Teaching Metacognitively

  • Hope J. Hartman
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 19)


A growing body of research and theory highlights teachers’ use of their metacognitive knowledge and skills before, during and after instruction. This chapter describes what is involved in teaching metacognitively, it explains why teaching metacognitively is important, it describes and illustrates metacognitive techniques used in my own teaching, and it explains procedures for developing other teachers’ metacognition about their own instruction.


Preservice Teacher Educational Psychology Teaching Strategy Lesson Plan Cooperative Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Annis, L.F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J. and Snapp, M. (1978) The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C. Kulik, 1.A, and Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 61, 213–238Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, D. 1988?(1987) Ways ofthinking about students and classrooms by more and less experienced teachers. In: Calderhead, J. (Ed.) Exploring Teachers’ Thinking 60–83. London: Cassell Educational Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Borko, H. and Livingston, C. (1989) Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal. 26. 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brophy, J. (1986). Socializing students motivation to learn. Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching. ED 269 384.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. L., and Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts. The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Bums, M. (1990). Using groups of four. In. Davidson, N. (Ed.) Cooperative Learning in Mathematics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, C. (1983). Research on Teacher Planning: An Inventory of the Knowledge Base. In: Smith, D. (Ed.) Essential Knowledge for Beginning Educators. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. 5–15.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, C. and Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittroch, M. C. (ed.)Handhook of Research on Teaching. 3rd edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, C. M. and Yinger, R. (1987). Teacher Planning. In: Calderhead, J. (Ed.) Exploring Teachers’ Thinking. 84–103. Cassell Educational Limited: London.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, C. M. and Yinger, R. (1978). Research on Teacher Thinking. Research Series No. 12. ED160592.Google Scholar
  14. East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University. Doyle, W. (1983) Academic Work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.Google Scholar
  15. Haigh, N. (1981). Research on Teacher Thinking. Paper presented at the National Conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, ED213657.Google Scholar
  16. Hartman, H. (1993) Intelligent Tutoring. fl and H Publishing Co. Cleawater, FL.Google Scholar
  17. I lartman, H. and Sternberg, R. J. (1993) A Broad BACEIS for Improving Thinking. nstructional Science 21 (5). 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation. competition, and individualization Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, M. M. (1998) The relevance of content in inservice teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Lhyle, K. G. andKulhavy, R. W. (1987). Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 320–322.Google Scholar
  21. Manning, B. and Payne, B. (1996). Self Talk for Teachers and Students. Allyn and Bacon: NeedhamGoogle Scholar
  22. McKeachie, W. (1994). Teaching Tips. 9th edition. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  23. McKeachie, W., Pintrich, P., Lin, Y. G. and Smith, D.A. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom. National Center for Research on Improving Post Secondary Teaching and Learning: Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  24. Medway, F. J. (1991). A social psychological analysis of peer tutoring. Journal of Developmental Education, 15 (1), 20–32.Google Scholar
  25. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive Behavior Modification. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meichenbaum, D. and Biemiller, A. (1998). Nurturing Independent Learners. Cambridge: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, B.,and Harris, B. (1986). An assessment of prospective teachers’ cognitive knowledge of appropriate instructional strategies for teaching letter sound to first grade children. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association. Missoula, MT. ED313371.Google Scholar
  28. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, Creating and Using Knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Osborne, J. W. (1999). A behavioral measure of metacognition for teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.Google Scholar
  30. Palincsar, A. and Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1 (2) 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Posner, G. J. (1985). Field Experience: A Guide to Reflective Teaching Longman: New York Pressley, M. and McGoogle Scholar
  32. Cormick, C. (1995). Advanced Educational Psychology for Educators, Researchers and Policymakers. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenshine, B. and Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership. April. 26–33.Google Scholar
  34. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., and Berliner, D.C. (1991) Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 63–88.Google Scholar
  35. Sharan, Y. and Sharan, S. (1989/1990) Group Investigation expands learning. Educational Leadership. 47(4). 17–21.Google Scholar
  36. Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  37. Sternberg, R. (1985). BeyondLQ.: A Triarchic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Winne, P. H. and Marx, R.W. (1982). Students’ and teachers’ views of thinking processes for classroom learning. Elementary School Journal. 82 (2) 494–518.Google Scholar
  40. Zeichner, K. Tabachnick, B. R. and Densmore, K. (1987). Individual, institutional, and cultural influences on the development of teachers’ craft knowledge. In J. Calderhead (ed.) Exploring Teachers’ Thinking. London: Cassell Educational Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hope J. Hartman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EducationCity College of the City University of New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational Psychology Graduate School and University CenterCity University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations