Queues, Construction Operations and Optimization

  • David G. Carmichael
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSE, volume 221)

Abstract

Certain construction operations lend themselves very neatly to be modelled as queueing processes. In particular earthmoving type operations are shown to be naturally modelled as finite source queueing processes or cyclic queueing processes. Such models take account of the variabilities in the operations as well as the interaction of equipment. Using two-stage cyclic queueing processes under various probability assumptions as a basis, the paper develops optimization in the planning and management of earthmoving operations. Specific problems formulated and solved include the choice of the optimal hauling unit fleet size, optimal loading policies, optimal heterogeneity (mix of equipment), optimal operation layout, optimal choice of equipment characteristics and optimal preemptive and non-preemptive priority treatment of equipment. The objective functions are typically cost, production, cost per production or equipment utilization. Constraints may include time, production or other considerations. The use of optimal planning and management strategies is shown to provide a more rational framework than conventional earthmoving procedures. In the process of developing the optimal strategies, new queueing models are put forward to handle the idiosyncrasies of the civil engineering problems considered.

Keywords

Service Time Lower Envelope Fleet Size Customer Type Construction Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Carmichael, D. G., (1987), `A Refined Queueing Model for Earthmoving Operations,’ Civil Engineering Systems 4, pp. 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Carmichael, D. G., (1987), Engineering Queues in Construction and Mining, Ellis Horwood Ltd ( John Wiley and Sons Ltd ), Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Carmichael, D. G., (1989), `Heterogeneity in Deterministic Finite Source Queues,’ submitted to Civil Engineering Systems.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Carmichael, D. G., (1987), `Optimal Pusher-Scraper Loading Policies,’ Engineering Optimization 10, pp. 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Carmichael, D. G., (1989), `Production Tables for Earthmoving, Quarrying and Open-Cut Mining Operations,’ in Applied Construction Management, D. G. Carmichael (Ed.), Unisearch Ltd. Publishers, Sydney, pp. 275–281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Carmichael
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringThe University of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations