Structure and functions of the genital ducts of the male Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni
Abstract
The genital ducts of Heterodontus portusjacksoni consist of the sperm carrying ducts (the rete testis, ductuli efferentes, and initial and terminal segments of the ductus epididymidis) and the Leydig glands (anterior opisthonephros). The ducts are lined by a ciliated epithelium which maintains a barrier to the transport of solute between blood and the lumen of the duct. Spermatozoa, Sertoli cell bodies, Sertoli cell cytoplasts and cellular `debris’ are released from spermatocysts into the longitudinal canal of the rete testis. However, only the Sertoli cell cytoplasts persist throughout the sperm ducts. The epithelia lining the initial segment of the ductus epididymidis and secretory tubules of the Leydig glands are specialized for protein secretion and (particularly the Leydig glands) must be the main source of luminal protein in the ductus epididymidis. The epithelium lining the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis also secretes protein, reabsorbs fluid and sodium, and may carry out heterophagic digestion. Spermatozoa develop the capacity for motility in the extratesticular sperm ducts, but do not undergo structural changes. However, they form spherical bundles in the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis. It is suggested that the reduction in ratio of sodium:potassium from 48:8 in the ductuli efferentes to 3:4 in the distal end of the terminal segment of the ductus epididymidis may favour sperm survival.
Key words
Elasmobranch Epididymis Reproductive system Sperm ductsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References cited
- Bedford, J.M. 1979. Evolution of the sperm maturation and storage functions of the epididymis. pp. 7–22. In: D.W. Fawcett & J.M. Bedford (ed.) The Spermatozoon: Maturation, Motility, Surface Properties and Comparative Aspects, Urban Schwarzenberg, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Borcea, J. 1906. Système uro-génital des elasmobranchs. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 4: 119–484.Google Scholar
- Botte, V., G. Chieffi & H.P. Stanley. 1963. Histological and histochemical observations on the male reproductive tract of Scyliorhinus stellaris, Torpedo marmorata and T. torpedo. Publ. St. Zool. Napoli 33: 224–242.Google Scholar
- Callard, G., P. Mak, W. Dubois & M.E. Cuevas. 1989. Regulation of spermatogenesis: the shark testis model. J. Exp. Zool. Suppl. 2: 23–34.Google Scholar
- Collenot, G. & D. Damas. 1980. Étude ultrastructurale de la cellule de Sertoli au cours de la spermiogenèse chez Scyliorhinus canicula L. Cah. Biol. Mar. 21: 209–219.Google Scholar
- Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1982a. Stereological analysis of the epididymis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus, and Wistar rat. Aust. J. Zool. 30: 865–875.Google Scholar
- Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1982b. Ultrastructure of the ductus epididymidis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. J. Anat. 135: 625–634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Djakiew, D. & R.C. Jones. 1983. Sperm maturation, fluid transport and secretion and absorption of protein in the epididymis of the echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. J. Reprod. Fertil. 68: 445–456.Google Scholar
- Fawcett, D.W. & AR Hoffer. 1979. Failure of exogenous androgen to prevent regression of the initial segments of the rat epididymis after efferent duct ligation or orchidectomy. Biol. Re-prod. 20: 162–181.Google Scholar
- Goodrich, E.S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan and Co., London. 657–719 pp.Google Scholar
- Gustafsson, B. 1966. Luminal contents of the bovine epididymis under conditions of reduced spermatogenesis, luminal blockage and certain sperm abnormalities. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 17: 1–80.Google Scholar
- Hoffer, A.P., D.W. Hamilton & D.W. Fawcett. 1973. The ultrastructure of the principal cells and intraepithelial leucocytes in the initial segment of the rat epididymis. Anat. Rec. 175: 169–202.Google Scholar
- Holstein, A.F. 1969. Zur Frage der lokalen Steuerung der Spermatogenese beim Dornhai (Squalus acanthus L.) Z. Zell-forsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 93: 265–281.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. 1980. Luminal composition and maturation of spermatozoa in the genital ducts of the African elephant, Loxodonta africana. J. Reprod. Fertil. 60: 87–93.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. 1987. Changes in protein composition of the luminal fluids along the epididymis of the tammar, Macropus eugenü. J. Reprod. Fertil. 80: 193–199.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. 1990. Reproduction in male Macropodidae. pp. 287305. In: G. Grigg, P. Jarman & I.D. Hume (ed.) Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat Kangaroos, Surrey Beatty & Sons, Australia.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. & J. Clulow. 1987. Fluid absorption and sperm maturation and storage in the mammalian epididymis. pp229 240. In: C. Pholpramool & R. Sudsuang (ed.) Proc. 1st Asian & Oceanian Physiol. Soc., Bangkok.Google Scholar
- Jones, N. & R.C. Jones. 1982. The structure of the male genital system of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, with particular reference to the genital ducts. Aust. J. Zool. 30: 523–541.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C., N. Jones & D. Djakiew. 1984. Luminal composition and maturation of spermatozoa in the male genital ducts of the Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. J. Exp. Zool. 230: 417–426.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. & K.J. Jurd. 1987. Structural differentiation and fluid reabsorption in the ductuli efferentes testis of the rat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 40: 79–90.Google Scholar
- Jones, R.C. & M. Lin. 1992. Ultrastructure of the genital duct epithelium of the male Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Aust. J. Zool. 40: 257–266.Google Scholar
- Matthews, L.H. 1950. Reproduction in the basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus (Gunner). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. Biol. Sci. 234: 247–316.Google Scholar
- McLaughin, R.H. & A.K. O’Gower. 1971. Life history and underwater studies of heterodont sharks. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 271289.Google Scholar
- Moniem, K.A., T.D. Glover & C.W. Lubicz-Nawrocki. 1978. Effects of duct ligation and orchidectomy on histochemical reactions in the hamster epididymis. J. Reprod. Fertil. 54: 173–176.Google Scholar
- Pudney, J. & G.V. Callard. 1986. Sertoli cell cytoplasts in semen of the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Tissue Cell. 18: 375382.Google Scholar
- Rendez, E. & B. Belonoschkin. 1929. Form und Funktion des Nebenhodens einiger Elasmobranchier. Z. Zeltforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 9: 663–682.Google Scholar
- Roosen-Runge, E.C. 1961. The rete testis in the albino rat: its structure, development and functional significance. Acta Anat. 45: 1–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, T.H. & C.S. Wardle. 1967. A seasonal cycle in the testis of the spurdog, Squalus acanthias, and the sites of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 47: 699–708.Google Scholar
- Simpson, T.H., R.S. Wright & H. Gottfried. 1963. Steroids in the semen of the dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Endocrinol. 26: 489–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, T.H., R.S. Wright & J. Renfrew. 1964. Steroid biosynthesis in the semen of the dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Endocrinol. 31: 11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stanley, H.P. 1963. Urogenital morphology in chimaeroid fish Hydrolagus colliei (Lay and Bennett). J. Morph. 112: 99–125.Google Scholar
- Stanley, H.P. 1971. Fine structure of spermiogenesis in the elasmobranch fish, Squalus suckleyi. II. Late stages of differentiation and structure of the mature spermatozoon. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 36: 103–118.Google Scholar