Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics pp 279-294 | Cite as

# Measurement and Quantum Silence

## Abstract

The central problem in the interpretation of the quantum theory is how to understand the superposition of the eigenstates of an observable. To a considerable extent scientific practice here, especially as codified in versions of Bohr’s Copenhagen interpretation, follows an interpretive principle that I have elsewhere called the *Rule of Silence* (Fine 1987). That rule admonishes us not to talk about the values of an observable unless the state of the system is an eigenstate, or a mixture of eigenstates, of the observable in question. With regard to the Rule of Silence, as in other matters bearing on the interpretation of the quantum theory, Einstein was one of the first to realize that there can be difficulties. They appear as soon as we look at something like an explosion; i.e., the interaction between a micro- and a macrosystem that involves the amplification of a microphenomenon to macroscopic scale (Fine 1988 Chap. 5, esp. p. 78ff.). John Bell describes the difficulty over the Rule of Silence this way.

## Keywords

Quantum Theory Measurement Problem Replacement Theory Interaction Formalism Usual Story## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Bibliography

- Albert, D. and Loewer, B. (1990) in A. Fine,
*PSA**1990*, Volume I, Philosophy of Science Association, E. Lansing, p. 277.Google Scholar - Albert, D. and Vaidman, L. (1988),
*Physics Letters*A, 139, 1.Google Scholar - Bell, J.S. (1987),
*Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - Bohm, D. (1952),
*Physical Review*,85, pp. 166, 180.Google Scholar - Born, M. (1953),
*Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born*, Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar - de Broglie, L. (1956),
*Tentative d’interpretation causale et non-linéaire de la méchanique ondulatoire*, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar - Fine, A. (1970),
*Physical Review*, D 2, 2783.Google Scholar - Fine, A. (1987) in R. Kargon and P. Achinstein (eds.),
*Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics*, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, p. 491.Google Scholar - Fine, A. (1988),
*The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory*, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.Google Scholar - Fine, A. (1989) in J. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.),
*Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory*, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, p. 175.Google Scholar - Fine, A. (1992),
*Foundations of Physics*, 5, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fukuda, R. (1987a),
*Physical Review*, A 35, 8.Google Scholar - Fukuda, R. (1987b),
*Physical Review*, A 36, 3023.Google Scholar - Geroch, R. (1984),
*Noûs*, 18, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1986),
*Physical Review*, D 34, 470.Google Scholar - Gisin, N. (1984),
*Physics Review Letters*, 52, 1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gisin, N. (1989),
*Helvetica Physica Acta*, 62, 363.Google Scholar - Kobayashi, T. and Ohmomo, K. (1990), preprint of Tsukuba University, Japan, UTHEP-196.Google Scholar
- Machida, S. and Namiki, M. (1988),
*Foundations of Physics*, 18, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pearle, P. (1986) in R. Penrose and C. J. Isham (eds.),
*Quantum Concepts in Space and Time*, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 539.Google Scholar - Post, H.R. (1971),
*Studies in History and Philosophy of Science*, 2, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Post, H.R. (1974), Against Ideologies, Inaugural Lecture, Chelsea College, University of London. Scully, M.O. and Drühl, K. (1982), Physical Review, A 25, 2208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shimony, A. (1974),
*Physical Review*, D 9, 2321.Google Scholar - Shimony, A., Ghirardi, G. and Pearle, P. (1991) in A. Fine,
*PSA**1990*, Volume II, Philosophy of Science Association, E. Lansing, p. 17.Google Scholar - Stairs, A. (1992),
*Foundations of Physics*, 5, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wigner, E.P. (1963),
*American Journal of Physics*, 31, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar