Organic Sulfur and the Retention of Nutrient Cations in Forest Surface Soils

  • Henry G. SprattJr.
Chapter

Abstract

Sulfur and cation transformations were studied in A-horizon soils from 9 plots in Deer Run State Forest (DRSF) in southeastern Missouri on two dates, and from 27 plots of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP) near DRSF, seasonally for three years. The DRSF plots were chosen based on history of timber harvest; 2–3 yr and 8–10 yr post clear-cut, with controls about 40 yt post cut. Total C and S, organic sulfur (OS), exchangeable K+ and Mg2+, and rates of microbial OS production varied by season and year in surface soils from MOFEP plots. Exchangeable K+ concentrations were correlated with total C, total S, and OS. In clear-cut DRSF A-horizon soils, OS production was greatly reduced (p < 0.05) compared with controls. Exchangeable K+ and Mg2+ also were much lower in soils from clear-cut plots than in soils from control plots (p < 0.01). Cation exchange for OS compounds with sulfhydryl groups was only marginally greater than for organic matter of similar structure with no sulfhydryl groups. Overall, litter input appears to be a key to maintaining long-term surface soil OS, K+, and Mg2+ concentrations.

Keywords

base cations exchangeable K exchangeable Mg forest soils organic sulfur 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annand, E.M. and Thompson, F.R.: 1997, J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookshire, B.L., Jensen, R. and Dey, D.C.: 1997, ‘The Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: Past, Present and Future’, in B.L. Brookshire and S.R. Shifley (eds.), Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: An Experimental Approach to Landscape Research,Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR NC-193, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station St. Paul, MN (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Chen, J., Xu, M. and Brosofske, K. D.: 1997, ‘Microclimatic Characteristics in Southern Missouri Ozarks’, in B.L. Brookshire and S.R. Shifley (eds.), Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: An Exper-imental Approach to Landscape Research,Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR NC-193, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station St. Paul, MN (in press).Google Scholar
  4. David, M.B., Mitchell, M.P. and Nakas, J.P.: 1982, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fitzgerald, J.W., Ash, J.T.,and Strickland, T.C.: 1983, Can. J. For. Res. 13, 1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hausenbuiller, R.L.: 1978, Soil Science, Principles and Practices, 2nd edition, Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, D.W., Henderson, G.S., Huff, D.D., Lindberg, S.E., Richter, D.D., Shriner, D.S., Todd, D.E. and Turner, J.: 1982, Oecologia 54, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, D.W.: 1992, ‘Base Cation Distribution and Cycling’, in D.W. Johnson and S.E. Lindberg (eds.), Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Nutrient Cycling, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kabrick, J., Larsen, D. and Shifley, S.: 1997, ‘Analysis of Pretreatment Woody Vegetation and Environmental Data for the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project’, in B.L. Brookshire and S.R. Shifley (eds.), Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: An Exper-imental Approach to Landscape Research,Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR NC-193, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station St. Paul, MN (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy, I.R.: 1986, Acid Soil and Acid Rain: The Impact on the Environment of Nitrogen and Sulphur Cycling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  11. Lundgren, B.: 1982, Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitchell, M.J. and Lindberg, S.E.: 1992, ‘Sulfur Chemistry, Deposition, and Cycling in Forests’, in D.W. Johnson. and S.E. Lindberg (eds.), Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Nutrient Cycling, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, M.J., David, M.B. and Harrison, R.B.: 1992, ‘Sulphur Dynamics of Forest Ecosystems’, in R.W. Howarth, J.W.B. Stewart and M.V. Ivanov (eds.), Sulphur Cycling on the Continents, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 215–254.Google Scholar
  14. Pietikäinen, J. and Fritze, H.: 1995, Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rechcigl, J.E. and Sparks, E.L.: 1985, Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Richter, D.D., Johnson, D.W. and Todd, D.E.: 1983, J. Environ. Qual. 12, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schindler, S.C., Mitchell, M.J., Scott, T.J., Fuller, R.D. and Driscoll, C.T.: 1986, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simard, R.R.: 1993, ‘Ammonium Acetate-extractable Elements’, in M.R. Carter (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  19. Spratt, H.G., Jr.: 1997a, Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spratt, H.G., Jr.: 1997b, ‘Aspects of Carbon and Sulfur Transformations in MOFEP Surface Soils: Pretreatment Conditions’, in B.L. Brookshire and S.R. Shifley (eds.), Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: An Experimental Approach to Landscape Research,Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR NC-193, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station St. Paul, MN (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Stevenson, F.J.: 1986, Cycles of Soil — Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micro-nutrients, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  22. Strick, J.E., Schindler, S.C., David, M.B., Mitchell, M.J. and Nakas, J.P.: 1982, Northeast. Environ. Sci. 1, 161.Google Scholar
  23. Strickland, T.C. and Fitzgerald, J.W.: 1984, Biogeochemistry 1, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swank, W.T., Fitzgerald, J.W. and Ash, J.T.: 1984, Science 223, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watwood, M.E. and Fitzgerald, J.W.: 1988, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watwood, M.E., Sommer, AS. and Fitzgerald, J.W.: 1993, Soil Sci. (Trend. Agric. Sci.), 1, 103.Google Scholar
  27. Wilklander, L.: 1980, ‘Interaction between Cations and Anions Influencing Adsorption and Leaching’, in T.C. Hutchinson, and M. Havas (eds.), Effects ofAcid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry G. SprattJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations