Diversity, distribution and ecology of water mites (Acari:Hydrachnidia and Halacaridae) in high Alpine lakes (Central Alps, Italy)

  • A. di Sabatino
  • A. Boggero
  • F. P. Miccoli
  • B. Cicolani
Chapter

Abstract

Information on water mite assemblages from high elevation lentic biotopes is scant. A survey of 14 small Alpine lakes located between1900 and 2400 m a.s.l. in Italy resulted in the discovery of 17 species of Hydrachnidia and a single species of freshwater Halacaridae. Arrenurus conicus and Lebertia tuberosa were the most widespread and abundant species; Lebertia sefvei, Lebertia rufipes, Oxus setosus, Panisus torrenticolus and Sperchon glandulosus were also widely distributed but relatively less abundant. Atractides fissus and Arrenurus conicus are recorded for the first time from Italy. In contrast to mid/low elevation lakes and ponds, water mite assemblages of alpine lakes are less diverse and are composed mainly of rheo- and crenobiontic taxa, most of which are cold-stenothermic. Typical standing water dwellers represented only a small fraction (23%) of the species sampled. A principal component analysis conducted on lake environmental variables resulted in a clear separation of the lakes mainly based on ionic contents, pH and temperature. Water mites seem to be less influenced by these factors than by temperature fluctuations and habitat stability and heterogeneity. We conclude with some considerations of the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on the altitudinal and latitudinal distribution pattern of water mites.

Key words

Biodiversity Distribution Ecology High Alpine lakes Hydrochemistry Multivariate analysis Water mites 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelier C. 1950. Hydrachariens nouveaux des Pyrénées. 5eme note. Bull. Mus. Paris. 22: 232–237.Google Scholar
  2. Angeber C. and Angelier E. 1953. Contributions à la connaissance des Hydrachariens des Pyrénées. Le genre Arrenurus Dugés. Bull. Mus. Paris. 25: 69–79.Google Scholar
  3. Angelier E. 1965. Les Porohalacaridae de la faune française. Ann. Limnol. 1: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagge P. 1999. Water mites of small boreal forest lakes (Central Finland). In: Bruin J., van der Geest L.P.S. and Sabelis M.W. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of the Acari. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 483–489.Google Scholar
  5. Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R. and Martin P. 2000. The biology and ecology of lotit water mites (Hydrachnidia). Freshwat. Biol. 44: 47–62.Google Scholar
  6. Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R., Martin P. and Cicolani B. 2002. Water mites (Hydrachnidia). In: Rundle S.D., Robertson A.L. and Schmid-Araya J.M. (eds), Freshwater Meiofauna: Biology and Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 105–133.Google Scholar
  7. Fjellheim A., Boggero A., Nocentini A.M., Rieradevall M., Raddum G. and Schnell O. 2000. Distribution of benthic invertebrates in relation to environmental factors. A study of European remote Alpine lake ecosystems. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 484–488.Google Scholar
  8. Gerecke R. and Di Sabatino A. 1996. Hystorical zoogeography and evolution of habitat preference in water mites of the Central Mediterranean region. In: Mitchell R., Horn, D.J., Needham G.R. and Welbourn C.W. (eds), Acarology [X, Vol. 1, Proceedings. Ohio Biol. Surv., Columbus, OH, pp. 523–527.Google Scholar
  9. Heino J. 2002. Concordance of species richness patterns among multiple freshwater taxa: a regional perspective. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kovach W.L. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis. Quaternary Res. Assoc., Tech. Guide 5: 1–38.Google Scholar
  11. Kovach W.L. 1999. A Multivariate Statistical Package, Version 3. 1 Users’ Manual. Kovach Computing Services, London.Google Scholar
  12. Lundblad C.O. 1962. Die Hydracarinen Schwedens II. Ark. Zool. 14: 1–6635.Google Scholar
  13. Migot A. 1926. Sur la faune francaise des hydracarides. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France 51: 91–134.Google Scholar
  14. Monti R. 1903. Le condizioni fisico-biologiche dei laghi Ossolani e Valdostani in rapporto alla piscicoltura. Mem. Ist. Lombard., Pavia 20: 51.Google Scholar
  15. Monti R. 1904. Di un’altra nuova specie di Lebertia e di alcune idracne nuove per la fauna italiana. Rend. 1st. Lombard. Sci. Lett. 37: 14.Google Scholar
  16. Monti R. 1910. Contributo alla biologia degli idracnidi alpini in relazione all’ambiente. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. Nat. Pavia 49: 167–243.Google Scholar
  17. Mosello R., Marchetto A., Boggero A., Brizzio M.C., Tartari G.A. and Rogora M. 1999. Pluriannual evolution of the hydrochemistry of two Alpine lakes ( Lake Paione Inferiore and Lake Paione Superiore, Ossola Valley) in relation to atmospheric loads. J. Limnol. 59: 42–48.Google Scholar
  18. Motas C. 1928a. Contribution à la connaissance des Hydracariens français, particulièrement du Sud-Est de la France. Tray. Labor. Piscicult. Univ. Grenoble 20: 373.Google Scholar
  19. Motas C. 19286. La faune hydracarienne des eaux courantes et des lacs élevés des Alpes du Dauphiné. C. R. Soc. Biogéographie, Paris 2: 150–186.Google Scholar
  20. Motas C. and Soarec J. 1939. Sur deux nouveaux Hydracariens français recueillis dans les Pyrénées. Ann. Sci. Univ. Jassy 25: 1–13.Google Scholar
  21. Musazzi S. and Marchetto A. 2002. Distribuzione lungo un gradiente di acidità delle diatomee nei sedimenti dei laghi alpini nella Val d’Ossola (Alpi Centrali). Studi Trent. Sci. Nat., Acta Biol. 78: 71–80.Google Scholar
  22. Özkan M. 1982. Wassermilben (Acari, Actinedida) aus der Türkei. Ent. Basiliensia 7: 29–60.Google Scholar
  23. Özkan M. 1988. Hyde phanies (s. str.) crossipalpis Koenike, 1914 (Hydryphantidae, Hydrachnellae, Acari) üzerine bir arastirma. Doga Tr. J. Zool. 12: 86–110.Google Scholar
  24. Özkan M. and Boyaci Y.Ö. 1992. A new Forelia Haller 1882 species (Pionidae, Hydrachnellae, Acari) for the Turkish fauna. Doga Tr. J. Zool. 16: 385–394.Google Scholar
  25. Pieczynski E. 1976. Ecology of water mites (Hydracarina) in lakes. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 2: 5–54.Google Scholar
  26. Rogora M., Marchetto A. and Mosello R. 2003. Modelling the effects of the deposition of acidity and nitrogen on selected lakes and streams in Central Alps (Italy). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 7: 540–551.Google Scholar
  27. Rogora M., Mosello R., Marchetto A., Boggero A. and Tartari G. 2001. Long-terni variations in the hydrochemistry of Alpine lakes in the Ossola and Sesia Valleys (Central Alps) in relation to atmospheric input and climate change. Studi Trentini Sc. Nat., Acta Biol. 78: 59–69.Google Scholar
  28. Rundle S.D. 1990. Micro-arthropod seasonality in streams of varying pH. Freshwat. Biol. 24: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smit H., Gerecke R. and Di Sabatino A. 2000. A catalogue of water mites of the superfamily Arrenuroidea (Acari: Hydrachnidia) from the Mediterranean countries. Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 121: 201–267.Google Scholar
  30. Smith I.M., Cook D.R. and Smith B.P. 2001. Water mites (Hydrachnida) and other arachnids. In: Thorp J.H. and Covich A.P. (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 551–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tartari G.A. and Mosello R. 1997. Metodologie analitiche e controlli di qualità nel laboratorio chimico dell’istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. Documenta 1st. ital. Idrobiol. 60: 160.Google Scholar
  32. Valdecasas A.G. and Camacho A.I. 1986. Las Hidracnelas leniticas de la Sierra de Guadarrama (Acari, Parasitengona, Hydrachnellae). Graellsia 42: 149–160.Google Scholar
  33. Viets K. 1913. Hydracarinen aus Südostfrankreich. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen 21: 333–336. Wetzel R. 2002. Limnology, 3rd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Young V. 1969. Ecological distribution of Hydracarina in North Central Colorado. Am. Mid. Nat. 82: 367–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. di Sabatino
    • 1
  • A. Boggero
    • 2
  • F. P. Miccoli
    • 1
  • B. Cicolani
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze AmbientaliUniversity of L’AquilaCoppito L’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.CNR-Institute for Ecosystem StudyLargo TonolliVerbaniaItaly

Personalised recommendations