Genetic structures as indicators for adaptation and adaptational potentials

  • Martin Ziehe
  • Hans H. Hattemer
  • Rommy Müller-Starck
  • Gerhard Müller-Starck
Chapter
Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 63)

Abstract

Forests have become increasingly affected by human influence and forest genetics has gained substantial importance in view of the recently detected genetic implications of environmental changes. Conclusions drawn from genetic structures and their dynamics can help to evaluate the genetic processes and their consequences.

Keywords

Genetic Structure Gene Locus Adaptational Capacity Fagus Sylvatica European Beech 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Bergmann, F. and H.-R. Gregorius 1993. Ecogeographical distribution and thermostability of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH-A) alloenzymes in European silver fir (Abies alba). Biochem. Systematics and Ecology 21, 597–6605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergmann, F. and F. Scholz 1989. Selection effects of air pollution in Norway spruce (Picea abies) populations. In Scholz, F., Gregorius, H.-R., and Rudin, D. (eds.): Genetic Effects of Air Pollutants in Forest Tree Populations. Springer Verlag. 143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregorius, H.-R. 1974. Genetischer Abstand zwischen Populationen. L Zur Konzeption der genetischen Abstandsmessung. Silvae Gen. 23, 22–27.Google Scholar
  4. Gregorius, H.-R. 1989. The attribution of phenotypic variation to genetic or environmental variation in ecological studies In Scholz, F., H.-R. Gregorius, and D. Rudin (eds.): Genetic Effects of Air Pollutants in Forest Tree Populations. Springer Verlag. 3–15Google Scholar
  5. Gregorius, H.-R. 1995. Measurement of genetic diversity with special reference to the adaptive potential of populations. In Boyle, T.J.B. and Boontawee, B. (eds.): 1995. Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity in Tropical and Temperate Forests. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research. 145–175Google Scholar
  6. Gregorius, H.-R. and M. Ziehe 1995. Detecting independence in viability selection on two traits. Heredity 74, 70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hattemer, H.H., F. Bergmann und M. Ziehe. 1993. Einführung in die Genetik für Studierende der Forstwisssenschaft. Frankfurt am Main, J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, 2“’ ed.Google Scholar
  8. Hattemer, H.H_ and M. Ziehe. 1997. Genetic control of phenotypic traits with relevance to gene conservation in trees - a survey of methods. In Mayâs, Cs. (ed.): Perspectives of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding in a Changing World. IUFRO World Series Vol. 6, Sopron, 135–148Google Scholar
  9. Karp, A., Isaac, P.G., Ingram, D.S.(eds.): 1998. Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity: Plants and Animals. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, Z.S. 1979. Inheritance of leucine aminopeptidase and acid phosphatase isozymes in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Silvae Gen. 28, 68–71Google Scholar
  11. Kim, Z.S. 1980. Veränderung der genetischen Struktur von Buchenpopulationen durch Viabilitätsselektion im Keimlingsstadium. Göttingen Res. Notes in Forest Genetics no. 3, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, Z.S. 1985. Viability selection at an allozyme locus during development in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Silvae Gen. 34, 181–186.Google Scholar
  13. Müller-Starck, G. 1989. Genetic implications of environmental stress in adult forest stands of Fagus sylvatica L. In Scholz, F., H.-R. Gregorius, and D. Rudin (eds.): Genetic Effects of Air Pollutants in Forest Tree Populations. Springer Verlag. 127–142Google Scholar
  14. Müller-Starck, G. 1993. Auswirkungen von Umweltbelastungen auf genetische Strukturen von Waldbeständen am Beispiel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Schriften aus der Foretl. Fakultät der Univ. Göttingen und der Niedersächs. Foretl. Versuchsanstalt. Bd. 112. German w. Engl.sum., 163 pages.Google Scholar
  15. Müller-Starck, G. and R. Starke 1993. Inheritance of isoenzymes in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). J. Hered. 84: 291–296.Google Scholar
  16. Müller-Starck, G. and M Ziehe. 1991. Genetic variation in populations of Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea Liebl. in Germany. In Müller-Starck, G. and M Ziehe (eds.): Genetic Variation in European Populations of Forest Trees. Frankfurt am Main., J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, 125–140Google Scholar
  17. Müller-Starck, G. and M Ziehe. 1999. Genetic response of populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to environmental stress - a case study. In Year, F. and F. Scholz (eds.): Diversity and Adaptation in Forest Ecosystems in a Changing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, submitted.Google Scholar
  18. Müller-Starck, R. 1996. Genetische Aspekte der Reproduktion der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) unter Berücksichtigung waldbaulicher Gegebenheiten. Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd. 135. Göttingen, 103+ XIIGoogle Scholar
  19. Roloff, A. 1985. Schadstufen bei der Buche–Vorschlag für eine bundeseinheitliche Einordnung der Buche in 4 Schadstufen bei terrestrischen Aufnahmen. Forst-und Holzwirt 40: 131–134.Google Scholar
  20. Rothe, G. and F. Bergmann 1995. Increased efficiency of Norway spruce heterozygous phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase phenotype in response to heavy air pollution. Angew. Bot. 69, 27–30Google Scholar
  21. Starke, R. 1996. Die Reproduktion der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) unter verschiedenen waldbaulichen Gegebenheiten. S. 135–159 In Mtiller-Starck, G. (Hsg.) Biodiversität un.d nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft. Ecomed Verlag, LandsbergGoogle Scholar
  22. Starke, R, M Ziehe, and G. Müller-Starck 1996. Viability selection in juvenile populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forest Gen. 3, 217–225Google Scholar
  23. Ziehe, M. 1999. Genomische Assoziationen durch Selbst-und Fremdbefruchtung und ihre Bedeutung fur die Interpretation genetischer Strukturen am Beispiel der Buche (Fags sylvatica L.). Habilitationsschrift Universität Göttingen, submittedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ziehe, M. and II.-R Gregorius 1996. Beurteilung der Gefährdung genetischer Ressourcen anhand von StreBmerkmalen. In Müller-Starck, G. (Hsg.): Biodiversität und nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft. Ecomed Verlag, Landsberg, 300–317Google Scholar
  25. Ziehe, M. and H.H. Hattemer 1998. The significance of heterozygosity in tree breeding and gene conservation. Forest Tree Improvement no. 26, 3–25Google Scholar
  26. Ziehe, M. and G. Müller-Starck 1991. Changes of genetic variation due to associated selection. In Müller-Starck, G. and Ziehe, M. (eds.): Genetic Variation in European Populations of Forest Trees. Frankfurt am Main, J.D. Sauerländer’s Verlag, 259–271Google Scholar
  27. Ziehe, M., Starke, R., Hattemer, H.H. und Turok, J. 1998. Gentypische Strukturen in Buchen-Altbeständen und ihren Samen. Allgem. Forst-u. Jagdztg. 169, 91–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ziehe
  • Hans H. Hattemer
  • Rommy Müller-Starck
  • Gerhard Müller-Starck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations