Advertisement

Time Series Models with Given Interactions

  • R. Fried
Chapter

Abstract

In seasonal time series for instance there may be interactions at small and large time lags, while interactions at intermediate time lags are missing. We use graphical models to explore and compare the structures of ARMA models and of models based on multivariate marginals of a time series. While the latter are equivalent to AR models if no additional restrictions are imposed, assuming conditional independencies to model missing interactions results in models which do not belong to the class of ARMA models. Formulae for optimal interpolations in this new model class are simpler than in seasonal ARMA models. We present some simulations and an application to real data providing evidence that we may benefit from imposing such conditional independence restrictions instead of using a seasonal ARMA model.

Keywords

Conditional independence Graphical models ARMA models Seasonal time series 

AMS subject classification

60G15 62M10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, M., U. Gather and M. Imhoff (1999) ‘The Identification of Multiple Outliers in Online Monitoring Data’. Technical Report 29/1999, Department of Statistics, University of Dortmund, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, C. and U. Gather (1999) ‘The Masking Breakdown Point of Multivariate Outlier Identification Rules’. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94, 947–955.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockwell, P.J. and R.A. Davis (1987) Time Series: Theory and Methods. New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, C. and L.-M. Liu (1993) ‘Joint Estimation of Model Parameters and Outlier Effects in Time Series’. J. Americ. Statist. Assoc. 88, 284–297.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawid, A.P. (1979) ‘Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory’. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 41, 1–31.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Delicado, P. and A. Justel (1999) ‘Forecasting with Missing Data: Application to Coastel Wave Heights’. J. Forecasting 18, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dempster, A. (1972) ‘Covariance Selection’. Biometrics 28, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fried, R. (2000) ‘Graphical and Phase space models for univariate time series’. In J.G. Bethlehem, P.G.M. van der Heijden: Proceedings in Computational Statistics, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 307–312.Google Scholar
  9. Fried, R., J. Eichhorn and U. Paar (2001) ‘Exploratory Analysis and a Stochastic Model for Humusdisintegration’. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 68, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kjaerulff, U. (1995) ‘dHugin: a computational system for dynamic time-sliced Bayesian networks’. Int. J. Forecasting 11, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lauritzen, S.L. (1996) Graphical Models. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lewellen, R.H. and S.H. Vessey (1999) ‘Analysis of Fragmented Time Series Data Using BoxJenkins Models’. Commun. Statist. — Sim. Comp. 28, 667–685.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Packard, N.H., J.P. Cmtchfield, J.D. Farmer and R.S. Shaw (1980) ‘Geometry from a time series’. Physical Review Letters 45, 712–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wermuth, N. and S.L. Lauritzen (1990) ‘On Substantive Research Hypotheses, Conditional Independence Graphs and Graphical Chain Models’. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 52, 21–72 (with discussion).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Wermuth, N. and E. Scheidt, E. (1977) ‘Fitting a Covariance Selection Model to a Matrix’. Applied Statistics 26, 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Fried
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of DortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations