Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsidered pp 133-150 | Cite as
Names, Statements, and Their Corresponding Acts in Husserl’s Logical Investigations
Abstract
At the outset of the second volume of Husserl’s Logical Investigations it is pointed out, in agreement with John Stuart Mille2, that language is central to the concerns of logic (Hua XIX/1, p. 5). Among the linguistic expressions which concern Husserl in the subsequent investigations are names (Namen) and statements (Aussagen), as indeed Book I of Mill’s System of Logic was concerned with names and propositions1. In this regard Husserl and Mill follow a long-standing tradition, in which names and statements are indeed among the elements of logic, to be followed only by inferences. Nonetheless, the topic of names and statements, or any other class of linguistic expressions for that matter, is not Husserl’s ultimate concern in the second volume of the Logical Investigations. This volume, entitled “Investigations in the Phenomenology and Theory of Cognition”2, culminates in the fifth and six “Logical Investigations”, which are respectively entitled “On Intentional Lived-Through Processes and their ‘Contents”’3 and “Elements of a Phenomenological Elucidation of Cognition”4. In both of these cases Husserl is concerned with intentional lived-through processes which are intentionally directed. This concern with such processes (with acts, as Husserl often says) is of course explicit in the title of the fifth “Logical Investigation”. The term “cognition”, as found in the sixth one, by and large designates those acts in which something is evident5. In the following I shall critically examine Husserl’s views in the Logical Investigations on names and statements with particular attention to his observations concerning the corresponding acts of consciousness. As it has been seen elsewhere6, Husserl’s belonging to the school of Brentano will prove to be of great relevance here.
Keywords
Logical Investigation Categorial Perception Linguistic Expression Double Posit Psychical ProcessPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 2.See Mill, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principle of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 81h ed. (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1874), Bk. I, Ch. I, § 1. In Husserl’s library (Husserl Archives, Leuven) there is a copy of the authorized (also annotated) German translatation of this work: Theodor Gomperz (translator), System der deductiven and inductiven Logik. Eine Darlegung der Grundsätze der Beweislehre and der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung (Fue’s Verlag (R. Reisland): Leipzig, 1872. The copy bears extensive markings and annotations by Husserl.Google Scholar
- 1.The term “proposition” is used by Mill to designate statements, i.e., particular linguistic expressions. The term “proposition” in this paper, however, will be used as a translation of Satz,which is used by Husserl in application to certain ideal objects which need not be expressed in language or even “thought” in the mind.Google Scholar
- 2.Findlay’s two-volume translation of the Logical Investigations,which has many points in its favor compared to other translations of Husserl’s writings, unfortunately does not contain this title in the table of contents or in the text.Google Scholar
- 3.The term Erlebnisse is translated as “lived-through processes”, whereas Findlay translates it as “experiences”. Though a perfect English translation of this term, let alone one that fits all its usages, is perhaps impossible, it is very important to avoid any confusion at all between Erlebnis and Erfahrung,the latter of which absolutely must be translated as “experienced”.Google Scholar
- 4.The term Erkenntnis,which is here translated as “cognition”, is translated by Findlay as “knowledge”. Though his translation of this term is suitable for much ordinary and philosophical usage, it is better to translate it here as “cognition”, which is more appropriate for designating a class of acts than the term “knowledge” would be. It is after all quite acceptable to speak of someone having knowledge even when the person is asleep. That is to say, knowledge is a disposition rather than an act. Cognition, however, occurs only insofar as something is actually being cognized.Google Scholar
- 5.Though the term Erkenntnis normally refers only to higher intellectual acts, Husserl often uses it in references to lower acts, e. g., perception, in which something is evident.Google Scholar
- 6.Robin D. Rollinger, 1999. See also Robin D. Rollinger, 1993.Google Scholar
- 1.Though the term Bedeutung is nowadays often taken to mean “reference”, Husserl points out plainly that he uses it as a synonym of Sinn (Hua XIX/1, p. 58).Google Scholar
- 2.The only case in which Husserl finds it acceptable to say that an expression is not a sign he finds in solitary speech (Hua XIX/1, pp. 41 ff.).Google Scholar