Advertisement

Local Understandings of the Land: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Indigenous Knowledge

  • Roy C. Dudgeon
  • Fikret Berkes
Part of the Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science book series (SACH, volume 4)

Abstract

Much of the literature on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) deals with similarities and differences between Western science and traditional knowledge (e.g., Johannes, 1989; Williams and Baines, 1993; Berkes, 1999). By contrast, little has been written about the relationship between TEK and indigenous knowledge (IK). These two areas constitute two closely related and broadly overlapping literatures. While each approach seeks to understand local knowledge of the land, there are both similarities and differences between the two. One of the primary differences is the insight provided by TEK regarding some new understandings in ecology and resource management.

Keywords

Indigenous People Aboriginal People Adaptive Management Traditional Knowledge Indigenous Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Agrawal, Arun. ‘Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge.’ Development and Change 26: 413–439, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcorn, Janis B. and Antoinette G. Royo. Indigenous Social Movements and Ecological Resilience: Lessons from the Dayak of Indonesia. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Baines, Graham B.K. ‘Traditional resource management in the Melanesian South Pacific: A development dilemma.’ In Common Property Resources, F. Berkes, ed. London: Belhaven, 1989, pp. 273–295.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Bantam Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson. Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York: Bantam Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. Beaucage, P. and Taller de Tradicio´n Oral del Cepec. ‘Integrating innovation: The traditional Nahua coffee-orchard (Sierra Norte de Puebla, Mexico).’ Journal of Ethnobiology 17: 45–67, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Berkes, Fikret. Sacred Ecology. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia and London: Taylor and Francis, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Berkes, Fikret, Johan Colding and Carl Folke. ‘Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management.’ Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkes, Fikret and Carl Folke. ‘Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability.’ In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, F. Berkes and C. Folke, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Berkes, Fikret, Carl Folke and Madhav Gadgil. ‘Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability.’ In Biodiversity Conservation, Charles Perrings, Karl-Goran Mäler, Carl Folke, C.S. Holling, and Beng-Owe Jansson, eds. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berkes, Fikret and Thomas Henley. ‘Co-management and traditional knowledge: threat or opportunity?’ Policy Options, March 1997, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
  13. Berkes, Fikret, Mina Kislalioglu, Carl Folke and Madhav Gadgil. ‘Exploring the basic ecological unit: ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies.’ Ecosystems 1: 409–415, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berkes, Fikret, R. Mahon, P. McConney, R.C. Pollnac and R.S. Pomeroy. Managing Small-Scale Fisheries: Alternative Directions and Methods. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Berman, Morris. The Reenchantment of the World. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. Bird-David, Nurit. ‘Tribal metaphorization of human-nature relatedness: a comparative analysis.’ In Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, Kay Milton, ed. London: Routledge, 1993, pp. 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bodley, John H. Anthropology and Contemporary Human Problems. Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Bookchin, Murray. Toward an Ecological Society. Montre´al: Black Rose Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Booth, Annie L. and Harvey M. Jacobs. ‘Ties that bind: native American beliefs as a foundation for environmental consciousness.’ Environmental Ethics 12: 27–43, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bormann, F.H. and G.E. Likens. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boyd, Robert, ed. Indians, Fire and the Land in the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. Bright, Chris, ‘The nemesis effect.’ World Watch, May/June 1999, pp. 12–23.Google Scholar
  23. Brokensha, David. Comment on ‘The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology’ by Paul Sillitoe. Current Anthropology 39 (2): 236–237, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Brouwer, Jan. ‘On indigenous knowledge and development.’ Current Anthropology 39: 351, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cajete, Gregory. Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Clear Light Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Callicott, J. Baird. ‘Traditional American Indian and western European attitudes towards nature.’ Environmental Ethics 4: 293–318, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Callicott, J. Baird. Earth’s Insights: A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Capra, Fritjof. The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. London: Fontana,1975.Google Scholar
  29. Capra, Fritjof. The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture. New York: Bantam Books, 1982.Google Scholar
  30. Costa-Pierce, B.A. ‘Aquaculture in ancient Hawaii.’ BioScience 37: 320–330, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Devall, Bill and George Sessions. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City, Utah: Peregrine Smith Books,1985.Google Scholar
  32. Fenge, Terry. ‘Ecological change in the Hudson Bay bioregion: a traditional ecological knowledge perspective.’ Northern Perspectives 25 (1): 2–3, 1997.Google Scholar
  33. Folke, Carl, Fikret Berkes, and Johan Colding. ‘Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability.’ In Linking Social and Ecological Systems, F. Berkes and C. Folke, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 414–436.Google Scholar
  34. Folke, Carl and Johan Colding. ‘Traditional conservation practices.’ In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Simon Levin, ed. Vol. 5. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2001, pp. 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fox, Warwick. Towards a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations forEnvironmentalism. Boston: Shambhala,1990.Google Scholar
  36. Gadgil, Madhav. ‘Diversity: cultural and biological.’ Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2 (12): 369–373, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Golley, Frank B. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  38. Griffin, David Ray, ed. The Reenchantment of Science: Postmodern Proposals. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  39. Gunderson, Lance H. and Holling, C.S., eds. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  40. Harries-Jones, Peter. ‘Sustainable anthropology: ecology and anthropology in the future.’ In Contemporary Futures: Perspectives from Social Anthropology, Sandra Wallman, ed. London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 157–171.Google Scholar
  41. Harries-Jones, Peter. A Recursive Vision: Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  42. Holling, C.S. ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems.’ Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Holling, C.S., Fikret Berkes and Carl Folke. ‘Science, sustainability and resource management.’ In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, F. Berkes and C. Folke, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 342–362.Google Scholar
  44. Howard, Albert and Frances Widdowson. ‘Traditional knowledge threatens environmental assessment.’ Policy Options, November 1996, pp. 34–36.Google Scholar
  45. Howard, Albert and Frances Widdowson. ‘Revisiting traditional knowledge.’ Policy Options, April 1997, pp. 46–48.Google Scholar
  46. Hughes, J. Donald. American Indian Ecology. El Paso: Texas Western Press,1983.Google Scholar
  47. Hughes, J. Donald. ‘Metakuyase.’ The Trumpeter 8 (4): 184–185, 1991.Google Scholar
  48. Hviding, Edvard. Guardians of Marovo Lagoon: Practice, Place and Politics in Maritime Melanesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 1996.Google Scholar
  49. Ingold, Tim. ‘An anthropologist looks at biology.’ Man (N.S.) 25: 208–209, 1990.Google Scholar
  50. Ingold, Tim. ‘Editorial.’ Man (N.S.) 27: 693–696, 1992.Google Scholar
  51. Ingold, Tim. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johannes, Robert E., ed. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A Collection of Essays. Gland: International Conservation Union (IUCN),1989.Google Scholar
  53. Kates, Robert W., William C. Clark, R. Corell et al. ‘Sustainability science.’ Science 292: 641–642, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kimmerer, Robin W. ‘Native knowledge for native ecosystems.’ Journal of Forestry 98 (8): 4–9, 2000.Google Scholar
  55. Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  56. Lasserre, Pierre, et al. Traditional Knowledge and Management of Marine Coastal Systems. Biology International, Special Issue 4, 1983.Google Scholar
  57. Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  58. Ludwig, N.A. ‘An Ainu homeland: an alternative solution for the Northern Territories/Southern Kuriles imbroglio.’ Ocean and Coastal Management 25: 1–29, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mauro, Francesco and Preston D. Hardison. ‘Traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities: international debate and policy initiatives.’ Ecological Applications 10: 1263–1269, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: HarperCollins,1980.Google Scholar
  61. Moorehead, Richard. ‘Changes taking place in common-property resource management in the Inland Niger Delta of Mali.’ In Common Property Resources, F. Berkes, ed. London: Belhaven, 1989, pp. 256272.Google Scholar
  62. Nabhan, Gary P. Sonoran Desert Sense of Place Project, 2001. http://www.desertmuseum.org. Nadasdy, Paul. ‘The politics of TEK: power and the ‘integration’ of knowledge.’ Arctic Anthropology 36:1–18,1999.Google Scholar
  63. Naess, Arne. ‘The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement.’ Inquiry 16: 95–100, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Posey, Darrel A. Comment on ‘The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology’ by Paul Sillitoe. Current Anthropology 39 (2): 241–242, 1998.Google Scholar
  66. Preston, Richard J., Fikret Berkes and Peter J. George. ‘Perspectives on sustainable development in the Moose River Basin.’ In Papers of the Twenty-Sixth Algonquian Conference, David Pentland, ed. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 1995, pp. 379–394.Google Scholar
  67. Purcell, Trevor W. ‘Indigenous knowledge and applied anthropology: questions of definition and development.’ Human Organization 57: 258–272, 1998.Google Scholar
  68. Ramakrishnan, P.S., K.G. Saxena and U.M. Chandrashekara, eds. Conserving the Sacred for Biodiversity Management. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
  69. Rappaport, Roy A. Ecology, Meaning and Religion. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  70. Rappaport, Roy A. ‘Humanity’s evolution and anthropology’s future.’ In Assessing Cultural Anthropology, R.F. Borofsky, ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp. 153166.Google Scholar
  71. Reed, Gerard. ‘A Sioux view of the land: the environmental perspectives of Charles A. Eastman.’ The Trumpeter 8 (4): 170–173, 1991.Google Scholar
  72. Riedlinger, Dyanna and Fikret Berkes. ‘Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic.’ Polar Record 37: 315–328, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rogers, Raymond A. The Oceans are Emptying: Fish Wars and Sustainability. Montre´al: Black Rose Books, 1995.Google Scholar
  74. Ruddle, Kenneth, Edvard Hviding and Robert E. Johannes. ‘Marine resources management in the context of customary tenure.’ Marine Resource Economics 7: 249–273, 1992.Google Scholar
  75. Ruddle, Kenneth and Tomoya Akimichi, eds. Maritime Institutions in the Western Pacific. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, Senri Ethnological Studies No. 17, 1984.Google Scholar
  76. Salmon, Enrique. ‘Kincentric ecology: indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship.’ Ecological Applications 10: 1327–1332, 2000.Google Scholar
  77. Sillitoe, Paul. ‘The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology.’ Current Anthropology 39: 223–252, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stevenson, Marc G. ‘Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment.’ Arctic 49: 278–291, 1996.Google Scholar
  79. Stirrat, R. L. Comment on ‘The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology’ by Paul Sillitoe. Current Anthropology 39: 242–243, 1998.Google Scholar
  80. Stone, M. Priscilla. Comment on ‘The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology’ by Paul Sillitoe. Current Anthropology 39: 243, 1998.Google Scholar
  81. Taiepa, Todd, Phil Lyver, P. Horsley, J. Davis, M. Bragg and H. Moller. ‘Co-management of New Zealand’s conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review.’ Environmental Conservation 24: 236–250, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tyler, Mary Ellen. ‘Spiritual stewardship in aboriginal resource management systems.’ Environments 22 (1): 18, 1993.Google Scholar
  83. Warren, D. Michael, L.J. Slikkerveer and D. Brokensha, eds. The Cultural Dimension of Development:Indigenous Knowledge Systems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications,1995.Google Scholar
  84. Watanabe, H. The Ainu Ecosystem, Environment and Group Structure. Seattle: University of Washington Press,1973.Google Scholar
  85. Williams, Nancy M. and Graham Baines, eds. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Wisdom for Sustainable Development. Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University,1993.Google Scholar
  86. Williams, Nancy M. and Eugene S. Hunn, eds. Resource Managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1982.Google Scholar
  87. Zimmerman, Michael. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy C. Dudgeon
  • Fikret Berkes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations