Structure and functions of the genital ducts of the male Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni

  • Russell C. Jones
  • Minjie Lin
Part of the Developments in environmental biology of fishes book series (DEBF, volume 14)

Abstract

The genital ducts of Heterodontus portusjacksoni consist of the sperm carrying ducts (the rete testis, ductuli efferentes, and initial and terminal segments of the ductus epididymidis) and the Leydig glands (anterior opisthonephros). The ducts are lined by a ciliated epithelium which maintains a barrier to the transport of solute between blood and the lumen of the duct. Spermatozoa, Sertoli cell bodies, Sertoli cell cytoplasts and cellular `debris’ are released from spermatocysts into the longitudinal canal of the rete testis. However, only the Sertoli cell cytoplasts persist throughout the sperm ducts. The epithelia lining the initial segment of the ductus epididymidis and secretory tubules of the Leydig glands are specialized for protein secretion and (particularly the Leydig glands) must be the main source of luminal protein in the ductus epididymidis. The epithelium lining the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis also secretes protein, reabsorbs fluid and sodium, and may carry out heterophagic digestion. Spermatozoa develop the capacity for motility in the extratesticular sperm ducts, but do not undergo structural changes. However, they form spherical bundles in the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis. It is suggested that the reduction in ratio of sodium:potassium from 48:8 in the ductuli efferentes to 3:4 in the distal end of the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis may favour sperm survival.

Key words

Elasmobranch Epididymis Reproductive system Sperm ducts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Bedford, J.M. 1979. Evolution of the sperm maturation and storage functions of the epididymis. pp. 7–22. In: D.W. Fawcett & J.M. Bedford (ed.) The Spermatozoon: Maturation, Motility, Surface Properties and Comparative Aspects, Urban Schwarzenberg, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  2. Borcea, J. 1906. Système uro-génital des elasmobranchs. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 4: 119–484.Google Scholar
  3. Botte, V., G. Chieffi & H.P. Stanley. 1963. Histological and histochemical observations on the male reproductive tract of Scyliorhinus stellaris, Torpedo marmorata and T. torpedo. Publ. St. Zool. Napoli 33: 224–242.Google Scholar
  4. Callard, G., P. Mak, W. Dubois & M.E. Cuevas. 1989. Regulation of spermatogenesis: the shark testis model. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 2: 23–34.Google Scholar
  5. Collenot, G. & D. Damas. 1980. Étude ultrastructurale de la cellule de Sertoli au cours de la spermiogenèse chez Scyliorhinus canicula L. Cah. Biol. Mar. 21: 209–219.Google Scholar
  6. Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1982a. Stereological analysis of the epididymis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus, and Wistar rat. Aust. J. Zool. 30: 865–875.Google Scholar
  7. Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1982b. Ultrastructure of the ductus epididymidis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. J. Anat. 135: 625–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1983. Sperm maturation, fluid transport and secretion and absorption of protein in the epididymis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. J. Reprod. Fertil. 68: 445–456.Google Scholar
  9. Fawcett, D.W. & AR Hoffer. 1979. Failure of exogenous androgen to prevent regression of the initial segments of the rat epididymis after efferent duct ligation or orchidectomy. Biol. Re-prod. 20: 162–181.Google Scholar
  10. Goodrich, E.S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan and Co., London. 657–719 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Gustafsson, B. 1966. Luminal contents of the bovine epididymis under conditions of reduced spermatogenesis, luminal blockage and certain sperm abnormalities. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 17: 1–80.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffer, A.P., D.W. Hamilton & D.W. Fawcett. 1973. The ultrastructure of the principal cells and intraepithelial leucocytes in the initial segment of the rat epididymis. Anat. Rec. 175: 169–202.Google Scholar
  13. Holstein, A.F. 1969. Zur Frage der lokalen Steuerung der Spermatogenese beim Dornhai (Squalus acanthus L.) Z. Zell-forsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 93: 265–281.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, R.C. 1980. Luminal composition and maturation of spermatozoa in the genital ducts of the African elephant, Loxodonta africana. J. Reprod. Fertil. 60: 87–93.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, R.C. 1987. Changes in protein composition of the luminal fluids along the epididymis of the tammar, Macropus eugenü. J. Reprod. Fertil. 80: 193–199.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, R.C. 1990. Reproduction in male Macropodidae. pp. 287305. In: G. Grigg, P. Jarman & I.D. Hume (ed.) Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat Kangaroos, Surrey Beatty & Sons, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, R.C. & J. Clulow. 1987. Fluid absorption and sperm maturation and storage in the mammalian epididymis. pp229 240. In: C. Pholpramool & R. Sudsuang (ed.) Proc. 1st Asian & Oceanian Physiol. Soc., Bangkok.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, N. & R.C. Jones. 1982. The structure of the male genital system of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, with particular reference to the genital ducts. Aust. J. Zool. 30: 523–541.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, R.C., N. Jones & D. Djakiew. 1984. Luminal composition and maturation of spermatozoa in the male genital ducts of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. J. Exp. Zool. 230: 417–426.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, R.C. & K.J. Jurd. 1987. Structural differentiation and fluid reabsorption in the ductuli efferentes testis of the rat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 40: 79–90.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, R.C. & M. Lin. 1992. Ultrastructure of the genital duct epithelium of the male Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Aust. J. Zool. 40: 257–266.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, L.H. 1950. Reproduction in the basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus (Gunner). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. Biol. Sci. 234: 247–316.Google Scholar
  23. McLaughin, R.H. & A.K. O’Gower. 1971. Life history and underwater studies of heterodont sharks. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 271289.Google Scholar
  24. Moniem, K.A., T.D. Glover & C.W. Lubicz-Nawrocki. 1978. Effects of duct ligation and orchidectomy on histochemical reactions in the hamster epididymis. J. Reprod. Fertil. 54: 173–176.Google Scholar
  25. Pudney, J. & G.V. Callard. 1986. Sertoli cell cytoplasts in semen of the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Tissue Cell. 18: 375382.Google Scholar
  26. Rendez, E. & B. Belonoschkin. 1929. Form und Funktion des Nebenhodens einiger Elasmobranchier. Z. Zeltforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 9: 663–682.Google Scholar
  27. Roosen-Runge, E.C. 1961. The rete testis in the albino rat: its structure, development and functional significance. Acta Anat. 45: 1–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simpson, T.H. & C.S. Wardle. 1967. A seasonal cycle in the testis of the spurdog, Squalus acanthias, and the sites of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 47: 699–708.Google Scholar
  29. Simpson, T.H., R.S. Wright & H. Gottfried. 1963. Steroids in the semen of the dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Endocrinol. 26: 489–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson, T.H., R.S. Wright & J. Renfrew. 1964. Steroid biosynthesis in the semen of the dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Endocrinol. 31: 11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stanley, H.P. 1963. Urogenital morphology in chimaeroid fish Hydrolagus colliei (Lay and Bennett). J. Morph. 112: 99–125.Google Scholar
  32. Stanley, H.P. 1971. Fine structure of spermiogenesis in the elasmobranch fish, Squalus suckleyi. II. Late stages of differentiation and structure of the mature spermatozoon. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 36: 103–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell C. Jones
    • 1
  • Minjie Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations