Raising Atlantis: The Later Heidegger and Contemporary Philosophy
Chapter
Abstract
What does Heidegger have to contribute to contemporary philosophy? In this essay I will mean by “contemporary philosophy” mostly Anglo-American-European “analytic” philosophy. That is itself hardly a united movement, but much of it shares certain basic methods and goals for the construction and defense of philosophical positions.
Keywords
Contemporary Philosophy Futural Possibility Philosophical Position Transcendental Philosophy Ontological Position
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.References to Heidegger’s works will be given in the text according to the following abbreviations: EPH: “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking,” translated by Joan Stambaugh, reprinted in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, edited by David Krell (New York: Harper and Row, 1977). SZ: Sein and Zeit (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1963), translated as Being and Time (New York: Harper and Row, 1962). US: Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen: Neske, 1975). All but one of the essays in the German volume are translated in WL. WL: On the Way to Language, translated by Peter Hertz and Joan Stambaugh (New York: Harper and Row, 1971). ZS: “Time and Being,” translated by Joan Stambaugh, in On Time and Being ( New York: Harper and Row, 1972, 1–24.Google Scholar
- After I had been thinking about this passage, I discovered that Derrida had written an enlightening long footnote concerning it in De l’esprit (Paris: Gallilée, 1987, 147n1). Oddly, just as I realized the relevance of the Derrida passage late in the game, so Derrida was put on to the passage by a colleague after the main text of De l’esprit was written. This happened, I think, because the passage goes against Heidegger’s standard rhetoric about thought’s task being that of ever deeper questioning, so the passage tends to recede from view. In his discussion, Derrida shows how the passage invites a retrospective reinterpretation of Heidegger’s whole thought, but also why this temptation is inappropriate.Google Scholar
- 7.William D. Blattner, “Existential Temporality in Being and Time (Why Heidegger is not a Pragmatist),” in Hubert Dreyfus and Harrison Hall, eds., Heidegger: A Critical Reader ( Oxford: Blackwell, 1992 ), p. 105.Google Scholar
- 8.See Hubert L. Dreyfus, Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1 ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992 ).Google Scholar
- 13.Nearing nearness has the character of denial and withholding…. The giving that gives time is determined by denying and withholding nearness…. We call the giving which gives true time an extending which opens and conceals.“ (ZS 15f). Cf. ”Vom Wesen der Wahrheit“ (in Wegmarken [Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1967]; the English version by John Sallis is found in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings,edited by David Krell [New York: Harper and Row, 1977]).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995