Root growth characteristics, biomass and nutrient dynamics of seedlings of two larch species raised under different fertilization regimes

  • Laiye Qu
  • Ali M. Quoreshi
  • Takayoshi KoikeEmail author
Part of the Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences book series (DPSS, volume 101)


The effects of different fertilization regimes on root growth characteristics, nutrient uptake and biomass production of Japanese larch (Larix kampferi Sarg.) and its hybrid larch (L. gmelinii × L. kampferi) seedlings were examined for one growing season. Seedlings were raised in the greenhouse under three fertilizer levels (10, 20, 40 mg N seedling−1 season−1) and two delivery schedules, conventional (C) and exponential (E) for 12 weeks. Root growth, biomass allocation and nutrient loading capacity of seedlings were measured for a 3-week interval. By the end of growing season, seedlings fertilized with low dose conventionally (10C) and exponentially (10E) developed relatively longer root and larger root surface areas than those fertilized at high dose exponential loading (40E). At final harvest, the 40E treated Japanese larch had 134% and 155% more shoot mass as compared with those raised under 20E and 10E treated seedlings, respectively. The seedlings fertilized under 10C and 10E showed a high root mass ratio, while 40E treated seedlings showed a low root mass ratio. These data indicated that different nutrient levels (10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg) strongly affected root growth characteristics. The same seasonal dose (10 mg) applied exponentially (10E) accumulated more N in seedlings compared to the 10C treatment. Exponential fertilization enhanced an increase in N concentration of the whole plant suggesting exponential delivery schedule is an efficient fertilization technique for greater nutrient uptake of plants. In contrast, N concentration of whole plant was declined for seedlings treated with conventional fertilization due to growth dilution. Late in the growing season, seedlings raised under 40E did not significantly improved dry mass production of root, but nutrient accumulation increased without a concomitant increased in root dry mass production. The result suggests that seedlings fertilized exponentially at medium and high dose rates (20E and 40E) induced luxury nutrient consumption within the plant.

Key words

Biomass conventional and exponential fertilization hybrid larch Japanese larch root growth seedling experiment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brouwer R 1962 Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 10, 399–408.Google Scholar
  2. Brouwer R 1983 Functional equilibrium: sense or nonsense ? Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 31, 335–348.Google Scholar
  3. Chapin III F S, Schulze E D and Mooney H A 1990 The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 423-’l47.Google Scholar
  4. Fitter A H 1999 Root as dynamic systems. In The Developmental Ecology of Root and Root Systems. Ed. M C Press and Scholes J D pp. 115–132. Blackwell Science Ltd, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Fitter A H and Stickland T R 1991 Architectural analysis of plant root systems II. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytol. 118, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitter A H, Graves J D, Self G K, Brown T K, Bogle D S and Taylor K 1998 Root production, turnover and respiration under two grassland types along an altitude gradient: Influence of temperature and solar radian. Oecologia 114, 20–30.Google Scholar
  7. Fransen B, de Kroon and Berndse H 1998 Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition by perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient available. Oecologia 115, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gower S T and Rechards J H 1990 Larches: Deciduous conifers in an evergreen world. BioScience 40, 818–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawkins B J, Henry G and Kiiskila S B R 1998 Biomass and nutrient allocation in Douglas-fir and Amabilis fir seedlings: influence of growth rate and nutrition. Tree Physiol. 18, 803–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imo M and Timmer V R 1992 Nitrogen uptake of mesquite seedlings at conventional and exponential fertilization schedules. Soil Dci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 927–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ingestad T and Lund A B 1979 Nitrogen stress in birth seedlings: Growth technique and growth. Physiol. Plant. 45, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingestad T and Lund A 1986 Theory and techniques for steady-state mineral nutrition and growth of plants. Scand. J. For. Res. 1, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koike T, Yazaki K, Funada R, Maruyama R, Mori Y and Sasa K 2000 Forest health and vitality in northern Japan — A history of larch plantation. Res. Note, Fac. Forestry, Univ. of Joensuu, 92, 49–60.Google Scholar
  14. Lambers H, Chapin III F S and Pons T L 1998 Plant physiological ecology. pp. 239–263. Springer-Verlag, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Litter R C, Henry P R and Ammerman C B 1998 Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1216–1231.Google Scholar
  16. Malik V and Timmer V R 1995 Interaction of nutrient loaded black spurs seedlings with neighboring vegetation in greenhouse environments. Can. J. For. Res. 25, 1017–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller B D and Timmer V R 1994 Steady-state nutrition of Pinus resonosa seedlings: response to nutrient loading, irrigation and hardening regimes. Tree Physiol. 14, 1327–1338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munson A D and Bernier P Y 1993 Comparing natural and planted spruce seedlings. II. Nutrient uptake and efficiency of use. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2435–2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quoreshi A M and Timmer V R 1998 Exponential fertilization increases nutrient uptake and ectomycorrhizal development of black spruce seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 28, 674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Quoreshi A M and Timmer V R 2000 Growth, nutrient dynamics, and ectomycorrhizal development of container-grown Picea mariana seedlings in response to exponential nutrient loading. Can. J. For. Res. 30, 191–201.Google Scholar
  21. SAS Institute Inc. 1996 SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
  22. Taub D B and Goldberg D 1996 Root system topology of plants from habitats differing in soil resource availability. Funct. Ecol. 10, 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Timmer V R 1997 Exponential nutrient loading: A new fertilization technique to improve seedlings performance on competitive sites. New Forest 13, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Timmer V R and Armstrong G 1987 Growth and nutrition of Pinus resinosa seedlings at exponential increasing nutrient additions. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 64 /1 647.Google Scholar
  25. Timmer V R and Munson A D 1991 Site-specific growth and nutrient uptake of planted Picea mariana in the Ontario Clay Belt. IV. Nitrogen loading response. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1058–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu X J and Timmer V R 1998 Biomass and nutrient dynamics of Chinese fir seedlings under conventional and exponential fertilization regimes. Plant Soil 203, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Hokkaido University Forests, FSCSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations