Advertisement

Towards an Evolutionary Semiotics: The Emergence of New Sign-Functions in Organisms and Devices

  • Peter Cariani
Chapter

Abstract

Signs, symbols, and signals are basic to our existence on many organizational levels, from the biological to the psychological to the social. The ‘semiosphere’, the realm of symbolically-mediated processes, envelopes and incorporates us at every turn (see papers by Hoffmeyer, Umerez, Exteberria, and Joslyn in this volume; Hoffmeyer, 1997). Symbolic nucleotide sequences lie at the root of our biological organizations, neural pulse codes subserve the coherent functional organizations in our brains that permit us to think, while the symbol sequences of our languages afford the complex communications that make human society possible. Semiotic concepts, properly developed, are critical for a deep understanding of the organization of life, the functioning of the brain, and the functional organization of the observer.

Keywords

Functional Organization Robotic Device Semantic Linkage Computational Device Computational Part 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M.; Floyd Merrell, 1991, On Semiotic Modelling, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Carello, C.; Turvey, M.T.; Kugler, P.N.; Shaw, R.E., 1984, Inadequacies of the computational metaphor, in Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, M. Gazzaniga (ed.), New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cariani, P., 1992a, Emergence and artificial life, in Artificial Life II, C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds.), Redwood City, CA, Addison-Wesley, pp. 775–798.Google Scholar
  4. Cariani, P., 1992b, Some epistemological implications of devices which construct their own sensors and effectors, in Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems, F. Varela and P. Bourgine (eds.), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 484–493.Google Scholar
  5. Cariani, P., 1993, To evolve an ear: Epistemological implications of Gordon Pask’s electrochemical devices, Systems Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cariani, P., 1989, On the Design of Devices with Emergent Semantic Functions, Ph.D., State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
  7. Cassirer, E., 1955, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vols. 1–3, R. Manheim (transi.), New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, J.-C.; Conrad, M., 1994, A multi-level neuromolecular architecture that uses the extradimensional bypass principle to facilitate evolutionary learning, Physica D, vol. 75, pp. 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, H.L., 1979, What Computers Can’t Do, New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. Emmeche, C., 1994, The Garden in the Machine, Princeton, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer, J., 1997, Signs of Meaning in the Universe, Bloomington, Indiana University Press. Kampis, G., 1991a, Emergent computations, life, and cognition, World Futures, vol. 32, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
  12. Kampis, G., 1991b, Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science, Oxford, Pergamon Press. Maturana, H.R., 1981, Autopoiesis, in Autopoiesis: A Theory of the Living, M. Zeleny (ed.), New York, North Holland.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, G.A., 1951, Language and Communication, New York, McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morris, C., 1946, Signs, Language, and Behavior, New York, George Braziller.Google Scholar
  15. Murdoch, D., 1987, Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Neumann, J. von, 1987, Re-evaluation of the problems of complicated automata–problems of hierarchy and evolution, in Papers of John von Neumann on Computing and Computer Theory, W. Aspray and A. Burks (eds.), Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 477–490.Google Scholar
  16. Nöth, W., 1990, Handbook of Semiotics, Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nöth, W., 1994, Origins of Semoosis: Sign Evolution in Nature and Culture, Berlin, M. de Gruyter. Pask, G., 1981, Organizational closure of potentially conscious systems, in Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organization, M. Zeleny (ed.), New York, North Holland, pp. 265–308.Google Scholar
  18. Pattee, H.H., 1972, Physical problems of decision-making constraints, International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pattee, H.H., 1973, Discrete and continuous processes in computers and brains, in The Physics and Mathematics of the Nervous System, W. Guttinger and M. Conrad (eds.), NY, Springer-Verlag. Pattee, H.H., 1979, The complementarity principle and the origin of macromolecular information, Biosystems, vol. 11, pp. 217–226.Google Scholar
  20. Pattee, H.H., 1982, Cell psychology: An evolutionary view of the symbol-matter problem, Cognition and Brain Theory, vol. 5, pp. 325–341.Google Scholar
  21. Pattee, H.H., 1985, Universal principles of measurement and language functions in evolving systems, in Complexity, Language, and Life: Mathematical Approaches, J.L. Casti and A. Karlqvist (eds.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 268–281.Google Scholar
  22. Rocha, L., 1996, Eigenbehavior and symbols, Systems Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 371–384. Rosen, R., 1985, Anticipatory Systems, Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rosen, R., 1991, Life Itself, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sebeok, T.A.; Umiker-Sebeok, J. (eds.), 1991, Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web, Berlin, M. de Gruyter. Üxkiill, J. von, 1926, Theoretical Biology, New York, Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  25. Üxküll, T. von; Geigges, W.; Hermann, J.M., 1993, Endosemiosis, Semiotica, vol. 96, nos. 1–2, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Cariani
    • 1
  1. 1.Eaton Peabody LaboratoryMassachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations