsprüfungen bei Schweinen. Dtsch. landw. Tierzucht, 32, No. 16.Google Scholar
  498. Schoessau, W. 1927. Die Leistungsprüfungen in Schlesien. Z. Schweinez., 34: 703–707.Google Scholar
  499. Schott, A. 1931. Studien über die züchterische Bedeutung der Blutgruppen des Schweines. Wiss. Arch. Landw., B. 7: 68–108.Google Scholar
  500. Schotterer, A. 1933. Polydaktylie und Gaumenspalte bei deutschen Edelschweinen. Z. Züchtg., B. 26: 219–223.Google Scholar
  501. Schweder, G. 1895. [Note on the Occurrence of three-toed pigs on the Upper Dvina.] Korresp.bl. Naturf. Ver. Riga, 38: 82.Google Scholar
  502. Schwyzer, M. 1928. Die Fruchtbarkeit des veredelten Landschweins. Schweiz, landw. Monatshefte, 6: 251–253.Google Scholar
  503. Seedorf, —. 1932. Nachrichten über den Vieh-und Fleischmarkt. No. 44.Google Scholar
  504. Severson, A. 1917. Color inheritance in swine. J. Hered., 8: 379–381.Google Scholar
  505. Severson, A. 1925–26. Prolificacy of sows and mortality of pigs. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 60-62. (1927).Google Scholar
  506. Severson, A. 1932. [Experiments with livestock in North Dakota.] North Dakota Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 256.Google Scholar
  507. Shaw, A. M. 1929. Variations in the skeletal structure of the pig. Sci. Agric, 10: 23–27.Google Scholar
  508. Shaw, A. M. 1930. A method of determining the variations in the vertebral column of the live pig. Sci. Agric, 10: 690–695.Google Scholar
  509. Shearer, P. S., Evvard, J. M., & Culbertson, C. C. 1926. Crossbreds versus purebreds in producing market hogs. Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta., Leaflet 20., 11 pp.Google Scholar
  510. Shearer, P. S. & Culbertson, C. C. 1931. Outbreeding versus crossbreeding with swine. Iowa Agric Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 24.Google Scholar
  511. Shepperd, J. H., Christensen, F. W., Thompson, O. A., & Kuenning, A. C. 1924. Hairlessness in pigs (at the Williston substation). N. Dakota Agric Exp. Sta., Bull. 174: 96.Google Scholar
  512. Silverhjelm, W. 1933. Wyniki pracy hodowlanej w Szwecji nad polepszeniem trzody bekonowej. Przegląd hodowl., 7: 299–300.Google Scholar
  513. Simpson, Q. I. 1907. Reversion induced by cross-breeding. Science, 25: 426–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  514. Simpson, Q. I. 1907. Rejuvenation by hybridisation. Proc Amer. Breed. Ass.Google Scholar
  515. Simpson, Q. I. 1908. Genetics in swine hybrids. Science, 27: 941.Google Scholar
  516. Simpson, Q. I. 1909. Inheritance of face shape in swine. Amer. Breed. Ass. Rpt., 5: 250–255.Google Scholar
  517. Simpson, Q. I. 1911. Analytical hybridizing. Amer. Breed. Ass Rpt., 7: 266–275.Google Scholar
  518. Simpson, Q. I. 1912. Fecundity in swine. Amer. Breed. Ass. Rpt., 8: 261–266.Google Scholar
  519. Simpson, Q. I. 1914. Coat-pattern in mammals. J. Hered., 5: 329–339.Google Scholar
  520. Sinclair, R. D. & Sackville, J. P. 1927. A study of some problems in bacon hog production. Alberta Coll. Agric, Bull. 15, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  521. Sinclair, R. D. & Syrotuck, M. 1928. Age as a factor in swine reproduction. Sci. Agric, 8: 492–496.Google Scholar
  522. Sinclair, R. D. 1932. Swine Production in Alberta. Alberta Coll. Agric, Bull. 22, 90 pp.Google Scholar
  523. Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1926. Geneticist’s point of view in mating pigs. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 6: 42–47.Google Scholar
  524. Smith, A. D. Buchanan & Calder, A. 1928. Pig testing. The results of preliminary work on bacon type. Scot. J. Agric., 11: 318–325.Google Scholar
  525. Smith, A. D. Buchanan & Calder, A. 1930. Pig testing station. First report. 1928–30. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  526. Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1930–31. Litter size: is it inherited? Pig Breeders’ Annual, 10: 46–52.Google Scholar
  527. Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1933. Pig testing and recording. Agric. Prog., 10: 114–119.Google Scholar
  528. Smith, A. D. Buchanan. 1934. University of Edinburgh, Institute of Animal Genetics. The Farm of Shothead. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd. 15 pp.Google Scholar
  529. Smith, G. E. & Welch, H. 1917. Foetal athyrosis. A study of the iodine requirement of the pregnant sow. J. Biol. Chem., 29: 215–225.Google Scholar
  530. Smith, W. W. 1913. Colour inheritance in swine. Amer. Breed. Mag., 4: 113–123.Google Scholar
  531. Sommer, K. 1931. Die englischen Schweinemasttypen und ihre Beurteilung unter Berücksichtigung der Absatzverhältnisse. Arch. Tierernähr. Tierz., 6: 260–312.Google Scholar
  532. Spencer, S. 1921. Evolution of the improved pig. Pig Breeders’ Annual, 1: 10–11.Google Scholar
  533. Spillman, W. J. 1906. Inheritance of coat-colour in swine. Science, 24: 441–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  534. Spillman, W. J. 1907a. Colour inheritance in mammals. Science, 25:313–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  535. Spillman, W. J. 1907b. Inheritance of the belt in Hampshire swine. Science, 25: 541–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  536. Spillman, W. J. 1908. Colour factors in mammals. Amer. Breed. Ass. Rpt., 4: 357–359.Google Scholar
  537. Spillman, W. J. 1910. History and peculiarities of the mule-foot hog. Amer. Breed. Mag., 1: 178–182.Google Scholar
  538. Spöttel, W. 1924. Über Domestikationserscheinungen bei Schweinen. Z. Schweinez., 32: 65–68, 79-82, 112-114, 129-130.Google Scholar
  539. Staffe, A. 1914. Beiträge zu einer Monographie des Landschweines der südlichen Ostalpen. Mitt. landw. Lehrkanz., Hchsch. Bodenkult., Wien, 3: 335–446.Google Scholar
  540. Stahl. — 1930. Ruhlsdorfer Beobachtungen zur Ferkelaufzucht. Z. Schweinez., 37: 423–427.Google Scholar
  541. Stang. — 1931. Schweine Versuchswirtschaft Ruhlsdorf. Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 47: 709.Google Scholar
  542. Stewart, W. A. 1931. Pig-keeping. Min. Agric. Fish., Bull. 32.Google Scholar
  543. Struthers, J. 1863. On the solid-hoofed pig; and on a case in which the fore foot of the horse presented two toes. Edinburgh New Phil. J., 17: 273–280.Google Scholar
  544. Sultemeier, H. 1927. Ein Beitrag zur Leistungsprüfung in der Schweinezucht. Dtsch. landw. Presse, 54: 297–298.Google Scholar
  545. Surface, F. M. 1909. Fecundity of swine. Biometrika, 6: 433–436.Google Scholar
  546. Szymanowski, Z., Stetkiewicz, St., & Wachler, B. 1926. Les groupes sérologiques dans le sang du porc et leur relation avec les groupes du sang humain. C. R. Soc. Biol., 94: 204–205.Google Scholar
  547. Teodoreanu, N. I. 1922. Die Schweineborste als Rassenmerkmal. Med. Vet. Dissertation, Hannover.Google Scholar
  548. Teodoreanu, N. I. 1929. Vererbungsbeobachtungen bei Schweinen. Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Rouman., 12: 26–37.Google Scholar
  549. Teodoreanu, N. I. 1930. Histo-ethnologische Untersuchungen über die Struktur der Haut bei Mangalicza-und Lincolnshire-Schweinen. Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Rouman., 13: 139–157.Google Scholar
  550. Teodoreanu, N. I. 1931. Weitere Untersuchungen über die ethno-histologische Struktur der Haut bei verschiedenen Schweinerassen und deren Kreuzungsprodukten. Z. Zücht., B, 21: 146–169.Google Scholar
  551. Teodoreanu, N. I. 1932. Weitere Vererbungsbeobachtungen am Schwein. Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Rouman., 15: 165–180.Google Scholar
  552. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 1932. Report.Google Scholar
  553. Thomson, G. M. 1922. The naturalisation of animals and plants in New Zealand. Cambridge Univ. Press, 607 pp.Google Scholar
  554. Tinline, M. J. 1922. Experiments with swine at the Scott experiment station. Canada Expt. Farms, Scott. Sta., Rpt. Supt.: 13-19.Google Scholar
  555. Tinline, M. J. 1923. Experiments with swine at the Scott experiment station. Canada Expt Farms, Scott Sta., Rpt. Supt.: 5-8.Google Scholar
  556. Toole, W. Investigations with swine. Ontario Dept. Agric, Ann. Rpt., 47: 33–36.Google Scholar
  557. Toole, W. & Knox, R. G. 1926. The bacon hog: breeding, growing and finishing. Ontario Dept. Agric, Ontario Agric. College., Bull. 320, 15pp.Google Scholar
  558. Tuff, Per. 1932. Foredlingsarbeidet i svineavlen. Norsk Landmandsblad, Nos. 5 & 6.Google Scholar
  559. Uhlenhuth, P., Miessner, H. & Geiger, W. 1933. Züchtung seuchenfester Schweinerassen. Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr., 41: 49–51.Google Scholar
  560. Vitzthum Von Eckstaedt, W. 1928. Fruchtbarkeitsuntersuchungen an Schweinen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Inzuchtverhältnisse. Züchtungskunde, 3: 473–495.Google Scholar
  561. Volpini, A. 1924. Delia prolificità e fecondità delle scrofe. L’aveniro zoot. umbro, 4: 6.Google Scholar
  562. Walentowicz, A. 1888. O przypadku dwuplciowosci obustronnej u świni. Mem. Cracow Acad. Sci., Math-nat. Sect., 14: 71–74.Google Scholar
  563. Walther, J. A. 1929. Cercetari asupra porcului de Basana. Bul. direct, gen. zootech. sanit. vet., 15, 572.Google Scholar
  564. Walter, Ad. R., Prüfer, J. and Carstens, P. 1932. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vererbungserscheinungen beim Schwein. Züchter, 4: 178–184.Google Scholar
  565. Warwick, B. L. 1926a. Inheritance of black in swine. J. Hered., 17: 251–255.Google Scholar
  566. Warwick, B. L. 1926b. A Study of Hernia in Swine. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 69: 1–27.Google Scholar
  567. Warwick, B. L. 1927. What factors determine the number, size and weight of newborn pigs? Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 396: 64–67.Google Scholar
  568. Warwick, B. L. 1928a. Inheritance of scrotal hernia in swine. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bimonth. Bull. 13: 15–18.Google Scholar
  569. Warwick, B. L. 1928b. Prenatal growth of swine. J. Morph. Physiol., 46: 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  570. Warwick, B. L. & Bell, D. S. 1930. Genetic experiments with sheep and swine. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 446: 153–154.Google Scholar
  571. Warwick, B. L. 1931. Breeding experiments with sheep and swine. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 480. 37 pp.Google Scholar
  572. Waschinsky, G. 1925. Über den Thymus des Schweines. Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
  573. Weaver, L. A. 1929. Swine feeds and feeding. Poland China J., 15 (12).Google Scholar
  574. Welch, H. 1917. Hairlessness and goiter in newborn domestic animals. Montana Agric. Exp. Sta., Bull. 119: 81–104.Google Scholar
  575. Welch, H. 1917. The cause and prevention of hairless pigs in the United States. Montana Agric. Exp. Sta., Circul. 71: 34–47.Google Scholar
  576. Wellmann, O. 1913. Carcass tests continued on Lincoln and Mangalita pigs in Hungary (t. t.). Köztelek (Budapest), 23: 3272–3275.Google Scholar
  577. Wellmann, O. 1930. Fiatal, Sertesek Taplalóanyaknukseglete. Mezögaz dasági Közlony, Budapest 2 sz: 82-88.Google Scholar
  578. Wenck, E. 1931. Über die Beziehungen zwischen der Entwicklung der Saugferkel und ihren späteren Mastleistungen als Grundlage der Herden und Zuchtwertbeurteilung. Z. Zücht., B. 22: 1–33.Google Scholar
  579. Wentworth, E. N. 1912. Another sex-limited character. Science, 35: 986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  580. Wentworth, E. N. 1912. Inheritance of mammae in swine. Proc. Amer. Breed. Ass., 8: 545–549.Google Scholar
  581. Wentworth, E. N. 1913. Inheritance of mammae in the Duroc-Jersey swine. Amer. Nat., 47: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  582. Wentworth, E. N. 1914. Sex-linked factors in the inheritance of rudimentary mammae in swine. Iowa Acad. Sci., 21: 265–268.Google Scholar
  583. Wentworth, E. N. & Aubel, C. E. 1916. Inheritance of fertility in swine. J. Agric. Res., 5: 1145–1160.Google Scholar
  584. Wentworth, E. N. 1916. Large-type swine and fertility. Breeders’ Gaz., 69:722–723.Google Scholar
  585. Wentworth, E. N. 1917. The influence of the male on litter sizes. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 24: 305–308.Google Scholar
  586. Wentworth, E. N. & Lush, J. L. 1923. Inheritance in swine. J. Agric. Res., 23: 557–582.Google Scholar
  587. Wentworth, E. N. 1925–26. Practical considerations in cross-breeding. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 42-49. (1927).Google Scholar
  588. Wentworth, E. N. 1927. Some factors in the national lard trade. Monthly Letter to Animal Husbandmen: Armour’s Livestock Bureau, 7, No. 11.Google Scholar
  589. Werner, J. 1897. Polydactylie beim Schweine. Sitz. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berlin: 47-48.Google Scholar
  590. Weszeczky, O. 1920. Untersuchungen über die gruppenweise Hämagglu tination beim Menschen. Biochem. Z., 107: 159–171.Google Scholar
  591. White, G. R. 1914. Animal Castration. 227 pp., Nashville.Google Scholar
  592. Wieland, W. 1927. Ein Beitrag zur Schweinezucht auf Leistung. Z. Schweinez., 34: 798–800.Google Scholar
  593. Wilckens, M. 1886. Untersuchungen über das Geschlechtsverhältnis und die Ursachen der Geschlechtsbildung bei Haustieren. Landw. Jahrb., 15: 611–654.Google Scholar
  594. Wild, H. 1927. Ergebnisse von Schweineleistungsprüfungen, insonderheit Studien über die Ferkelentwicklung nach Wiederergebnissen der Versuchswirtschaft Ruhlsdorf aus den Jahren 1923–26. Dissertation, Berlin.Google Scholar
  595. Wiley, J. R. 1926. Ton litters are money makers. Chester White J., July.Google Scholar
  596. Wilkens, Ch. 1929. Über Zucht und Wachstum des deutschen veredelten Landschweines im Regierungsbezirk Lüneburg.Google Scholar
  597. Williams, R. H., Burns, R. H. & Smith, C. A. 1923. Hog-feeding investigations. Arizona Agric. Exp. Sta. Rpt.: 467-470.Google Scholar
  598. Winter, S. G. 1930. Untersuchungen über die Isohämagglutination im Blute von Pferd, Rind, Schaf, Ziege und Schwein. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  599. Wodsedalek, J. E. 1913. Spermatogenesis of the pig with special reference to the accessory chromosomes. Biol. Bull., 25: 8–32.Google Scholar
  600. Wodsedalek, J. E. 1913. Accessory chromosomes in the pig. Science, 38: 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  601. Wright, S. 1918. Colour inheritance in mammals. VIII. Swine. J. Hered., 9: 33–38.Google Scholar
  602. Yates, F. 1934. A complex pig-feeding experiment. J. Agric. Sci., 24: 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  603. Youatt. 1847. See Warwick, 1926b.Google Scholar
  604. Zavoral, H. G. 1932. Swine herd improvement projects in Minnesota. Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.: 222-225. (1933).Google Scholar
  605. Zollikofer. 1926. Leistungsprüfungen in der Schweinezucht in der Provinz Hannover.Google Scholar
  606. Zorn, W. 1927. Frühreife, Futterwertung, Fruchtbarkeit, Säugefähigkeit und Wüchsigkeit der Ferkel. Dtsch. landw. Tierzucht, No. 19.Google Scholar
  607. Zorn, 1931. 6. Jahresbericht der preussischen Versuchs-und Forschungsanstalt für Tierzucht in Tschechnitz. Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  608. Zorn, W., Krallinger, H. F., & Schott, A. 1933. Untersuchungen zur züchterischen Bewertung der Fruchtbarkeit und des Vierwochengewichtes bei weissen Edelschweinen. Züchtungskunde, 8: 433–450.Google Scholar
  609. Zwagerman, C. 1930. Die Schweinehaltung in Holland. Z. Schweinez., 37: 841–845, 861-864.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1936

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Buchanan Smith
    • 1
  • O. J. Robison
    • 1
  • D. M. Bryant
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal GeneticsUniversity of EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations