Meaning and Noema

  • J. Claude Evans
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 10)


Although the concept of the noema was explicitly introduced in the Ideen, it is, in Eugen Fink’s terminology, more an operative concept of Husserlian phenomenology than a thematic concept (Fink, 59f.): it quickly became a working concept which was used rather than thematized for itself. A complicating factor is the fact that the background in Husserl’s thought for the concept of the noema is rather mixed. As Ludwig Landgrebe has noted, although the concept of the noema is introduced “in the context of the analysis of sense perception and perceptual judgments as assertions concerning the results of perception” (Landgrebe, 122), it is perceptual judgment that is the model for the concept. The concepts of the matter and the quality of an act, developed in the Logical Investigations, are now introduced as the sense and thetic character of the noema. Landgrebe even goes so far as to claim that “The legitimate locus of the use of the concepts ‘noema’ and ‘noesis’ is thus the theory of predicative judgments. Noema is the ‘that about which’ of assertion...” (ibid., 123).


Logical Investigation Intentional Object Perceptual Judgment Intentional Content Ideal Sense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angelelli, Ignacio. Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evans, J. Claude. The Metaphysics of Transcendental Subjectivity. Amsterdam: B. R. Gruener, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Fink, Eugen. “Operative Concepts in Husserl’s Phenomenology.” Trans. William McKenna. Apriori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology. Ed. by William McKenna, Robert M. Harlan and Laurence E. Winters. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981. 56–70.Google Scholar
  4. Frege, Gottlob. “Über Sinn und Bedeoni tg.” Funktion, Begriff Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien. Edited by Günther Patzig. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1962. 40–65. English translation by Max Black: “On Sense and Meaning.” Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Edited by Peter Geach and Max Black. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952. 56–78Google Scholar
  5. Hickman, Larry. Modern Theories of Higher Level Predicates: Second Intentions in the Neuzeit. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, Edmund. Logische Untersuchungen. Volume I. Husserliana XVIII. Edited by Elmar Holenstein. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975. Volume II, parts 1 and 2. Husserliana XIX/1–2. Edited by Ursula Panzer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984. English translation by J.N. Findlay: Logical Investigations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Band I. Husserliana III/1. Edited by Karl Schuhmann. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff,1976. English translation by Fred Kersten: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, Edmund. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Husserliana XVII. Edited by Paul Janssen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974. English translation by Dorton Cairns: Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. Erfahrung und Urteil. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Claassen Verlag, 1964. English translation by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks: Experience and Judgment. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890–1910). Husserliana XXII. Edited by Bernhard Rang. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Edited by Wilhelm Weischedel. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975. English translation by N.K. Smith: Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  12. Landgrebe, Ludwig. “Reflections on the Schutz-Gurwitsch Correspondence.” Trans. J. Claude Evans. Human Studies 14, 1991. 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohanty, J.N. Husserl and Frege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Claude Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations