Advertisement

Cognitive Support and the Rhythm of Design

  • Mike Sharples
Part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems book series (COGS, volume 17)

Abstract

There are many ways to support creativity. Aids to creative thinking include a pencil and a blank sheet of paper, resources such as reference and topic books, other creative works to provide inspiration, different ways of representing ideas such as musical notation or topic maps, discussion and argument with colleagues, general techniques such as ‘brainstorming’ or ‘lateral thinking’, and more specific skills and procedures relevant to the particular activity. This chapter suggests how to make good use of existing aids to creative thinking and how to develop new ways to support creative design, drawing on a cognitive theory of creativity.

Keywords

Conceptual Framework External Representation Musical Notation Creative Design Musical Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bamberger, J.: 1974, The luxury of necessity, Logo Memo, 12, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberger, J.: 1979, Logo music projects: experiments in musical perception and design, Logo Memo, Vol. 52, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M.: 1987, The Psychology of Written Composition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  4. Boden, M.: 1990, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D.: 1985, Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. S.: 1973, Organisation of early skilled action, Child Development, 44: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzan, T.: 1989, Use Your Head (rev. edn), BBC Books, London.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, D.: 1991, Writing media, Unpublished paper, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. and Karmiloff-Smith, A.: (1993), The cognizer’s innards: A psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought, Mind and Language, 8: 3.Google Scholar
  10. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M.: 1988, IBIS: A tool for all reasons, MCC Technical Report STP-252–88, MCC, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  11. Corcoran, G. B.: 1970, Language Arts in the Elementary School, Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Finlayson, H.: 1985, Logo, Mathematics and Upper Primary School Children, PhD Thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Ghiselin, B.: 1954, The Creative Process,University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goodlet, J. S. and Pemberton, L.: 1992, Practical experiences of using a hypertext design tool, Proceedings of St. Petersburg HCI Workshop (IFIP HCI’92).Google Scholar
  15. Hammond, R.: 1984, The Writer and the Word Processor, Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
  16. Howe, J. A. M., O’Shea, T. and Plane, F.: 1979, Teaching mathematics through Logo programming: an evaluation study, Proceedings of IFIP Working Conference on CAL, London.Google Scholar
  17. Howe, J. A. M., Ross, P. M., Johnson, K. R. and Inglis, R.: 1983, Model building, mathematics and Logo, DAI Research Paper 197, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, June, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchison, A.: 1970, Labanotation ( 2nd edn ), Theatre Arts, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Inde, D.: 1979, Technics and Praxis, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, D. W.: 1990, Nad and Dan adn Quaffy, in Pratchett, T. (ed.), Digital Dreams, Hodder and Stoughton, London, (pp. 259–279 ).Google Scholar
  21. Karmiloff-Smith, A.: 1990, Constraints on representational change: evidence from children’s drawing, Cognition, 34: 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuutti, K.: 1991, The concept of activity as a basic unit of analysis for CSCW research, in Bannon, L., Robinson, M. and Schmidt, K. (eds), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawler, R. W.: 1985, Computer Experience and Cognitive Development, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  24. Mandel, B. J.: 1978, Losing one’s mind: learning to write and edit, College Composition and Communication, 29: 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, T.: 1981, Literary Machines, Swathmore, Pa.Google Scholar
  26. O’Shea, T. and Self, J.: 1983, Learning and Teaching with Computers, Harvester, Brighton. Plimpton, G.: 1988, Writers at Work, Seeker and Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  27. Reisberg, D.: 1987, External representations and the advantages of externalising one’s thoughts, Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Seattle.Google Scholar
  28. Sharpies, M.: 1985, Cognition, Computers and Creative Writing, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  29. Sharpies, M., Goodlet, J. and Pemberton, L.: 1992, Developing a Writer’s Assistant, in Hartley, J. (ed.), Technology and Writing: Readings in the Psychology of Written Communication, Jessica Kingsley, London.Google Scholar
  30. Sharpies, M. and Pemberton, L.: 1992, Representing writing: external representations and the writing process, in Holt, P. O. and Williams, N. (eds), Computers and Writing: State of the Art, Intellect, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shelley, M.: 1985, Frankenstein, Penguin, Hannondsworth.Google Scholar
  32. Sinding-Larsen, H.: 1991, Computers, musical notation and the externalisation of knowledge: towards a comparative study in the history of information technology, in Negrotti, M. (ed.), Understanding the Artificial: On the Future Shape of Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stour, A.: 1972, The Dynamics of Creation, Seeker and Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  34. Winograd, T. and Flores, F.: 1986, Understanding Computers and Cognition: a New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  35. Wood, C.: 1992, A cultural-cognitive approach to collaborative writing, Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Lake Balaton, Hungary.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Sharples
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SussexUK

Personalised recommendations