Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design pp 97-139 | Cite as
An appreciation of subsonic engine technology
Summary
This survey presents some background information which is required when an engine has to be chosen for a new subsonic aircraft design.
The first chapter compares piston and turbo-engines and their principal applications. The second chapter presents a survey of the characteristics, possible applications and performance of piston engines with a power rating of up to about 500. h.p. Various engine configurations are discussed and a generalized method is given for estimating the takeoff power and weight of the piston engine.
Single flow, bypass turbojet engines and turboprop engines are compared, taking a division between the gas generator and the propulsive device as the point of departure. An explanation of the significance of the thermal efficiency and propulsive efficiency, as well as specific fuel consumption, specific thrust and power rating, is also given. The influence of the compressor pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature and bypass ratio on engine performance, general configuration, weight, drag and external engine noise is discussed on the basis of generalized data. Some attention is paid to possible future developments.
Keywords
Pressure Ratio Specific Fuel Consumption Piston Engine Turbojet Engine Propulsive EfficiencyNomenclature
- Ae
exhaust nozzle area
- BHP
Brake Horse Power (Pbr)
- BMEP
Brake Mean Effective Power
- BPR
By Pass Ratio
- CT
specific fuel consumption of turbojet engine
- CP
specific fuel consumption of propeller engine
- cp
specific heat of engine air at constant pressure
- D
drag
- FPR
Fan Pressure Ratio (= εf)
- G
gas generator function
- g
acceleration due to gravity
- H
heating value of fuel
- h
enthalpy; altitude
- IMEP
Indicated Mean Effective Pressure
- ISA
ICAO Standard Atmosphere
- K
ratio for estimating engine weight
- k
constant of proportionality
- Mo
flight Mach number
- METO
Maximum Except Take-Off (power)
- ṁ
mass flow per unit time
- Ncyl
number of cylinders per engine
- n
engine rotation speed; exponent of V in polytropic process; exponent of Vcyl
- OPR
Overall Pressure Ratio (= εc)
- P
power
- Pbr
brake horsepower
convertible energy, generated by gasifier
- Pto
static takeoff power
- p
(static) pressure
- po
ambient (static) pressure
- pt
total (stagnation) pressure
- R
gas constant; ratio for estimating piston engine takeoff power
- rpm
revolutions per minute
- SFC
Specific Fuel Consumption (CT or CP)
- shp
shaft horsepower
- T
(static) temperature; thrust
- To
ambient temperature
- Ts
standard ambient temperature
- Tt
total (stagnation) temperature
- TET,TIT
Turbine Entry (Intake) total Temperature ()
- V
specific volume of a charge (piston engine)
- Vo
flight speed
- Vcyl
total swept cylinder volume per engine
- v
velocity of fully expanded exhaust flow
- We
dry engine weight
- ẇ
weight flow per unit time (no index: engine air)
- γ
ratio of specific heats of air
- δm
relative static pressure = static pressure/ambient pressure
- Δ
increment
- ε
compression ratio (piston engine); pressure ratio (gasturbine engine)
- η
efficiency
- λ
bypass ratio
- ρ
atmospheric density
- σ
relative (atmospheric) density
- φ
non-dimensional TET
- B
combustion chamber
- c
(high pressure) compressor
- cr
cruising flight
- cyl
cylinder(s)
- d
intake duct
- e
engine (installation); exhaust opening
- F
fuel
- f
fan
- g
gas generator; gearing
- i
fuel injection
- id
ideal (thrust definition)
- j
jet
- m
manifold inlet
- mech
mechanical transmission (gearbox)
- n
rotational speed
- p
propulsive; pressure
- prop
propeller
- r
ram effect
- s
supercharging
- sn
standard net (thrust definition)
- t
turbine
- tf
combination turbine-fan
- to
takeoff
- tot
overall (efficiency definition)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
General literature and textbooks
- 4-1.Anon.: “Powerplant Review”. A survey of the world’s turbine engines. The Aeroplane, March 15, 1957, pp. 360–365.Google Scholar
- 4-2.W.R. Hawthorne and W.T. Olson: “Design and performance of gas turbine power plants”. High speed aerodynamics and jet propulsion, Vol. XI, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1959.Google Scholar
- 4-3.O.E. Lancaster (ed.): “Jet propulsion engines”. High speed aerodynamics and jet propulsion, Vol. XII, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1959.Google Scholar
- 4-4.M.J. Zucrow: “Aircraft and missile propulsion” (Vol. 1: Thermodynamics of fluid flow and application to thermal engines; Vol. 2: The gas turbine power plants, turboprop, turbojet, ramjet and rocket engins).Wiley and Sons, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
- 4-5.H. Cohen, G.F.C. Rogers and H.I.H. Saravanamuttoo: “Gas turbine theory”. Second Edition, Longman, London, 1974.Google Scholar
- 4-6.W.J. Hesse and N.V.S. Mumford Jr.: “Jet propulsion for aerospace applications”. Pitman Publishing Corporation, 1964.Google Scholar
- 4-7.P.G. Hill and C.R. Peterson: “Mechanics and thermodynamics of propulsion”. Addison-Wesley Publ. Cy., Reading, Massachusetts, 1965.Google Scholar
- 4-8.W. Thomson: “Thrust for flight”. Pitman Publishing Cy., 1969.Google Scholar
- 4-9.I.E. Treager: “Aircraft gas turbine engine technology. McGraw-Hill Book Cy., 1970.Google Scholar
- 4-10.P.J. McMahon: “Aircraft Propulsion”. Pitman Aeronautical Engineering Series, 1971.Google Scholar
Reciprocating Engines
- 4-11.A.W. Morley: “Performance of a piston-type aero-engine”. London, Pitman and Sons Ltd., 1951.Google Scholar
- 4-12.J. Liston: “Powerplants for aircraft”. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 1953.Google Scholar
- 4-13.F. Eisfeld: “Der Kolbenmotor als Antrieb für Leichtflugzeuge und Möglichkeiten seiner Verbesserung”. Jahrbuch 1965 der WGLR, pp. 327–336.Google Scholar
- 4-14.L. von Bonin and K. Grasmann: “Zukunftaussichten der Kolbenmotoren und Turbotriebwerke für Leichtflugzeuge”. Jahrbuch 1965 der WGLR, pp. 337–352.Google Scholar
- 4-15.L.M. Yanda: “Correction of turbocharged engine performance to standard conditions and prediction of non-standard day performance”. SAE Paper No. 690309, March 1969.Google Scholar
- 4-16.W.A. Wiseman: “Altitude performance with turbosupercharged light aircraft engines”. SAE Paper No. 622A, Jan. 1963.Google Scholar
- 4-17.W.A. Wiseman and E.M. Ounsted: “Tiara light aircraft engines - A new generation”. SAE Paper No. 700205.Google Scholar
- 4-18.J.L. Dooley: “Two-stroke light-aircraft engine potential”. SAE Paper No. 670238.Google Scholar
- 4-19.D.L. Satchwell: “Performance characteristics of aircraft with turbo-supercharged engine and cabin 1968”. SAE Paper No. 680266.Google Scholar
- 4-20.D.E. Cole: “The Wankel engine”. Scientific American, Aug. 1972, pp. 14–23.Google Scholar
- 4-21.C. Jones and H. Lamping: “Curtiss-Wright’s development status of the stratified charge rotating combustion engine”. SAE Paper No. 710582.Google Scholar
Turboprop engines
- 4-22.B. Pinkel and I.M. Karp: “A thermodynamic study of the turbine-propeller engine”. NACA TN 2653, March 1952.Google Scholar
- 4-23.J. Szydlowski: “Bedeutung der Propellerturbine für das leichte 4- bis 6-sitzige Mehrzweckflugzeug”. WGLR Jahrbuch 1960, pp. 289–296.Google Scholar
- 4-24.R.M. Sachs: “Small propeller turbines compared with other power plants in low speed flight applications”. AIAA Paper No. 64–799, Oct. 1964.Google Scholar
- 4-25.E.P. Cockshutt and C.R. Sharp: “Gas turbine cycle calculations: design-point performance of turbo-propeller and turboshaft engines”. NRC Report LR-449, Nov. 1965.Google Scholar
- 4-26.E.P. Cockshutt: “Cycle calculations for turboprop engines”. Can. Aeron. and Space Journal, Feb. 1968, Vol. 14, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
- 4-27.E.J. Kordik: “Kleine Fluggasturbinen für Hubschrauber, Propeller-und Strahlflugzeuge”. Jahrbuch 1969 der DGLR, pp. 194–234.Google Scholar
- 4-28.E.P. Neate and J.J. Petraits: “The Allison Model 250 engine: a case for the small turboprop”. SAE Paper No. 7002–6.Google Scholar
Turbojet engines
- 4-29.M.S. Chapell and E.P. Cockshutt: “A comprehensive method for calculating turbojet and turbofan design-point performance”. Can. Aeron. and Space Journal, June 1964, Vol. 10 No. 6.Google Scholar
- 4-30.S. Boudìgues: “Défense et illustration des propulseurs pour avions rapides”. Technique et Sciences Aéron. et Spatiales, July-Aug. 1964, pp. 271–285.Google Scholar
- 4-31.L.R. l’Anson: “The application of the high bypass turbofan for business and executive aircraft”. SAE Paper No. 660221, April 1966.Google Scholar
- 4-32.C.L. Bagby and W.L. Andersen: “Effect of turbofan cycle variables on aircraft cruise performance”. Journal of Aircraft, Sept.-Oct. 1966.Google Scholar
- 4-33.R.E. Neitzel and M.C. Hemsworth: “High-bypass turbofan cycles for long-range subsonic transports”. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 3, No. 4, July-Aug. 1966, pp. 354–358.Google Scholar
- 4-34.J.P. Armstrong and A.T. Jones: “The advantages of three-shaft turbofan engines for civil transport operation”. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 73, Jan. 1969, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
- 4-35.W.H. Sens and R.M. Meyer: “New generation engines - the engine manufacturers’ outlook”. SAE Paper No. 680278, April-May 1968.Google Scholar
- 4-36.E. Torenbeek: “Analytical method for computing turbo-engine performance at design and off-design conditions”. Memorandum M-188, Delft University of Technology, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Delft, Jan. 1973.Google Scholar
- 4-37.J.H. Horlock and J.F. Norbury: “The aero-thermodynamics of subsonic propulsion”. Int. congress on subsonic aerodynamics, New York Acad. of Sciences, 22nd Nov. 1968, Vol. 154, No. 2, pp. 549–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4-38.B. Wrigley: “Engine performance considerations for the large subsonic transport”. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,Lecture Series 16, April 1969.Google Scholar
- 4-39.W. Dettmering and F. Fett: “Methoden der Schuberhohung und ihre Bewertung”. Zeitschrift für Flugwiss., Aug. 1969, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 257–267.Google Scholar
- 4-40.R.H. Weir: “Propulsion prospects”. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 73, Nov. 1969, pp. 923–934.Google Scholar
- 4-41.J. Wotton: “Engine development — where now?”. Flight Int., Dec. 4, 1969, pp. 888–890.Google Scholar
- 4-42.R.M. Denning and J.A. Hooper: “Prospects for improvement in efficiency of flight-propulsion systems”. AIAA Paper No. 70–873.Google Scholar
- 4-43.R.L. Cummings and H. Gold: “Low-cost engines for Aircraft”. In: NASA SP-259, V II, Nov. 1970.Google Scholar
- 4-44.L.G. Dawson: “Propulsion”. In: “The future of aeronautics”, edited by J.E. Allen & J. Bruce, Hutchinson of London, 1970.Google Scholar
- 4-45.E.S. Taylor: “Evolution of the jet engine”. Astronautics and Aeronautics, Nov. 1970, pp. 64–72.Google Scholar
- 4-46.H. Gevelhof f: “Ein Beitrag zur optimalen Auslegung von Installierten, Luftansangenden Strahltriebwerken”. Dissertation, Dec. 1970, T.H. Aachen.Google Scholar
- 4-47.G. Rosen: “Prop-fan. A high thrust, low noise propulsor”. SAE Paper No. 710470.Google Scholar
- 4-48.M.A. Beheim a.o.: “Subsonic and supersonic propulsion”. In: Vehicle technology for civil aviation, NASA SP-292, Nov. 1971, pp. 107–156.Google Scholar
- 4-49.P. Alesi: “Des hautes températures devant turbine sur turboréacteurs et turbines à gaz”. l’Aéronautique et l’Astronautique, No. 33, 1972–1, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
- 4-50.R.W. Koenig and L.H. Fischback, “GENENG — A program for calculating design and off-design performance for turbojet and turbofan engines”. NASA TN D-6552 and D-6553, Feb. 1972.Google Scholar
- 4-51.J.F. Dugan Jr.: “Engine selection for transport and combat aircraft”. Von Karman Institute of Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series 49, April 1972 (NASA TM-X-68009).Google Scholar
- 4-52.D.G.M. Davies: “Variable pitch fans”. Interavia, March 1972, pp. 241–243.Google Scholar
- 4-53.W.L. McIntire: “Engine and airplane — will it be a happy marriage?” SAWE Paper No. 910, May 1972.Google Scholar
- 4-54.M.J. Banzakein and S.B. Kazin: “The NASA/GE Quiet engine A”. AIAA Paper No. 72–659.Google Scholar
- 4-55.E.A. White and G.L. Wilde: “Engines for civil V/STOL”. The Aeronautical Journal, Oct. 1972, pp. 627–632.Google Scholar