Advertisement

Neurath’s Opposition To Tarskian Semantics

  • Thomas Mormann
Chapter
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1998] book series (VCIY, volume 6)

Abstract

The Vienna Circle’s relations to Polish Semantics comprise a rather large spectrum that reaches from Camap’s whole-hearted reception, Gödel’s partial anticipation that Neurath would completely reject semantics. According to Neurath, semantics was of no help for the empiricist program of the Vienna Circle. Quite the contrary, Neurath seems to have regarded Tarski as a sort of evil genius who led astray his closest philosophical friend Carnap, seducing him to leave the path of empiricist virtue and to become addicted to the vice of Aristotelian metaphysics.2

Keywords

Deductive System Empirical Science Scientific Language Logical Empiricism Coherence Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rudolf Camap, “Wahrheit und Bewährung”, in: Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientiftque,fasc. 4, Induction et Probablité,Paris, 1936, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright, Nancy/ Cat, Jordi/ Fleck, Lola/ Uebel, Thomas E.:Otto Neurath: Philosophy ltween Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Alberto C. Coffa, “Carnap, Tarski and the Search for Truth”, in: Nous 21, 1987, pp. 547–72.Google Scholar
  4. Richard Creath, “The Unimportance of Semantics”, in: PSA 1990, vol. 2,1991, pp. 405–416.Google Scholar
  5. Ludwik Fleck, “O oberwacji naukowej i postrzeganiu wogóle”, in:Przeglad Filozoficzny 38, 1935, 57–76.Google Scholar
  6. German translation in L. Fleck, Erfahrung und Tatsache,pp. 59–83.Google Scholar
  7. Alan Gewirth, “Clearness and Distinctness in Descartes”, in: Philosophy 18, 1943, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
  8. Jaakko Hintikka, Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator, An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Richard Kirkham, “Tarski’s Physicalism”, in: Erkenntnis 38, 1992, pp. 289–302.Google Scholar
  10. Otto Neurath, Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften, Band I, II, (GPMS I, II) herausgegeben von Rudolf Haller und Heiner Rutte, Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Otto Neurath, “Die Verirrten des Cartesius und das Auxiliarmotiv”, in: Otto Neurath, GPMS I, Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1981, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar
  12. Otto Neurath, “Anti-Spengler”, in: Otto Neurath,GPMSI, Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1981, pp. 139–196.Google Scholar
  13. Otto Neurath, “Die Enzyklopädie als `Modell”’, in: Neurath, Otto: GPMS II, Wien: Hölder-PichlerTempsky 1981, pp.725–738.Google Scholar
  14. Otto Neurath, “For the Discussion: Just Annotations, Not a Reply”, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6, 1945/46, pp.526–528.Google Scholar
  15. Otto Neurath, “Protokollsätze”, in: Erkenntnis 3, 1932/33, pp.304–214.Google Scholar
  16. Thomas Oberdan, “Camap’s Concept of Truth in Logical Syntax of Language ”,in: Synthese 93, 1992, pp. 239–60.Google Scholar
  17. Charles S. Peirce, “How to make Our Ideas Clear”, in: Collected Papers,vol. V, ed. by Charles Hartshome and Paul Weiss, Cambridge/Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 1978 (19314935).Google Scholar
  18. Charles S. Peirce, “Issues of Pragmatism”, in: The Monist 14, 1905, pp. 481–499.Google Scholar
  19. Eduard Poznanski/Alfred Wundheiler, “Pojecie prawdy na terenie fizyki” (The Concept of Truth in Physics, 1934), in: T. Paswlowski (ed.), Logiczna teoria nauki,Warsawa 1966, pp. 399–448.Google Scholar
  20. George A. Reisch Jr., “How Postmodem was Neurath’s Idea of Unity of Science?”, in:Studies in Philosophy and History of Science 28, 1997, pp. 439–451.Google Scholar
  21. Scott Soames, “What is a Theory of Truth?”, in: The Journal Of Philosophy 81, 1984, pp. 411–29.Google Scholar
  22. Alfred Tarski, “Grundlegungder wissenschaftlichen Semantik”, in: Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique (Paris 1935), Paris 1936, vol. 3, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  23. Alfred Tarski, “Über den Begriff der Logischen Folgerung”, inActes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique (Paris 1935),Paris 1936, vol. 7, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  24. Alfred Tarski, “The Semantic Conception of Toth and the Foundations of Semantics”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 1944, pp. 341–76.Google Scholar
  25. Alfred Tarski, “Drei Briefe an Otto Neurath”, herausgegeben und mit einem Vorwort versehen von Rudolf Haller, translated into English by Jan Tarski, in: Grazer Philosophische Studien 43, 1992, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  26. Stephen Toulmin, Cosmopolis, The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, New York: The Free Press, MacMillan 1990.Google Scholar
  27. Thomas E. Uebel, “Neurath’s Program for Naturalist Epistemology”, in:Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 22, 1991, pp. 623–643.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas E. Uebel, Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within: The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalist from the Vienna Circle ‘s Protocol Sentence Debate, Amsterdam: Rodopi 1992.Google Scholar
  29. Morton White, “A Philosophicd Letter of Alfred Tarski”, in: The Journal Of Philosophy 84, 1987, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
  30. Timothy Williamson, Vagueness, London: Routledge 1994.Google Scholar
  31. Jan Wolenski, Peter Simons, “De Veritate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski”, in: K. Szaniawski (ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1989, pp. 391–442.Google Scholar
  32. Jan Wolenski, “The Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle”, in: K. Szaniawski (ed.), The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1989, pp. 443–53.Google Scholar
  33. Jan Wolenski, “Some Polish Contributions to Fallibilism”, in: G. Debrock/M. Hulswit (eds.),Living Doubt, Essays Concerning the Epistemology of Charles Sanders Peirce, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1994, pp. 187–195.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Mormann
    • 1
  1. 1.IPLWUniversität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations