New Perspectives in Wood Anatomy pp 23-58

Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 1)

Systematic, phylogenetic, and ecological wood anatomy — History and perspectives

  • Pieter Baas

Summary

Following an account of the early beginnings of wood anatomy in the seventeenth century, with special emphasis on the often neglected role of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, history and achievements of systematic, phylogenetic, and ecological wood anatomy are reviewed. Most current concepts in systematic wood anatomy had been formulated towards the end of the nineteenth century. A discussion is given of the major trends in xylem evolution (the ‘Baileyan trends’), and of possibilities of reversions of these trends, especially in vessel element (or cambial initial) length. Recently surveyed data on the fossil pollen record of angiosperm families (by Muller) are compared with the occurrence of primitive or advanced wood anatomical characters in extant representatives of these families. Families of Cretaceous origin (as deduced from fossil pollen records) show a much higher incidence of primitive vessel, fibre and parenchyma features, but in families of Tertiary origin the same degree of specialisation occurs as in the extant world flora. For ray type and storied structure no such trend exists. In a discussion of the achievements of ecological wood anatomy, some general trends on vessel element and fibre dimensions, and vessel perforation type as related to temperature and drought are reviewed. Tentative trends for ray histology, parenchyma abundance and fibre type are explored. Rigid adaptionist interpretations are criticised: in addition to adaptive ecological trends, functionless trends imposed by correlative restraints and ‘patio ludens’ variation (sensu Van Steenis) are advocated. Priorities for future research, in order to promote further integration of the various aspects of comparative wood anatomy, are listed. These are of equal significance in pure and applied research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akachuku, A.E. amp J. Burley. 1979. Variation of wood anatomy of Gmelina arborea Roxb. in Nigerian pantations. IAWA Bull. 1979 /4: 94–99.Google Scholar
  2. Arber, A. 1941a. Tercentenary of Nehemiah Grew (1614–1712). Nature 147: 630–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arber, A. 1941b. Nehemiah Grew and Marcello Malpighi. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 153: 218238.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, J.E. amp D.T. Funk. 1980. Genetic variation in the wood of Fraxinus americana. Wood and Fiber 12: 112–120.Google Scholar
  5. Baas, P. 1969. Comparative anatomy of Platanus kerrii Gagnep. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 413–421.Google Scholar
  6. Baas, P. 1973. The wood anatomy of Ilex ( Aquifoliaceae) and its ecological and phylogenetic significance. Blumea 21: 193–258.Google Scholar
  7. Baas, P. 1976. Some functional and adaptive aspects of vessel member morphology. In: P. Baas, A.J. Bolton amp D.M. Catling (eds.), Wood Structure in Biological and Technological Research: 157–181. Leiden Bot. Series No. 3. Leiden Univ. Press, The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Baas, P. 1977. The peculiar wood structure of Leptospermum crassipes Lehm. (Myrtaceae). IAWA Bull. 1977 /2: 25–30.Google Scholar
  9. Baas, P. 1979. The peculiar wood structure of Vaccinium lucidum (BI.) Miq. (Ericaceae). IAWA Bull. 1979 /1: 11–16.Google Scholar
  10. Baas, P. 1982. Leeuwenhoek’s contributions to wood anatomy and his ideas on sap transport in plants. In: L.C. Palm amp H.A.M. Snelders (eds.), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek 1632–1982. Studies Commemorating the 350th Anniversary of his Birth. Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Baas, P. amp E. Werker. 1981. A new record of vestured pits in Cistaceae. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 4142.Google Scholar
  12. Baas, P. amp R.C.V.J. Zweypfenning. 1979. Wood anatomy of the Lythraceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 28: 117–155.Google Scholar
  13. Baas Becking, L.M.G. 1924. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, immortal dilettant. Scientific Monthly, New York 18: 547–554.Google Scholar
  14. Bailey, I.W. 1933. The cambium and its derivative tissues. VIII. Structure, distribution, and diagnostic significance of vestured pits in Dicotyledons. J. Am. Arbor. 14: 259–273.Google Scholar
  15. Bailey, I.W. 1944. The development of vessels in angiosperms and its significance in morphological research. Amer. J. Bot. 31: 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bailey, I.W. 1953. Evolution of the tracheary tissue of land plants. Amer. J. Bot. 40: 4–8.Google Scholar
  17. Bailey, I.W. amp W.W. Tupper. 1918. Size variation in tracheary cells. I. A comparison between the secondary xylems of vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms and angiosperms. Proc. Amer. Arts amp Sci. 54: 149–204.Google Scholar
  18. Bannan, M.W. 1965. The length, tangential diameter and length/width ratio of conifer tracheids. Canad. J. Bot. 43: 967–984.Google Scholar
  19. Barghoorn, E.S. 1964. Evolution of cambium in geological time. In: M.H. Zimmermann (ed.), The Formation of Wood in Forest Trees: 3–17. Acad. Press, New York/London.Google Scholar
  20. Bary, A. de. 1877. Vergleichende Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Phanerogamen undGoogle Scholar
  21. Farne. Englemann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  22. Boerlage, J.G. 1875. Bijdrage tot de kennis der houtanatomie. Thesis, Leiden.Google Scholar
  23. Böhm, J. 1879. Über die Function der vegetabilischen Gefässe. Bot. Ztng. 37: 214–255.Google Scholar
  24. Brazier, J. 1975. The changing pattern of research in wood anatomy. J. Microscopy 104: 53–64.Google Scholar
  25. Bruyne, A.S. de. 1952. Wood structure and age. Proc. Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, Series C, 55: 282–286.Google Scholar
  26. Candolle, A.P. de. 1818. Systema naturale regni vegetabilis. Treuttel amp Würtz, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Carlquist, S. 1961. Comparative plant anatomy. Holt, Rinehart amp Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Carlquist, S. 1962. A theory of paedomorphosis in dicotyledonous woods. Phytomorphology 12: 30–45.Google Scholar
  29. Carlquist, S. 1966. Wood anatomy of Compositae: a summary, with comments on factors controlling wood evolution. Aliso 6: 25–44.Google Scholar
  30. Carlquist, S. 1970. Wood anatomy of Hawaiian, Macaronesian, and other species of Euphorbia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. Suppl. 60, Vol. 63 (1): 181–193.Google Scholar
  31. Carlquist, S. 1975. Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. Univ. California Press, Berkeley/ Los Angeles/London.Google Scholar
  32. Carlquist, S. 1977. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. Amer. J. Bot. 64: 887–896.Google Scholar
  33. Carlquist, S. 1980. Further concepts in ecological wood anatomy, with comments on recent work in wood anatomy and evolution. Aliso 9: 499–553.Google Scholar
  34. Chalk, L. 1937. The phylogenetic value of certain anatomical features of dicotyledonous woods. Ann. Bot. n.s. 1: 409–428.Google Scholar
  35. Chalk, L. amp C.R. Metcalfe. 1979. The history of wood anatomy. In: C.R. Metcalfe amp L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons 1: 4–9 ( 2nd Ed. ). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Chalon, J. 1868. Anatomie comparée des tiges ligneuse dicotylédonées. Deuxième Mémoire, Gand. Seen in: Bull. Soc. bot. France 16, revue bibl.: 38–39.Google Scholar
  37. Chattaway, M.M. 1955. Crystals in woody tissues I. Trop. Woods 102: 55–74.Google Scholar
  38. Chattaway, M.M. 1956. Crystals in woody tissues II. Trop. Woods 104: 100–124.Google Scholar
  39. Cronquist, A. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Nelson, London.Google Scholar
  40. Dahlgren, R.M.T. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91–124.Google Scholar
  41. Dickison, W.C. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative anatomy. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 590–620.Google Scholar
  42. Dickison, W.C. 1979. A note on the wood anatomy of Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). IAWA Bull. 1979/2–3: 57–60.Google Scholar
  43. Dickison, W.C. 1980. Comparative wood anatomy and evolution of the Cunoniaceae. Allertonia 2: 281–321.Google Scholar
  44. Dickison, W.C., P.M. Rury amp G.L. Stebbins. 1978. Xylem anatomy of Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae) in relation to ecology and evolution. J. Am. Arbor. 59: 32–49.Google Scholar
  45. Dobell, C. 1932. Antony van Leeuwenhoek and his `little animals’. Bale amp Danielson, London. Duhamel du Monceau, H.L. 1758. La physique des arbres. Paris.Google Scholar
  46. Engler, A. amp K. Prantl. 1889–1897. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1–4.Google Scholar
  47. Englemann, Leipzig. Furuno, T. 1977. Anatomy of Papua New Guinea woods. Research Report of Foreign Wood (Shimane Univ.) No. 6.Google Scholar
  48. Furuno, T, 1979. Ibidem (continued). Ibidem,No. 8.Google Scholar
  49. Gibson, A.C. 1973. Wood anatomy of the Cactoideae (Cactaceae). Biotropica 5: 29–65. Gould, S.J. 1980. Is a new general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6: 119–130.Google Scholar
  50. Gould, S.J. amp R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme Proc. R. Soc. London B 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
  51. Graaff, N.A. van der, amp P. Baas. 1974. Wood anatomical variation in relation to latitude and altitude. Blumea 22: 101–121.Google Scholar
  52. Gregory, M. 1980. Wood identification: an annotated bibliography. IAWA Bull. n.s. 1: 3–41 (also separately: IAWA, Leiden).Google Scholar
  53. Grew, N. 1682. The anatomy of plants with an idea of a philosophical history of plants. Rawlins, London.Google Scholar
  54. Grosser, D. 1977. Die Hölzer Mitteleuropas. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hartig, T. 1859. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Holzpflanzen. Bot. Ztng. 11: 93–101; 105–112.Google Scholar
  56. Hayashi, S., T. Kishima, L.C. Lau, T.M. Wong amp P.K. Balan Menon. 1973. Micrographic atlas of Southeast Asian timbers. Wood Research Institute, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  57. Heniger, J. 1973. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. In: C. Coulston Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography 8: 126–130. Scribner’s, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Hill, J. 1770. The construction of timber (from its early growth explained by the microscope and proved from experiments in a great variety of kinds). R. Baldwin, London.Google Scholar
  59. Hogeweg, P. amp J. Koek-Noorman. 1975. Wood anatomical classification using iterative character weighing. Acta Bot. Neerl. 24: 269–283.Google Scholar
  60. Hooke, R. 1665. Micrographia: or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses with observations and inquiries thereupon. Martyn amp Allestry, London (repr. 1961, Cramer, Weinheim ).Google Scholar
  61. IAWA Committee. 1981. Standard list of characters suitable for computerized hardwood identification (with explanation of coding procedure and characters by R.B. Miller). IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 99–145 (also separately: IAWA, Leiden).Google Scholar
  62. Jane, F.W. 1963. Botanical aspects of wood science. In: W.B. Turrill (ed.), Vistas in Botany 2: 135. Pergamon, London/New York/Paris/Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  63. Kanehira, R. 1921. Anatomical characters and identification of Formosan woods. Govt. of Formosa, Taihoku.Google Scholar
  64. Kieser, D.G. 1815. Elemente der Phytonomie 1. Phytotomie. Cröcker, Jena.Google Scholar
  65. Koek-Noorman, J. 1980. Wood anatomy and classification of Henriquezia Spruce, Platycarpum Humb. et Bonpl. and Glaesonia Stand!. Acta Bot. Neerl. 29: 117–126.Google Scholar
  66. Koek-Noorman, J. amp P. Hogeweg. 1974. The wood anatomy of Vanguerieae, Cinchoneae, Condamineae and Rondeletieae (Rubiaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 627–653.Google Scholar
  67. Koek-Noorman, J., P. Hogeweg, W.H.M. van Maanen amp B.J.H. ter Welle. 1979. Wood anatomy of the Blakeae (Melastomataceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 28: 21–43.Google Scholar
  68. Kribs, D.A. 1935. Salient lines of structural specialization in the wood rays of dicotyledons. Bot. Gaz. 96: 547–557.Google Scholar
  69. Kribs, D.A. 1968. Commercial foreign woods on the American market. Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Leeuwenberg, A.J.M. (ed.). 1980. Loganiaceae. In: A. Engler amp K. Prantl (contd by P. Hiepko amp H. Melchior), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd Ed., 28 b I (especially: Anatomy of the secondary xylem by A.M.W. Mennega, p. 112–161 ).Google Scholar
  71. Leeuwenhoek, A. van. 1673–1696 (1939–1982). The collected letters I-XI (to be continued). Swets amp Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  72. Mabberley, D.J. 1974. Pachycauly, vessel-elements, islands and the evolution of arborescence in `herbaceous’ families New Phytol. 73: 977–984.Google Scholar
  73. Mägdefrau, K. 1973. Geschichte der Botanik. Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  74. Malpighi, M. 1686. Opera omnia. London (repr. 1687, Leiden).Google Scholar
  75. Marum, M. van. 1773. Diss. inauguralis philosophica de motu fluidorum in plantis. Thesis, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  76. Metcalfe, C.R. 1959. A vista in plant anatomy. In: W.B. Turrill (ed.), Vistas in Botany 1: 76–99. Pergamon, London/New York/Paris/Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  77. Metcalfe, C.R. 1979. History of systematic anatomy. In: C.R. Metcalfe amp L. Chalk (eds.), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons 1: 1–4 ( 2nd Ed. ). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  78. Metcalfe, C.R. amp L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons 1 amp 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  79. Meylan, B.A. amp B.G. Butterfield. 1978. The structure of New Zealand woods. DSIR Bull. 222. Wellington.Google Scholar
  80. Miller, R.B. 1977. Vestured pits in Boraginaceae. IAWA Bull. 1977 /3: 43–48.Google Scholar
  81. Miller, R.B. 1980. Wood identification via computer. IAWA Bull. n.s. 1: 154–160.Google Scholar
  82. Möbius, M. 1901. Marcellus Malpighi: Die Anatomie der Pflanzen. Englemann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  83. Moll, J.W. amp H.H. Janssonius. 1906–1938. Mikrographie des Holzes der auf Java vorkommenden Baumarten 1–6. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  84. Möller, J. 1876. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie des Holzes. Vienna, Gerold (abstracted in French in Bull. Soc. Bot. France 24: 3 ).Google Scholar
  85. Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant Angiosperms. Bot. Review 47: 1–142. Normand, D. amp J. Paquis. 1976. Manuel d’identification des bois commerciaux. 2. Afrique guinéo-congolaise. CTFT, Nogent s/Marne.Google Scholar
  86. Novruzova, Z.A. 1968. The water-conducting system of trees and shrubs in relation to ecology. Baku, Izd. AN. Azerb. SSR (in Russian).Google Scholar
  87. Oever, L. van den, P. Baas amp M. Zandee. 1981. Comparative wood anatomy of Symplocos and latitude and altitude of provenance. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 3–24.Google Scholar
  88. Page, V.M. 1979. Dicotyledonous wood from the Upper Cretaceous of central California. J. Am. Arbor. 60: 323–349.Google Scholar
  89. Page, V.M. 1980. Ibidem. II. J. Am. Arbor. 61: 723–748.Google Scholar
  90. Robbertse, P.J., G. Venter amp H. Janse van Rensburg. 1980. The wood anatomy of South African Acacias. IAWA Bull. n.s. 1: 93–103.Google Scholar
  91. Sachs, J. 1875. Geschichte der Botanik. Oldenbourg, München.Google Scholar
  92. Sanio, C. 1863. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Zusammensetzung des Holzkörpers. Bot. Ztng. 21: 359–363; 369–375; 377–385; 389–399; 401–412.Google Scholar
  93. Schierbeek, A. 1950 amp 1951. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - zijn leven en werken. De Tijdstroom, Lochem, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  94. Schierbeek, A. 1959. Measuring the invisible world. The life and works of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek FRS. Abelard-Schuman, London/New York.Google Scholar
  95. Schmucker, T. amp G. Linnemann. 1951. Geschichte der Anatomie des Holzes. In: H. Freund (ed.), Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik V/1: 3–77. Umschau, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  96. Schweingruber, F.H. 1978. Mikroskopische Holzanatomie. Formenspektren mitteleuropäischer Stamm-und Zwerghölzer zur Bestimmung von rezentem und subfossilem Material. Kommissionsverlag, Zürich.Google Scholar
  97. Solereder, H. 1885. Ueber den systematischen Wert der Holzstructur bei den Dicotyledonen. Thesis, München.Google Scholar
  98. Solereder, H. 1899 amp 1908. Systematische Anatomie der Dicotyledonen amp Ergänzungsband. Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  99. Steenis, C.G.G.J. van. 1976. Autonomous evolution in plants. Differences in plant and animal evolution. Gardens’ Bull. ( Singapore ) 29: 103–126.Google Scholar
  100. Steenis, C.G.G.J. van. 1981. Rheophytes of the world. An account of flood-resistant flowering plants and ferns and the theory of autonomous evolution. Sijthoff amp Noordhoff, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  101. Stern, W.L. 1978. A retrospective view of comparative anatomy, phylogeny, and plant taxonomy. IAWA Bull. 1978/2–3: 33–39.Google Scholar
  102. Stern, W.L. 1982. Highlights in the early history of the International Association of Wood Anatomists. This volume.Google Scholar
  103. Styer, C.H. amp W.L. Stern. 1979. Comparative anatomy and systematics of woody Saxifragaceae. Deutzia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 79: 291–319.Google Scholar
  104. Sudo, S. 1959. Identification of Japanese hardwoods. Bull. Govt. Exper. Station No. 118: 1–138.Google Scholar
  105. Takhtajan, A.L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225–359.Google Scholar
  106. Thorne, R.F. 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evolutionary Biology 9: 35–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Timell, T.E. 1980. Karl Gustav Sanio and the first scientific description of compression wood. IAWA Bull. n.s. 1: 147–153.Google Scholar
  108. Vesque, J. 1876. Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur la structure du bois. Ann. Sci. nat. 6e sér. bot. 3: 358–371.Google Scholar
  109. Vesque, J. 1881. De l’anatomie des tissus appliquée à la classification des plantes. Nouv. Arch. Muséum (Paris) 2e sér. 4: 1–56.Google Scholar
  110. Vesque, J. 1889. De l’emploi des caractères anatomique dans la classification des végétaux. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 36: 41–87.Google Scholar
  111. Vesque, J. amp C. Viet. 1881. Influence du milieu sur les végétaux. Ann. Sci. nat. 6e sér. bot. 12: 165–176.Google Scholar
  112. Vliet, G.J.C.M. van. 1976. Wood anatomy of the Rhizophoraceae. In: P. Baas, A.J. Bolton amp D.M. Catling (eds.), Wood Structure in Biological and Technological Research: 20–75. Leiden Bot. Series No. 3. Leiden Univ. Press, The Hague.Google Scholar
  113. Vliet, G.J.C.M. van. 1979. Wood anatomy of the Combretaceae. Blumea 25: 141–223.Google Scholar
  114. Vliet, G.J.C.M. van. 1981. Wood anatomy of the Old World Melastomataceae. Blumea 27: 395462.Google Scholar
  115. Werker, E. amp P. Baas. 1981. Trabeculae of Sanio in secondary tissues of Inula viscosa (L.) Desf. and Salvia fruticosa Mill. IAWA Bull. n.s. 2: 69–76.Google Scholar
  116. Wolfe, J.A., J.A. Doyle amp V.M. Page. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: paleobotany. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 801–824.Google Scholar
  117. Zimmermann, M.H. 1979. The discovery of tylose formation by a Viennese Lady in 1845. IAWA Bull. 1979/2–3: 51–56.Google Scholar
  118. Zimmermann, M.H. amp C.L. Brown. 1971. Trees - structure and function. Springer, Berlin/New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter Baas
    • 1
  1. 1.RijksherbariumLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations