Two Models of Medical Knowledge

  • Zbigniew Szawarski
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 64)

Abstract

When a physician talks about disease or impaired capacity, he usually means some imperfection in biological and/or psychological functioning of the human being. As a medical student, he was taught some basic knowledge concerning human biology, anatomy, physiology, and pathology. Theoretically he should easily be able to tell the difference between the perfect and the imperfect, the normal and the pathological, the healthy and the sick. A pediatrician sees at once the difference between the healthy and the severely handicapped newborn. A GP can easily diagnose herpes or trivial flu, and has no difficulty in assessing the level of deficiency in our sight or hearing. Of course there are some difficult cases where it is impossible to make even a tentative diagnosis, and when despite all technological support, the physician is unable to find any convincing explanation of the patient’s condition [Cassell, 19781. These are, however, incidental and rare cases and indeed very few doctors will straightforwardly declare their ignorance. By and large medicine, as a powerful branch of modern science, shares its epistemological optimism: even if at present it cannot explain nor treat some illnesses, it is only a question of time before it will be able to.

Keywords

Medical Knowledge Human Person Biological Organism Biomedical Model Complex Biological System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, J. R., “Why Aren’t More Doctors Phenomenologist?” in: D. Leder (ed.), The Body in Medical Thought and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Boorse, C., “Health as a Theoretical Concept”, Philosophy of Science (1977) 44, 542 - 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody, H, H., “The System View of Man: Implications for Medicine, Science, and Ethics”, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Autumn, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Canguilhem, G., The Normal and the Pathological, New York: Zone Books, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Cassell, E., “The Conflict between the Desire to Know and the Need to Care for the Patient”, in: S. F. Spicker (ed.), Organism, Medicine, and Metaphysics, D. Reidel Publishing House, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Cassell, E., “The Body of the Future”, in D. Leder (ed.), The Body in Medical Thought and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Foss, L. “Putting the Mind back into the Body. A Successor Scientific Medical Model”, Theoretical Medicine (1994) 15: 291 - 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greaves, D., The Historical Conceptualization of Impaired Capacity and Some Ethical Implications. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Laszlo, E., The Systems View of the World, New York: Brazilier, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Leder, D., “A Tale of Two Bodies: The Cartesian Corpse and the Lived Body”, in D. Leder (ed.), The Body in Medical Thought and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Nordenfelt, L., On the Nature of Health, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nordenfelt, L., Quality of Life, Health and Happiness, Avebury, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. Pickering, G., Creative Malady, London: Allen and Unwin, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Querido, A., —The Wisdom of the Body’: The Usefulness of System Thinking”, in Discipline of Medicine, A. Querido, L. A. van Es, E. Mandema (eds.), North Holland, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenfield, C., From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine, New York: Octagon Books, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. Sheldon, A., “Toward a General Theory of Disease and Medical Care”, in: Systems and Medical Care, A. Sheldon, F. Baker, C. P. McLaughlin (eds.), Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  17. Wartofsky, M., “The Social Presuppositions of Medical Knowledge”, in: J. L. Peset, D. Gracia (eds.), The Ethics of Diagnosis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Wulff, H. R., “Function and Value of Medical Knowledge in Modern Diseases”, in: H. ten Have, G. K. Kimsma, S. F. Spicker (eds.), The Growth of Medical Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Wulff, H. R., “The Disease Concept and the Medical View of Man”, in: Discipline of Medicine, A. Querido, L. A. van Es, E. Mandema (eds.), North Holland, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Wulff, H. R., Pedersen, S. A., Rosenberg, R. Philosophy of Medicine, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbigniew Szawarski
    • 1
  1. 1.University College of SwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations