Plant Biotechnology 2002 and Beyond pp 479-483 | Cite as
Transgenic Plants for Environmental Biomonitoring: New Perspectives
Abstract
Modern socio-economic development is often associated with a heavy load of radioactive and chemical contamination of the biosphere. Sources of radiation exposure are almost ubiquitous in our environment due to the growing production of radioactive waste, nuclear tests and accidents in nuclear power plants that lead to the release of radioactive material into the environment. Along with radioactive pollution there exists the problem of chemical contamination. Large territories all over the world are contaminated by wastes of the chemical and petroleum industries. Soils and drinking water supplies are polluted with heavy metals, such as cadmium, lead, copper and others as well as with toxic organic compounds. As a result, living organisms suffer from the cumulative effect of various environmental pollutants — powerful forces that are continuously shaping the genomes of all species
Keywords
Environment contamination radiation heavy metals transgenic plants mutation recombination biomonitoringPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Burk L.G. and H.A. Menser. 1964. A dominant aurea mutation in tobacco. Tob. Sci. 8: 101–104.Google Scholar
- Friedlender M., Lev-Yadun S.;, Baburek I., Angelis K. and A.A. Levy. 1996. Cell divisions in cotyledons after germination: localization, time course and utilization for a mutagenesis assay. Planta 199: 307–313.Google Scholar
- Grant W. F. 1994. The present status of higher plant bioassays for detection of environmental mutagens. Mut. Res. 310: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hohn B., Kovalchuk I. and O. Kovalchuk. 1999. Transgenic plants sense radioactive contamination. Bioworld 6: 13–15.Google Scholar
- Ichikawa S. 1992. Tradescantia stamen-hair system as an excellent botanical tester of mutagenicity: its responses to ionizing radiations and chemical mutagens, and some synergistic effects found. Mut. Res. 270: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kanaya N., Gill B., Grover I., Murin A., Osiecka R., Sandhu S. and H. Andersson. 1994. Vicia faba chromosomal aberration assay. Mut. Res. 310: 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovalchuk I., Kovalchuk O., Arkhipov A. and B. Hohn. 1998. Transgenic plants are sensitive bioindicators of nuclear pollution caused by the Chernobyl accident. Nature Biotechnology 16: 1054–1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovalchuk O., Kovalchuk I., Titov V., Arkhipov A. and B. Hohn. 1999. Radiation hazard caused by the Chernobyl accident in inhabited areas of Ukraine can be monitored by transgenic plants. Mut. Res. 446: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovalchuk I., Kovalchuk O. and B. Hohn.I999. Transgenic plants as bioindicators of environmental pollution. Review. AgBiotechNet Vol. I, October, ABN 030.Google Scholar
- Kovalchuk I., Kovalchuk O. and B. Hohn. 2000. Genome-wide variation of the somatic mutation frequency in transgenic plants. EMBO J. 19: 4431–4438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kovalchuk I., Kovalchuk O. and B. Hohn. 2001. Biomonitoring of genotoxicity of environmental factors with transgenic plants. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 306–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Puchta H.;, Swoboda P. and B. Hohn. 1995. Induction of homologous DNA recombination in whole plants. Plant J. 7: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Puchta, H. and B. Hohn. 1996. From centiMorgans to basepairs: homologous recombination in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 340–348.Google Scholar
- Raskin I., Smith R.D. and D.E. Salt. 1997. Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 8: 221–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues G.S., Ma T.H., Pimentel D. and L. Weinstein. 1997 Tradescantia bioassays as monitoring systems for environmental mutagenesis: A Review. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16: 325–359.Google Scholar
- Rugh C.L., Wilde H.D., Stack N.M., Thompson D.M., Summers A.O. and R.B. Meagher. 1996. Mercuric ion reduction and resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing a modified bacterial merA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 6667–6671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar