Advertisement

Interpreting Provenance Relations from Detrital Modes of Sandstones

  • William R. Dickinson
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 148)

Abstract

Detrital modes of sandstone suites primarily reflect the different tectonic settings of provenance terranes, although various other sedimentological factors also influence sandstone compositions. Comparisons of sandstone compositions are aided by grouping diverse grain types into a few operational categories having broad genetic significance. Compositional fields associated with different provenances can then be displayed on standard triangular diagrams.

The major provenance types related to continental sources are stable cratons, basement uplifts, magmatic arcs, and recycled orogens. Each provenance type contributes distinctive detritus preferentially to associated sedimentary basins that occupy a limited number of characteristic tectonic settings in each case. Sands of composite provenance can be described as mixtures of quartzose sand from stable cratons, quartzofeldspathic sand from basement uplifts or arc plutons, feldspatholithic sand from arc volcanics, and quartzolithic sands of several types from different kinds of recycled orogens that yield varying proportions of quartzose and lithic grains. Proportions of contributions from different provenance types can be estimated from mean compositions for ideal derivative sands represented by points or restricted areas on triangular plots.

Evolutionary trends in sandstone composition within individual basins or sedimentary provinces commonly reflect changes in tectonic setting through time, or erosional modification of provenance terranes. Forearc sandstone suites typically evolve from feldspatholitic petrofacies of volcaniclastic nature, through lithofeldspathic petrofacies of volcanoplutonic origin, to quartzofeldspathic petrofacies of plutonic derivation. Foreland sandstone suites commonly evolve from rift-related quartzofeldspathic petrofacies, through quartzose petrofacies of passive continental margins, to quartzolithic petrofacies derived from recycled orogens.

Keywords

Foreland Basin Lithic Fragment Petroleum Geologist Continental Block Forearc Basin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basu, A., 1976, Petrology of Holocene fluvial sand derived from plutonic source rocks: implications to paleoclimatic interpretation: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 46, p. 694–709.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, A., S. W. Young, L. J. Suttner, W. C. James, and G. H. Mack, 1975, Re-evaluation of the use of undulatory extinction and polycrystallinity in detrital quartz for provenance interpretation: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 45, p. 873–882.Google Scholar
  3. Boles, J. R., 1974, Structure, stratigraphy, and petrology of mainly Triassic rocks, Hokonui Hills, Southland, N.w Zealand: N. Z. Jour. Geology and Geophysics, v. 17, p. 337–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boles, J. R., 1982, Active albitization of plagioclase, Gulf Coast Tertiary: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 282, p. 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryer, J. A. and H. A. Bart, 1978, The composition of fluvial sands in a temperate semiarid region: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 48, p. 1311–1320.Google Scholar
  6. Carey, S. M., 1981, Sandstone petrography of the Upper Cretaceous Chatsworth Formation, Simi Hills, California, in Link, M. H., R. L. Squires, and I. P. Colburn, eds., Simi Hills Cretaceous turbidites, southern California: Pacific Sec., Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Los Angeles, California, p. 89–97.Google Scholar
  7. Cawood, P. A., 1983, Modal composition and detrital pyroxene geochemistry of lithic sandstones from the New England fold belt (east Australia), a Paleozoic forearc terrane: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 94, p. 1199–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickinson, W. R., 1970, Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and arkose: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 40, p. 695–707.Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, W. R., 1982, Compositions of sandstones in CircumPacific subduction complexes and fore-arc basins: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 66, p. 121–137.Google Scholar
  10. Dickinson, W. R., L. S. Beard, G. R. Brakenrifge, J. L. Erjavec, R. C. Ferguson, k.F. Inman, R. A. knepp, F. A. Lindberg, and P. T. Ryberg, 1983a, Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in relation to tectonic setting: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 94, p. 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickinson, W. R., D. W. Harbaugh, A. H. Saller, P. L. Heller, and W. S. Snyder, 1983b, Detrital modes of upper Paleozoic sandstones derived from Antler orogen in Nevada: implications for nature of Antler orogeny: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 283, p. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickinson, W. R., K. P. Helmold, and J. A. Stein, 1979, Mesozoic lithic sandstones in central Oregon: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 49, p. 501–516.Google Scholar
  13. Dickinson, W. R., R. V. Ingersoll, D. S. Cowan, K. P. Helmold, and C. A. Suczek, 1982, Provenance of Franciscan graywackes in coastal California: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 93, p. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickinson, W. R. and E. I. Rich, 1972, Petrologic intervals and petrofacies in the Great Valley Sequence, Sacramento Valley, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 83, p. 3007–3024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickinson, W. R. and C. A. Suczek, 1979, Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 63, p. 2164–2182.Google Scholar
  16. Dickinson, W. R. and R. Valloni, 1980, Plate settings and provenance of sands in modern ocean basins: Geology, v. 8, p. 82–86.Google Scholar
  17. Franzinelli, E. and P. E. Potter, 1983, Petrology, chemistry, and texture of modern river sands, Amazon River system: Jour. Geology, v. 91, p. 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galloway, W. E., 1974, Deposition and diagenetic alteration of sandstone in northeast Pacific arc-related basins: implications for graywacke genesis: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 85, p. 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gandolfi, G., L. Paganelli, and G. G. Zuffa, 1983, Petrology and dispersal pattern in the Marnoso-Arenacea Formation (Miocene, northern Apennines): Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 53, p. 493–507.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, S. A., W. R. Dickinson, and R. V. Ingersoll, 1975, Himalayan-Bengal model for flysch dispersal in the Appalachian-Ouachita system: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 86, p. 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham, S. A., R. V. Ingersoll, and W. R. Dickinson, 1976, Common provenance for lithic grains in Carboniferous sandstones from Ouachita Mountains and Black Warrior Basin: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 46, p. 620–632.Google Scholar
  22. Harrell, J. and H. Blatt, 1978, Polycrystallinity: effect on the durability of detrital quartz: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 48, p. 25–30.Google Scholar
  23. Heller, P. L. and P. T. Ryberg, 1983, Sedimentary record of subduction to forearc transition in the rotated Eocene basin of western Oregon: Geology, v. 11, p. 380–383.Google Scholar
  24. Helmold, K. P., 1980, Diagenesis of Tertiary arkoses, Santa Ynez Mountains, California [PhD thesis]: Stanford University, Stanford, California, 225 p.Google Scholar
  25. Hiscott, R. N., 1978, Provenance of Ordovician deep-water sandstones, Tourelle Formation, Quebec, and implications for initiation of Taconic Orogeny: Canadian Jour. Earth Sci., v. 15, p. 1579–1597.Google Scholar
  26. Houseknecht, D. W., 1980, Comparative anatomy of a Pottsville lithic arenite and quartz arenite of the Pocahontas Basin, southern West Virginia: petrogenetic, depositional, and stratigraphic implications: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 50, p. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubert, J. F., 1967, Sedimentology of Prealpine Flysch sequences, Switzerland: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 37, p. 885–907.Google Scholar
  28. Hubert, J. F., J. G. Butera, and R. F. Rice, 1972, Sedimentology of Upper Cretaceous Cody-Parkman delta, southwestern Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 83, p. 1649–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingersoll, R. V., 1983, Petrofacies and provenance of late Mesozoic forearc basin, northern and central California: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 67, p. 1125–1142.Google Scholar
  30. Ingersoll, R. V. and C. A. Suczek, 1979, Petrology and provenance of Neogene sand from Nicobar and Bengal fans, DSDP sites 211 and 218: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 49, p. 1217–1228.Google Scholar
  31. Ingersoll, R. V., T. F. Bullard, R. L. Ford, J. P. Grimm, J. D. Pickle, and S. W. Sares, 1984, The effect of grain size on detrital modes: a test of the Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 103–116.Google Scholar
  32. James, W. C., G. H. Mack, and L. J. Suttner, 1981, Relative alteration of microcline and sodic plagioclase in semi-arid and humid climates: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 51, p. 151–164.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, S. Y., 1984, Stratigraphy, age, and paleogeography of the Eocene Chuckanut Formation, northwest Washington: Can. Jour. Earth Sci., v. 21, p. 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, P. C., 1972, Quartzarenite and litharenite facies in the fluvial foreland deposits of the Trenchard Group (Westphalian), Forest of Dean, England: Sed. Geology, v. 8, p. 177–198.Google Scholar
  35. Korsch, R. J., 1984, Sandstone compositions from the New England Orogen, eastern Australia: implications for tectonic setting: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 192–211.Google Scholar
  36. Link, M. H., 1982, Petrography and geochemistry of sedimentary rocks, Ridge Basin, southern California, in Crowell, J. C. and M. H. Link, eds., Geologic history of Ridge Basin, southern California: Pacific Sec., Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Los Angeles, California, p. 159–180.Google Scholar
  37. Mack, G. H., 1981, Composition of modern stream sand in a humid climate derived from a low-grade metamorphic and sedimentary foreland fold-thrust belt of north Georgia: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 51, p. 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mack, G. H.., 1984, Exceptions to the relationship between plate tectonics and sandstone composition: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 212–220.Google Scholar
  39. Mack, G. H., W. C. James, and W. A. Thomas, 1981, Orogenic provenance of Mississippian sandstones associated with southern Appalachian-Ouachita Orogen: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 65, p. 1444–1456.Google Scholar
  40. McBride, E. F., 1966, Sedimentary petrology and history of the Haymond Formation (Pennsylvanian), Marathon Basin, Tex.s: Tex. Bur. Econ. Geol. Rpt. Inv. No. 57, 101 p.Google Scholar
  41. McBride, E. F., A. E. Weidie, and J. A. Wolleben, 1975, Deltaic and associated deposits of Difunta Group (Late Cretaceous to Paleocene), Parras and La Popa basins, northeastern Mexico, in Broussard, M. L., ed., Deltas, models for exploration: Houston Geol. Soc., Houston, p. 485–522.Google Scholar
  42. Misko, R. M. and Hendry, H. E., 1979, The petrology of sands in the uppermost Cretaceous and Palaeocene of southern Saskatchewan: a study of composition influenced by grain size, source area, and tectonics: Can. Jour. Earth Sci., v. 16, p. 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pacht, J. A., 1984, Petrologic evolution and paleogeography of the Late Cretaceous Nanaimo Basin, Washington and British Columbia: implications for Cretaceous tectonics: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 95, p. 766–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parkash, B., R. P. Sharma, and A. K. Roy, 1980, The Siwalik Group (molasse)–sediments shed by collision of continental plates: Sed. Geology, v. 25, p. 127–159.Google Scholar
  45. Potter, P. E., 1978, Petrology and chemistry of modern big river sands: Jour. Geology, v. 86, p. 423–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Putnam, P. E., 1982, Fluvial channel sandstones within upper Mannville (Albian) of Lloydminster area, Canada–geometry, petrography, and paleogeographic implications: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 66, p. 436–459.Google Scholar
  47. Ruxton, B. P., 1970, Labile quartz-poor sediments from young mountain ranges in northeast Papua: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 40, p. 1262–1270.Google Scholar
  48. Schwab, F. L., 1981, Evolution of the western continental margin, French-Italian Alps: sandstone mineralogy as an index of plate tectonic setting: Jour. Geology, v. 89, p. 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz, R. K., 1982, Broken Early Cretaceous foreland basin in southwestern Montana: sedimentation related to tectonism, in Powers, R. P., ed., Geologic studies of the Cordilleran thrust belt: Rocky Mtn. Assoc. Geologists, Denver, Colorado, p. 159–183.Google Scholar
  50. Sclater, J. G. and P. A. F. Christie, 1980, Continental stretching, an explanation of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea Basin: Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 85, p. 3711–3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart, R. J., 1978, Neogene volcaniclastic sediments from Atka Basin, Aleutian Ridge: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 62, p. 87–97.Google Scholar
  52. Suczek, C. A. and R. V. Ingersoll, 1984, Petrology and provenance of Cenozoic sand from the Indus Cone and the Arabian Basin (DSD sites 221, 222, and 224): Jour. Sed. Petrology, in press.Google Scholar
  53. Suttner, L. J., A. Basu, and G. H. Mack, 1981x, Climate and the origin of quartz arenites: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 51, p. 1235–1246.Google Scholar
  54. Suttner, L. J., R. K. Schwartz, and W. C. James, 1981b, Late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic foreland sedimentation in southwest Montana, in Tucker, T. E., ed., Guidebook to southwest Montana: Montana Geol. Soc., Billings, p. 93–103.Google Scholar
  55. Tennyson, M. E. and M. R. Cole, 1978, Tectonic significance of upper Mesozoic Methow-Pasayten sequence, northeastern Cascade Range, Washington and British Columbia, in Howell, D. G., and K. A. McDougall, eds., Mesozoic paleogeography of the western United States: Pacific Sec., Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists Pacific Coast Paleogeography Symp. 2, p. 499–508.Google Scholar
  56. Valloni, R. and J. B. Maynard, 1981, Detrital modes of recent deep-sea sands and their relation to tectonic setting: a first approximation: Sedimentology, v. 28, p. 75–83.Google Scholar
  57. Valloni, R. and G. G. Zuffa, 1984, Provenance changes for arenaceous formations of the northern Apennines, Italy: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 95, in press.Google Scholar
  58. Van Andel, Tj. H., 1958, Origin and classification of Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene sandstones of western Venezuela: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 42, p. 734–763.Google Scholar
  59. Van de Kamp, P. C., 1973, Holocene continental sedimentation in the Salton Basin, California: a reconnaissance: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 84, p. 827–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Velbel, M. A., 1980, Petrography of subduction zone sandstones: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 50, p. 303–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walker, T. R., 1984, Diagenetic albitization of potassium feldspar in arkosic sandstones: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 3–16.Google Scholar
  62. Webb, W. M. and P. E. Potter, 1971, Petrology and geochemistry of modern detritus derived from a rhyolitic terrane, western Chihuahua, Mexico: Bol. Soc. Geol. Mexicana, v. 32, p. 45–61.Google Scholar
  63. Winn, R. D., Jr., 1978, Upper Mesozoic flysch of Tierra del Fuego and South Georgia Island: a sedimentological approach to lithosphere plate restoration: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 89, p. 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Young, S. W., 1976, Petrographic textures of detrital polycrystalline quartz as an aid to interpreting crystalline source rocks: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 46, p. 595–603.Google Scholar
  65. Zieglar, D. L. and J. H. Spotts, 1978, Reservoir and source-bed history of Great Valley, California: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 62, p. 813–826.Google Scholar
  66. Zuffa, G. G., 1980, Hybrid arenites: their composition and classification: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 50, p. 21–29.Google Scholar
  67. Zuffa, G. G., W. Gaudio, and S. Rovito, 1980, Detrital mode evolution of the rifted continental-margin Longobucco Sequence (Jurassic), Calabrian Arc, Italy: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 50, p. 51–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Dickinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Geotectonics, Department of GeosciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations